WATERWAYS AND BRIDGES IN TEXAS “Final” Presentation by: Brandon Klenzendorf CE 394K 11-22-05 Dr. Maidment.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

WinTR-20 Course February Muskingum-Cunge Flood Routing Procedure in NRCS Hydrologic Models Prepared by William Merkel USDA-NRCS National Water Quality.

Advertisements

Questions concerning the Halloween Flood in Onion Creek Presentation by David R. Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at.

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Low Head / Low Power Resource Assessment of Hydrologic Units 11 and 17 Randy D. Lee December 18,

CHARACTERISTICS OF RUNOFF

Standard watershed and stream delineation recipe - Vector stream (ex. NHD data) fusion into DEM raster (burning in) - Sink removal - Flow direction - Flow.

Continuous Hydrologic Simulation of Johnson Creek Basin and Assuming Watershed Stationarity Rick Shimota, P.E. Hans Hadley, P.E., P.G. The Oregon Water.

Approximate Floodplain Mapping - Procedures and Approaches to Data Challenges Troy Thielen, CFM Brett Addams, CFM May 18, 2010.

PrePro2004: Comparison with Standard Hydrologic Modeling Procedures Rebecca Riggs April 29, 2005.

Floodplain Mapping using HEC-RAS and ArcView GIS Eric Tate Francisco Olivera David Maidment

1-Degree USGS DEM Control Points Locations National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) Drainage Lines Corrected Stream Lines Filled DEM Burned DEM Flow Area Accumulation.

Application of HEC- HMS for Hydrologic Studies Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering CVEN689 – Applications of GIS in CE Instructor: Dr.

By Jennifer VerWest. Differences between Flat and Average/Steep Terrain Flat Terrain Steep/Average Terrain.

Processing Geospatial Data with HEC-GeoRAS 3.1

Texas A&M University Department of Civil Engineering Cven689 – CE Applications of GIS Instructor: Dr. Francisco Olivera Logan Burton April 29, 2003 Application.

CE 3372 – Lecture 10. Outline  Hydrology Review  Rational Method  Regression Equations  Hydrographs.

CE 515 Railroad Engineering Drainage Source: AREMA Ch. 5, J. Rose Lectures, Ch. 19 “Transportation exists to conquer space and time -”

NHD Watershed: Tools and Applications

“Flood monitoring and mapping for Emergency Response in San Antonio-Texas” Part I by Silvana Alcoz Source photo Term.

FNR 402 – Forest Watershed Management

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Alabama Water Science Center StreamStats: By Kernell Ries and J.

Upper Brushy Creek Water Control & Improvement District

New Variables, Gage Data, and WREG REGIONAL ANALYSIS IN THE LEVISA FORK AND TUG FORK BASINS.

Flow Time Time Series Hydro FeaturesHydro Network Channel System Drainage System ArcGIS Hydro Data Model.

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Office of Surface Water Reston, VA StreamStats: By Kernell Ries A Web.

MA BF REFERENCE CURVES Objective Develop bankfull regional curves and equations for estimating bankfull width, mean depth, cross-sectional area, and discharge.

Taming the Alabama River Patrick Dobbs & Clay Campbell AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Inc Alabama Water Resources Conference.

ArcHydro – Two Components Hydrologic  Data Model  Toolset Credit – David R. Maidment University of Texas at Austin.

National Research Council Mapping Science Committee Floodplain Mapping – Sensitivity and Errors Scott K. Edelman, PE Watershed Concepts and Karen Schuckman,

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Implementation of the U.S. Geological Survey’s StreamStats Program in Kansas— A Web Application.

March 2009WinTR-20 Course1 Muskingum-Cunge Flood Routing Procedure in NRCS Hydrologic Models Prepared by William Merkel USDA-NRCS National Water Quality.

What is a Drainage Basin? Drainage basin Drainage basin  A drainage system which consists of a surface stream or a body of surface water together with.

Streamflow Statistics on the Web: A Prototype for a National Rivers Information Center By Kernell Ries USGS, Office of Surface Water Reston, VA.

Assessment of Economic Benefits of the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program Hydrologic and Hydraulic Case Studies Adapted from a Presentation to NRC.

Vision for the National Geospatial Framework for Surface Water Robert M. Hirsch Associate Director for Water U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological.

Review of SWRCB Water Availability Analysis Emphasis on Dry Creek Water Availability Analysis.

Description of WMS Watershed Modeling System. What Model Does Integrates GIS and hydrologic models Uses digital terrain data to define watershed and sub.

Arc Hydro and Modeling Intrinsic Modeling – within a particular application eg Excel, ArcGIS Dynamic Linked Library – tightly coupled package of functions.

Map-Based Flood Hydrology and Hydraulics David R. Maidment Jan 10, 1998.

Floodplain Analysis with ArcGIS Model Builder

Basic Hydrology & Hydraulics: DES 601 Module 1 Introduction.

Basic Hydrology & Hydraulics: DES 601 Module 6 Regional Analysis.

ARC GIS IN THE SANTA RIVER BASIN IN PERU GIS in Water Resources Fall 2006 Professor: Dr. David Maidment Presented by Presented by Eusebio Ingol.

NID Data Model based on HUC CE394K.3 Term Project by Seungwon Won December 7, 2000.

By Pete Steeves Rainy River and Lake of the Woods (RRLOW) StreamStats Demonstration for the International Joint Commission October 2, 2014 U.S. Geological.

Determining Watershed Parameters for Water Rights in the Cypress River Basin By: Hema Gopalan GIS in Water Resources (C E 394K) Fall 2001.

Hydrologic Calibration: October 2010 U PDATE OF E FFECTIVE H YDROLOGY FOR M ARYS C REEK.

[Hydrology and Hydraulic Analysis Utilizing Terrain Data] [Barrett Goodwin]

DIRECT RUNOFF HYDROGRAPH FOR UNGAUGED BASINS USING A CELL BASED MODEL P. B. Hunukumbura & S. B. Weerakoon Department of Civil Engineering, University of.

HEC-PrePro Workshop GIS Research Group Center for Research in Water Resources University of Texas at Austin Francisco Olivera HEC-PrePro v. 2.0 Workshop.

Talavera Floodplain Delineation Study Technical Review Noah’s Ark Group Study Las Cruces, New Mexico September 17, 2008.

Hurricane Irene in Connecticut River Milena Spirova CE 394 K 2015.

ERT 246 Hydrology & Water Resources Eng.

May 1, 2002 Streamflow and Water Availability Estimates in Ungaged Streams California’s North Coast Region GIS Layers Lorri Peltz-Lewis U.S. Bureau of.

Drainage Analysis of the Sacramento River Hong Sun Term Project for CE 394K Department of Civil Engineering, EWRE.

Storm Water Management Plan Lawrence County, PA Katelyn Zollos CE 549.

Regional to Engineering Scale HUC8 HUC12 Catchment Engineering Hydrology Engineering Hydraulics Personal – a flooded home.

Cristina Nelson, Term Project, CEE 6440, Fall 2007

Map-Based Hydrology and Hydraulics

Midwest Regional Flood Frequency Analysis

Calculating Hydrologic Parameters for Estimating Surface Water Flow at Ungaged Locations Richard Hoffpauir Water Resources Engineering.

Flow Prediction on the Yampa River

GIS FOR HYDROLOGIC DATA DEVELOPMENT FOR DESIGN OF HIGHWAY DRAINAGE FACILITIES by Francisco Olivera and David Maidment Center for Research in Water Resources.

Little Bear River 100-Year Storm Flood

From GIS to HMS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center University of Texas at Austin Center for Research in Water Resources Francisco.

Geog 380 Watershed Analysis Digital Terrain Analysis and Geomorphology

Development of a Hydrologic Model for the Wichita Falls District

HYDROLOGICAL Study for DESIGN AL MALEH DAM

Flood Inundation Mapping

Presentation transcript:

WATERWAYS AND BRIDGES IN TEXAS “Final” Presentation by: Brandon Klenzendorf CE 394K Dr. Maidment

Background ► TxDOT to use crash-tested bridge rails ► May impact FEMA 100-year floodplains ► Cause for map revisions – time and money! ► Need to determine how bridge rails affect water surface profiles

TxDOT Design Frequencies TxDOT Hydraulic Design Manual

Project Purpose ► In order to solve this problem, we need to predict…  Hydraulic impact of crash-tested bridge rails  100-year peak flood discharges ► Determine peak discharge for 100-year return period flood ► Use GIS and NFF programs to gain info on flood discharges

GIS Data Collection ► State of Texas HUCs from TNRIS  ► Major highway network from TNRIS ► Major stream network from TNRIS ► DEMs for selected bridges from USGS 

ArcHydro Tools ► DEM processing  Problems with gaps in stream layer ► Drainage line creation ► Batch point watershed delineation ► Longest upstream length ► Upstream and downstream elevations

Bridge 1 Problems!

USGS NFF Program ► National Flood Frequency Program ► Estimates the magnitude and frequency of flood peak discharges and hydrographs  2, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, and 500-year frequency floods ► Uses Visual Basic and regression equations specific for each state ► FREE!!! ►

NFF Program Parameters ► Drainage Area (A) – area (mi 2 ) contributing to flow at the bridge ► Shape Factor (SH) – ratio of stream length squared (mi 2 ) to drainage area (mi 2 )  Represents stream length to average width ► Stream Slope (SL) – change in elevation (ft) divided by steam length (mi)

Hydrologic Regions ► Determined based on physiography and climatic conditions ► Each hydrologic region has range of applicable parameters ► Hydrologic Region 1 - Q 100 =371A SH

Determined NFF Parameters Hydrologic Region Area (mi 2 ) Upstream Length (mi) Slope(ft/mi) Shape Factor Latitude(DD)Longitude(DD) R R R R R R R R R R R

NFF Interface

Flood Region Map

NFF Results ► 100-year hydrograph for five bridges ► Bridge 5 has largest peak, but third largest area ► Bridge 3 has second lowest peak, but largest area

Completed Work ► Geodatabase of Texas rivers, highways, and HUCs ► ArcHydro tools for all bridges ► Batch point watershed delineation for all bridges ► Partial completion of longest stream length ► Partial completion of NFF analysis

Future Work ► Longest stream lengths for remaining Hydrologic Regions ► NFF analysis for all bridges ► Comparison of results ► Analyze errors in DEMs, HUCs, and bridge locations ► Write final report

Questions ?