Stryker Interaction Design Workshop September 7-8, 2005 1 January 2006 Functional biomimesis * Compliant Sagittal Rotary Joint Active Thrusting Force *[Cham.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements Christopher A. Shera, John J. Guinan, Jr., and Andrew J. Oxenham.
Advertisements

Lecture 20 Dimitar Stefanov. Microprocessor control of Powered Wheelchairs Flexible control; speed synchronization of both driving wheels, flexible control.
PID Control -1 + Professor Walter W. Olson
Takanori Sekiguchi Italy-Japan Workshop (19 April, 2013) Inverted Pendulum Control for KAGRA Seismic Attenuation System 1 D2, Institute for Cosmic Ray.
Loop Shaping Professor Walter W. Olson
CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS
10/10/02 Zurich-02 How does the lamprey swim? All you ever wanted to know about the CPG for lamprey locomotion The role of coupling, mechanics and sensory.
1 In this lecture, a model based observer and a controller will be designed to a single-link robot.
Control System Design Based on Frequency Response Analysis
Sandra Wieser Alexander Spröwitz Auke Jan Ijspeert.
Lutz Lilje DESY -MPY- XFEL Tuner Lorentz Force Detuning System Setup New Saclay design.
Fast and Robust Legged Locomotion Sean Bailey Mechanical Engineering Design Division Advisor: Dr. Mark Cutkosky May 12, 2000.
The Effect of Transmission Design on Force Controlled Manipulator Performance William T. Townsend Presented by: Sean Verret.
MURI Fabrication Biomimetic Robots - ONR Site Visit - August 9, 2000 H. Kazerooni Human Engineering Laboratory (HEL) University of California at Berkeley.
Biological motor control Andrew Richardson McGovern Institute for Brain Research March 14, 2006.
Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Simulation and Control Aspects of FHT M. V. Sivaselvan CO-PI CU-NEES Assistant Professor Dept. of Civil, Environmental.
Comparing the Locomotion Dynamics of a Cockroach and a Shape Deposition Manufactured Biomimetic Robot Sean A. Bailey, Jorge G. Cham, Mark R. Cutkosky Biomimetic.
Biomimetic Robots for Robust Operation in Unstructured Environments M. Cutkosky and T. Kenny Stanford University R. Full and H. Kazerooni U.C. Berkeley.
Chapter 7 PID Control.
WP11: Modelling and simulation for NND Thomas Geijtenbeek, Frans van der Helm Delft University of Technology Amsterdam – February 2015.
SICB10 Talia Yuki Moore 1/7/2010 Adding Inertia and Mass to Test Stability Predictions in Rapid Running Insects Talia Yuki Moore*, Sam Burden, Shai Revzen,
ISAT 303 Mod 1-1  M. Zarrugh Module I Sensors and Measurements in MFG  The objectives of this module are to –understand the role which sensors.
A Shaft Sensorless Control for PMSM Using Direct Neural Network Adaptive Observer Authors: Guo Qingding Luo Ruifu Wang Limei IEEE IECON 22 nd International.
Introduction Designing controllers for walking robots presents many challenges. In order for walking robotics to reach this stage, perhaps a new approach.
Motion Control. Two-Link Planar Robot Determine Kp and Kv and Tv.
Advanced Programming for 3D Applications CE Bob Hobbs Staffordshire university Human Motion Lecture 3.
A Typical Feedback System
Theory of walking Locomotion on ground can be realized with three different basic mechanisms: slide lever wheel or track First two are walking mechanisms.
EE369C Final Project: Accelerated Flip Angle Sequences Jan 9, 2012 Jason Su.
5: Processor-based Control Systems CET360 Microprocessor Engineering J. Sumey.
Rhythmic Movements Questions: –How do they happen? –What do they mean? –Where do they come from? Reflex chain? Sequential pattern of activation? Reverberatory.
Biomimetic Robots for Robust Operation in Unstructured Environments M. Cutkosky and T. Kenny Stanford University R. Full and H. Kazerooni U.C. Berkeley.
High-Level Control MURI Low-Level Control Fabrication How do we build robust biomimetic structures and systems? Shape deposition manufacturing of integrated.
Professor Walter W. Olson Department of Mechanical, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering University of Toledo Loop Shaping.
M. Zareinejad 1.  fundamentally, instability has the potential to occur because real-world interactions are only approximated in the virtual world 
Controls. Given a set of desired Tool frame positions and orientations (that trace out a path over time, t ), there will be a corresponding required set.
MURI Low-Level Control Fabrication High-Level Control How is Compliance used in Locomotion? Berkeley & Stanford: Measurements of Cockroach Locomotion What.
Signals and Systems Fall 2003 Lecture #20 20 November Feedback Systems 2. Applications of Feedback Systems.
MCE MCE-2.6 Identification of Stochastic Hybrid System Models Shankar Sastry Sam Burden UC Berkeley.
The MIT Leg Lab: From Robots to Rehab.
Control systems KON-C2004 Mechatronics Basics Tapio Lantela, Nov 5th, 2015.
Lecture 25: Implementation Complicating factors Control design without a model Implementation of control algorithms ME 431, Lecture 25.
B. Caron, G. Balik, L. Brunetti LAViSta Team LAPP-IN2P3-CNRS, Université de Savoie, Annecy, France & SYMME-POLYTECH Annecy-Chambéry, Université de Savoie,
Frequency Response Analysis and Stability
Melak Zebenay > EPOS- A Robotics-Based Hardware in-the-Loop Simulator for Simulating Satellite RvD Operations >Aug 30, 2010 Slide 1 Control Strategy of.
Process Control Methods 1. Open-Loop Control 2 Process control operations are performed automatically by either open-loop or closed-loop systems Processes.
Demonstration Platform. Engaging-disengaging scheme engagedisengage High torque required?
MURI High- Level Control Biomimetic Robots - ONR Site Visit - August 9, 2000 Human Computational Modeling PurposePurpose: to understand arm impedance.
Λ-Model and Equilibrium Point Hypothesis References: 1.Latash M.L., Control of human movement, chapters 1-3, Human kinetics Publishers, Feldman.
MURI High-Level Control Biomimetic Robots - ONR Site Visit - August 9, Fabrication MURI Low-Level Control High-Level Control What strategies are.
Chapter 5 Motor Programs 5 Motor Programs C H A P T E R.
Robot Intelligence Technology Lab. 10. Complex Hardware Morphologies: Walking Machines Presented by In-Won Park
Date of download: 7/6/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: A Universal Ankle–Foot Prosthesis Emulator for Human Locomotion Experiments J Biomech.
Date of download: 7/8/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Stabilization of a Dynamic Walking Gait Simulation J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam.
Components of Mechatronic Systems AUE 425 Week 2 Kerem ALTUN October 3, 2016.
6: Processor-based Control Systems CET360 Microprocessor Engineering J. Sumey.
Introduction to Sensors and Actuators
Autonomous Navigation of a
Realization of Dynamic Walking of Biped Humanoid Robot
Robot Fabrication MURI Fabrication
MURI Biomimetic Robots Low-Level High-Level Control Control
Robust Dynamic Locomotion Through Feedforward-Preflex Interaction
Sprawl Robots Biomimetic Design Analysis: Simplified Models
Motor Control Theories
Vision based automated steering
IENG 475: Computer-Controlled Manufacturing Systems
-Koichi Nishiwaki, Joel Chestnutt and Satoshi Kagami
IENG 475: Computer-Controlled Manufacturing Systems
Presentation transcript:

Stryker Interaction Design Workshop September 7-8, January 2006 Functional biomimesis * Compliant Sagittal Rotary Joint Active Thrusting Force *[Cham et al. 2000]

Stryker Interaction Design Workshop September 7-8, January 2006 Study biological materials, components, and their roles in locomotion. Study Shape Deposition Manufacturing (SDM) materials and components. Models of material behavior and design rules for creating SDM structures with desired properties Example: mapping from passive mechanical properties of insects to biomimetic robot structures stiff material viscoelastic material

Stryker Interaction Design Workshop September 7-8, January 2006 Study biological materials, components, and their roles in locomotion. Study Shape Deposition Manufacturing (SDM) materials and components. Models of material behavior and design rules for creating SDM structures with desired properties Hysteresis Example: mapping from passive mechanical properties of insects to biomimetic robot structures position (mm) Force (mN) Data Model

Stryker Interaction Design Workshop September 7-8, January Velocity (cm/s) Frequency = 5 Hz Frequency = 11 Hz Sprawlita running on sloped track uphilldownhill slope Self-tuning is needed to adapt to changes Velocity versus slope for different stride frequencies 24 deg.

Stryker Interaction Design Workshop September 7-8, January 2006 Biological approach Passive mechanical system and predominantly feed-forward control allow animal to run over rough terrain. “Preflexes,” augmented by reflexes and adaptation, account for changes in system and environmental conditions. The approach overcomes limitations of slow neural pathways, imperfect sensing, etc. Mechanical system FF model Task Environment Adaptation model Reflex control Sensory feedback Learning Command signal Feed-Forward control preflex

Stryker Interaction Design Workshop September 7-8, January 2006 Adaptation in small biomimetic robots Use preflexes and open-loop motor control for robust, stable locomotion. Use simple, inexpensive sensors to detect changes in operating conditions. Use adaptation to tune the parameters of the open-loop system. Mechanical system (actuators, limbs) Environment Feed-forward activation pattern and timing Command input Locomotion preflexes Contact Senso r Adaptation model Passive stabilization time tripods No encoders, gyros, tachometers... No tedious calibration No fancy filtering No sophisticated closed-loop control.

Stryker Interaction Design Workshop September 7-8, January 2006 maximize: Thrust timing for max. height Time tftf t td tctc tltl Thrust Height Ground Reaction Force T T on y y Contact Time

Stryker Interaction Design Workshop September 7-8, January 2006 Hop Height Natural period:  n = 0.21 sec Thrust magnitude: F/mg = 1.50 Damping:  = x Period (ms) Multiple Solutions Velocity at actuation Eigenvalues Effect of period for “long thrust” hopping “normal” unstable period-1 hop-settle-fire 1 2 3

Stryker Interaction Design Workshop September 7-8, January 2006 Conclusions from 1 DOF model: Maximum hop height occurs if thrust is initiated near maximum compression Stability requires thrust initiation before max. compression. For long thrust (vs natural period) thrust should begin before max. compression and end essentially at liftoff. Therefore, measuring the interval between thrust deactivation and liftoff is a good indicator of whether the stride period is tuned correctly.

Stryker Interaction Design Workshop September 7-8, January time (ms)   n+1 = Ki - Kp(Td - T l + Tv) “Drift” Trying to reduce activation frequency Td Deactivation Time T v Const. offset between deactivation and lift-off times T l Loss of Contact piston activation foot contact Gait Period ON OFF Adaptation algorithm Lag Period (ms) (T d - T l )

Stryker Interaction Design Workshop September 7-8, January 2006 Slope adaptation demonstration

Stryker Interaction Design Workshop September 7-8, January 2006 Hopping with variable stiffness (1) (2) (3) Discussion: Blue curve shows typical results when maximum stroke length is constrained. Maximum period-1 hop height (1) is followed by range of non-period-1 hops (2) and then by low amplitude, stable period-1 behavior (3). At frequencies below (1) hopping reverts to “hop-settle-fire.” J. Karpick 08MAR06 fn = sqrt(k/m)/(2*pi)