doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 1 5GSG Orlando, Florida Wednesday May 14, 2001

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 2 5 GSG Orlando Agenda May 14-18

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 3 Objectives 5 GHZ GLOBALIZATION STUDY GROUP (RICHARD K. / BRUCE K.) Review output of ETSI BRAN#23 & formation of ETSI BRAN 5GHz Alignment Rapporteur Group Review future meeting dates Obtain tutorial on HCF from member of TGe Review Interworking proposals, impact of HCF and potential mergers Establish Decision process for a new "IEEE Task Group J" & the ETSI BRAN 5GHz Alignment Rapporteur Group Review purpose, schedules and name for "5WING" Review purpose and structure of 3GPP Begin draft of new "5WING" requirements and operating procedures, Terms & Definitions Prepare for July meeting and creation of new study group

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 4 5GSG Agenda - Times are chair’s guidelines

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 5 5GSG Agenda

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 6 5GHz Study Group Original Intent Standard Harmonization - Single Global Standard for 5GHz WLANs International effort IEEE, ETSI, MMAC Interim Objective Interworking mechanism Interworking Proposal Concepts Legacy backward compatibility maintained Approaches so far based upon superframes using either DCF or PCF HCF now being investigated Likely to have no impact on Client, AP implementation only Future plan 5GHz Partnership Project now called 5WING

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 7 5GHz Study Group Original Intent Standard Harmonization - Single Global Standard International effort IEEE, ETSI, MMAC Interim Objective Interworking mechanism Interworking Proposals Legacy backward compatibility maintained AT&T, Philips, Ericsson, hLAN, NEC, U of Aachen, Comprise, Magis Principal approach so far based upon superframes using either DCF or PCF No impact on Client, AP implementation only Future plan 5GHz Partnership Project now called 5WING

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 8 5GHz Standardization Roadmap IEEE a (wireless Ethernet) IEEE e/f/h (QoS, Security, DFS/TPC,..) BRAN-HL/2 (wireless ATM, IP) Home Profile Joint SG Requirements Coexistence Inter-working Spectrum single global standard HE phase2 UMTS - interworking Public Access Inter- working Standards Revisions 5GWIAG MMAC also participating 5GPP Partnership Project (BRAN/IEEE/ MMAC) IW additions IW additions Today

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 9 HL2 MT Ch2 Internet AP HL2 AP Coexistence – Level 1 - Using different channels in the same coverage area Data exchanged between the devices using the backbone (each device communicates with its Access Point) STA Ch1 11a PHY 11 MAC Bridge H2 PHY H2 DLC H2 CL MAC Bridge Corporate/Public Scenario - 1

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 10 HL2 MT Ch1 Internet AP STA Ch1 HL2 AP Coexistence – Level 2 - Using the same channel in the same coverage area Data exchanged between the devices using the backbone (each device communicates with its Access Point) 11a PHY 11 MAC Bridge H2 PHY H2 DLC H2 CL MAC Bridge Corporate/Public Scenario - 2

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 11 Coexistence – Level 2 - Using the same channel in the same coverage area Data exchanged between the devices using the backbone Each device communicates with the Unified Access Point but to a different MAC entity. Each MAC has a different address HL2 MT Ch1 Internet Unified AP 2 different MACs STA Ch1 Hybrid PHY H2 DLC 11 MAC H2 CL MAC Bridge MAC/DLC Convergence Layer Corporate/Public Scenario - 3 Interworking – 1 (one AP)

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 12 Coexistence – Level 2 - Using the same channel in the same coverage area Data exchanged between the devices using Layer 2 of the AP Only one MAC address is used Corporate/Public Scenario - 4 HL2 MT Ch1 Internet Unified AP Unified Dual MAC STA Ch1 Hybrid MAC/DLC H2 CL MAC Bridge Hybrid PHY Hybrid PHY H2 DLC 11 MAC H2 CL MAC Bridge MAC/DLC Convergence Layer OR Interworking – 1 (one MAC)

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 13 Home Scenario – Bringing Laptop In Coexistence – Level 2 - Using the same channel in the same coverage area HL2 CC Internet Gateway a STA Ch HL2 MT HL2 PHY H2 DLC+HE 1394 CL 1394 Appl. HL2 PHY H2 DLC+HE 1394 CL 1394 Appl. 11a PHY Ethernet Appl. 11 MAC Ch1 Dual Mode Device Acting CC Point Coordinator Hybrid PHY H2 DLC+HE Ethernet CL Ethernet Appl. 11 MAC 1394 CL 1394 Appl. HL2 MT HL2 PHY H2 DLC Ethernet CL Ethernet Appl. Control HL2 User Data Control 11a

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 14 Hybrid MAC/DLC H2 PHY 11a PHY H2 DLC 11 MAC H2 CL MAC Bridge Hybrid PHY H2 DLC 11 MAC H2 CL MAC Bridge H2 CL MAC Bridge Hybrid MAC/DLC/CL MAC Bridge 11a PHY 11 MAC Bridge H2 PHY H2 DLC H2 CL MAC Bridge Hybrid PHY Hybrid PHY Hybrid PHY H2 DLC 11 MAC H2 CL MAC Bridge MAC/DLC Convergence Layer Implementation Issue (2 radios) Interwork Single Global Standard Now Interworking Single Global Standard Choose one step in gray parts Convergence Progression

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 15 IEEE Hilton Head Accomplishments Motions:  Proposed that we extend the 5GSG to the next joint plenary. Motion passed in study group 36/0/0 Motion passed in plenary 74/6/4  Proposed that we pursue the creation of a 5GHzPP as a vehicle for establishing a single global standard. Motion passed in study group 23/0/1  PAR document ( ) passed in plenary 41/8/17  5 Criteria document ( ) passed in plenary 42/6/13

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide Scope of Proposed Project:Scope Establish coexistence and inter-working among the a, ETSI HiperLAN/2, MMAC CSMA and HiSWANa standards. Extension of each of the MAC and PHY layers of these standards will be defined collaboratively to achieve coexistence and inter-working. 10. Purpose of Proposed Project:Purpose To establish coexistence and inter-working among the a, ETSI HiperLAN/2, MMAC CSMA and HiSWANa standards. A subsequent project under a separate PAR is to create a single converged standard in the 5GHz band.

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 17 Future of HiperLAN2 5GSG? 5GHz Wireless LAN Next Generation Partnership Project (5WING): How to proceed? Presentation of further proposals and merger process Preparation for IEEE interim meeting in Orlando ( May) AoB ETSI BRAN #23 Agenda

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 18 Task 1 Scope of the 5GHz Alignment Rapporteur Group (5GARG): –To prepare a solution for co-existence and inter-working between a(e,h,…) and HiperLAN2 (TS) in a close cooperation with “TGj” within IEEE WG Creation of an list Creation of a list including pros and cons of submitted proposals as a basis for proposals merger –To facilitate the HiperLAN2/HiSWANa alignment activities (based on H2GF Liaison Letter) –To coordinate the activities on global 5GHz spectrum allocation and harmonization

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 19 Tentative Schedule for 5GARG BRAN#23: Call for submissions BRAN#24: First consolidated draft solution IEEE July meeting: submission of draft solution to “TGj” IEEE September/BRAN#25: the first joint draft solution Comment resolution process 2 to 6 months

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 20 Task 2 Scope of the 5GHz Wireless LAN Next Generation (5WING) Study Group: –Initially coordinate with 5GSG of –To assist the formation of the Partnership Project by drafting Operational Procedures, Project Requirements Definition and Terms of Reference –To prepare a report on requirements (spectrum and services) and architectures for the next generation global WLAN system in 5GHz and submission of the report to the Partnership Project as a basis of a (set of) Technical Report(s)

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 21 Tentative Schedule for 5WING SG Operational Procedures –IEEE May: Prepare material (e.g. relationship diagram) and kick-off discussion –BRAN#24/IEEE July: initial submissions –IEEE Sep/BRAN#25: first draft prepared for circulation Project Requirements Definition –IEEE Nov/BRAN#26: initial submissions –IEEE Jan 2002/BRAN#27: first draft prepared for circulation Terms of Reference

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 22 Task 3 Decision Process in “TGj” and 5GHz Alignment Rapporteur Group (5GARG) 5WING formation process Joint study group on topics for 5WING Inter-working Proposal –Tutorial on HCF (Hybrid Coordination Function) –Philips et al / AT&T et al merger

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 23 Schedule of Standards Meetings May 8-9 – H2GF – Princeton May – IEEE –Orlando June 12 - IAG - Helsinki June – BRAN 24 – Sophia Antipolis July 9-13 – IEEE – Portland Sept – IEEE – Sydney Sept – BRAN25 – Seattle Nov – IEEE – Austin Dec. 4-7 – BRAN26 – Sophia Antipolis

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 24 Meeting Schedules MayJunJulAugMayJunJulSepOctNovDecJanFebMarApr NESCOMNESCOM ExCOMExCOM ETSI BRAN 24 IEEE ETSI BRAN 25 ETSI BRAN 26 ETSI BRAN 27 ETSI BRAN 28 ExCOMExCOM ExCOMExCOM ExCOMExCOM

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 25 Composite Timeline MayJunJulAugMayJunJulSepOctNovDecJanFebMarApr ETSI IEEE ETSI 5GHz Alignment Rapporteur Group TGj 5WING5GSG 2 5GSG

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 26 Interworking Options Amend Standards Mandatory Retrofit – installed equipment must be updated or replaced All new systems – new equipment shipped as of “date” Optional Some changes to 11a, HL2, MMAC standards will be required Implementation of these changes will be optional Some new 11a, HL2, MMAC equipment will employ the “J” option Recommended practice Rules to be applied when and if compatibility is desired Standards are adequate as written

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 27 Interworking Schedule as presented in PAR doc: r0 July 2001 Issue Drafts of Proposal Selection Process, Functional Requirements, Evaluation Criteria as a Task Group Issue Call For Proposals for inter-working mechanisms. PHY: Modifications of a MAC: Modifications of MAC Mar 2002 Decision on specific modifications July 2002 First Tentative Draft Standard submitted for review Sept 2002 Comment Resolutions Nov 2002 Comment Resolutions Jan 2003 Submit to RevCom

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 28 Converged Standard – Desired Features – v 0.2 Higher Data Rate ( Mbps) Power Management Scaleable Data Rates (64 kbps up) Radio Efficiency (frequency band) Software defined radio (software upgradable) Layered System Architecture/APIs (parameterization, flexibility, coordinated) Low Cost QoS (application dependent) Streaming and IP support (asynchronous and isochronous) Seamless network connecting at Application layer(subnets, bridges, Global roaming (High Mobility) IP v 6 compliant (security and transport) Wireless Routing (cell extension) Ease of Connection (hot plugging) No legacy costs Smarter Antennas Improved coexistence with other radio types System performance for radio cell Security

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 29 Key Desired Features Global nomadic roaming Scalability (power consumption and price performance) Flexibility (applications and services) Wider range of data rates (from 100 Mbps) Security (IPv6 compatible, 802.1X)

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 30 IEEE & ETSI Procedures IEEE Each attendee can earn/lose voting rights based upon attendance and voting behavior and paid up meeting fees One vote per person Anyone can attend Voting normally takes place on completed specification No limit on votes per company Block voting by company is illegal No proxies ETSI Membership fees based on turnover (revenue) Only paid member companies can send representatives- or chairman allows Consensus approval normally used – unanimous agreement Details worked out in discussion item by item One weighted vote per company – if necessary 71% approval required Regulatory Administrations also have weighted voting? No proxies Voting rules differ based on topic?

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 31 Procedures Used Today in MMAC & 3GPP MMAC Consensus decision making where possible Voting –requires 71% agreement One vote per company no weighting – simple majority Anyone can attend meetings – typically all conducted in Japanese For large companies, additional one vote per subsidiary is allowed if fee paid Do not know if Proxies are allowed? 3GPP Individual members are = companies Consensus sought- unanimous agreement If consensus not reached, One vote per company – no weighting Voting –approval requires 71% agreement Only members can attend meetings Proxies are allowed Voting rules differ based on topic?

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 32 5WING Voting Rights – First Draft Use entity voting – one vote per company (need to further define rights of divisions, subsidiaries, sectors, groups….?) This is acceptable under IEEE rules Equivalent to MMAC Minor deviation from ETSI rules Equivalent to 3GPP Are proxies to be allowed? How will operating expenses be collected? Membership fees ? Fees: per company, per meeting

3GPP’s Relationship Diagram Project Co-ordination Group Technical Specification Groups Support Functions 3GPP PARTNERS Organizational Partners Market Representation Partners Organizational Partners’ Standardization Process Organizational Partners’ deliverables Technical Specifications INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS Technical Contributions ITU International Recommendations IMT 2000 Contributions via existing processes Regulators / Governments Mandates

Project Co-ordination Group Technical Specification Groups 5WING IEEE, ETSI, ARIB, ITU Marketing Partners WECA H2GF MMAC PP 5GWIAG ETSI, IEEE, MMAC Standards deliverables Technical Specifications Individuals from Member Companies Technical Contributions Spectrum Harmonization Group Non member Or University 5WING Relationship Diagram – v 0.1

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 35 Information Item - Get IEEE 802 "GET IEEE 802(TM)" PROGRAM PROVIDES PUBLIC ACCESS TO NETWORKING STANDARDS The IEEE Standards Association (IEEE-SA) launched the "Get IEEE 802" program granting public access to view and download individual electronic (PDF) IEEE Local and Metropolitan Area Network (802) standards at no charge. New IEEE 802 standards will be added to the "Get IEEE 802" program, in PDF format, six months after publication. The "Get IEEE 802" pilot marks the first time the IEEE-SA has joined forces with industry to make a series of standards widely available. The program was established to assist potential users for whom the standard itself could be more costly than its actual implementation for network connectivity. Visit <

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 36 IEEE SA Policies Definition/Use of Consensus CONSENSUS IEEE shall ensure that its standards represent a consensus, to the extent possible, of all interests substantially concerned or potentially affected by the standards and that proper procedures have been carried out in their development. This implies that all interests shall have had an opportunity to submit input to, or comments on, standards proposals, that all dissenting views shall have been considered and addressed, and that an adequate appeal mechanism is available to parties objecting to a standard. Consensus embodies more than merely a majority but not necessarily unanimity.

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 37 IEEE SA –Standards Development NEW OPTIONS FOR DEVELOPING STANDARDS Traditional balloting on IEEE Standards has been by individuals. An employer funded many of these individuals. In a few cases the individual was funded by an organization and was identified as an organizational member of the balloting group. This tradition of individual balloting has been a hallmark of the IEEE standards process. Some standards developing efforts do not benefit from this traditional balloting process. Instead, there are instances where projects will benefit from a sense of organizational involvement and voice. Organizational involvement can offer: Accelerated standards development. Organizations can commit resources to conduct many meetings over a shorter time interval than customary, Continued involvement by the organization even if personnel changes occur, Organizational voting assures equal voting, a level field – not multiple votes from individuals having the same employer, Some projects are only available for IEEE sponsorship if decision making is "organizational", Organizations may offer quicker and wider distribution of information, may widely distribute draft information, and are more likely to purchase paper and electronic versions of approved standards. A study of these and other concerns over the last four years has identified need for IEEE to offer more options for developing standards. The options adopted by the IEEE-SA Standards Board to become available in 1999 are: Continuation of the traditional individual balloting without any change, and Entity voting (A combination of entity and individual voting is under consideration) An entity can be any type of "person" except an individual. Examples are a corporation; federal, state, provincial or local government agency; partnership and similar. The entity must be a member of IEEE-SA. The type of voting must be indicated on the PAR when submitted for Standards Board approval.

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 38 Orlando Objectives/Accomplishments 5 GHZ GLOBALIZATION STUDY GROUP (RICHARD K. / BRUCE K.) Review output of ETSI BRAN#23 & formation of ETSI BRAN 5GHz Alignment Rapporteur Group Obtain tutorial on HCF from member of TGe Review Interworking proposals, impact of HCF and potential mergers Establish Decision process for a new "IEEE Task Group J" & the ETSI BRAN 5GHz Alignment Rapporteur Group Prepare for July meeting and creation of new 5WING study group Review purpose, schedules and name for "5WING" Review purpose and structure of 3GPP Begin draft of new "5WING" requirements and Operating Procedures, Terms & Definitions Review future meeting dates

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 39 Portland (July) Objectives/Accomplishments 5 GHZ GLOBALIZATION STUDY GROUP (RICHARD K. / BRUCE K./??/??) Review output of ETSI BRAN#24 & 5GIAG Helsinki Establish Decision/Operating process for a new "IEEE Task Group J" & the ETSI BRAN 5GHz Alignment Rapporteur Group Continue review of Interworking proposals & impact of HCF Reaffirm TGj PAR, 5 Criteria and present to Excom for approval Continue to review 5WING purpose, schedules, requirements, Operating Procedures, Terms & Definitions Review future meeting dates & critical milestones Prepare for September meetings

doc.:IEEE /240r1 Submission May 2001 Bruce Kraemer, IntersilSlide 40 Session Documents 5GSG Committee Report r1 HCF Overview r0 3GPP Overview r0 5GSG Minutes r0