Sample expanded template for one theme: Physics of Galaxy Evolution Mark Dickinson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
General Astrophysics with TPF-C David Spergel Princeton.
Advertisements

Ultra-Deep galaxy surveys with the early build-up of galaxies Olivier Le Fèvre With the DIORAMAS team (F, IT, CH, SP)
Extremely Large Telescopes and Surveys Mark Dickinson, NOAO.
Integral Field Spectroscopy on Gemini Andrew Bunker (IoA, Cambridge) Euro3D Meeting July 2002 GMOS Gemini Multi-Object Spectrograph, optical IFU (Durham)
The Galaxy Evolution Science Case for a Large Ground-based Telescope Betsy Gillespie December 4, 2002 Grateful acknowledgements to: Arjun Dey’s “Galaxy.
With a wide-field multi-IFU spectrograph.  Clusters provide large samples of galaxies in a moderate field  Unique perspective on the interaction of.
Extragalactic AO Science James Larkin AOWG Strategic Planning Meeting September 19, 2004.
Kinematics/Dynamics  Chemistry/dust  Stellar populations  Searches for z ~ 6-7 « Hot » scientific researches at VLT in cosmology Mass Galaxy formation/gas.
Quasar & Black Hole Science for GSMT Central question: Why do quasars evolve?
Dusty star formation at high redshift Chris Willott, HIA/NRC 1. Introductory cosmology 2. Obscured galaxy formation: the view with current facilities,
Synergies with multi-wavelength surveys Matt Jarvis University of Hertfordshire.
WISH upon a first galaxy….. WISH Wide-field Imaging Surveyor for High-Redshift WISH Working Group M31 Phot: R.Gendler.
Instruments and Science with TMT Shude Mao. Outline International context Telescope overview and science instruments Some key science areas Summary.
WISH upon a first galaxy….. WISH Wide-field Imaging Surveyor for High-Redshift WISH Working Group M31 Phot: R.Gendler.
Simulating Observations of z~2 galaxies with GLAO Yosuke Minowa, Ikuru Iwata (Subaru telescope) 2013/6/13-14 Subaru GLAO Science Hokkaido Univ.
P olarized R adiation I maging and S pectroscopy M ission Probing cosmic structures and radiation with the ultimate polarimetric spectro-imaging of the.
NAOKI YASUDA, MAMORU DOI (UTOKYO), AND TOMOKI MOROKUMA (NAOJ) SN Survey with HSC.
Gamma-ray Bursts in the E-ELT era Rhaana Starling University of Leicester.
Cosmology & Large Scale Structure Case, Matthew Colless, GSMT SWG, 4-5 Dec 2002 11 GSMT Science - Case Studies Large Scale Structure and Cosmology Matthew.
1 BDRv3 - November 26, Markus Kissler-Patig E-ELT Programme 1 E-ELT Science Case Markus Kissler-Patig.
X-ray Surveys with Space Observatory Khyung Hee University Kim MinBae Park Jisook.
Molecular Gas and Dust in SMGs in COSMOS Left panel is the COSMOS field with overlays of single-dish mm surveys. Right panel is a 0.3 sq degree map at.
The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.
17 may 04leonidas moustakas STScI 1 High redshift (z~4) galaxies & clustering Lexi Moustakas STScI.
Wide Field Imagers in Space and the Cluster Forbidden Zone Megan Donahue Space Telescope Science Institute Acknowledgements to: Greg Aldering (LBL) and.
Understanding the Physics of the Bulge/Black-Hole Connection with GSMT Stephen Eikenberry University of Florida 3 November 2007.
Stellar Populations Science Knut Olsen. The Star Formation Histories of Disk Galaxies Context – Hierarchical structure formation does an excellent job.
The Formation and Evolution of Galaxies What were the first sources of light in the Universe? How were luminous parts of galaxies assembled? How did the.
HIGH REDSHIFT GALAXIES and COSMOLOGY SUMMARY. RESOLUTION > (IGM metals, molecules, constants) ( would be fine too – turbulence?
Next generation redshift surveys with the ESO-VLT
The Extremely Red Objects in the CLASH Fields The Extremely Red Galaxies in CLASH Fields Xinwen Shu (CEA, Saclay and USTC) CLASH 2013 Team meeting – September.
Suggested Subaru-NAOJ/Princeton Consortium: Overview Michael Strauss, Ed Turner, Jim Gunn January 25, 2007.
Radio-optical analysis of extended radio sources in the FLS field 2009 SA SKA Postgraduate Bursary Conference 4 th Annual Postgraduate Bursary Conference.
NEXT GENERATION OPTICAL SPECTROGRAPH FOR NOAO Samuel Barden, Charles Harmer, Taft Armandroff, Arjun Dey, and Buell Jannuzi (National Optical Astronomy.
KMOS Instrument Overview & Data Processing Richard Davies Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics  What does KMOS do?  When will it do it?
Surveying the Universe with SNAP Tim McKay University of Michigan Department of Physics Seattle AAS Meeting: 1/03 For the SNAP collaboration.
PI Total time #CoIs, team Bob Fosbury 10n (ELT 42m) ~5. Skills: lens modelling, photoionization modelling, massive star SED modelling, practical nebular.
CELT Science Case. CELT Science Justification Process Put together a Science Working Group –Bolte, Chuck Steidel, Andrea Ghez, Mike Brown, Judy Cohen,
Initial Results from the Chandra Shallow X-ray Survey in the NDWFS in Boötes S. Murray, C. Jones, W. Forman, A. Kenter, A. Vikhlinin, P. Green, D. Fabricant,
PACS SVR 22/23 June 2006 Scientific/Performance Requirements1 PACS Science and Performance Requirements A. Poglitsch.
DMD Spectroscopy Yun Wang Yun Wang (with DMD slides from Massimo Robberto) WFIRST SDT #2, March, 2011.
Expected progress and break-throughs in ground-based extragalactic astronomy Ralf Bender ESO Council FORS Deep Field.
SNAP Calibration Program Steps to Spectrophotometric Calibration The SNAP (Supernova / Acceleration Probe) mission’s primary science.
The European Extremely Large Telescope Studying the first galaxies at z>7 Ross McLure Institute for Astronomy, Edinburgh University.
Keck Observatory in the TMT Era Keck Strategic Planning meeting September 18, 2009.
ALMA Science Examples Min S. Yun (UMass/ANASAC). ALMA Science Requirements  High Fidelity Imaging  Precise Imaging at 0.1” Resolution  Routine Sub-mJy.
Major dry-merger rate and extremely massive major dry-mergers of BCGs Deng Zugan June 31st Taiwan.
Forming High Mass Stars Probing the Formation Epoch.
Emission Line Galaxy Targeting for BigBOSS Nick Mostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab BigBOSS Science Meeting Novemenber 19, 2009.
The Black Hole-Galaxy Evolution Connection Ezequiel Treister Einstein Fellow IfA, Hawaii IfA, Hawaii Credit: ESO/NASA, the AVO project and Paolo Padovani.
Galactic Astronomy 銀河物理学特論 I Lecture 3-2: Evolution of Luminosity Functions of Galaxies Seminar: Lily et al. 1995, ApJ, 455, 108 Lecture: 2011/12/12.
FIRST LIGHT A selection of future facilities relevant to the formation and evolution of galaxies Wavelength Sensitivity Spatial resolution.
AGN / Starbursts in the very dusty systems in Bootes Kate Brand + the Bootes team NOAO Lijiang, August 2005.
SOFIA and the ISM of Galaxies Xander Tielens & Jessie Dotson Presented by Eric Becklin.
KASI Galaxy Evolution Journal Club A Massive Protocluster of Galaxies at a Redshift of z ~ P. L. Capak et al. 2011, Nature, in press (arXive: )
Competitive Science with the WHT for Nearby Unresolved Galaxies Reynier Peletier Kapteyn Astronomical Institute Groningen.
Galaxy formation and evolution with a GSMT: The z=0 fossil record 17 March, 2003.
NIRSS: the Near-Infrared Sky Surveyor WFIRST Meeting 2011 February 3 Daniel Stern (JPL/Caltech)
July 25th, 2000WFC3 Critical Science Review1 Performance Summary in Key Science Areas Verify that WFC3 as designed is capable of carrying out the WFC3.
DESpec in the landscape of large spectrographic surveys Craig Hogan University of Chicago and Fermilab.
Nature of Broad Line Region in AGNs Xinwen Shu Department of Astronomy University of Science and Technology of China Collaborators: Junxian Wang (USTC)
Galaxy Evolution and WFMOS
Stellar Populations Science Knut Olsen. The Star Formation Histories of Disk Galaxies Context – Hierarchical structure formation does an excellent job.
The Science Case Hubble Space Telescope CELT+AO HDF.
SN 1987A: The Formation & Evolution of Dust in a Supernova Explosion
ESAC 2017 JWST Workshop JWST User Documentation Hands on experience
Future Challenges Today’s burning questions in EGPN research, and the strategies, tools & techniques needed to answer them Outline: Overview (10 min) Open.
Observational Prospect of NIREBL
Probing the IMF Star Formation in Massive Clusters.
Black Holes in the Deepest Extragalactic X-ray Surveys
Presentation transcript:

Sample expanded template for one theme: Physics of Galaxy Evolution Mark Dickinson

25 September 2007M. Dickinson Physics of galaxy evolution Approach: Understanding galaxy evolution requires physical diagnostics of stellar populations, chemical abundances, interstellar medium properties, and spatially resolved kinematics for very large samples of galaxies at high redshift spanning a diverse range of properties. Current 8-10m telescopes can carry out moderately large redshift surveys, but can only obtain spectra with adequate S/N for these physical diagnostics for a small number of the brightest galaxies. A 20-30m GSMT can achieve the required S/N for these measurements, and/or push observations to fainter objects, opening up much larger samples of galaxies for detailed physical investigation. A GSMT with a high-multiplex spectrograph might also accelerate the pace & size of redshift surveys by a large factor.

25 September 2007M. Dickinson Physics of galaxy evolution Measurements: – ~10 6 galaxy redshift survey (shared, at least in part, with the LSS+IGM theme), to define high-z population statistically and select objects for more detailed investigation. – High quality, moderate resolution spectra for ~10 5 galaxies for diagnosing metallicity & stellar populations – Near-IR IFU kinematic spectroscopy for dynamics, ISM physics, stellar populations, etc. Instrumental requirements: – Wide-field high-multiplex optical spectrograph – Wide-field high-multiplex near-IR spectrograph – Multiplexed AO-fed near-IR IFU spectrograph

25 September 2007M. Dickinson Physics of galaxy evolution Role of a 20-30m-class GSMT: – Optical spectroscopy: Main gain is achieving: – ~3x higher constant flux & exposure time, – or ~3x higher spectral constant S/N – or ~3x fainter flux constant S/N Enables physical diagnostics for galaxies now out of reach - particularly important where the luminosity function is steep, e.g., where now we can only study the rarest, brightest objects or lensed examples. Possible gain: ~10x acceleration of redshift surveys at constant mag & multiplex Useful, but may not beat future massively multiplexed spectrographs on 8-10m telescopes. – Near-infrared spectroscopy: More gain from AO. Work on faint, extended galaxies probably will not benefit from reaching the full diffraction limit, so sensitivity gain is probably less than full D 4. For compact galactic subcomponents, gain should fall be somewhere between D 2 and D 4. Most likely to cross critical threshold of sensitivity: 8-10m telescopes can only barely accomplish spectroscopy of the brightest high redshift galaxies. The number of accessible targets should increase very steeply by going factors of 3-10 fainter.

25 September 2007M. Dickinson Physics of galaxy evolution Telescope & site requirements: – Wide field for optical instruments – Moderate field, moderate AO correction for near-IR spectroscopy. – Does not necessarily benefit from diffraction-limited AO. Moderate AO correction over a wider field for high-multiplex instruments more valuable. Operations requirements: – Nothing unusual

25 September 2007M. Dickinson Physics of galaxy evolution Comparison with current 8-10m telescopes: – Current 8-10m facilities lack sensitivity to obtain spectra of ordinary high-z galaxies (not the rare & most luminous ones) with S/N adequate for physical diagnostics. – Current 8-10m facilities are nearly incapable of obtaining near-IR continuum/absorption line spectroscopy (even simply for measuring redshifts) of any but the very brightest high-redshift galaxies. – For extended emission, larger GSMT aperture may make it possible to collect enough light per unit solid angle from extended galaxy emission to take advantage of stronger AO correction (even if not diffraction limited), thus achieving better angular resolution for spatially-resolved studies.

25 September 2007M. Dickinson Physics of galaxy evolution Gains with aperture size: – Primarily linear scaling of limiting flux or S/N with aperture diameter for optical or NIR observations (generally not diffraction limited). – For a large spectroscopic survey at fixed instrumental multiplex to fixed flux limit, speed or sample size scales as ~D 2 – No fundamental breakthroughs scaling from 20 to 30 to 40m, but the number of interesting, accessible targets may increase steeply at fainter fluxes if the luminosity function is steep.

25 September 2007M. Dickinson Physics of galaxy evolution Precursor observations: – Ultradeep multicolor (U through z or Y) imaging survey, 25 deg 2, as for the LSS/IGM theme. LSST or other facilities can provide this. – Extremely deep, wide-field near-IR + Spitzer/IRAC imaging surveys highly desirable. – HST-resolution (or better) wide-area imaging surveys, ideally in the near-infrared, would be valuable for charactierizing galaxy morphologies in advance of target selection for IFU spectroscopy. IFU data will measure morphlogies, but having an imaging precursor survey would enable morphological target selection if desired. High resolution imaging could greatly enhance value of the deep slit (non- IFU) spectroscopic component. – Initial ~10 6 galaxy redshift survey might come from precursor facility (e.g. 8m/10m+WFMOS)

25 September 2007M. Dickinson Physics of galaxy evolution Follow-up observations: – Wide range of detailed, multiwavelength follow-up possible for interesting objects or classes of objects (imaging, other spectroscopy, X-ray, ALMA, etc.) Connection to other elements of the US System: – JWST, ALMA, future space FIR missions and/or SKA for SFR studies Archival value & data requirements: – Very high. All spectra will be useful for other studies. IFU spectra may be mined for many projects. Flux calibration very important. Accurate absolute astrometry will enable precise comparison to ALMA data.