APS DPP 2006 October 31 2006 1 Dependence of NTM Stabilization on Location of Current Drive Relative to Island J. Woodby 1 L. Luo 1, E. Schuster 1 F. D.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 5 Distributed Force. All of the forces we have used up until now have been forces applied at a single point. Most forces are not applied at a.
Advertisements

Sources of the Magnetic Field
Example: Two point charges are separated by a distance of 20 cm. The two charges q 1 and q 2 have magnitudes of 5  C and 12  C, respectively. a)What.
Two-dimensional Structure and Particle Pinch in a Tokamak H-mode
2L 2aL s h T Introduction Zach Frye, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Faculty Advisors: Mohamed Elgindi, and John Drost, Department of Mathematics Funded.
ELECTRON CYCLOTRON SYSTEM FOR KSTAR US-Korea Workshop Opportunities for Expanded Fusion Science and Technology Collaborations with the KSTAR Project Presented.
Chapter 23 Gauss’ Law.
Study on supporting structures of magnets and blankets for a heliotron-type fusion reactors Study on supporting structures of magnets and blankets for.
Chapter 24 Gauss’s Law.
Effect of sheared flows on neoclassical tearing modes A.Sen 1, D. Chandra 1, P. K. Kaw 1 M.P. Bora 2, S. Kruger 3, J. Ramos 4 1 Institute for Plasma Research,
Physics of fusion power
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8: Conserved quantities / mirror / tokamak.
Physics of fusion power
Chapter 24 Gauss’s Law.
Solar Physics & upper Atmosphere Research Group University of Sheffield A possible method for measuring the plasma density profile along coronal loops.
1 A. Derivation of GL equations macroscopic magnetic field Several standard definitions: -Field of “external” currents -magnetization -free energy II.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8 : The tokamak continued.
Chapter 23 Gauss’s Law.
Method to Use Conservations Laws in Fluid Flows…… P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department I I T Delhi Mathematics of Reynolds Transport.
Physics of Fusion power Lecture 7: Stellarator / Tokamak.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.
1 Mixers  Mixers plays an important role in both the transmitter and the receiver  Mixers are used for down frequency conversion in the receiver  Mixers.
Computer simulations of fast frequency sweeping mode in JT-60U and fishbone instability Y. Todo (NIFS) Y. Shiozaki (Graduate Univ. Advanced Studies) K.
SIMULATION OF A HIGH-  DISRUPTION IN DIII-D SHOT #87009 S. E. Kruger and D. D. Schnack Science Applications International Corp. San Diego, CA USA.
6 th Japan-Korea Workshop on Theory and Simulation of Magnetic Fusion Plasmas Hyunsun Han, G. Park, Sumin Yi, and J.Y. Kim 3D MHD SIMULATIONS.
Joaquim Loizu P. Ricci, F. Halpern, S. Jolliet, A. Mosetto
Kinetic Effects on the Linear and Nonlinear Stability Properties of Field- Reversed Configurations E. V. Belova PPPL 2003 APS DPP Meeting, October 2003.
Numerical Simulation on Flow Generated Resistive Wall Mode Shaoyan Cui (1,2), Xiaogang Wang (1), Yue Liu (1), Bo Yu (2) 1.State Key Laboratory of Materials.
Faculty of Engineering Sciences Department of Basic Science 5/26/20161W3.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 10: tokamak – continued.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Ampère’s Law.
Chapter 24 Gauss’s Law. Let’s return to the field lines and consider the flux through a surface. The number of lines per unit area is proportional to.
Stability Properties of Field-Reversed Configurations (FRC) E. V. Belova PPPL 2003 International Sherwood Fusion Theory Conference Corpus Christi, TX,
Numerical simulations of thermal counterflow in the presence of solid boundaries Andrew Baggaley Jason Laurie Weizmann Institute Sylvain Laizet Imperial.
Comparison of Ion Thermal Transport From GLF23 and Weiland Models Under ITER Conditions A. H. Kritz 1 Christopher M. Wolfe 1 F. Halpern 1, G. Bateman 1,
Two problems with gas discharges 1.Anomalous skin depth in ICPs 2.Electron diffusion across magnetic fields Problem 1: Density does not peak near the.
QSH/SHAx states: towards the determination of an helical equilibrium L. Marrelli acknowledging fruitful discussions with S.Cappello, T.Bolzonella, D.Bonfiglio,
APS DPP 2006 October Adaptive Extremum Seeking Control of ECCD for NTM Stabilization L. Luo 1, J. Woodby 1, E. Schuster 1 F. D. Halpern 2, G.
M. Onofri, F. Malara, P. Veltri Compressible magnetohydrodynamics simulations of the RFP with anisotropic thermal conductivity Dipartimento di Fisica,
HEAT TRANSFER FINITE ELEMENT FORMULATION
Transport in three-dimensional magnetic field: examples from JT-60U and LHD Katsumi Ida and LHD experiment group and JT-60 group 14th IEA-RFP Workshop.
STUDIES OF NONLINEAR RESISTIVE AND EXTENDED MHD IN ADVANCED TOKAMAKS USING THE NIMROD CODE D. D. Schnack*, T. A. Gianakon**, S. E. Kruger*, and A. Tarditi*
DIFFER is part ofand Modelling of ECCD applied for NTM stabilization E. Westerhof FOM Institute DIFFER Dutch Institute for Fundamental Energy Research.
RFX workshop / /Valentin Igochine Page 1 Control of MHD instabilities. Similarities and differences between tokamak and RFP V. Igochine, T. Bolzonella,
TITLE Stuart R.Hudson, D.A.Monticello, A.H.Reiman, D.J.Strickler, S.P.Hirshman, L-P. Ku, E.Lazarus, A.Brooks, M.C.Zarnstorff, A.H.Boozer, G-Y. Fu and G.H.Neilson.
The influence of non-resonant perturbation fields: Modelling results and Proposals for TEXTOR experiments S. Günter, V. Igochine, K. Lackner, Q. Yu IPP.
Modelling the Neoclassical Tearing Mode
Cheng Zhang, Deng Zhou, Sizheng Zhu, J. E. Menard* Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Science, P.O. Box 1126, Hefei , P. R. China *
QAS Design of the DEMO Reactor
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  In our earlier lectures, we found the general equations of motion  We initially considered only the linear fields, but now we will.
Non-linear MHD modelling of RMPs with toroidal rotation and resonant and non-resonant plasma braking. M.Becoulet G. Huysmans, E. Nardon Association Euratom-CEA,
Neoclassical Effects in the Theory of Magnetic Islands: Neoclassical Tearing Modes and more A. Smolyakov* University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada,
Plasma MHD Activity Observations via Magnetic Diagnostics Magnetic islands, statistical methods, magnetic diagnostics, tokamak operation.
SWIM Meeting Madison, WI 12/4/07 A closure scheme for modeling RF modifications to the fluid equations C. C. Hegna and J. D. Callen University of Wisconsin.
53rd Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , 2010, Salt Lake City, Utah 5-pin Langmuir probe configured to measure the Reynolds.
53rd Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, November , 2011, Salt Lake City, Utah When the total flow will move approximately along the.
1 Recent Progress on QPS D. A. Spong, D.J. Strickler, J. F. Lyon, M. J. Cole, B. E. Nelson, A. S. Ware, D. E. Williamson Improved coil design (see recent.
1 ASIPP Sawtooth Stabilization by Barely Trapped Energetic Electrons Produced by ECRH Zhou Deng, Wang Shaojie, Zhang Cheng Institute of Plasma Physics,
= Boozer g= 2*1e -7 *48*14*5361 =.7205 =0 in net current free stellarator, but not a tokamak. QHS Mirror Predicted Separatrix Position Measurements and.
Resistive Modes in CDX-U J. Breslau, W. Park. S. Jardin, R. Kaita – PPPL D. Schnack, S. Kruger – SAIC APS-DPP Annual Meeting Albuquerque, NM October 30,
Plan V. Rozhansky, E. Kaveeva St.Petersburg State Polytechnical University, , Polytechnicheskaya 29, St.Petersburg, Russia Poloidal and Toroidal.
54th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Plasma Physics, October 29 – November 2, 2012, Providence, Rhode Island 3-D Plasma Equilibrium Reconstruction.
NIMROD Simulations of a DIII-D Plasma Disruption S. Kruger, D. Schnack (SAIC) April 27, 2004 Sherwood Fusion Theory Meeting, Missoula, MT.
54th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics, October 29 – November 2, 2012, Providence, Rhode Island 5-pin Langmuir probe measures floating potential.
U NIVERSITY OF S CIENCE AND T ECHNOLOGY OF C HINA Influence of ion orbit width on threshold of neoclassical tearing modes Huishan Cai 1, Ding Li 2, Jintao.
Kinetic Effects on Slowly Rotating Magnetic Islands in Tokamaks
Mechanisms for losses during Edge Localised modes (ELMs)
Investigation of triggering mechanisms for internal transport barriers in Alcator C-Mod K. Zhurovich C. Fiore, D. Ernst, P. Bonoli, M. Greenwald, A. Hubbard,
New Results for Plasma and Coil Configuration Studies
Modelling the Neoclassical Tearing Mode
Presentation transcript:

APS DPP 2006 October Dependence of NTM Stabilization on Location of Current Drive Relative to Island J. Woodby 1 L. Luo 1, E. Schuster 1 F. D. Halpern 2,G. Bateman 2, A. H. Kritz 2 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering 2 Department of Physics Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma Physics American Physical Society 30 October – 3 November 2006 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

APS DPP 2006 October Abstract High plasma pressure can cause ideally nested magnetic flux surfaces to tear and reconnect, leading to the formation of magnetic islands. The neoclassical tearing mode (NTM) instability drives the islands to grow to their saturated widths, at which they can persist stably in the plasma. The presence of magnetic islands leads to a local flattening of the pressure and current profiles, which is undesirable as it degrades plasma confinement. One common method of replacing lost current within islands is direct current injection via electron cyclotron current drive (ECCD). The greatest effect of current drive on the island width is achieved when current is driven near the island center. In preparation for feedback stabilization of NTMs, the effect of off-center current drive on the saturated magnetic island widths is considered here. The off-center drive is modeled mathematically by a parabolic current density peak (the center of which need not coincide with the island center), which is then transformed into Hamada coordinates. The results are implemented in the ISLAND module, which is used in BALDUR.* * JP

APS DPP 2006 October Objectives It has been shown that increasing current within magnetic islands shrinks the island Localized current drive (e.g. ECCD) can be used to inject current into islands, with the strongest shrinking effect when current is injected into island center Difficulty lies in determining the position of the island flux surface in real time Past work has lead to an expression in the ISLAND module which allows for centered current drive only This work seeks to model current drive with the possibility of shifting the drive center off the island This is in preparation for feedback stabilization, for which it is necessary to consider off-center current drive

APS DPP 2006 October References ISLAND module from NTCC module library: Background, finding saturated magnetic island widths, ISLAND: - F. Halpern, Physics of Plasmas 13 (2006) C.N. Nguyen and G. Bateman, Physics of Plasmas 11 (7) (2004) - G. Bateman and R.N. Morris, Phys. Fluids 29 (3) (1986) Similar work expressing current drive in Hamada coordinates: - G. Giruzzi et al., Nuclear Fusion 39 (1999) C. Hegna and J. Callen, Physics of Plasmas 4 (1997) 2940 Computing elliptic integrals: JP “Adaptive Extremum Seeking Control of Current Drive for NTM Stabilization”

APS DPP 2006 October Using Hamada-like coordinate system ( V is any quantity which is constant over a flux surface, such as volume, are anglelike variables in the poloidal and toroidal directions, respectively) Get set of coupled ODEs which describe change in background current and pressure profiles due to presence of island Implemented in ISLAND module (used in BALDUR) which computes saturated magnetic island widths NTM=neoclassical tearing mode, magnetic “islands” result from tearing and reconnection of ideally nested magnetic flux surfaces Starting from force-balance eqs Background

APS DPP 2006 October (1) (2) where J is the Jacobian, the elements B 0 and J 0 are the background magnetic field and current density, and the perturbations on these, B 1 and J 1, are expressed in terms of both contravariant and covariant components in Hamada coordinates ODEs to find saturated magnetic island widths

APS DPP 2006 October Previous work: Toroidal current density is proportional to Current density is flattened by magnetic island, centered current peaking is controlled by Current profile for centered peak = island halfwidth

APS DPP 2006 October The ISLAND module uses, = averaged current To find integrate (at fixed V ) over the angle Result without current drive: where is the incomplete elliptic integral of the first kind Derivative of averaged current

APS DPP 2006 October Preliminary code modification Implemented exact elliptic integral in term in ISLAND to replace analytic approximations Result: Similar saturated island widths Factor proportional to current drive u = radial coordinate centered on island

APS DPP 2006 October with different portions of the current drive both inside and outside the island, depending on the current drive shape Generalize current drive term to include drive offset from island center Modified current profile

APS DPP 2006 October Assume that the current drive has the following form Off-center current drive

APS DPP 2006 October Current applied in u-coordinates gets spread over magnetic flux surfaces, given by Relation between u-coordinates and flux surfaces (Taylor expansion of near mode-rational surfaces): Finding average driven current

APS DPP 2006 October Current applied in u- coordinates onto a differential area dA gets spread over flux surface it hits, over dS, the corresponding differential area in flux surface coordinates Or, inserting the Taylor expansion for Now integrate over and to get the averaged current drive density Derivation of average driven current - 1

APS DPP 2006 October The average current density is given by Note that the average must be taken separately within the island ( is the separatrix, or island edge) and outside, since the area ratio dA / dS will vary Problem: even if dA / dS is assumed to be constant, this integral cannot be done analytically Derivation of average driven current - 2

APS DPP 2006 October : Assume all the current is driven near the widest part of the island, at 2: Assume that dA / dS is constant and the same constant both inside and outside the island Simplifying assumptions

APS DPP 2006 October Result for averaged current drive (setting dA / dS = 1): Taking the derivative where is the complete elliptic integral of the first kind and Result of current drive derivation where is the complete elliptic integral of the second kind and

APS DPP 2006 October In this derivation, since the integral was taken separately for positive and negative u, the result is not symmetric within the island, even though flux surfaces form closed loops there. In effect, we assumed that any current applied in positive u will get spread over the flux surfaces it hits in the positive u region only For implementation in ISLAND, we have symmetrized the result by assuming that when current is driven at a positive offset ( +a ), an equivalent current is driven on the other side, at ( -a ). We then normalized the result so that increasing the offset would not result in a larger total current drive. Additional assumption - Symmetry

APS DPP 2006 October Symmetrized current drive density “Typical” case Results not normalized

APS DPP 2006 October Symmetrized current drive density Centered drive Results not normalized

APS DPP 2006 October Symmetrized current drive density Increased power Results not normalized

APS DPP 2006 October Symmetrized current drive density Narrow drive Results not normalized

APS DPP 2006 October Symmetrized current drive density Completely off island Results not normalized

APS DPP 2006 October Summary Implemented exact elliptic integrals in ISLAND to replace analytic approximations; similar saturated island widths After making several simplifying assumptions, found analytical expression for averaged current drive in Hamada coordinates, which was then symmetrized, normalized and implemented in ISLAND Future work Generalize result to include current driven at all toroidal angles simultaneously, not only near island center Symmetrize results only within island, where flux surfaces form closed loops Include effect of dA / dS, which is not constant