ESSnet on Consistency of Concepts and applied Methods of Business and Trade-related Statistics: Statistical Units D. Filipponi – Istat (Italy) ________________________________________________________.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Research and Innovation Research and Innovation Results of the 2012 Survey on R&D investment and policy measures Pierre Vigier DG Research and Innovation.
Advertisements

Research and Innovation Research and Innovation Results of the 2012 Survey on R&D investment and policy measures Pierre Vigier DG Research and Innovation.
Continuous improvement of EU-SILC quality: standard error estimation and new quality reporting system Emilio Di Meglio and Emanuela Di Falco (EUROSTAT)
1 Owner-Occupied Housing Summary of the pilot Item 5 of the Agenda D4 – Price Statistics HICP Working Group Luxembourg October 2007.
Session 1: Child poverty outcomes and main factors behind International benchmarking and key challenges for Member States András Gábos TARKI Social Research.
ESSnet on Consistency of Concepts and applied Methods of Business and Trade-related Statistics: Statistical Units P.Schuhl & S.Mabile, INSEE - France ________________________________________________________.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION - EUROSTAT ESSnet on Consistency of Concepts and Methods of business-related Statistics 2010 project on statistical units n°
Session 1: Child poverty outcomes and main factors behind International benchmarking and key challenges for Member States András Gábos TARKI Social Research.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION - EUROSTAT ESSnet on Consistency of Concepts and Methods of business-related Statistics 2010 project on statistical units n°
Improvements of the Swedish estimated Intrastat data by adding estimations based on VIES data Nordic meeting 16 September 2014 Jennie Bergman & Ari Mansikkaviita.
Training on occupational classifications. Name of the presentation Introduction ISCO 08 has started to be implemented in the EU countries in several social.
S T A T I S T I C S A U S T R I A Conference of European Statisticians Session 1- The Demographic Impact of Migration Paris, 12 June 2008 Migration.
EDIT validation tool item 8 of the agenda Structural Business Statistics Working Group 14 April 2015, Luxembourg Arlind Dobërdolani.
Eurostat Ag.no "Annex 2" supplement to Eurostat Annual Report, October 2015 Working Group on Article 64 and Article 65 of the Staff Regulations Meeting.
Gender Equality is key towards the eradication of Violence against Women.
All Roads Lead to Rome Km 923 Km 489 Km 0 Km 989 Km 518 Km 898 Km 811
Highlights of 2016 and the outlook for 2017
Economic benefits of gender equality in the EU
Eurojust cases involving crimes against children
The Inquiry on the Statistical Units
Point 5. Countries plans on Time Use Surveys
Update on the UOE 2012 data collection
5. Areas under organic farming
Working Party “Cooperation on Land Cover/Use Statistics”
No document Ag 08 ESA2010 (SNA 2008)
State of legal transposition (1)
Ag.no.16 A65 country manuals and country assessments
SBS Compliance report item 3 of the agenda
3C. Update of Summary of WISE electronic delivery
Report on WISE Art.8 and GIS issues
Habides update (May 2011).
State of play Article 5 reports
MISSOC NETWORK MEETING Amsterdam, 6-7 June 2016
State of play of Urban Audit
Education and Training Statistics Working Group
Emilio Di Meglio and Emanuela Di Falco (EUROSTAT)
LAMAS October 2017 Agenda Item 3.2 Labour Cost Indices state of play Daniel Iscru Hubertus Vreeswijk.
Agenda Item 2.1 SES 2014: follow-up
on Priority Substances Strategic Coordination Group
Representative sampling questionnaire
ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF GENDER EQUALITY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION
LAMAS Working Group 29 June-1 July 2016
Reporting – Art 17 of HD and Art 12 of BD
Item 8.1 Implementation of the 2016 Adult Education Survey
2b. Status of WFD reporting
Programme adoptions Cohesion Policy:
Ag.no. 15 Lessons from the 2016 A65 exercise
Item 7.1 – Overview of 2012 UOE data collection
ETS Working Group meeting 24-25/9/2007 Agenda point 7 CVTS3 brief update /09/ 2007 ETS working group.
State of play: data transmission, validation and dissemination
Proposal for granting access to HOUSEHOLD BUDGET SURVEYS (HBS)
Steering Committee, Eurostat, Luxembourg, 4 February 2011
LAMAS Working Group 7 – 8 December 2016
Labour market statistics- State of play
Update on legal issues Strategic Co-ordination Group 7-8 May 2009
State of Play RBMPs and WISE reporting (9/07/10)
Item 4 Overview of the 2016 AES & 2015 CVTS data collection
FISIM State of play Agenda Item 3.
Update on implementation WG F 27 April 2010 Maria Brättemark
European Statistical Training Programme (ESTP)
Update on legal issues Strategic Coordination Group 23 February 2010
Grants for the implementation of ISCO 08 during 2010
LAMAS October 2018 Agenda Item 4.1 LMI Review – main scenarios
Update on status of reporting and validation process
LAMAS Working Group June 2018
LAMAS Working Group 7-8 December 2016
LAMAS Working Group 5-6 October 2016
LAMAS Working Group June 2015
Teodora Brandmuller Unit E4
LAMAS Working Group June 2018
Presentation transcript:

ESSnet on Consistency of Concepts and applied Methods of Business and Trade-related Statistics: Statistical Units D. Filipponi – Istat (Italy) ________________________________________________________ ESSnet on consistency – Statistical Units Workshop Riga, 19 – 20 June 2012 Results of the quantitative part of the Inquiry on identification of inconsistencies between Member States

Content Why a quantitative part in the questionnaire The Statistical Unit Enterprise: questionnaire The Statistical Unit Enterprise: main results The Statistical Unit KAU: questionnaire The Statistical Unit KAU: main results Discussion

The quantitative part of questionnaire The aim: to give a quantitative information – measure- on the inconsistency - if any - of the statistical units among MS The approach: to evaluate the impact of the actions carried out by each country for the identification of the statistical unit as defined by the Regulation N.696/93 The considered statistical unit: Enterprise and KAU

The Statistical Unit Enterprise – The Questionnaire

The Statistical Unit Enterprise – Inquiry Results  The respondent countries have been divided into 3 groups according to their application of the enterprise definition (treatment)  The analysis has been carried out using three measures : units, employed, turnover GroupLabel in graphsDescription of treatment 1Part1 NO Part3 NONo treatment of LeUs 2Part1 YES Part3 NOThresholds or other methods to identify the productive units 3Part1 YES Part2 YES Both combination of LeUs and methods to identify the productive units Analysis of the impact of the applied treatment to identify Enterprises from the administrative LeUs.

The Statistical Unit Enterprise – Inquiry Results Percentual variation between LeUs and Enterprises ( units, employed and turnover) by type of treatment and country

The Statistical Unit Enterprise – Inquiry Results LeU and Enterprise (number) by NACE and country

The Statistical Unit Enterprise – Inquiry Results How much does the distribution “before and after” the treatment vary? And in which NACE codes?

The Statistical Unit Enterprise – Inquiry Results

Index of dissimilarity (of units, employed and turnover) by type of treatment and country

The Statistical Unit Enterprise – Inquiry Results Index of dissimilarity (of units, employed and turnover) by type of treatment and country

The Statistical Unit Enterprise – Inquiry Results We tried to explicate the index of dissimilarity of the distributions by NACE before and after the treatment as a function of the applied treatment of units and in relation with the countries who performed it. Used tool: Correspondence analysis

The Statistical Unit Enterprise – Inquiry Results Index of dissimilarity and treatment In terms of units

The Statistical Unit Enterprise – Inquiry Results Index of dissimilarity and treatment In terms of employed

The Statistical Unit Enterprise – Inquiry Results Index of dissimilarity and treatment In terms of turnover

The Statistical Unit Enterprise – Inquiry Results If we consider, where are defined as before, it is possible to analyze the differences between the two distributions for each NACE code (i) The differences have been grouped in classes: <-1 (-1,-0.5] [-0.5,0) 0 (0,0.5] (0.5,1] >1

The Statistical Unit Enterprise – Inquiry Results In terms of units

The Statistical Unit Enterprise – The Questionnaire Table 3 – Legal units by main economic activity code (only NACE codes that could be considered as "ancillary"

The Statistical Unit Enterprise – Inquiry Results Estimated number of legal units combined with other legal units by nace code and country via Generalized Linear Mixed Model. A generalized mixed model is a statistical model containing both fixed effects and random effects.fixed effects random effects These models are useful where repeated measurements are made on the same statistical units, or where measurements are made on clusters of related statistical units.statistical units ~N(0,G) g is a link function y is a vector of observations units is a vector of fixed effects The general matrix formulation is: and X and Z are matrices of regressors relating the observations Y to

The Statistical Unit Enterprise – Inquiry Results Here, and This model allows to take into account the correlation among units belonging to the same group (NACE SECTOR), with the matrix G1, G2 and G3, and the correlation among number employed and turnover, with the matrix G12 G13 and G23 The parameters have been estimated using the value of the respondent countries: ES, SE, LT, NO The Leu, employed and turnover have been estimated for the othercountries

The Statistical Unit Enterprise – Inquiry Results %Legal units combined with other legal units to create the enterprise by country

The Statistical Unit Enterprise – Inquiry Results Cluster of EU/EFTA country (respondent) using the distribution of the unit by NACE code, before and after the treatment.....

The Statistical Unit Enterprise – Inquiry Results

The Statistical Unit Enterprise – Conclusion 1.The application of the PART 1 of the definition of Ent (identification of “productive activity” – threshold-) brings: big variation between LeUs and Ents in terms of unit small variation in terms of employment and turnover 2.The application of the PART 3 of the definition of Ent (“combination of units”) brings; variations in terms of employment and turnover

The Statistical Unit Enterprise – Conclusion 3.The distribution of LeU with respect to the distribution of Ent (in Units): decrease the incidence of NACE “L” and “S” (<-1); high increase of “G”, “M” and “F” (>+1); medium increase of “C”, “H” and “Q” (+0.5 to +1); all the others are stable variation

The Statistical Unit KAU – The Questionnaire

The Statistical Unit KAU – Inquiry Results Number of enterprises, economic activities and KAU by country and domain

The Statistical Unit KAU – Inquiry Results Number of enterprises, economic activities and KAU by country

The Statistical Unit KAU – Inquiry Results KAU and Enterprise (number) by NACE and country

The Statistical Unit KAU – Inquiry Results KAU and Enterprise (employed) by NACE and country

The Statistical Unit KAU – Inquiry Results KAU and Enterprise (turnover) by NACE and country

The Statistical Unit KAU – Inquiry Results Index of dissimilarity of Number, Employed and Turnover by country

The Statistical Unit KAU – Inquiry Results Estimated KAU and KAU’ employed by NACE sector via Linear Mixed Model. A mixed model is a statistical model containing both fixed effects and random effects.fixed effectsrandom effects These models are useful where repeated measurements are made on the same statistical units, or where measurements are made on clusters of related statistical units.statistical units ~N(0,G) y is a vector of observations units is a vector of fixed effects The general matrix formulation is: andX and Z are matrices of regressors relating the observations Y to

The Statistical Unit KAU – Inquiry Results Here, and This model allows to take into account the correlation among units belonging to the same group (NACE SECTOR), with the matrix G1 and G2, and the correlation among number and employed, with the matrix G12 The parameters have been estimated using the value of the respondent countries: AT, ES, LT, PT, SE, SK, DK, EE, HU, IT, LV, and SI The KAU and the related employed have been estimated for the following countries BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, EL, FI, IE, LU, MT, NO, PL and RO

The Statistical Unit KAU – Inquiry Results

KAU and Estimated KAU by NACE for the respondent countries.

The Statistical Unit KAU – Inquiry Results KAU and Estimated KAU employed by NACE for the respondent countries.

The Statistical Unit KAU – Inquiry Results KAU and Enterprise by NACE for the EU/EFTA

The Statistical Unit KAU – Inquiry Results KAU and Enterprise employed by NACE for the EU/EFTA

The Statistical Unit KAU – Conclusion The results of the KAU analysis it is partial because of missing data for most of the biggest countries There are not evident differences between the Enterprise NACE distribution and KAU NACE distribution, even if the analysis carried out at section level could be partial

44 Thanks for your attention!