Michigan Assessment Consortium Common Assessment Development Series Module 2 – Determining the Parameters of the Common Assessment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Michigan Assessment Consortium Common Assessment Development Series Putting Together The Test Blueprint.
Advertisements

Daniel Peck January 28, SLOs versus Course Objectives Student Learning Outcomes for the classroom describe the knowledge, skills, abilities.
Student Learning Targets (SLT) You Can Do This! Getting Ready for the School Year.
State Testing PARCC, LEAP, iLEAP. What State Assessments will your children take this year? When will they take them ? All students grades 3-8 will take.
1 Designing High Quality, Affordable Assessment Systems Edward Roeber Michigan State University National Research Council Board on Testing and Assessment.
Michigan Assessment Consortium Common Assessment Development Series Module 6 – The Test Blueprint.
By: Michele Leslie B. David MAE-IM WIDE USAGE To identify students who may be eligible to receive special services To monitor student performance from.
CHAPTER 3 ~~~~~ INFORMAL ASSESSMENT: SELECTING, SCORING, REPORTING.
Research Methods and Proposal Writing
Norm-referenced assessment Criterion-referenced assessment Domain-referenced assessment Diagnostic assessment Formative assessment Summative assessment.
Common Core Standards Norwalk – La Mirada Unified School District.
Module 1: PERA Illinois Administrative Code Part 50
Unit and Lesson Planning
Essay Assessment Tasks
Research Methods and Proposal Writing
Curriculum Mapping.
Classroom Assessment and Grading
PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENTS. INTRODUCTION & PURPOSE Students or teachers collect student work products.
ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION. Copyright Keith Morrison, 2004 PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT... Concerns direct reality rather than disconnected.
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING Manal bait Gharim.
The Teaching Portfolio
Common Assessments Social Studies. Objectives: Create common assessments that measure student learning and determine the effectiveness of the Parkway.
Curriculum Mapping November Types of Curriculum Recommended – Standards as defined by experts in their field. Written – State standards, local goals.
Introduction to Mapping
Session 2 Traditional Assessments Session 2 Traditional Assessments.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Evidence. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
MAC Common Assessment Training Modules Session F3 Michigan School Testing Conference February 23, 2012.
Building Assessment Literacy in Michigan through Quality Common Assessment Development.
Michigan Assessment Consortium Building and Using Common Assessments: A Professional Development Series Module 1 Overview of the Series.
EDAD 5389 Domains and Competencies. Domain I—School Community Leadership Domain II—Instructional Leadership Domain III—Administrative Leadership.
STATE OF TEXAS ASSESSMENTS OF ACADEMIC READINESS (STAAR) STAAR Reading and Writing.
Common Formative Assessments for Science Monica Burgio Daigler, Erie 1 BOCES.
Michigan Assessment Consortium Common Assessment Development Series Module 9B – Editing the Draft Test Items.
Module 2: Joint Committee Decisions Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Michigan Assessment Consortium Common Assessment Development Series Module 7 Assessing Special Needs Students.
Lecture # 32 SCIENCE 1 ASSOCIATE DEGREE IN EDUCATION Professional Standards for Teaching Science.
Grand Island K-8 SCIENCE Common Formative Assessments for Science Monica Burgio Daigler, Erie 1 BOCES.
Catholic College at Mandeville Assessment and Evaluation in Inclusive Settings Sessions 3 & /14/2015 Launcelot I. Brown Lisa Philip.
An Integral Part of Professional Learning Communities.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Summary of Assessments By the Big Island Team: (Sherry, Alan, John, Bess) CCSS SBAC PARCC AP CCSSO.
Medlock Bridge Parent Coffee Georgia Milestones Testing December 9, 2015.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A. Mertler Chapter 4 Overview of Assessment Techniques.
SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT A process – not an event. Summative assessment “Information is used by the teacher to summarize learning at a given point in time.
1 Board “Leanings” on State Assessment System David T. Conley, Ph.D. Professor, University of Oregon Director, Center for Educational Policy Research CEO,
Greenbush. An informed citizen possesses the knowledge needed to understand contemporary political, economic, and social issues. A thoughtful citizen.
CAHSEE California High School Exit Exam ChipMatt EricCrystal.
Electronic Portfolios E-portfolios have two critical components: Evidence that documents teaching Reflections that support each piece of evidence.
Handout Regarding Development of Quality Assessments to Determine Student Growth Objectives.
Mara Barbosa Alejandra Carrillo-Muñoz.  You will…  Identify appropriate and effective strategies to present evidence of teaching effectiveness.  Plan,
Michigan Assessment Consortium Common Assessment Training Modules Session B5 Michigan School Testing Conference February 23, 2011.
CAHSEE California High School Exit Exam ChipMatt EricCrystal.
SCIENCE Assessment Amanda Cantafio.
 What are ‘Constructed-Response’ test questions?  How can I write excellent ‘constructed response’ test questions?  How well do ‘constructed response’
Chapter 6 Assessing Science Learning Updated Spring 2012 – D. Fulton.
Bellevue University Faculty Development November 4, 2005
Michigan Arts Education Instruction and Assessment
Alternative Assessment (Portfolio)
An Introduction to NETS*T
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING
The Academy of the Arts Henry Snyder High School
Perkins Annual Reports
Overview: Understanding and Building a Schoolwide Assessment Plan
Assessing the Common Core Standards
Michigan Assessment Consortium Common Assessment Development Series Module 21 Assessment Administration and Scoring MAC CAD-PD Mod-6 BRF
ESL SLO Reports Spring 2017.
Assessment Literacy: Test Purpose and Use
Preparing Educators in Classroom Assessment
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
Presentation transcript:

Michigan Assessment Consortium Common Assessment Development Series Module 2 – Determining the Parameters of the Common Assessment

Developed and Narrated by Edward Roeber Professor Michigan State University

Support The Michigan Assessment Consortium professional development series in common assessment development is funded in part by the Michigan Association of Intermediate School Administrators in cooperation with …

In Module 2 you will learn about What are the components of a typical common assessment? What are the components of a typical common assessment? How should the school make decisions about which components to use? How should the school make decisions about which components to use?

Typical Common Assessment Components The typical types of assessments used in common assessments include: Multiple-choice items Short written response items Long written response (essay) items Performance assessments Existing student work collected in a portfolio

Selected-Response Items These items are most useful for: Coverage of a content area broadly, since many questions can be asked in a short period of time Learning what students know about a topic These items are less useful for: In-depth assessments, since writing items based on challenging content is difficult

Short Written Response Items These items are most useful for: Determining if students can solve problems Students can provide the answer rather than select it These items are less useful for: Inexpensive, quick assessments, since the responses will need to be scored by a teacher or aide

Long Written Response (Essay) Items These items are most useful for: Learning what students know about a subject area Seeing if students can apply their learning These items are less useful for: Broad content area coverage Factual (right-wrong) types of questions

Performance Assessments These items are most useful for: Determining if students can actually use the skills they have been taught Learning what students actually know Probing learning at some depth These items are less useful for: Broad content area coverage

Portfolios of Student Work These items are most useful for: Documenting the work students have done in class Demonstrating the growth in learning over time These items are less useful for: Standardized assessments of the same skills using the same assessment techniques

Making Decisions About Assessment Components There are several things to keep in mind when deciding on which components to use: Purpose(s) of the assessment Use(s) of the assessment information Resources (money, staff and time) available to support the assessment

Making Decisions About Assessment Components See Module 1 on determining the purpose of the assessment Use(s) of the assessment information Determine what consequences the assessment will have for students or educators - this determines the “stakes” for the assessment If students have to pass the assessment to get a grade, pass a course, get promoted or graduate, then it is “high stakes”

Making Decisions About Assessment Components High stakes assessments have specific policy, technical and legal requirements for them, many of which are described in subsequent modules Make sure that the types of assessments chosen, the manner in which these are developed, and how they are implemented matches the purposes and uses of the assessment

Making Decisions About Assessment Components Follow the advice given in this series of modules to make sure that the common assessments created by your school or district are technically sound and legally defensible