WP Inc.: Automatic Parts Washer Process Improvement Final Project Summer D. Leifer MGMT580 – Quality Management and Statistical Analysis March 25, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A3 PROBLEM SOLVING TOOL: Date: Contact: SOLUTIONS / COUNTERMEASURES What solutions will solve the root causes? (Tools: Brainstorming and Affinity Diagram)
Advertisements

MGMT580 – Quality Management & Statistical Analysis Final Project Josh Murphy.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 3.1.
WP Inc: spray nozzle blues
Productive Maintenance
AUTOMATIC PARTS WASHER: PROBLEM ANALYSIS BEN BROXTERMAN MBA STUDENT SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE MGMT 580, SUMMER 2012 WP Inc.
Project quality management Cody Ronning 3/23/2015.
Chapter 9 Management of Quality McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Continuous Process Improvement
King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals Department of Construction Engineering & Management CEM 515: Quality Management “ Implementing the Lean Sigma.
Quality Management, 6 th ed. Goetsch and Davis © 2010 Pearson Higher Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ All Rights Reserved. 1 Quality Management.
Chapter 10 Quality Improvement.
1 Continuous Improvement. 2 1.Overview of the PDCA Problem Solving Cycle. 2.Foundations of the PDCA Cycle 3.Plan Step 4.Do Step 5.Check Step 6.Act Step.
WP Inc. Case STUDY 3.1 Problem Solving Jonathan Stanley & Kari Eddings
Lisa M. Cochran MGMT580PA Quality Management & Statistical Analysis Southwestern College Dr. Michael Corriere 13 June 2012.
Quality Improvement: Problem Solving
Case Study 3.1: WP Inc. Problem-Solving
Managing Project Quality
Basic Concepts of Quality Philosophy
MGMT 580 By Samuel & Adrienne 18 December The problem at hand is the spray nozzles, which frequently clog with particles, causing the parts washer.
Final Project Case Study 3.1 MGMT 580
Six Sigma By: Tim Bauman April 2, Overview What is Six Sigma? Key Concepts Methodologies Roles Examples of Six Sigma Benefits Criticisms.
TTMG 5103 Module Techniques and Tools for problem diagnosis and improvement prior to commercialization Shiva Biradar TIM Program, Carleton University.
Process Management Process improvement (for Chronic problems) Process control (for Sporadic problems)
© 2005 Wiley1 Total Quality Management Chapter 5.
Elizabeth Wilmoth Period 2.  Identify problems that can occur if hardware is not properly maintained.  Identify routine maintenance that can be performed.
LESSON 8 Booklet Sections: 12 & 13 Systems Analysis.
Quality and Quantity Control
Lecture #9 Project Quality Management Quality Processes- Quality Assurance and Quality Control Ghazala Amin.
C ONTINUOUS Q UALITY I MPROVEMENT M ODEL The Deming cycle: Originally developed by Walter Shewart, but renamed in 1950s because Deming promoted it extensively.
LEAN Roger Jones Joe Novello. Introductions Historical Background Baldridge Quality Framework.
Module 1, Part 3: Process validation Slide 1 of 22 © WHO – EDM – 12/2001 Validation Part 3: Process validation Supplementary Training Modules on Good Manufacturing.
By Ruby Amey Southwestern College of Professional Studies Quality Management & Statistics Dr. Mohamed Elaoudiy March 30, 2013.
WP, Inc. Automatic Parts Washer Brought to you by Candace Hunt, Drew Siebert, Laura Anstine MGMT 580-Quality Management & Statistical Analysis October.
Robert Eickleberry MGMT 580 – Quality Management and Statistical Analysis Date June 14, 2012 Dr. Corriere Southwestern College Professional.
Lean Six Sigma: Process Improvement Tools and Techniques Donna C. Summers © 2011 Pearson Higher Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ All Rights Reserved.
TEPM 6304: Quality Improvement in Project Management Project Quality Management & Course Overview.
Ami™ as a process Showing the structural elements in the Accelerated Model for Improvement™
Chapter 8 Problem-Solving Using Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control.
Lean Six Sigma: Process Improvement Tools and Techniques Donna C. Summers © 2011 Pearson Higher Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ All Rights Reserved.
Kirk Baringer Sabrina Hoffman Hanna Spicer. Problem-Solving Steps  Plan 1.Recognize a problem exists 2.Form a quality improvement team 3.Develop performance.
CLICK THE NUMBERS IN SEQUENCE
Traditional Economic Model of Quality of Conformance
© 2005 Wiley1 Total Quality Management Chapter 5.
Skip Counting Practice
Group 4 MGMT 580 Case Study 3.1 Shawndra Janne. Problem Statement The spray nozzles located in the parts washer are clogging, causing the parts washer.
IT Project Management, Third Edition Chapter 8 1 Chapter 5: Project Quality Management.
Case Study 3.1 WP Inc MGMT 580 – Quality Management and Statistics Group 3: Cody Groves, Bruce Kastner, & Heather Moore.
A3 PROBLEM SOLVING TOOL: Date: Contact: SOLUTIONS What solutions will solve the root causes? (Tools: Brainstorming and Affinity Diagram) What solutions.
Lean Six Sigma: Process Improvement Tools and Techniques Donna C. Summers © 2011 Pearson Higher Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ All Rights Reserved.
Danielle Gooch MGMT580 – Quality Management & Statistical Analysis January 19, 2012 Dr. Michael Corriere Southwestern College Professional Studies Final.
Introduction to Computers
Quality Certification
Quality Improvement: Problem Solving
OPS/571 Operations Management
DSQR Training Control Plans
Quality Improvement: Problem Solving
Overview Slides for CU Speaking Engagement
Continuous Process Improvement
الجــودة الشاملة في مؤسسات التعليم العالي
Systems Analysis and Design
NUMBERS one two three four five six seven eight
DMAIC STANDARD WORK TEMPLATE
DMAIC STANDARD WORK TEMPLATE
CLICK THE NUMBERS IN SEQUENCE
Quality Management and Statistical Analysis (MGMT 580)
WP Inc.: Faulty Spray Nozzles
CLICK THE NUMBERS IN SEQUENCE
Multiplication facts Your Help Guide.
+/- Numbers Year 3-4 – Addition and subtraction of hundreds within
Presentation transcript:

WP Inc.: Automatic Parts Washer Process Improvement Final Project Summer D. Leifer MGMT580 – Quality Management and Statistical Analysis March 25, 2013 Mr. Mohamed Elaoudiy Southwestern College Professional Studies

Introduction Plan Do Study Act Conclusion References WP Inc.: Automatic Parts Washer Process Improvement

 WP Inc. Problem Solving Group  Problem- Auto Parts Washer Clogging  Problem Solving Methodology- Dr. Deming’s “PDSA” Introduction

PlanDoStudyAct Dr. Deming’s PDSA Process Improvement Model

Recognize problem exists Form an improvement team Act Plan DoStudy Dr. Deming’s PDSA Process Phase One: Plan Steps One and Two

Develop performance measures Act Plan DoStudy Dr. Deming’s PDSA Process Phase One: Plan Step Three

Timing of Nozzle Clogs in One Month Period

Clogged Parts Washer Causes Affinity Diagram

Clearly defining the problem Act Plan DoStudy Dr. Deming’s PDSA Process Phase One: Plan Step Four

Problem Statement Status Quo Destabilizing Moment Consequences

Document and analyze the process and/or problem. Act Plan DoStudy Dr. Deming’s PDSA Process Phase One: Plan Step Five

Parts Washer Process Flowchart Parts Washer is turned on Dirty parts are placed in the machine Parts are run Are parts clean? Parts move to the next step Is wate r dirty? Water is emptied New soap and water are put in tank. Evaporation occurs; water and soap are added Coil heats water. YES NO

Clogged Nozzle Cause and Effect Diagram Parts Equipment issues Additives Operator Error Chips from the parts Paint chips from the parts Calcium build-up Soap flakes/build-up Chemical reaction Improper water temp Improper operations Insufficient maintenance Nozzle defects Parts Washer defects Old equipment Clogged spray nozzles Hard water Gravel or dirt Improper soap/water mixture

Determine possible causes Perform root cause analysis Determine root cause Act Plan DoStudy Dr. Deming’s PDSA Process Phase One: Plan Step Six

Soap Buildup on Tank Bottom Cause and Effect Diagram Water Temperature Equipment issues Free floating particles Dissolve best at elevated temp Low temps do not permit proper dissolution Soap concentration increased/cannot be held in solution Soap particles fall to bottom/disturbed during cleaning No filter system between tank and nozzles Soap buildup on the bottom of the tank Tank water heated/water evaporates Fluid level decreases/more soap & water added

Identify, Select and Implement the Solution Act Plan Do Study Dr. Deming’s PDSA Process Phase Two: Do Step Seven

Force-Field Analysis Driving Forces 1. Improving manufacturing and service quality assurance for all stakeholders 2. Delivering quality product on-time and per specification to customers leads to better customer relations 3. Improved parts washer process leads to less waste (e.g. time, money, resources) 4. Efficient processes lead to higher employee satisfaction Restraining Forces 1.Training operators on new processes 2.The costs of installing new equipment and revising training Actions 1.Change the parts washer operation process 2.Implement and provide training on revised process to current and new operators 3.Monitor the process change and adjust as necessary

Evaluate the solution Act Plan Do Study Dr. Deming’s PDSA Process Phase Three: Study Step Eight

Chart for Counts of Nonconformities (Clogs)

Ensure permanence Continuous Improvement Act Plan StudyDo Dr. Deming’s PDSA Process Phase Four: Act Steps Nine and Ten

 WP Inc. Problem Solving Group  Problem- Auto Parts Washer Clogging  Problem Solving Methodology- Dr. Deming’s “PDSA” Conclusion

Contact: Summer D. Leifer Questions?

Brassard, M., & Ritter, D. (1994). The memory jogger II (1st ed.). Salem, NH: GOAL/QPC. Summers, D. (2010). Quality (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. References