Performances of the upgraded SVT The Silicon Vertex Trigger upgrade at CDF J.Adelman 1, A.Annovi 2, M.Aoki 3, A.Bardi 4, F.Bedeschi 4, S.Belforte 5, J.Bellinger.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
22 settembre 2004A. Annovi1 SVT upgrade status A. Annovi - Assisi, 22 settembre 2004.
Advertisements

High Level Trigger – Applications Open Charm physics Quarkonium spectroscopy Dielectrons Dimuons Jets.
The LHCb DAQ and Trigger Systems: recent updates Ricardo Graciani XXXIV International Meeting on Fundamental Physics.
FPCP 2002, 05/16-18/2002 p. 1 Richard E. Hughes, The Ohio State UniversityCDF Run II Status Status of CDF and Prospects Flavor Physics and CP Violation.
The new Silicon detector at RunIIb Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96.
CDF Trigger System Veronica Sorin Michigan State University Silicon Workshop UCSB May 11,2006.
The first testing of the CERC and PCB Version II with cosmic rays Catherine Fry Imperial College London CALICE Meeting, CERN 28 th – 29 th June 2004 Prototype.
SVT L.Ristori1 SVT Workshop July 22, 2003 Summary (1) Minimal upgrade for run IIb silicon –Detailed bit level format for hits from HF’s to Mergers needs.
FTK poster F. Crescioli Alberto Annovi
June 19, Outcome of the CERN meetings Preparing the upgrade R&D proposal M. Shochet.
BEACH Conference 2006 Leah Welty Indiana University BEACH /7/06.
Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 1 Recent B Physics results from DØ The B Physics program in D Ø Run II Current analyses – First results.
SVT workshop October 27, 1998 XTF HB AM Stefano Belforte - INFN Pisa1 COMMON RULES ON OPERATION MODES RUN MODE: the board does what is needed to make SVT.
Scientific Highlights : CDF Experiment 1.Introduction 2.CDF Run-II detector 3.Phyiscs highlights B Physics, Top, Higgs, … to be continued by Rob October.
Simulation issue Y. Akiba. Main goals stated in LOI Measurement of charm and beauty using DCA in barrel –c  e + X –D  K , K , etc –b  e + X –B 
Cluster Finder Report Laura Sartori (INFN Pisa) For the L2Cal Team Chicago, Fermilab, Madrid, Padova, Penn, Pisa, Purdue.
SVT June 2005Mauro Dell'Orso - Beauty SVT The CDF Silicon Vertex Trigger Beauty 2005 Mauro Dell’Orso Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Pisa –
17-Aug-00 L.RistoriCDF Trigger Workshop1 SVT: current hardware status CRNowFinal Hit Finders64242 Mergers31616 Sequencers2312 AMboards4624 Hit Buffers21212.
The CDF Online Silicon Vertex Tracker I. Fiori INFN & University of Padova 7th International Conference on Advanced Technologies and Particle Physics Villa.
NA62 Trigger Algorithm Trigger and DAQ meeting, 8th September 2011 Cristiano Santoni Mauro Piccini (INFN – Sezione di Perugia) NA62 collaboration meeting,
ICHEP 2002 First Heavy Flavor Results Using the Silicon Vertex Trigger A. Cerri.
AMB HW LOW LEVEL SIMULATION VS HW OUTPUT G. Volpi, INFN Pisa.
G. Volpi - INFN Frascati ANIMMA Search for rare SM or predicted BSM processes push the colliders intensity to new frontiers Rare processes are overwhelmed.
January 31, MICE DAQ MICE and ISIS Introduction MICE Detector Front End Electronics Software and MICE DAQ Architecture MICE Triggers Status and Schedule.
Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96 TeV  Instantaneous luminosity will.
D0 Status: 01/14-01/28 u Integrated luminosity s delivered luminosity –week of 01/ pb-1 –week of 01/ pb-1 –luminosity to tape: 40% s major.
A. Meneguzzo Padova University & INFN Validation and Performance of the CMS Barrel Muon Drift Chambers with Cosmic Rays A. Meneguzzo Padova University.
Accessing PBeast and monitoring the L1 trigger Emily Thompson.
7/20/04Director's Review - SVT Upgrade1 Silicon Vertex Trigger (SVT) Upgrade J. Adelman, I. Furic, Y.K. Kim, M. Shochet, U.K. Yang (Chicago) T. Liu (Fermilab)
Roma, Riunione CSN1: Maggio 2004F. Bedeschi, INFN-Pisa 1/13 CDF  Stato del Tevatron  Stato del rivelatore  Upgrades in corso  Richieste finanziarie.
Lukens - 1 Fermilab Seminar – July, 2011 Observation of the  b 0 Patrick T. Lukens Fermilab for the CDF Collaboration July 2011.
2007 Run Update for STAR Jeff Landgraf For the STAR collaboration.
Alberto AnnoviFTK meeting - September 30, 2004 Ideas for a Fast-Track trigger processor - FTK... an evolution of the CDF Silicon Vertex Trigger (SVT) A.
ATLAS Trigger Development
Chunhui Chen, University of Pennsylvania 1 Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the Tevatron Heavy Flavor Production and Cross Sections at the.
SVT Nov 7, 2002Luciano Ristori - Vertex2002_7Nov02.ppt1 SVT The CDF Silicon Vertex Trigger Vertex 2002 Luciano Ristori Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare.
CHIPP meeting Appenberg, 24 Aug 2009 Preparation for LHC beam, Jeroen van Tilburg 1/15 Jeroen van Tilburg (Universität Zürich) LHCb: Preparation for LHC.
The SVT Bypass (not for review) 1.Hardware description; 2.Possible applications; 3.Technical feasibility; 4.Hardware requirements/needs; estimate on firmware/software.
SVT April 2006Alberto Annovi- IFAE SVT L’upgrade del Silicon Vertex Trigger (SVT) di CDF IFAE 2006 Alberto Annovi Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare.
First physics results with the Silicon Vertex Trigger at CDF-II 2 nd Workshop on the CKM Unitarity triangle. April 5 th -9 th IPPP Durham, England, UK.
LHCbComputing Computing for the LHCb Upgrade. 2 LHCb Upgrade: goal and timescale m LHCb upgrade will be operational after LS2 (~2020) m Increase significantly.
1 Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Fergus Wilson, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2) 3.Collider Experiments.
A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System Mark Neubauer 1, Laura Sartori 2 1 University.
Living Long At the LHC G. WATTS (UW/SEATTLE/MARSEILLE) WG3: EXOTIC HIGGS FERMILAB MAY 21, 2015.
S. Donati University and INFN Pisa 9th Topical Seminar on Innovative Particle and Radiation Detectors, May , Siena, Italy The CDF Online Silicon.
Evelyn Thomson Ohio State University Page 1 XFT Status CDF Trigger Workshop, 17 August 2000 l XFT Hardware status l XFT Integration tests at B0, including:
FTK high level simulation & the physics case The FTK simulation problem G. Volpi Laboratori Nazionali Frascati, CERN Associate FP07 MC Fellow.
Nikhef Scientific Meeting 2000Onne Peters D0 Muon Spectrometer December 14-15, Amsterdam Onne Peters Nikhef Jamboree 2000.
SVT 4/5 operation CDF meeting 1/16/2003 G. Punzi for the SVT group.
The LHCb Calorimeter Triggers LAL Orsay and INFN Bologna.
DAQ and Trigger for HPS run Sergey Boyarinov JLAB July 11, Requirements and available test results 2. DAQ status 3. Trigger system status and upgrades.
UPDATE ON HARDWARE 1 1.VERTICAL SLICE & COOLING TESTS 1.ONLY a TEST STAND or a SMALL DEMONSTRATOR ?? 2.CRATE.
EPS HEP 2007 Manchester -- Thilo Pauly July The ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Overview and Status Report including Cosmic-Ray Commissioning Thilo.
More technical description:
2018/6/15 The Fast Tracker Real Time Processor and Its Impact on the Muon Isolation, Tau & b-Jet Online Selections at ATLAS Francesco Crescioli1 1University.
Pending technical issues and plans to address and solve
RT2003, Montreal Niko Neufeld, CERN-EP & Univ. de Lausanne
Overview of the ATLAS Fast Tracker (FTK) (daughter of the very successful CDF SVT) July 24, 2008 M. Shochet.
FTK variable resolution pattern banks
Kevin Burkett Harvard University June 12, 2001
14 paesi, 62 universita’ e laboratori
The LHC collider in Geneva
FPGA-based Time to Digital Converter and Data Acquisition system for High Energy Tagger of KLOE-2 experiment L. Iafolla1,4, A. Balla1, M. Beretta1, P.
A Fast Hardware Tracker for the ATLAS Trigger System
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 6th May 2009 Fergus Wilson, RAL.
Bringing the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer to Life with Cosmic Rays
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL
The Road Warrior: first use of the Pulsar for SVT
Presentation transcript:

Performances of the upgraded SVT The Silicon Vertex Trigger upgrade at CDF J.Adelman 1, A.Annovi 2, M.Aoki 3, A.Bardi 4, F.Bedeschi 4, S.Belforte 5, J.Bellinger 6, E.Berry 1,M.Bitossi 2, M.Bogdan 1, M.Carlsmith 6, R.Carosi 4, P.Catastini 9, A.Cerri 8, S.Chappa 7, W.Chung 6,M.A.Ciocci 9, F.Crescioli 2, M.Dell’ Orso 2, B.Di Ruzza 11, S.Donati 2, I.Furic 1, S.Galeotti 4, P.Giannetti 4, C.M.Ginsburg 6, P.Giovacchini 4, R.Handler 6, Y.K.Kim 1, J.D.Lewis 7, T.Liu 7, R.Mahlum 7, T.Maruyama 3, F.Morsani 4, G.Ott 6, I.Pedron 10, M.Piendibene 4, M.Pitkanen 7, L.G.Pondrom 6, G.Punzi 2, B.Reisert 7, M.Rescigno 11, L.Ristori 4, H.Sanders 1, L.Sartori 10, F.Schifano 10, F.Sforza 9, M.Shochet 1, B.Simoni 2, F.Spinella 4, P.Squillacioti 9, F.Tang 1, S.Torre 9, R.Tripiccione 10, G.Volpi 9, U.K.Yang 1, L.Zanello 11, A.M.Zanetti 5 1 University of Chicago,Illinois,USA, 2 University of Pisa, Italy, 3 University of Tsukuba,Japan, 4 INFN Sezione di Pisa, 5 INFN Sezione di Trieste, 6 University of Wisconsin,USA, 7 Fermilab,Batavia,Illinois,USA, 8 LBL,California,USA, 9 University of Siena,Italy, 10 University of Ferrara and INFN,Italy, 11 University of Rome and INFN,Italy COT tracksSVX hits Finding tracks in the silicon Low res track 2 steps: 1.Find low resolution: not time consuming 2.Fit hits at full res.: time consuming depending on the number of fits CDF DAQ & Trigger Detector Raw Data To Mass Storage (50~100 Hz) Level 1 pipeline: 42 clock cycles L1 Accept Level 2 Trigger Level 2 buffer: 4 events L2 Accept DAQ buffers L3 Farm 7.6 MHz Crossing rate Level 1 Trigger Level 2 Asynchronous 3 Stage Pipeline 20  s Latency 300 Hz accept rate Level MHz Synchromous Pipeline 5544 ns Latency 50 KHz accept rate SVT here 40 kHz accept rate 20  s average Latency ~20 kHz actual ~35  s actual Tails are important Design goals The task of the Silicon Vertex Trigger (SVT) is very complex: Links hits from five layers of the Silicon Vertex Detector (SVX) to segments observed in the Central Outer Chamber (COT) The task proceeds through steps of increasing resolution. 1.Associate hits to tracks at low resolution (roads) strongly reducing the combinatorics 2.Fit tracks and precisely determine their parameters solving the residual combinatorics Thanks to the use of Associative Memories the first step is performed in parallel during the detector readout The Silicon Vertex Trigger reconstructs in real time tracks precise enough to measure b quark decay secondary vertices. The tracks reconstructed by SVT are used for the selection of events at the Collider Detector at Fermilab (CDFII) The CDF DAQ and Trigger system is organized in three levels. The Level 2 uses the SVT tracks for the event selection The Level-2 Trigger processing time at present limits the Level-1 bandwidth depending on instantaneous luminosity. The SVT takes a significant fraction of the total Level-2 processing time whose fluctuations cause deadtime and limit the Level-2 processing rate Why was the SVT upgrade necessary? SVT processing time is well described by this model: ~c 1 +(35ns)*N(Hit) +(300ns)*N(Comb.). Left plot shows comparison between this parameterization (blue line) and data (red histogram) taken at 5x10 31 cm -2 s -1. The two histograms agree. The peak luminosity the Tevatron is expected to provide is 30x10 31 cm -2 s -1 (6 times the luminosity used to train the model). Middle plot shows the expected performances of the SVT at the maximum luminosity. 56% of events would take longer than 50  s to be processed: a time long enough for all Level 2 buffers to be filled. Impossible to run SVT at that luminosity. To reduce the processing time: Thinner patterns  less fits but bigger AM (AM++) Bigger AM  Need faster HIT-PATTERN association  new Hit Buffer (HB++) Faster Fits  new Track Fitter (TF++) Rightmost plot shows how the 512k pattern AM bank and TF++ reduce the tails The two steps upgrade 1.First install AM++, AMS/RW, TF++: allow for 128k pattern bank. AM++ inherited from FTK. TF++ and AMS/RW implemented in Pulsar 2.Second step faster HB++ in another pulsar to support the final 512k pattern bank. New Associative Memory (AM++) Pulsar: AMS/RW, TF++ and HB++ 1 st Pulsar Sequencer & Road warrior (AMS/RW) Associative Memory kpattern (AM++) 3 rd Pulsar Track Fitter (TF++) 2 nd Pulsar Hit Buffer (HB++) ~300  m Dead Time (%) Accept Rate (kHz) Phased installation of the SVT upgrade The commissioning of the SVT upgrade occurred during data taking Need to reduce the impact on the data acquisition: proceed in three phases 1.Install AMS/RW and AM++ with 128k patterns enabling only 32k patterns: major changes to the SVT crate layout 2.Install TF++ and after few days of data taking without problem enable the whole 128k patterns bank (July 2005) 3.Install HB++ and after few days of data taking without problem enable the whole 512k patterns bank (February 2006) System fully tested before installation of any board 1.Standalone test of each board: check firmaware functionality and develop the software for monitoring and debugging 2.Vertical slice tests: create a whole SVT crate with new boards and feed it with data coming from one SVT wedge to compare the output of old and new system 3.Take data with one upgraded wedge: before proceeding to the full installation we install the new boards in one wedge and take data for at least 100 hours Most of the data taken during the commissioning were good Mean processing time The average processing time of old SVT used to have a large growth at high luminosity. The faster hardware allows for smaller mean processing time reduces the dependence on the instantaneous luminosity The new system allows for a smaller latency at Level 2 Fluctuations of the processing time Large processing times measured by the distribution RMS are due to complex events They are reduced by improving the fitting stage The TF++ fits each hit combination in less time, reducing the dependence on the number of combination (175 ns instead of 300 ns) The larger pattern bank allow for thinner road and consequently a smaller number of combination to be fitted per road The upgrade reduce the dependence of the fluctuations on the luminosity providing a larger Level 1 bandwidth over a wide luminosity range Fraction of long processing time events Events with processing time higher than 50  s can cause all the Level 2 buffers to be filled and therefore deadtime The percentage of this kind of events used to be strongly dependent on the instantaneous luminosity The upgrade reduces the fraction of long processing time events and its dependence on the instantaneous luminosity With 512k patterns at luminosity of 1.5x10 31 cm -2 s -1 less than 2% of events require more than 50  s to be processed At low luminosity the bandwidth is mostly filled by B physics triggers The 128 kpattern bank already allowed to increase the minimum Level 1 Accept rate at low luminosity: from  20 kHz (blue) to  25 kHz (violet). With the 128 kpattern bank we can already collect 20% more of B decays than in the past with negligible deadtime Because of the shutdown no significant comparison with fully upgraded SVT is possible yet at high luminosities, but the power of the system has been strongly improved (see plots on the left) to be ready for the highest luminosities. Thanks to the upgrade, CDF will be able to fully exploit the increase of the Tevatron luminosity and efficiently select events containing displaced vertexes Effect of the upgrade on the DAQ The deadtime as a function of the rate of events accepted by the Level 1 (L1A) shows the upgrade impact on the performance of the DAQ. The upgrade reduces the deadtime allowing for higher output rates at Level 1 B triggers