I TEM T H 13 A – REV South Mission Beach City of San Diego San Diego County C ALIFORNIA C OASTAL C OMMISSION S AN D IEGO C OAST D ISTRICT S LIDE 1

I TEM T H 13 A – R EVOCATION R EQUEST N UMBER REVS LIDE 2 P ROJECT L OCATION Project Area Subject Site

I TEM T H 13 A – R EVOCATION R EQUEST N UMBER REVS LIDE 3 A PPROVED S ITE P LAN Existing lifeguard station to be demolished Proposed shoreline protective device Proposed lifeguard station Ocean Front Walk Ocean Existing parking, comfort station, public recreation facilities to remain

I TEM T H 13 A – R EVOCATION R EQUEST N UMBER REVS LIDE 4 P ROJECT H ISTORY Identical proposed development approved by: Permit # Approved Status CDP Feb Extension E1 Mar CDP Aug Extension E1 Oct Extension E2 May 2014 Expired Vested

I TEM T H 13 A – R EVOCATION R EQUEST N UMBER REVS LIDE 5 R EVOCATION P ROCEDURES No reconsideration of issued permit Grounds for revocation must establish: §13105(a) Intentional inclusion of inaccurate, erroneous or incomplete information where accurate or complete information would have caused the Commission to act differently; or §13105(b) Failure to comply with notice provisions where the views of the person(s) not notified were not made known to the Commission and could have caused the Commission to act differently

I TEM T H 13 A – R EVOCATION R EQUEST N UMBER REVS LIDE 6 R EVOCATION R EQUEST C ONTENTIONS : §13105( A )

I TEM T H 13 A – R EVOCATION R EQUEST N UMBER REVS LIDE 7 A PPROVED VS. F INAL P LANS Originally Approved Footprint Final Plans Footprint EastWest North facade

I TEM T H 13 A – R EVOCATION R EQUEST N UMBER REVS LIDE 8 F LOOR C OMPARISONS Originally Approved Footprint Final Plans Footprint First Floor Second FloorThird Floor

I TEM T H 13 A – R EVOCATION R EQUEST N UMBER REVS LIDE 9 R EVOCATION R EQUEST C ONTENTIONS : §13105( B )

I TEM T H 13 A – R EVOCATION R EQUEST N UMBER REVS LIDE 10 V ISUAL I MPACT A NALYSIS Proposed shoreline protective device Existing lifeguard station to be demolished Proposed lifeguard station

I TEM T H 13 A – R EVOCATION R EQUEST N UMBER REVS LIDE 11 Project Rendering, View from North Project Rendering, View from East

I TEM T H 13 A – R EVOCATION R EQUEST N UMBER REVS LIDE 12 N O G ROUNDS FOR R EVOCATION E XIST No intentional inclusion of inaccurate or incomplete information No failure to comply with noticing provisions No Coastal Act issues that were not already considered by the Commission Minor 3% increase in total building sq. ft. is not substantial and would not have caused the Commission to impose different or additional conditions or deny permit Status of subject vested CDP and grounds for revocation do not rely on validity of the site development permit No amendment to project description required because no substantial change to project