A.Nianin1 EMCal FEM noise study Goals: develope a mechanism to compute and store cell-dependent pedestals for zero-suppression in DSP’s; study the noise.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
More FED FE Testing Results Mathew Pearson & Gareth Rogers.
Advertisements

6 Mar 2002Readout electronics1 Back to the drawing board Paul Dauncey Imperial College Outline: Real system New VFE chip A simple system Some questions.
MEG Experiments Stimulation and Recording Setup Educational Seminar Institute for Biomagnetism and Biosignalanalysis February 8th, 2005.
Peter Chochula, January 31, 2006  Motivation for this meeting: Get together experts from different fields See what do we know See what is missing See.
Veto Wall Test Hyupwoo Lee MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting Oct, 3, 2007.
US FAST site test results – a global view from ROOT T. Ferguson, A. Korytov, N. Terentiev* EMU Meeting University of Florida 01/09/2004.
J. Inman, “Studies with a TPC … measure ion feedback”, REU presentation, 08-Aug of 20 Studies with a TPC and development of a procedure to measure.
GLAST LAT Project IA weekly meeting, February 3, 2006 ACD subsystem Alex Moiseev 1 ACD Pedestals ACD Team at Goddard: Alex Moiseev Dave Thomspon Bob Hartman.
DSP online algorithms for the ATLAS TileCal Read Out Drivers Cristobal Cuenca Almenar IFIC (University of Valencia-CSIC)
US FAST site test results – a global view from ROOT T. Ferguson, A. Korytov, N. Terentiev* CMS EMU Meeting The Ohio State University April 16 – 17, 2004.
South Arm FEE Performance Prior to Au run, all FEMs installed and working. Currently, 157 of 168 FEMs read out useful data. = 93.5% operational FEM losses:
Status of Oxford Setup Matthew Chalk, Erik Devetak, Johan Fopma, Brian Hawes, Ben Jeffery, Nikhil Kundu, Andrei Nomerotski University of Oxford ( 18 August.
The first testing of the CERC and PCB Version II with cosmic rays Catherine Fry Imperial College London CALICE Meeting, CERN 28 th – 29 th June 2004 Prototype.
Octal ASD Certification Tests at Michigan J. Chapman, Tiesheng Dai, & Tuan Bui August 30, CERN.
Jianchun (JC) Wang, 08/21/99 RICH Electronics and DAQ Chip Carrier Short Cable Transition Board Long Cable Data Board Crate J.C.Wang Syracuse University.
Signal Processing in PHAT (P. Decowski, A. Olszewski, H. Pernegger, P. Sarin) Outline –Requirement for the signal calculation –Layout of the measurement.
Jianchun Wang Syracuse University 10/16/99 CLEO Meeting Outline DAQ problems solved Recent results Status of DAQ Work to be done.
US FAST site test results – a global view from ROOT T. Ferguson, A. Korytov, N. Terentiev* CMS EMU Meeting The Ohio State University April 16 – 17, 2004.
ACD calibrations Pedestals Measured from online script Measure PHA w/ HV off, no charge injection Use cyclic triggers ~ ADC counts, very narrow.
Range Measurement Unit Messenger Mercury Laser Altimeter Basic Familiarization.
Performance of the PHENIX Muon Tracking System in Run-2 Ming X. Liu Los Alamos National Lab (for the PHENIX Collaboration) –Detector Commissioning –Detector.
By: Daniel BarskyNatalie Pistunovich Supervisors: Rolf HilgendorfInna Rivkin.
1 HBD Commissioning (II) Itzhak Tserruya HBD group meeting November 28, 2006 Progress from October 3 to November 28, 2006.
06/03/06Calice TB preparation1 HCAL test beam monitoring - online plots & fast analysis - - what do we want to monitor - how do we want to store & communicate.
FPGA-based Dedispersion for Fast Transient Search John Dickey 23 Nov 2005 Orange, NSW.
MR (7/7/05) T2K electronics Beam structure ~ 8 (9?) bunches / spill bunch width ~ 60 nsec bunch separation ~ 600 nsec spill duration ~ 5  sec Time between.
Readout ASIC for SiPM detector of the CTA new generation camera (ALPS) N.Fouque, R. Hermel, F. Mehrez, Sylvie Rosier-Lees LAPP (Laboratoire d’Annecy le.
Preliminary measurements for the 8 channel prototype of SPD discriminator ASIC I.The 8 channel prototype. II.Status of the test. III.Noise. IV.Gain. V.Test.
Calorimeter Data Monitoring News Benoit Viaud (LAL-in2p3) B. Viaud, Calo Mtg Aug. 31 st
1 xCAL monitoring Yu. Guz, IHEP, Protvino I.Machikhiliyan, ITEP, Moscow.
AMS Tracker Data Reduction Status Claude Zurbach Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Astroparticules – Montpellier Houston, AMS-TIM, January 08, 2007.
HBD FEE test result summary + production schedule 16mv test pulse result –5X attenuator + 20:1 resistor divider at input (to reduce the noise on the test.
Dec.11, 2008 ECL parallel session, Super B1 Results of the run with the new electronics A.Kuzmin, Yu.Usov, V.Shebalin, B.Shwartz 1.New electronics configuration.
4 th Workshop on ALICE Installation and Commissioning January 16 th & 17 th, CERN Muon Tracking (MUON_TRK, MCH, MTRK) Conclusion of the first ALICE COSMIC.
1 HBD Update: DC Meeting June 2006 Thomas K Hemmick for the HBD Crew…
A.Chekhtman1 GLAST LAT ProjectInstrument Analysis meeting, February, 27, 2006 CAL features and idiosyncrasies. Alexandre Chekhtman NRL/GMU Gamma-ray Large.
1 07/10/07 Forward Vertex Detector Technical Design – Electronics DAQ Readout electronics split into two parts – Near the detector (ROC) – Compresses and.
Glenn R. Young, ORNL 12/13/2015 BNL Core Week Computing Meeting 1 Online & Calibration/Monitoring November 11, 1998 Calibration and Monitoring - Online.
HB LED Pulser Boards By Michael Miller The University of Iowa.
1 EMC Trigger Summery from RunII and discussion for RunIII H.Torii, Kyoto Univ. ERT Lvl-1 meeting.
Drift Chamber Status Report Tokyo PHENIX Meeting.
LHCb VELO Upgrade Strip Chip Option: Data Processing Algorithms Giulio Forcolin, Abdul Afandi, Chris Parkes, Tomasz Szumlak* * AGH-Krakow Part I: LCMS.
5 June 2002DOM Main Board Engineering Requirements Review 1 DOM Main Board Software Engineering Requirements Review June 5, 2002 LBNL Chuck McParland.
The labjack. WHAT IS A LABJACK? An interface box that allows a computer to interact with the real world by collecting data and passing out instructions.
1 Level 1 Pre Processor and Interface L1PPI Guido Haefeli L1 Review 14. June 2002.
Higher Computing Science 2016 Prelim Revision. Topics to revise Computational Constructs parameter passing (value and reference, formal and actual) sub-programs/routines,
LKr readout and trigger R. Fantechi 3/2/2010. The CARE structure.
Overview of PHENIX Muon Tracker Data Analysis PHENIX Muon Tracker Muon Tracker Software Muon Tracker Database Muon Event Display Performance Muon Reconstruction.
4 May 2006May 06 PMG - Paul R1 AFEII-t Status May 4, 2006 PMG Paul Rubinov.
Calorimeter global commissioning: progress and plans Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay & CERN, 25 jun 2008.
S.MonteilPS COMMISSIONING1 MaPMT-VFE-FE ELECTRONICS COMMISSIONING AND MONITORING. OUTLINE 1)Ma-PMT TEST BENCHES MEASUREMENTS 2)VFE AND FE ELECTRONICS FEATURES.
ZDC Status A.Mestvirishvili Iowa. Quite while we had some problems with ZDC, QIE saturations, Reflections, Noise etc. To improve the situation several.
PHOTOTUBE SCANNING SETUP AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND Doug Roberts U of Maryland, College Park.
Proposal for the after-pulse effect suppression  Observation of pulses and after-pulses  Shape measurement  Algorithm  Results  Efficiencies for after-pulse.
DB and Information Flow Issues ● Selecting types of run ● L1Calo databases ● Archiving run parameters ● Tools Murrough Landon 28 April 2009.
Feb C.Smith UVA EC energy calibration – g13 pass0 For pass0 data were cooked with CALDB calibration constants reset to nominal 10 channels / MeV.
Transient Waveform Recording Utilizing TARGET7 ASIC
EZDC spectra reconstruction and calibration
CTA-LST meeting February 2015
A Digital Pulse Processing System Dedicated to CdZnTe Detectors
Italian g-2 software discussion
CMS Preshower: Startup procedures: Reconstruction & calibration
Load Weighting and Priority
Design of Digital Filter Bank and General Purpose Digital Shaper
Pulse Shape Fitting Beam Test September, October CERN
USBPix Readout System using FE-I4/A chip Status Update: Finalization of Threshold Tuning and Minor updates Jimin Kim and Austin Piehl Department of Physics.
Trigger Strategy for LOPESSTAR
Calorimeter calibrations with Flight Software.
The CMS Tracking Readout and Front End Driver Testing
Fiber Optic Transciever Buffer
Presentation transcript:

A.Nianin1 EMCal FEM noise study Goals: develope a mechanism to compute and store cell-dependent pedestals for zero-suppression in DSP’s; study the noise performance of existing FEM’s; develope a procedure which can be used for initial trouble- shooting of FEM’s on delivery; develope a standard or agreed “FEM certificate” acceptable to both the designers and physicists as a prerequisite for FEM being used for real data-taking.

A.Nianin2 Amplitude measurements in EMCal

A.Nianin3 Data Single file recorded near the end of engineering run (HV ON). Vref & Iref parameters loaded into individual ASIC boards selected to make full use of the available dynamic range (pedestals are close to 4000 counts). Data file contains events of three classes: laser pulses; pedestals; test pulse to photocell preamps What is presented - based upon pedestal events only.

A.Nianin4 FEM noise performance: Global RMS plot for HGRMS plot for low gain

A.Nianin5 High Gain leg - single cell noise High Gain Post, RMS multy-panel picture FEM 0 High Gain Post RMS FEM 1

A.Nianin6 High Gain Leg - cell dependent correlated noise FEM0FEM1

A.Nianin7 Low Gain Leg - single cell noise

A.Nianin8 Low Gain Leg - cell dependent correlated noise

A.Nianin9 TAC - cell dependent noise FEM0 FEM1

A.Nianin10 Pedestals - same cell in Pre and Post modes High Gain Low Gain Conclusion - pedestals for Pre&Post measurements are different

A.Nianin11 Pedestals - future strategy For all analysis purposes we will need to either compute the pedestals for every possible combination of a Pre&Post cells or to use pedestals computed for individual cells in Pre and Post modes. DSP software uses the second approach so we will most likely follow. Preferable software solution - reimplementing DSP as software preprocessor which will handle every event independently of its content prior to any tracing or physics analysis program. Reminder: zero suppression test Value(Post)-Ped(Post cell ) < Threshold

A.Nianin12 Pedestals - what is done for now Pedestals labeled by Post cell address were computed for every FEM channel - AMU Post cell combination. We looked for a pattern in the pedestal values in the FEM channel - AMU cell address plane. The expectations were that if pattern exists - it would signal the problem either with the actual design of FEM or timing problem in the FPGA code we are using now.

A.Nianin13 Pedestals - FEM 0 High gain Low Gain

A.Nianin14 Pedestals - FEM 1

A.Nianin15 Conclusions