Kinematics Opportunities and issues 1F. Fleuretfixed-target projects at CERN.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CMS Heavy Ion Physics Edwin Norbeck University of Iowa.
Advertisements

LHC/HERA workshop, WG 4 (17. Jan. 2005)
LHeC - Detector Layout Tracker HCAL Solenoid Dipole Muon Detector Fwd Calorimeter Inserts Bwd Calorimeter Inserts p/A e∓e∓ EMC Dipole The Large Hadron.
Diffractive DIS with E e =70GeV and E p =7TeV at the LHeC For general physics aim and sketch of machine design, see plenary talk of E. Perez … … what could.
18-Jan pp Collisions: Introduction & Kinematics Talking points based on Lectures by Hebbeker (Aachen) & Baden (Maryland) Original Notes + Extra material.
J. Leonard, U. Wisconsin 1 Commissioning the Trigger of the CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider Jessica L. Leonard Real-Time Conference Lisbon,
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
3/1/05 Status of the SHBD for the NUMI OPERA exposure D. Autiero IPN Lyon  Reminder about the proposed setup for the SHBD  Status of the sub-detectors.
SPS (Charm in Heavy Ion Collisions) Detector design A 3 rd generation experiment to study charm with proton and ion beams on fixed target at SPS.
A. Bay Beijing October Accelerators We want to study submicroscopic structure of particles. Spatial resolution of a probe ~de Broglie wavelength.
Neil Collins Birmingham Masterclass Tuesday 24 April 2007 ATLAS and the LHC.
Lausanne, Generator Miniworkshop, March 2001 Massimiliano Ferro-Luzzi, CERN/EP Beam-gas background in LHCb What nuisances for LHCb from p-A background.
17th Sep JapanTau04 - International workshop on Tau Lepton Physics1 Discovery Potential of the SM Higgs at the LHC Junichi Tanaka ICEPP, University.
1 The CMS Heavy Ion Program Michael Murray Kansas.
Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay, for the LHCb Collaboration, 16 December 2014
The CMS Muon Detector Thomas Hebbeker Aachen July 2001 Searching for New Physics with High Energy Muons.
Introduction to Accelerators Eric Torrence University of Oregon QuartNet 2005 Special Thanks to Bernd Surrow
APS Meeting April 5-8, 2003 at Philadelphia Chunhui Luo 1 Chunhui Luo Inclusive J/ψ Production at DØ.
The SLHC and the Challenges of the CMS Upgrade William Ferguson First year seminar March 2 nd
The forward detectors of CMS Experiment at LHC Bolek Wyslouch MIT
CHIC, Charme et QGP –quarkonia suppression in A+A – –J/  experimental highlights – – CHIC physics motivations– –CHIC experimental aspects– Frédéric Fleuret.
1 Some predictions and experiment prospects of the heavy ion physics at LHC C. Kobdaj, Y. Yan and K. Khosonthongkee School of Physics, Institute of Science.
1 Perspectives for quarkonium production in CMS Carlos Lourenço, on behalf of CMSQWG 2008, Nara, Japan, December 2008.
Surrounding the tracker, the calorimetry system measures with high accuracy the energy of electrons and photons as well as individual hadrons with 7500.
1 Higgs : keV precision and CP violation W. J. Murray RAL.
C. K. MackayEPS 2003 Electroweak Physics and the Top Quark Mass at the LHC Kate Mackay University of Bristol On behalf of the Atlas & CMS Collaborations.
P ARTICLE D ETECTORS Mojtaba Mohammadi IPM-CMPP- February
Neutral Current Deep Inelastic Scattering in ZEUS The HERA collider NC Deep Inelastic Scattering at HERA The ZEUS detector Neutral current cross section.
1 EIC EW Meeting, W&M, VA, May 2010 E.C. Aschenauer.
Expectations of the first 2 years of LHC operations A.Rozanov ITEP Winter School of Physics February Outline LHC Experiments SM physics Higgs SUSY.
LHeC - Detector Layout Tracker HCAL Solenoid Dipole Muon Detector Fwd Calorimeter Inserts Bwd Calorimeter Inserts p/A e∓e∓ EMC Dipole Abstract The Large.
Coil and HCAL Parameters for CLIC Solenoid and Hadron-calorimetry for a high energy LC Detector 15. December LAPP Christian Grefe CERN.
J. Velkovska1 Lecture 17: Magnetic field sources. Ampere’s law PHYS 117B.02, Feb
Lattice /Detector Integration for Target Fragmentation, Diffraction, and other Low-t Processes Charles Hyde-Wright Old Dominion University
An experiment to measure  c suppression at the CERN SPS CHIC: Charm in Heavy Ion Collisions F. Fleuret 1, F. Arleo 2, E. G. Ferreiro 3, P.-B. Gossiaux.
Proton Charge Form Factor Measurement E. Cisbani INFN Rome – Sanità Group and Italian National Institute of Health 113/Oct/2011E. Cisbani / Proton FF.
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
LHC The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is an accelerator with 27 km circumference. Being built on the France- Switzerland border west of Geneva. It will start.
First CMS Results with LHC Beam
C H I C Charm in Heavy Ion SPS 1.J/  – Suppression in A+A 2.CHIC – Physics motivations 3.CHIC – Experimental aspects 1F. Fleuret - LLR.
accelerator centers worldwide
Calorimeters Design Issues and Simulation Needs C.Woody Physics Department Brookhaven National Lab EIC Simulation Workshop Oct 9, 2012.
April 7, 2008 DIS UCL1 Tevatron results Heidi Schellman for the D0 and CDF Collaborations.
Know How at LLR Ultra-granular calorimetry AFTER vs CHIC 1F. Fleuret - LLR11/05/ LPSC.
IR-Design 0.44 m Q5 D5 Q4 90 m 10 mrad m 3.67 mrad 60 m m 18.8 m 16.8 m 6.33 mrad 4 m Dipole © D.Trbojevic 30 GeV e GeV p.
1 Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Fergus Wilson, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2) 3.Collider Experiments.
July 27, 2002CMS Heavy Ions Bolek Wyslouch1 Heavy Ion Physics with the CMS Experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Bolek Wyslouch MIT for the CMS Collaboration.
Yen-Jie Lee (CERN) 1 MBUE working group 2012 Yen-Jie Lee (CERN) for the CMS Collaboration MBUE working group CERN 3 rd Dec, 2012 Two-particle correlations.
Steve Playfer University of Edinburgh 15th Novemebr 2008 Large Hadron Collider at CERN.
E. Todesco, Milano Bicocca January-February 2016 Unit 2 Magnets for circular accelerators: the interaction regions Ezio Todesco European Organization for.
H. Matis, S. Hedges, M. Placidi, A. Ratti, W. Turner [+several students] (LBNL) R. Miyamoto (now at ESSS) H. Matis - LARP CM18 - May 8, Fluka Modeling.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
E.C. AschenauerEIC INT Program, Seattle Week 81.
Charged particle yields and spectra in p+p and Heavy Ion Collisions with ATLAS at the LHC Jiří Dolejší (Charles University Prague) for the ATLAS collaboration.
Overview on CERN Test Beam Facilities On behalf of the CERN SPS/PS test beam coordinator: Horst Breuker, CERN Courtesy: Matteo Alfonsi, CERN Horst Breuker,
AFTER/CHIC experimental connections
Energy deposition studies on magnets. Aim. First applications
First data from TOTEM experiment at LHC
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
PEDESTAL STABILITY OF HCAL DURING GLOBAL RUNS AND 2009 CASTOR DQM ANALYSIS Emine GÜRPINAR Cukurova University 7/31/2018.
How to detect protons from exclusive processes
The Large Hadron Collider
Welcome to the CMS Virtual Visit
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 6th May 2009 Fergus Wilson, RAL.
LHC Beam Operations Past, Present and Future
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
The Measurement of Forward Particle Production in LHC
Installation, Commissioning and Startup of ATLAS & CMS Experiments
Main Design Parameters RHIC Magnets for MEIC Ion Collider Ring
LS 1 start date 12th June Schedule Extension 2012 run Extension of 2012 run approved by the DG on 3rd July 2012.
Presentation transcript:

kinematics Opportunities and issues 1F. Fleuretfixed-target projects at CERN

Luminosity F. Fleuret2 Intensity: expect protons.s -1 – Beam: 2808 bunches of 1.15x10 11 protons = 3.2x10 14 protons – Bunch: Each bunch passes IP: km.s -1 /27 km ~ 11 kHz – Instantaneous extraction: IP sees 2808 x 11000~ bunches passing every second  extract / ~ extract 16 protons in each bunch at each pass – Integrated extraction: Over a 10h run: extract p x 3600s.h -1 x 10h= p.run -1  extract 1.8 x /(3.2 x )~5.6% of the protons stored in the beam Instantaneous Luminosity L = N beam x N Target = N beam x (  x e x N A )/A – N beam =5 x 10 8 p + /s – e (target thickness) = 1 cm Integrated luminosity – 9 months running/year –  1year ~ 10 7 s –   year L = L inst x10 7 Intensity: expect protons.s -1 – Beam: 2808 bunches of 1.15x10 11 protons = 3.2x10 14 protons – Bunch: Each bunch passes IP: km.s -1 /27 km ~ 11 kHz – Instantaneous extraction: IP sees 2808 x 11000~ bunches passing every second  extract / ~ extract 16 protons in each bunch at each pass – Integrated extraction: Over a 10h run: extract p x 3600s.h -1 x 10h= p.run -1  extract 1.8 x /(3.2 x )~5.6% of the protons stored in the beam Instantaneous Luminosity L = N beam x N Target = N beam x (  x e x N A )/A – N beam =5 x 10 8 p + /s – e (target thickness) = 1 cm Integrated luminosity – 9 months running/year –  1year ~ 10 7 s –   year L = L inst x10 7 Targ  (g.cm -3 ) A L inst (  b -1.s -1 )  year L (pb -1.y -1 ) Liq H Liq D Be Cu W Pb Reach few fb -1 with 10cm liq H/D target fixed-target projects at CERN

Rapidity Energy – rapidity 3F. Fleuret p+p run : 7 TeV p  p : E CMS = GeV Pb+Pb run : 2.75 TeV p  p : E CMS = 71.8 GeV p+p run : 7 TeV p  p : y CMS = 4.8 Energy Pb+Pb run : 2.75 TeV p  p : y CMS = 4.3 fixed-target projects at CERN

Pseudo-rapidity  * =  – y CMS forward region:  *>0 backward region:  *<0 Very high boost: – With 7 TeV beam :  = 61.1 – With 2.75 TeV beam:  = 38.3 Very well placed to access backward physics Forward physics difficult to access  * =  – y CMS forward region:  *>0 backward region:  *<0 Very high boost: – With 7 TeV beam :  = 61.1 – With 2.75 TeV beam:  = 38.3 Very well placed to access backward physics Forward physics difficult to access 4F. Fleuret 7 TeV 2.75 TeV  *=-4.5  *=-4  *=-3.5  *=0 y CMS = 4.8 y CMS = 4.3  *=-4.8  *=-4.3 fixed-target projects at CERN

Detector constraint Geometry – The geometry of the detector is related to the geometry of the magnet – The magnet geometry is constrained by the outgoing particle momentum – In principle If p T > p L use a solenoid If p L > p T use a dipole Geometry – The geometry of the detector is related to the geometry of the magnet – The magnet geometry is constrained by the outgoing particle momentum – In principle If p T > p L use a solenoid If p L > p T use a dipole F. Fleuret5 solenoid  detector parallel to the beam dipole  detector transverse to the beam large p T particles  Solenoid is better large p L particles  Dipole is better B B B pTpT pLpL B fixed-target projects at CERN

Detector constraint Geometry – In principle : If p T > p L use a solenoid, if p L > p T use a dipole Converting p T =p L in rapidity frame Geometry – In principle : If p T > p L use a solenoid, if p L > p T use a dipole Converting p T =p L in rapidity frame F. Fleuret6 If p T > p L,  *<-4 If p T -4 In principle: one should use a solenoid to access  *<-4 one should use a dipole to access  *>-4 In principle: one should use a solenoid to access  *<-4 one should use a dipole to access  *>-4 pTpT fixed-target projects at CERN  pLpL p T =p L   = 45°    * = 0.88 – 4.8 ~ -4 

Longitudinal detector Typical detector : – -4.8 < y* < -3.5 – Multipurpose detector Vertex Tracking calorimetry Compact detector – Because of the high boost, the detector must be as compact as possible – Compact calorimeters (Calice) EMCal ~ 20 cm long HCal ~ 1 m long – Vertexing + Tracking 80 cm should be enough To be checked Typical detector : – -4.8 < y* < -3.5 – Multipurpose detector Vertex Tracking calorimetry Compact detector – Because of the high boost, the detector must be as compact as possible – Compact calorimeters (Calice) EMCal ~ 20 cm long HCal ~ 1 m long – Vertexing + Tracking 80 cm should be enough To be checked F. Fleuret7  *=-4 vertex tracking EMCal HCal solenoid fixed-target projects at CERN

Transverse detector F. Fleuret8 EMcal Hcal MuID ~1 m ~0.1 m~0.2 m ~1 m~2 m  *=0 fixed-target projects at CERN

Transverse detector Go forward ? – Possibility to access y*=1 by shifting the detectors Go forward ? – Possibility to access y*=1 by shifting the detectors F. Fleuret9 Detector Z min /Z max at  *=0 Z min /Z max at  *=1 Vertex 40/50 cm100/110 cm Tracker 50/150 cm200/300 cm EMCal 150/170 cm400/420 cm Hcal 170/270 cm500/600 cm muons 270/470 cm800/1000 cm fixed-target projects at CERN

Longitudinal.vs. Transverse Impossible to deal with the two magnets at the same time Two options : – limit ourself to -3.5<  *<0 (1) – build two setups Impossible to deal with the two magnets at the same time Two options : – limit ourself to -3.5<  *<0 (1) – build two setups F. Fleuret10 tracking EMCal HCal solenoid fixed-target projects at CERN Note that: Don’t need longitudinal detector !

conclusion LHC – Very high luminosity accessible : up to fb -1.y -1 – E CMS = 114.6/71.8 GeV in p+p/Pb+Pb – y CMS =4.8/4.3 in p+p/Pb+Pb Detector : two options – Measuring -4.8 <  *<-3.5  longitudinal/solenoid – Measuring -3.5 <  * < 0 (1)  transverse/dipole – Not possible to run both detectors at the same time, but, in principle, we don’t need to reach  *<-3.5 to access x F =-1. LHC – Very high luminosity accessible : up to fb -1.y -1 – E CMS = 114.6/71.8 GeV in p+p/Pb+Pb – y CMS =4.8/4.3 in p+p/Pb+Pb Detector : two options – Measuring -4.8 <  *<-3.5  longitudinal/solenoid – Measuring -3.5 <  * < 0 (1)  transverse/dipole – Not possible to run both detectors at the same time, but, in principle, we don’t need to reach  *<-3.5 to access x F =-1. 11F. Fleuretfixed-target projects at CERN