1 NGA Mission - Data – Collaboration 2009 Workshop on Monitoring North American Geoid Change 21 Oct 2009 NGA Mission - Data – Collaboration 2009 Workshop.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The OCTAS Project, the geoid, the mean sea surface and and the mean dynamic topography By Dag Solheim Norwegian Mapping Authority Co-authors A. Hunegnaw,
Advertisements

A Comparison of topographic effect by Newton’s integral and high degree spherical harmonic expansion – Preliminary Results YM Wang, S. Holmes, J Saleh,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey SRTM Level-2, ASTER GDEM Quality comparison Wm Matthew Cushing 18 February 2011, Sao Paulo Brazil.
From TOPEX-POSEIDON to JASON Science Working Team Meeting GRACE Mission Status Arles, France November 18-21, 2003 Byron D. Tapley (Principal Investigator)
New software for the World Magnetic Model (WMM) Adam Woods (1, 2), Manoj Nair (1,2), Stefan Maus (1,2), Susan McLean (1) 1. NOAA’s National Geophysical.
The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 43 Science and.
ASIC**3 Workshop -- May 2006 Measuring Global Sea Level Rise With Satellite Radar Altimetry ASIC**3 Workshop -- May 2006 Laury Miller NOAA/NESDIS Lab for.
Geographic Datums Y X Z The National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) and the Defense Mapping School Reviewed by:____________ Date:_________ Objective:
The Physical Setting Physical oceanography Instructor: Dr. Cheng-Chien LiuCheng-Chien Liu Department of Earth Sciences National Cheng Kung University Last.
Dynamic Planet 2005 Cairns, Australia August 2005
Know the Earth…Show the Way NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Approved for Public Release NGA Case # NGA’s Role in GPS Barbara Wiley.
NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey USGG2009 & GEOID09: New geoid height models for surveying/GIS ACSM-MARLS-UCLS-WFPS Conference FEB 2009 Salt Lake.
Use of G99SSS to evaluate the static gravity geopotential derived from the GRACE, CHAMP, and GOCE missions Daniel R. Roman and Dru A. Smith Session: GP52A-02Decade.
Error Analysis of the NGS Gravity Database Jarir Saleh, Xiaopeng Li, Yan Ming Wang, Dan Roman and Dru Smith, NOAA/NGS/ERT Paper: G , 04 July 2011,
Advances and Best Practices in Airborne Gravimetry from the U.S. GRAV-D Project Theresa M. Damiani 1, Vicki Childers 1, Sandra Preaux 2, Simon Holmes 3,
Puerto Rico Airborne Gravity Data Modeling
Marine Observation and Data Expert Group Meeting, 12 – 13 October 2011 GEBCO The name is used for the organisation, the people involved, and the products.
GRAV-D Project Update Vicki Childers, Ph.D. GRAV-D Project Manager.
1 Assessment of Geoid Models off Western Australia Using In-Situ Measurements X. Deng School of Engineering, The University of Newcastle, Australia R.
ESA Living Planet Symposium, Bergen, T. Gruber, C. Ackermann, T. Fecher, M. Heinze Institut für Astronomische und Physikalische Geodäsie (IAPG)
Mr.Samniang Suttara B.Eng. (Civil), M.Eng. (Survey) Topcon Instruments (Thailand) Co.,Ltd. Tel Satellite Surveying.
Geoid Modeling at NOAA Dru A. Smith, Ph.D. National Geodetic Survey National Ocean Service, NOAA November 13, 2000.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Image: MODIS Land Group,
Geoid Height Models at NGS Dan Roman Research Geodesist.
CryoSat Workshop, March 9, CryoSat: showing the way to a future of improved ocean mapping Walter H. F. Smith NOAA Lab for.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Altimetric Bathymetry Model Excels Global bathymetry model combines depths.
Last Time: Ground Penetrating Radar Radar reflections image variations in Dielectric constant  r ( = relative permittivity )  3-40 for most Earth materials;
1 J July, Ionospheric Calibration for the GFO AltimeterXiaoqing JPL Review Ionospheric Calibration for the GFO Altimeter Xiaoqing Pi Byron.
TERRESTRIAL REFERENCE SYSTEMS FOR GLOBAL NAVIGATION SATELLITE SYSTEMS
The National Geodetic Survey Gravity Program Benefits and Opportunities Juliana Blackwell, Director National Geodetic Survey (NGS)
NOAA National Geophysical Data Center & collocated World Data Centers, Boulder CO USA World Data Center for Marine Geology and Geophysics, Boulder, CO.
Data Requirements for a 1-cm Accurate Geoid
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® U.S. Army Corps of Engineers W. Jeff Lillycrop Technical Director Engineer Research and Development Center.
Shape of the Earth, Geoid, Global Positioning System, Map Coordinate Systems, and Datums Or how you can impress your friend on a hike D. Ravat University.
Numerical aspects of the omission errors due to limited grid size in geoid computations Yan Ming Wang National Geodetic Survey, USA VII Hotine-Marussi.
Spectral characteristics of the Hellenic vertical network - Validation over Central and Northern Greece using GOCE/GRACE global geopotential models Vassilios.
Effect of High Resolution Altimetric Gravity Anomalies on the North America Geoid Computations Yan M. Wang and D. Roman National Geodetic Survey NOAA Montreal,
GRACE Mascons and Hydrological Data for the Continents: GRACE ACCESS D. Rowlands (1), F. Lemoine (1), S. Luthcke (1), S. Klosko (2), D. Chinn (2), K. Akoumany.
Lecture 21 – The Geoid 2 April 2009 GISC-3325.
An Overview of the Observations of Sea Level Change R. Steven Nerem University of Colorado Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences Colorado Center.
Shipboard Automated Meteorological and Oceanographic System (SAMOS) Initiative: A Key Component of an Ocean Observing System Shawn R. Smith Center for.
Progress in Geoid Modeling from Satellite Missions
Case study on heterogeneous geoid/ quasigeoid based on space borne and terrestrial data combination with special consideration of GOCE mission data impact.
AUSGeoid Richard Bean Robyn Stevens 26 May Geoid 3D surface of equal gravity (Equipotential) Not smooth like an ellipsoid Transformation needed.
Gravity Lidar Study for 2006: A First Look D.R. Roman, V.A. Childers, D.L. Rabine, S.A. Martinka, Y.M. Wang, J.M. Brozena, S.B. Luthcke, and J.B. Blair.
Tide corrections from KGPS and a precise geoid
Data for Plate Tectonics Earthquakes –World wide network for detecting nuclear tests Magnetic stripes –From World War 2 submarine detection Bathymetry.
International Symposium on Gravity, Geoid and Height Systems GGHS 2012, Venice, Italy 1 GOCE data for local geoid enhancement Matija Herceg Per Knudsen.
Full Resolution Geoid from GOCE Gradients for Ocean Modeling Matija Herceg & Per Knudsen Department of Geodesy DTU Space living planet symposium 28 June.
C.C.Tscherning, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen. Improvement of Least-Squares Collocation error estimates using local GOCE Tzz signal standard.
Recent Investigations Towards Achieving a One Centimeter Geoid Daniel R. Roman & Dru A. Smith U.S. National Geodetic Survey GGG 2000, Session 9 The Challenge.
A comparison of different geoid computation procedures in the US Rocky Mountains YM Wang 1, H Denker 2, J Saleh 3, XP Li 3, DR Roman 1, D Smith 1 1 National.
Improved Marine Gravity from CryoSat and Jason-1 David T. Sandwell, Emmanuel Garcia, and Walter H. F. Smith (April 25, 2012) gravity anomalies from satellite.
Investigation of the use of deflections of vertical measured by DIADEM camera in the GSVS11 Survey YM Wang 1, X Li 2, S Holmes 3, DR Roman 1, DA Smith.
Improving Regional Geoid by optimal Combination of GRACE Gravity Model and Surface Gravity Data YM Wang, DR Roman and J Saleh National Geodetic Survey.
Mayer-Gürr et al.ESA Living Planet, Bergen Torsten Mayer-Gürr, Annette Eicker, Judith Schall Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformation University.
GRAV-D: NGS Gravity for the Re- definition of the American Vertical Datum Project V. A. Childers, D. R. Roman, D. A. Smith, and T. M. Diehl* U.S. National.
ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway A. Albertella, R. Rummel, R. Savcenko, W. Bosch, T. Janjic, J.Schroeter, T. Gruber, J.
The OC in GOCE: A review The Gravity field and Steady-state Ocean Circulation Experiment Marie-Hélène RIO.
An oceanographic assessment of the GOCE geoid models accuracy S. Mulet 1, M-H. Rio 1, P. Knudsen 2, F. Siegesmund 3, R. Bingham 4, O. Andersen 2, D. Stammer.
GOCE Gravity Field Models – Overview and Performance Analysis Th. Gruber*, R. Rummel* & High Level Processing Facility (HPF) Team *Institute of Astronomical.
How Do we Estimate Gravity Field? Terrestrial data –Measurements of surface gravity –Fit spherical harmonic coefficients Satellite data –Integrate equations.
ESA Living Planet Symposium, 29 June 2010, Bergen (Norway) GOCE data analysis: the space-wise approach and the space-wise approach and the first space-wise.
1 UPWARD CONTINUATION OF DOME-C AIRBORNE GRAVITY AND COMPARISON TO GOCE GRADIENTS AT ORBIT ALTITUDE IN ANTARCTICA Hasan Yildiz (1), Rene Forsberg (2),
Dynamic Planet 2005 Cairns, Australia August 2005
GEBCO (GENERAL BATHYMETRIC CHART
Hydrographic Commission United States of America National Report
Daniel Rieser, Christian Pock, Torsten Mayer-Guerr
Advances and Best Practices in Airborne Gravimetry from the U. S
Presentation transcript:

1 NGA Mission - Data – Collaboration 2009 Workshop on Monitoring North American Geoid Change 21 Oct 2009 NGA Mission - Data – Collaboration 2009 Workshop on Monitoring North American Geoid Change 21 Oct 2009 UNCLASSIFIED James Friederich James Friederich UINCLASSIFIED

2 Overview Earth Gravitational Model 2008 Digital Bathymetry and Elevation Data World Magnetic Model Collaboration on Geoid UNCLASSIFIED

3 Earth Gravitational Model 2008 UNCLASSIFIED UINCLASSIFIED

4 5  5  g Data Sources (v010808) UNCLASSIFIED

5 5  5  g Data Standard Deviations (v010808) UNCLASSIFIED

6 Statistics of 5  5  g (mGal) (v010808) Statistics refer to edited and downward continued gravity anomalies. The area void of high quality 5´ data (~16% of the globe) is also the “roughest” area of the gravity anomaly field. Source % Area Min. Max. RMS RMS  ArcGP Altimetry Terrestrial Fill-in Non Fill-in All ( , ) 19.4°, 293.5°10.8°, 286.3° UNCLASSIFIED

7 The Development of EGM2008 ITG-GRACE03S (Torsten Mayer-Gürr, 2007), along with its complete error covariance matrix to Nmax=180, was used. Least-Squares Adjustment, in terms of Ellipsoidal Harmonic coefficients, was used in order to combine the GRACE-only information with the coefficients implied solely by the terrestrial data. Evaluation, considering residual 5  5  g, GPS/Leveling, Astronomic Deflections of the Vertical, TOPEX Altimetry, the MIT ECCO DOT output, and GRACE KBRR data, was performed. Error Calibration, to optimize data combination and produce realistic propagated errors for various functionals, up to Nmax=2159, with geographic specificity (see Pavlis and Saleh, 2004), was performed. EGM2008 does NOT incorporate any GPS/Leveling or Astronomic Deflections of the Vertical data. UNCLASSIFIED

8 Spectra Related to the EGM2008 Model UNCLASSIFIED

9 EGM2008 Geoid Height UNCLASSIFIED

10 AbsVal of EGM2008 – EGM96 UNCLASSIFIED

11 5  5 Residual  g (Nmax=180) UNCLASSIFIED

12 EGM  5  Commission Error (Nmax=2159) UNCLASSIFIED

13 EGM  5  Commission Error (Nmax=2159) UNCLASSIFIED

14 EGM  5  Commission Error (Nmax=2159) UNCLASSIFIED

15 Region RMS σ N (cm) RMS σ ξ (arcsec) RMS σ η (arcsec) | φ | <66° and Ocean 5.8 (5.2)0.38 (~0.30)0.39 (~0.30) CONUS 5.9 (4.8)0.47 (1.12)0.47 (1.16) Land18.3 (~10.3)1.69 Ocean Globe EGM2008 Commission Error Estimates (Nmax=2159) Parenthetical values represent observed performance based on comparisons with independent data. However, the comparison results include also the omission error of the model. UNCLASSIFIED

16 Summary and Model Availability EGM2008 has been developed and is freely available – Overall, EGM2008 maintains or improves upon the performance of EGM96 for terrestrial applications (geoid undulations, deflections of the vertical, DOT, etc.). EGM2008 drastically improves upon the performance of EGM96 for various satellite applications (mostly GRACE- related) UNCLASSIFIED

17 Digital Bathymetry and Elevation Data UNCLASSIFIED UINCLASSIFIED

18 Digital Bathymetry and Elevation Data (DBED) A point prediction of global bathymetry and elevation data based on DTED 0 format Major Bathymetry Source Data –NGA Open Source Bathymetry Database –Danish National Space Center Sea Surface Altimetry –Smith and Sandwell Sea Surface Altimetry Major Elevation Source Data – SRTM, DTED, USGS-GTOPO30, Australia DEM, Danish National Space Center Greenland DEM UNCLASSIFIED

19 Digital Bathymetry and Elevation Data (DBED) SRTM2f Antarctic DEM Greenland DEM Various data Unclassified elevation data sources UNCLASSIFIED

20 Digital Bathymetry and Elevation Data (DBED) United States National Geophysical Data Center US Geologic Survey Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory Scripps Research Institute Japan Japan Oceanographic Data Center Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology Australia Dept of Environment and Water Resources Geoscience Australia United Kingdom British Geological Survey Natural Environment Research Council Germany Institute for Oceanography Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research International Organizations PANGAEA UN – Oceans and Law of the Sea International Bathymetric Chart of the Arctic Ocean International Bathymetric Chart of the Southern Ocean Unclassified Open Source Bathymetry Contributions - partial list UNCLASSIFIED

21 NGA Open Source Bathymetry Holdings January 2009 – 1.4 billion points from ship tracks and DEMs IBCAO DEM Australia DEM Ship Tracks White Areas – Data Voids UNCLASSIFIED

22 Digital Bathymetry and Elevation Data (DBED) 64,800 one-degree cells of seamless elevation and bathymetry data in DTED0 format UNCLASSIFIED

23 DBED 1 Degree Cell Accuracy Estimates UNCLASSIFIED

24 DBED Way Forward Future annual releases –include more/new Open Source bathymetry data –improved bathymetry prediction algorithms from Sea Surface Altimetry data Littoral Geotechnical bathymetry prediction Littoral Tide Model prediction Web Service to select specific areas Public Release version UNCLASSIFIED

25 World Magnetic Model UNCLASSIFIED UINCLASSIFIED

26 NGA / DOD World Magnetic Model Produced by the National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC) and the British Geological Survey (BGS) The release of the WMM-2010 will be available on 15 December, The file format remains the same as the current wmm.cof fil WMM-2005 UNCLASSIFIED

27 NGA / NGDC Enhanced Magnetic Model A new Enhanced Magnetic Model for improved navigation will also be available –new data file, new algorithm NGDC-720 model UNCLASSIFIED

28 Collaboration on Geoid UNCLASSIFIED UINCLASSIFIED

29 NGA Mission NGA main mission is to support the US Department of Defense, Intelligence Community, and Commonwealth Partners Collection, processing, evaluation of gravity data sets Maintaining and improving global geoid models UNCLASSIFIED

30 Areas of Collaboration Funding – Monies to support External Projects & Research and Travel are tight; always seeking collaborative efforts Equipment – NGA has absolute and relative gravimeters that could be available for loan Reference Base Stations – various reports, sketches, descriptions, data values available Personnel – limited availability beyond NGA mission UNCLASSIFIED

31 Areas of Collaboration NGA’s Releasable Unclassified Data – including gravity anomaly/point data, elevation data sets, geoids Relative Gravity Software – NGA has provided Gravnet software and training; improvements, upgrades possible Data Center – limited capability (beyond core mission) to process, evaluate, database survey data and information UNCLASSIFIED

32 UNCLASSIFIED James Friederich James Friederich