Survey Overview: - Promotion: Metro rider alerts, instant updates and through the CAC - Conducted online from Dec. 3 – 31, 2013 - 17 multiple choice.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Innovations in Multi-Modal Transit Mapping Margaret Carragher E.I.T Advisor: Dr. Kari Watkins P.E. October 16, 2013 GIS in Transit Conference, Washington.

Advertisements

Blueprint for Transportation Excellence Downtown CAG January 16, 2014.

4.12 U NDERSTAND DATA - COLLECTION METHODS TO EVALUATE THEIR APPROPRIATENESS FOR THE RESEARCH PROBLEM / ISSUE Understand promotion and intermediate.

Marketing 1 Dr. Mohammed A. Nasseef BUS 232 Marketing Plan and Research.

2.06 Understand data-collection methods to evaluate their appropriateness for the research problem/issue.

On-board Survey of Bus and Light Rail Customers May 8, 2006 Transit Marketing, LLC CJI Research Corporation.

Dallas Area Rapid Transit Safety & Security Campaign Spring 2012 to Present.

Asia’s Fashion Jewellery & Accessories Fair – September 2012 Exhibitor Survey Report.

Demand for bus and Rail Analyzing a corridor with a similar Level Of Service 5 th Israeli-British/Irish Workshop in Regional Science April, 2007.

METRO Rail Intercept Survey Findings, Data Uses AMPO Travel Modeling Work Group October 1, 2009.

Powered by FAST Customer Survey Tuesday, February 17, 2015.

City of West Covina Green Line Evaluation. Presented By Presented By Joanne Coletta Jim Jobst Leticia Llamas Kelly McDonald Ana Rosales Enrique Salgado.

1 Overview Purpose Methodology Results Conclusions and recommendations.

TNS Proprietary: © Linking Employee Compensation to Survey Metrics High-Level Considerations and Best Practices January, 2006.

Transportation Operations/Mobility in the Baltimore Region Customer Satisfaction Survey AMPO Operations Work Group September 28-29, 2006 Las Vegas.

Alasdair Cain & Jennifer Flynn National Bus Rapid Transit Institute Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida Mark McCourt &

1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.

Summary of Fare Change Feedback and Proposal Hillary Foose Director, Communication & Marketing.

Courtesy of: Kynda R. Curtis, Ph.D. Assistant Professor and State Extension Specialist Department of Resource Economics University of Nevada, Reno.

1 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Customer Satisfaction Measurement FY 2006 Q3 Comparison April 28, 2006.

FAST CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY COMPARISON

Feasibility Study Jonathan CalderwoodJune 14, 2013 West Shore Communities Feasibility of Sustainable Transportation with Passenger Ferry Service.

MARKET RESEARCH. CH. 6: MARKET RESEARCH  A business must satisfy the needs of its customers to succeed  To find out what customers need/want  Businesses.

SCAT Survey Results: 2013 Proposed Merger & Privatization with MCAT Summary: Survey posted to the public Sept. 25 thru Oct. 16, ,575 respondents.

Metrobus 30s Line Study Improving Your Customer’s Transit Experience Virginia Transit Association May 20,

Redesigned schedules signaled riders to the new transit network and differentiated from old information. Schedules were color coded to easily identify.

On-Board Transit Survey Presentation to TCC Dec. 13, 2002 Heather Alhadeff, AICP

Welcome! 1.Project Description 2.Scope and Approach 3.Prototype 4.Final Evaluation 5.Summary 6.Closing Comments Overview Team Cree Vilia Ingriany Alvin.

Prepared by: DECEMBER 2008 Metro Transit Light- Rail and Bus Rider Survey FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PERISCOPE.

Marketing Research 101 Developing a research study to define a problem or opportunity.

2012 CITY OF MIDDLETON SATISFACTION SURVEY WORKING DRAFT - PROPOSAL.

OLQP 2015 Survey Results Presented at Town Hall Meeting March 31, 2015.

MARKETING SURVEYS Constructing the Questionnaire validity  A questionnaire has validity when the questions asked measure what they were intended.

Alachua County Community Survey Report. Report Outline Analysis of survey tool Description of population and sample Zip Code Response Rates Findings Other.

Guidance for Completing Interim Report I Evaluation Webinar Series 3 Dec 2013.

An Alumni Survey Jack Beidler Computing Science University of Scranton Scranton, PA 18510

Metro’s Capital Improvement Needs Presented to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board By Tom Harrington, Director of Long Range Planning.

Concordia Publishing House ETM 627: Quality Management Date: September 16, 2014 Team Members: Ryan Jones, Raven Malone, Kayla Dunbar.

4 Conducting Marketing Research 1. What is Marketing Research? Marketing research is the systematic design, collection, analysis, and reporting of data.

Military Family Services Program Participant Survey Briefing Notes.

Transportation Demand Management Overview November 2006 James Stutz Transportation Supervising Planner TDM and Marketing Unit Office of Transit & Ridesharing.

Capabilities Overview Regional Public Transportation Authority Coyote Crisis Collaborative Community Workshop April 26, 2012.

Developing A Questionnaire

E C A T. Vision and Strategy Q UESTION: If transit was thought of as a rider-centric service, how would the structure of our current system change? A.

Focusing QuestionFocusing Question | Mini Lesson | Writer’s Work Time | Lesson SummaryMini LessonWriter’s Work TimeLesson Summary Create a Survey- Int.

Question Everything.  Questionnaire should be: ◦ Valid – Questions should measure what was meant to be measured ◦ Reliable – Should give you the same.

Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority: The Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority is a multimodal organization serving the Buffalo Niagara Region.

Copyright 2010 Delmar, a part of Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. H O S P I T A L I T Y & T R A V E L M A R K E T I N G & T R A V E L M A R K E T.

Purpose To develop and deploy a Metro Bus Tracking System (MBTS) Two main goals: – Provide the metro administration a tool to track and report on the status.

Social Science Inquiry Model An investigation that follows a formal procedure.

City of Phoenix Public Transit Department Phoenix Transit Technology September 21, 2007 City of Phoenix Public Transit Department Phoenix Transit Technology.

Prepared by: May Metro Transit Train and Bus Rider Surveys COMPARATIVE RESULTS Bruce Howard Director of Marketing.

2009 COMMUNITY SURVEY Presentation of Final Results January 21, 2010.

Marketing Research Developing a research Questionnaire.

Mr. J. Fletcher ENT 12. Putting the right product in the right place, at the right price, at the right time.

AS Leisure Studies Unit 2 – A People Business. Starter How can a leisure facility find out how good its customer service is?

2011 RTD Customer Satisfaction Research Results: Executive Summary – Ops Committee March 2013.

RCPS Transportation Department Overview Spring 2012.

Photos by Susie Fitzhugh Bell Times Analysis Task Force (Metro Service) (January 22, 2015date)

Service Guidelines and Standards Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority Board of Directors Meeting September 2015 capmetro.org |1.

BUS 642 Entire Course (2 Sets) FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT This Tutorial Contains 2 Sets of Assignments for All Weeks, Check Details.

Chapter 29 Conducting Market Research. Objectives  Explain the steps in designing and conducting market research  Compare primary and secondary data.

Service Development Process 1. Our mission: To meet our constituents’ present and future public transit needs by offering safe, clean, reliable, courteous,

Transportation System Engineering 1 , 61360

Marketing Plan – Metro Bikes

Marketing Research Developing a Research Questionnaire Written by: Meghan Hatcher Georgia CTAE Resource Network 2010.

The Marketing Survey By: Master Ence.

Use of Transportation Network Companies among MARTA Patrons

Jason Minser Director of Customer Research METRO (WMATA)

Access Services Customer Satisfaction Survey Summary of Recommended Topics Community Advisory Committee July 9, 2019.

Presentation transcript:

Survey Overview: - Promotion: Metro rider alerts, instant updates and through the CAC - Conducted online from Dec. 3 – 31, multiple choice questions with comment sections responses were received 26% answered section on Metro Bus; 33% - Metro Rail; 42% - Both - Response scale: ExcellentGoodNeeds ImprovementPoor SatisfactoryUnsatisfactory

Respondents who are satisfied with the cleanliness of the exterior of Metro Buses is 60%. 343 customers responded to this inquiry.

Conditions observed regularly on Metro Bus: 343 customers responded to this inquiry.

Respondents who are satisfied with the cleanliness of Metro Bus Shelters is 43%. 7% of respondents do not use shelters during their trips. 343 customers responded to this inquiry.

Conditions observed regularly at Metro Bus Shelters: 343 customers responded to this inquiry.

Respondents who are satisfied with the cleanliness of the exterior of rail cars is 66%. 348 customers responded to this inquiry.

Conditions observed regularly while using Metro Rail: 348 customers responded to this inquiry.

Respondents rated the cleanliness of various components at Metro Transit Centers as follows: 343 customers responded to this inquiry.

Conditions observed regularly at Metro Transit Centers: 343 customers responded to this inquiry.

1 (very poor) – 3% 2 – 4% 3 – 10% 4 – 15% 5 – 18% 6 – 16% 7 – 17% 8 – 13% 9 – 3% 10 (outstanding) – 1% Respondents rated the cleanliness of Metro vehicles and facilities as follows: Respondents indicated the general level of cleanliness of Metro vehicles and facilities as follows: 502 customers responded to these inquiries.

66 relative comments received. - Favorable More focus appears to be placed on maintaining the level of cleanliness throughout the Metro system than in the past. - Unfavorable Primary concerns are related to soiled seats, gritty floors and odor within the Metro system. 272 customers responded to this inquiry.