Oklahoma State University NGTDr. Camille DeYongSlide 1 Nominal Group Technique (NGT) Developed by Delbecq and Van de Ven in the early 1970s Useful to define.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Support Services Department- Leadership Teams Alignment: Setting and Communicating Direction.

Advertisements

THE NOMINAL GROUP TECHNIQUE

Nominal Group Technique Heather Hatch Quality Management, Winter 2010.

Nominal Group Technique (NGT) With Multivoting Paula Mower WISD Director Assessment and Organizational Development February 2012.

Creative Thinking.

An Introduction to Working Together

Nominal Group Technique Designed to promote group participation in the decision making process Everyone as a voice. Used by Small Groups to Reach consensus.

The Nominal Group Technique Presented to the: Brimbank Community 2009 National Health and Medical Research Council Public Health (Allied Health Professional)

WORKING TOGETHER AS A TEAM Why Should I Care? Crucial Activities for Team Undercurrents Stages of Team Growth Recipe for a Successful Team Working Through.

Reduce Waiting & No-Shows  Increase Admissions & Continuation The A’hah’s of Change Dave Gustafson Director of NIATx and Center for Health.

5.1.2 Situative Planning 1 Situative Planning - A Strategic Approach to Urban Planning UPA Package 5, Module 1.

Communicating for Results 9e 9 Key Ideas Defining small group Characteristics of successful problem-solving teams Group formats Small-Group Communication.

Consensus Based Decision Making

“Casting the Net” Building Consensus 2009 National Leadership Conference April 24, 2009 Lacosta Resort Carlsbad, California.

Engaging Students Through Cooperative Learning: Ideas for Success

Group Techniques John A. Cagle California State University, Fresno.

CONFLICT “ RESOLVING TERRITORIAL CONFLICTS BY USING POWER IS THE MOST ANCIENT WAY AND STILL MUCH PRACTICED” – DAN DANA.

Person 1 suggests something all students might have in common. If all teammates do, Person 1 records it in the “All” section, if only two people do, then.

Find Someone Who Stand Up, Hand Up, Pair Up

IE673Session 2 - Team Dynamics1 Team Dynamics NGT, Leadership, Facilitation.

Focus Groups Alfred Kobsa University of California, Irvine.

Pick up a Review Sheet...unless you have one with you.

Decision Methodologies

Do Too Many Cooks Spoil the Broth? The All Star Sports Team Case Key Learnings.

6-1 Copyright  2009 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Managerial Problem Solving by Wood Slides prepared by Robert Wood, Julie Cogin and Jens Beckmann.

How to Run Meetings. Meetings to Inform ○ Tell all meetings ○ Lots of Reports ○ Very little interaction ○ People are bored ○ No consent agenda ○ Attendance.

Copyright c 2006 Oxford University Press 1 Chapter 7 Solving Problems and Making Decisions Problem solving is the communication that analyzes the problem.

NIATx opportunities for tomorrow Over 13,000 substance abuse treatment providers nationwide. Going to the Tool Chest A Tool for Facilitators A Valuable.

Strategy Harvest Find the Fiction Line Up Jot Thoughts

Starter of the day Pick up a worksheet from Mrs. Francesconi at the door. Answer the questions below by writing your answers on the card. 1.Why did you.

Brainstorming process. Brainstorming – the process of finding ideas While some good ideas come from sudden inspiration, most result from staff members.

Title page. 1. Identify the Problem Write a statement that answers the following questions. What are you trying to design? What are the requirement gaps?

CQI (TQM) Tools and Time Management. CQI or TQM?? u CQI – Continuous Quality Improvement or u TQM – Total Quality Management Technically, there are some.

Consensus Building.  While formal consensus methods follow agreed procedures, some of these techniques may incorporate an element of informal, free interaction.

METHODOLOGIES – PART 3 Focus groups, nominal group process, Delphi technique.

Quality Tools. Decision Tree When to use it Use it when making important or complex decisions, to identify the course of action that will give the best.

Lecture : 5 Problem Identification And Problem solving.

World Religions Tabulate Game. wild cards wild cards ordinary cards.

4-1 Copyright  2009 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Managerial Problem Solving by Wood Slides prepared by Robert Wood, Julie Cogin and Jens Beckmann.

Communicating for Results Seventh Edition Cheryl Hamilton, Ph.D.

Determination of The Winners of 2012 Thomson Medal Award (Deadline for casting the 2 nd round vote is: 15 April, 2012 The sponsors of the top 10 candidates.

This is a quick and fun game that you can play with your team or new team members It shows in an interactive way, the benefits of putting things in the.

Bell Ringers (-256) x (-12) 870 ÷ (-6) 3. ( ) x 1.02

Reduce Waiting & No-Shows  Increase Admissions & Continuation Reduce Waiting & No-Shows  Increase Admissions & Continuation Nominal Group.

Developing Questions That Matter

ME 414W/415W Effective Team Decisions Team Decisions.

Effective Meeting Skills

Problem Solving and Decisions Making By Bhupendra Ratha, Lecturer S. L. I. Sc., D.A.V.V., Indore.

Future Prediction Methodologies using expert groups

Consensus Validation A Tool for Teams GALA Leadership Symposium October 11, 2013 Presenter: Mindy Taylor.

Facilitating Awesome Meetings Vicki Stasch, Management Consultant, ,

PM as Facilitator Six Essential Facilitation Techniques for Project Managers February 9, 2010.

Determination of The Winners of 2012 Thomson Medal Award 1.The 1 st round voting will be held to select the top 9 candidates by the members of the IMSF.

Nominal Group Process (NGP) A well researched technique (Delbecq et al., 1986) that is effective in facilitating a group to come to the best combined judgements.

© 2012 by Project Gals New Goals for a New Year A Learning Activity.

The Millennium Development Goals What has been achieved?

1 Technology Forecasting Introduction to Technology Forecasting Strengths and limitations of market trials for new technology.

Using Nominal Group Technique for Data Gathering, Prioritizing, and Decision Making Session 562 American Evaluation Association Conference 2012 October.

Examples of small group techniques ( Breakout groups are subdivisions of a larger meeting to deal with.

Interactive Science Notebook

Management & Planning Tools

PROBLEM SOLVING June 2010 CANADIAN COAST GUARD AUXILIARY - PACIFIC.

Communicating For Results

Answer the following question in your exercise book!

Nominal Group Technique

Free Response Warm Up #5 Copyright © 1930 Edward Weston.

[We] ain't afraid of no [retrospective]

Interactive Notebook Training NAME (FIRST LAST)

Card Sort & Criteria (evaluation) matrix

Presentation transcript:

Oklahoma State University NGTDr. Camille DeYongSlide 1 Nominal Group Technique (NGT) Developed by Delbecq and Van de Ven in the early 1970s Useful to define the dimensions of a decision Based on research that indicates that small groups that do not interact are the most creative idea generators, while groups that do interact perform the best evaluation. Incorporates evaluation as well as idea generation.

Oklahoma State University NGTDr. Camille DeYongSlide 2 Output Rich list of ideas. Preliminary rating of those the group feels are most important.

Oklahoma State University NGTDr. Camille DeYongSlide 3 Steps in NGT Silent Generation Round Robin Discuss/Clarify Vote/Rank Discussion

Oklahoma State University NGTDr. Camille DeYongSlide 4 Silent Generation Task statement 5-10 minutes (or until people run out of ideas….) Imperative to obtain individual responses.

Oklahoma State University NGTDr. Camille DeYongSlide 5 Round Robin List responses on flip charts or board. Each respondent offers one idea from their list and the facilitator moves on. The ideas should be numbered as they are listed.

Oklahoma State University NGTDr. Camille DeYongSlide 6 Discuss/Clarify Go through the list one by one. Make sure all participants understand each idea.

Oklahoma State University NGTDr. Camille DeYongSlide 7 Vote/Rank Depending on how many ideas are on the list, give each participant a set number of index cards. –Rule of thumb is 15-25% (If you have 28 ideas, give them 7 cards) Instructions –From the list of ideas, pick your top x and write one idea on each card. Put the idea number in the top left corner.

Oklahoma State University NGTDr. Camille DeYongSlide 8 Rank Spread your cards out in front of you. From this list, which is your top choice? –Give this a 7 – write a 7 in the top right hand corner of your card. Turn this card over. From the cards that are remaining, which is your least favorite. –Give this a 1 – write a 1 in the top right hand corner of your card. Turn this card over.

Oklahoma State University NGTDr. Camille DeYongSlide 9 Rank (cont’d) Continue with this process – until there are no more cards left. Everyone should have 7 cards with ideas, idea numbers, and ranking numbers.

Oklahoma State University NGTDr. Camille DeYongSlide 10 Record votes This is a good time for a break! Collect cards; List votes by each idea. Tally –Record using a/b where a = Number of people who voted for an idea; b = Sum of votes.

Oklahoma State University NGTDr. Camille DeYongSlide 11 Interpretation You can order the ideas according to the numerator or the denominator. Usually 1-2 ideas dominate. Provides powerful information about the subject of interest. –Consensus? –Divergence? –Strong opinions?