The Federal Role In Improving the Northeast Corridor It’s All About Leadership! APTA HSIPR Policy Forum December 2, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1. Welcome New APTA Members! APTA s History 3 Who Are APTA Members?
Advertisements

STATE OF NEW YORK Andrew M. Cuomo Governor New York State DOT Joan McDonald Commissioner Presentation by NYSDOT to the Transportation Border Working Group.
Freight Railroad Realignment Feasibility Study Council of Governments – Transportation Planning Board Follow- up Presentation July 18, 2007.
INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL NORTHEAST UPDATE AASHTO – FEBRUARY 29,
E-Government Policies, Strategies and Implementation Jamal Shahin Institute for European Studies, Vrije Universiteit Brussel 15:00 – 15:20, 21 December.
1 Business Model TRAIN OPERATIONS NEC INFRASTRUCTURE GOVERNMENT PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION AND OVERSIGHT.
1 Amtrak’s Vision for the Northeast Corridor PRIIA 305 Annual General Meeting – June 14 th, PRIIA305 DMU Approval Meeting Andrew Wood Chief, Next.
I-95 Corridor Coalition December 14, 2001 I-95 Corridor Coalition Mid-Atlantic Rail Operations Study — An Integrated Strategy to Eliminate Choke Points.
Passenger Rail Discussion Group April 17, 2012 Seattle, Washington Cross Border Passenger Rail: A Canadian Perspective.
Design and Development of Key National Indicator Systems: GAO's Study of U.S. and Other Country Experiences Bernice Steinhardt Director, Strategic Issues.
An Action Plan for the Restructuring and Rationalization of the National Intercity Rail Passenger System Briefing by the Amtrak Reform Council February.
UCAR These organizations have created guidance for the next Administration and Congress on making our nation more resilient to the impacts of severe weather.
California State Rail Plan Overview Presentation Tribal Informational Meeting – March 1,
Contracting Services for Intercity Passenger Rail
A coordinated effort among Midwestern States and the City of Chicago to connect our entire region by high-speed and inter-city rail.
The Northeast Megaregion in a National Infrastructure Plan
Program Update Baltimore MPO November 25, Internal Draft AGENDA  Program Overview  Alternatives Development  Stakeholder and Public Outreach.
Washington Update Department of Transportation Roger Petzold Federal Highway Administration Oct. 23, 2013.
1 National Perspective FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION April 17, 2012 Canada-United States Transportation Border Working Group - Spring Plenary Cross-Border.
Background Congress Enacted MAP-21 in July, 2012 MAP-21 Authorizes Transit/Highway programs through September 2014 $10.6/$10.7 BILLION in 2013/2014 Extends.
Intercity Rail Background/ Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Update Met Council TAC Meeting November 5, 2008.
What is the best purpose for VECF? What outcomes do we anticipate and want? How can these best be achieved, measured and communicated? What is our relationship.
December 12-13, 2007 Item 4.4 Tab 31 California State Rail Plan to
CCJPA Sacramento to Roseville 3 rd Track Project Sacramento Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC) Meeting #1 HDR Office Tuesday, May 20, :00 - 9:00.
September 19 & 20, 2007 Items 4.11a,b, & c Tabs 15, 16, & 17 Proposition 1B Intercity Rail Bond Program.
1 Becoming an Effective Board Member The Heartland Conference April 9, 2008.
State of Amtrak 2012 Congressional Outlook NGEC Annual Meeting Matt Kelly – Sr. Director, Government Affairs February 23, 2012.
RAIL PLANNING IN COLORADO SCORT – September 17, 2012 Portland, Maine.
Freight Council Webinar February 21, 2006 Anthony T. Furst Director, FHWA Office of Freight Management and Operations The Framework for National Freight.
GOODS MOVEMENT IN CALIFORNIA: A CALTRANS PERSPECTIVE.
The Future of Freight and High Speed Rail in Today’s Economy SASHTO Annual Conference – Biloxi, MS Shayne Gill Program Manager Aviation, Passenger Rail.
1 Report on Megaregions Forums Petra Todorovich Director, America 2050 National Leadership Meeting October 19, 2009 Library of Congress Washington, D.C.
Developing State-Amtrak Agreements Stephen Gardner Vice President, Policy and Development March 8, 2010.
Mitigation Action Plan and Scenarios Climate governance in Latin America: Case studies of Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Peru Andrea Rudnick, MAPS Programme.
THE NEW TRANS-EUROPEAN TRANSPORT NETWORK A CORE NETWORK: BLUEPRINT FOR 2030.
Challenges with Multi-State/Jurisdictional Transportation Planning Crystal City (Arlington), Virginia June 18-19, 2001 Wilbur Smith Associates Arno Hart.
SAFETEA-LU Reauthorization Process and USDOT’s Reform Proposal November 2008 Todd Kohr Office of the Assistant Secretary for Transportation Policy U.S.
Transport The new TEN-T guidelines Results of the legislative procedure Philippe Chantraine (MOVE B1), 24 June 2013.
Projects of National and Regional Significance Program.
SAFETEA-LU Operations, ITS, and Freight Provisions Jeffrey F. Paniati Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
Oklahoma City to South Texas Passenger Rail Corridor SCORT Presentation March 2010.
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Key Provisions Jeff Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
Federal Transit Administration Office of Safety and Security TRANSIT BUS SAFETY AND SECURITY PROGRAM Mike Flanigon Federal Transit Administration U.S./
Freight-21: A National Strategic Freight Mobility Program & Trust Fund Coalition for America’s Gateways and Trade Corridors.
PROJECT OVERVIEW FHWA Talking Freight Seminar December 15, 2004 Dilara Rodriguez Project Manager, CALTRANS National I-10 Freight Corridor Study.
1 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009: Challenges Facing the Department of Transportation and the Office of Inspector General’s Strategy for.
January 2009 Transportation 2009 Support for transportation choices and alternatives Jon Boyd
1 Summary of Options Dr. Bruce D. McDowell, FAICP Introduction by Ed Strocko FHWA Office Of Freight Management and Operations Presented to FHWA Talking.
State and Regional Corridors and Networks: Lessons Learned George Schoener, Executive Director I-95 Corridor Coalition ____________.
1 December 2, 2015 Getting to the Tipping Point – Governance and Leadership APTA High Speed Policy Forum Stephen Gardner.
2013 SCOWT WASHINGTON MEETING/ WASHINGTON, DC 20 JUNE2013 AASHTO Waterborne Freight Bottom Line Report Chris Smith Intermodal Policy and Program Manager.
Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board. Making the Case… – Freight community educated legislators - developed champions Creation of.
Positive Train Control The impact of legislative changes SCORT Chris Heald September 22, 2009.
AB 32 Update December 6, Outline Cap and Trade Program 2013 Update to Scoping Plan Looking ahead to
Intercity Passenger Rail: Legislative Policy Recommendations Astrid Glynn Chair ASC Intercity Passenger Rail Legislative Team AASHTO Standing Committee.
Conference Breakout Session Oklahoma’s Local Planning Regions Jeane Burruss - Workforce System Coordinator Michael Widell - Deputy Secretary for.
Department of Energy Energy Agency Reorganization Plan Little Hoover Commission Hearing on Governor Schwarzenegger’s Plan to Establish a Department of.
Rail Planning Efforts and Lessons Learned Nicole Katsikides Acting Director, Office of Freight & Multimodalism Maryland Department of Transportation Presentation.
Perspectives on a Performance-Based Federal-aid Highway Program Jeffrey F. Paniati Executive Director, Federal Highway Administration January 12, 2010.
APTA Webinar with Congressional Rail Staff– Overview of the FAST Act
Chapter 7: The Executive Branch at Work Section 2: Executive Departments and Independent Agencies (pgs )
Oregon State Rail Plan Update
PrESENTED BY Stanley G. Feinsod
NGEC - FRA NGEC Annual Meeting 2014
Oregon Transportation Plan
DRPT Overview Jennifer Mitchell Agency Director
APTA Webinar with Congressional Rail Staff– Overview of the FAST Act
La Crosse Area Development Corporation
APTA High Speed Rail Policy Forum December 2, 2015
Navigating Multiple Jurisdiction
Presentation transcript:

The Federal Role In Improving the Northeast Corridor It’s All About Leadership! APTA HSIPR Policy Forum December 2, 2015

NEC Milestones Over the Past 45 Years

NECIP: Do-It-All Federal Role: Create and Plan the Solution; Lead/Manage the Implementation Strong Regional Consensus on Need to Preserve/Upgrade The NEC – Followed decision to create Amtrak and nationalize the Penn Central (Conrail) – Congress and the States drove creation of USRA to preserve the NEC for passenger and freight rail service – Congress created the $2.3 billion NECIP program within the 4-R Act Coalition of Federal, State, Labor and DOT Champions – USDOT: John Volpe – Senators Weicker, Pell, Chafee, Ribicoff, Javits, Moynihan – NEC States and commuter rail authorities – Labor’s Charlie Luna Broad Regional Discussion on Role of Rail in the Northeast

Electrification/Acela: Federal Role: Direct and Fund the Specific Solution State and Congressional Led Initiative – Amtrak and FRA had concluded electrification cost too much – CONEG and the states pressed for improved trip time to Boston – Congress (Lautenberg) bought in and drove planning effort at Amtrak Key Leaders & Champions – Governors Weicker, Weld, Cuomo and Carper – Senators Lautenberg, D’Amato, Weicker, Pell, Chafee Congress and FRA Set objectives, then Allowed Amtrak to Implement – Broad goals and oversight, but planning of Acela service moved fundamentally within Amtrak

ARRA/HSIPR/NEC FUTURE Federal Role: Create the Broad Long-Term Vision; Let Others Plan and Implement the Solutions ARRA/HSIPR Has Been Administration-Led Initiative – Strong leadership by USDOT/FRA – Congress has remained generally silent – no funding since 2010 outside of Amtrak NEC appropriations – NEC Commission created to coordinate NEC management/investment issues – States focused on individual improvements within their borders Looking for Congressional Champions FRA Has Assumed Long-Term Planning Role – Focusing on corridor-wide benefits, operational efficiencies and accommodating plans/needs of Amtrak and commuters

What Have We Learned? No Program Can survive Without Champions No Program Can survive without Congressional Support Congressional Champions are Essential USDOT Plays Critical Role in Shaping and Policing the Vision States Must Assume Corridor-Wide Planning Focus; Can’t Just Focus on State-Wide Needs

What Should the Federal Role Be? USDOT – Only entity that can meld corridor-wide needs of the individual NEC railroads – Provides Carrot (funding) and Stick (consistency with long-term vision; requirement for operational efficiencies) – Can provide consistent criteria for Federal funding and standards/methodologies for NEPA – Assistance in working with Amtrak Congress – Champions to advocate for the NEC and secure funding – Bully-pulpit to build/force regional consensus – Changes in the law to reduce time/cost of implementation NEC Commission – Insist on corridor-wide planning by Member States and railroads – Platform for developing investment and project implementation – Lead development of a new multi-state/multi-railroad governance