Layered Process Audits Tommy Beheler Quality Manager The Timken Company’s Gaffney Bearing Plant.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Global Safety Management: Revolution or Evolution? Transitioning to an SMS: Whats Missing?
Advertisements

ISO 9001:2000 Certified Next Steps? Where do we go from here?
Chapter 8 Employee Empowerment.
ISO 9001 : 2000.
Where does Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) come from?  Developed by the Aerospace industry in the1960s  Spread to the Automotive industry 
Supplier Development Kaizen Implementation Kit
22000 Food Safety Management Systems
Dr. Ron Lembke SCM 462.  Financial return  Impact on customers and organizational effectiveness  Probability of success  Impact on employees  Fit.
Registration Management Committee (RMC) Auditor Training and Workshop Minneapolis, MN July 30-31, 2009WELCOME! Americas Aerospace Quality Group AAQG Registration.
TS16949 requirements Subjects –Audit planning –Recertification audit requirements –Auditing Remote supporting functions.
FPSC Safety, LLC ISO AUDIT.
QMS ISO 9001:2008 Introduction to QMS 9001:2008 and system auditing.
KNAUF INSULATION GmbH SAFETY MANAGEMENT PROCESS Kevin W. Donohue Manager, Corporate Safety Corporate Environmental Health and Safety Group EHS
Fundamentals of ISO.
Effectively applying ISO9001:2000 clauses 5 and 8
Effective Methods for Software and Systems Integration
ISO Quality management International Organization for Standardization International Organization for Standardization It addresses various aspects.
© ABSL Power Solutions 2007 © STM Quality Limited STM Quality Limited Introduction to 5C TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT 5C.
The Role of the Internal Auditor for Maintaining System Compliance and Promoting Continuous Improvement Wayne M. Uttke
Quality Function Deployment
1 Accreditation and Certification: Definition  Certification: Procedures by which a third party gives written assurance that a product, process or service.
ISO 9001:2000 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
Roberts Tool Company, Inc Strategic Planning Presented at SEA Webex January 10, 2011.
Introduction to ISO 9001:2000.
Detroit Regional Integrated Logistics Center QUALITY ASSURANCE LINC’s Quality System and Introduction to ISO 9002.
Lecture #9 Project Quality Management Quality Processes- Quality Assurance and Quality Control Ghazala Amin.
Setting up an Internal Audit Program By
ISO 9001: 2000 Certified Audit Process What to do.
ASQ Raleigh ASQ Raleigh Section 1113 Six Sigma SIG DMAIC Series.
1 Thank you for visiting our site and welcome to the “Introduction to ISO 22000” Presentation that you requested. For more information.
Material Adopted From: “The Internal Auditing Pocket Guide” --- J.P. Russell.
Non-conformity Reporting
ISO NON-CONFORMANCE, CORRECTIVE AND PREVENTIVE ACTION.
ISO 9001 – an overview Tor Stålhane IDI / NTNU. ISO 9001 and software development ISO 9001 is a general standard – equally applicable to software development.
Project Closure. Objectives  Determine when to terminate a project  Identify various reasons why a project is terminated  Describe a project audit.
Quality management systems – Requirements
Internal Auditing ISO 9001:2015
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
QSB Quality System Basics & Q7 tools in practice
Supplier Corrective Action Request (SCAR) Supplier Training
WORKSHOP ON ACCREDITATION OF BODIES CERTIFYING MEDICAL DEVICES INT MARKET TOPIC 6 CH 5 ISO MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY Philippe Bauwin Medical.
Internal Auditor Training
Why LPA’s? LPA’s can provide low cost system for finding problems and making improvements in Safety, Quality, Delivery, Cost and Morale when used effectively.
How to Implement an IG Manufacturing Quality Procedure System
LAYERED AUDITS.
Background Mandated by DaimlerChrysler for all tier 1 suppliers
Fundamentals of ISO.
Daimler-Chrysler Layered Process Audits (DCX LPA)
Daimler-Chrysler Layered Process Audits (DCX LPA)
Setting up an Internal Audit Program
Agenda Who are we? 1 Introductions Journey so far 2
Determining Effectiveness of Internal Audits Presented by: Tony Gutierrez R. Darrell Taylor Minneapolis, MN July 19 & 20, 2012.
Quality Department
Layered Process Audits
Background Mandated by DaimlerChrysler for all tier 1 suppliers
RISK REDUCTION PROCESS
Quality Management System ISO 9001:2008
DMAIC STANDARD WORK TEMPLATE
Determining Effectiveness of Internal Audits Presented by: Tony Gutierrez R. Darrell Taylor Minneapolis, MN July 19 & 20, 2012.
AS 9100 Awareness Training.
ISO 9001:2008 Quality Management Systems
Background Mandated by DaimlerChrysler for all tier 1 suppliers
How to conduct Effective Stage-1 Audit
An Audit of the SYSTEM, Not the PEOPLE
Utility Billing Balancing the Accounts Receivable
DMAIC STANDARD WORK TEMPLATE
Why LPA’s? LPA’s can provide low cost system for finding problems and making improvements in Safety, Quality, Delivery, Cost and Morale when used effectively.
Why LPA’s? LPA’s can provide low cost system for finding problems and making improvements in Safety, Quality, Delivery, Cost and Morale when used effectively.
Nonconformity Writing
Presentation transcript:

Layered Process Audits Tommy Beheler Quality Manager The Timken Company’s Gaffney Bearing Plant

Background Mandated by DaimlerChrysler for all tier 1 suppliers Strongly recommended by General Motors and Ford The Timken Company has been utilizing Layered Process Audits since 2004

Definition An ongoing system of process checks that verify proper methods, settings, tools, gages, operator craftsmanship, error proofing devices, and other important inputs are in place in order to achieve optimal results. Redundant process checks to make sure everything is right. Ensure multiple eyes looking at the process to ensure the key work steps are being performed properly. LPA’s Like Preflight Checklist. Is Everything Ready for Take-off

Requirements for LPA’s LPA’s shall be conducted for high risk elements at a minimum of once per shift. Checklist of high risk items can be established using reference items such as, customer complaints, warranty issues, PFMEA, etc. Audit items should be unambiguous and specific. LPA results should be recorded and posted and reaction plans for non-conformances found during audit shall be documented.

Requirements for LPA’s Non-conformances should be corrected immediately. Audit results shall be summarized and reviewed by plant leadership (non- conformance database) Successive levels of plant leadership shall perform the exact same audit as the first level auditors and insure that first level audits are being done.

20% Scrap Reduction Goal Requirements for LPA’s LPA items can be added and taken away. An audit item should not be deleted, unless the risk is eliminated and verified. LPA items should be limited to those items critical to the process or the plant’s objectives. Avoid putting too many items on the audit. Continuously improve the audit process (living document).

20% Scrap Reduction Goal Benefits of LPA’s Multiple layers verifying critical processes are ready to go. (Rib Angle) Gives management a reason to be on the floor. Makes management presence on floor commonplace. Ensures problem solving solutions (corrective actions) stay in place. Identifies problems upstream, before issue reaches customer. Generates continuous improvement opportunities.

20% Scrap Reduction Goal Roadblocks to LPA’s Culture shift in some cases to have associates do audits each shift and have management looking over their shoulder. Too many items on LPA, makes it impossible task Can become rubber stamp process. Managers get busy and don’t follow through on audit, undermining audit importance.

20% Scrap Reduction Goal Roadblocks to LPA’s Nothing done with the data Verification of LPA item not clear to everyone (different interpretation of OK)

20% Scrap Reduction Goal