Discussion on Multi Year Tariff By Vivek Sharma & Manisha Kabra.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NAESB Measurement and Verification Model Business Practice Retail Electric Demand Response 5/29/09 update.
Advertisements

Gender Perspectives in Introduction to Tariffs Gender Module #5 ITU Workshops on Sustainability in Telecommunication Through Gender & Social Equality.
1 Implementation of Multi-Year Tariff framework. 2 Contents of the presentation Issues to address in design of multi- year tariff (MYT) frameworks Alternative.
1 Water Services Training Group 16 th Annual Conference Water Sector Reform Programme Implementation INEC, Killarney, 8 th November 2012.
Comparison of Major Contract Types
Cross-Border Infrastructure: A Toolkit Tariff and Rate Setting Session on Regulation & Accountability Max Bradford Castalia The views expressed here are.
Performance Monitoring and Comparative Evaluation (Benchmarking)- Experience from Kosovo Vehbi Duraku Water and Wastewater Regulatory Office
OVERVIEW ON THE MUNICIPAL GUIDELINE,BENCHMARKS
Prayas Energy Group, India NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON: “10 YEARS OF THE ELECTRICITY ACT, 2003: A CRITICAL REVIEW” SECTOR PERFORMANCE AND REGULATION Presentation.
Indian gas regulatory framework: Industry issues.
22 August 2012 Regulating for productive efficiency – an assessment of the regulatory framework faced by Eskom Presented at the South African Economic.
The Australian Energy Regulator Public Forum April 29 Expenditure incentive guidelines Presentation on key issues.
Electricity Distributors Association The Voice of Ontario’s Electricity Distributors OEB Consultation on the Electricity Distribution Sector February 17,
Regulatory Environment and Small-hydro Development Professor Priyantha D C Wijayatunga Public Utilities Commission of Sri Lanka and University of Moratuwa.
Overview of tariff revision process under Regulatory Commission Prayas - EGI Skill-share workshop for Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan Delegates November 16-18,
TARIFF REGULATION IN THE NIGERIAN ELECTRICITY SUPPLY INDUSTRY
RENEWABLE ENERGY FEED – IN TARIFF REGULATORY GUIDELINES Waste-to-Energy Seminar 17 July 2009 Cape Town By Bianka Belinska.
Chapter 8 Rate and Tariff Adjustment Mechanisms. 8.2 Inflation Adjustments RPI-X Adjustment (most common) RPI--- retail (consumer) price inflation index.
Regulatory framework in the Energy Sector Chairman Ph.D. Tserenpurev Tudev Energy Regulatory Commission of Mongolia Energy Mongolia-2012 Ulaanbaatar Mongolia.
1/14 Policies/Programmes to Promote the Development of ESCO 5 March, 2012 APERC Workshop, Kuala Lumpur Bing-Chwen Yang Team Leader Asia Pacific Energy.
DO AMERICANS CONSUME TOO LITTLE NATURAL GAS?An Empirical Test of Marginal Cost Pricing. By Lucas W. Davis and Erich Muehlegger. Key words :Efficient pricing,
Trading rules in Lithuania Giedrius Radvila Lietuvos energija AB 3 July 2006, Riga II MINI-FORA.
Slide 1 Policy Alternatives to Stimulate Private Sector Investment in Domestic Alternative Fuels Wally Tyner with assistance from Dileep Birur, Justin.
Welcome and Introductions CoServ Presentation & Member Input.
Microeconomics and Corporate Analysis State Intervention, Public choice and Economic Regulation Lecture Slides Rui Baptista.
1 Georgian National Energy and Water Supply Regulatory Commission Tariff Regulation Gocha Shonia Department of Methodology and informational provision.
Incentive Regulation Topics Scott A. Struck, CPA Financial Analysis Division Public Utilities Bureau Illinois Commerce Commission.
Prayas Energy Group, India Regulatory process to enhance transparency and accountability: examples from India Bishkek, September 2011 Presentation By Prayas.
Scaling Up Energy Efficiency in India: Opportunities in the Electricity Sector Dr. Jayant Sathaye, Dr. Amol Phadke and Ranjit Bharvirkar Energy Analysis.
Rate and Revenue Considerations When Starting an Energy Efficiency Program APPA’s National Conference June 13 th, 2009 Salt Lake City, Utah Mark Beauchamp,
Page 1 Regulation: Catalyst for better governance and enhanced integrity in water utilities? Experiences from GIZ Water Programmes Regulation: Catalyst.
CHITALE & CHITALE PARTNERS 1 POLICY FRAMEWORK FOR TRANSMISSION & DISTRIBUTION IN POWER SECTOR ADVOCATES & LEGAL CONSULTANTS ONGCONGC.
NAESB MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION MODEL BUSINESS PRACTICE RETAIL ELECTRIC DEMAND RESPONSE NARUC update 9/14/09.
Prof. Valeria Termini AEEGSI Commissioner CEER Vice-President CEER DSO WG co-Chair The Future Role of European DSOs 1.
The Australian Energy Regulator. Today’s agenda Presentations from : ◦AER – Sebastian Roberts, General Manager Networks ◦Consumer challenge panel – Robyn.
AEG recommendations on Non-life insurance services (Issue 5) Workshop on National Accounts December 2006, Cairo 1 Gulab Singh UN STATISTICS DIVISION.
Prayas Energy Group, India Transparency in Electricity Service Delivery: Billing, Quality of Service and consumer issues Bishkek, September 2011 Presentation.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
Strategic Planning Management Control Systems Chapter 8 August 2014Iwan Pudjanegara SE., MM.1.
1 Electricity Industry – Municipal Tariff Issues and NERSA Approval Processes Compiled by Nhlanhla Ngidi.
UNDP Training Programme: Decentralisation and Local Governance (RBEC) Fiscal Decentralisation Nick Devas IDD, School of Public Policy June 2007.
4733 Bethesda Ave, Suite 600 Bethesda, MD (P) Developing Criteria for Project Programming.
Inflation Adjustments for Rates Karl McDermott Ameren Professor of Business and Government and Special Consultant at NERA Presented at 2010 NASUCA Annual.
Introduction The following chapter will review: –Overview –Model assumptions –The Cost Proposal & Evaluation –Payments methodology –Financial Incentives/Disincentives.
Electricity Regulatory Commissions in India: Resources, Transparency and Public Participation Shantanu Dixit Prayas, Pune, India
1 PRESENTATION TO PPC ON ENERGY 24 MAY 2013 MUNICIPAL TARIFF DETERMINATION PROCESS.
11 Prabhakar Tandon Head Business Development Secure Meters Limited Distribution Reform-A different Approach.
HEALTH FINANCING MOH - HPG JAHR UPDATE ON POLICIES Eleventh Party Congress -Increase state investment while simultaneously mobilizing social mobilization.
13 August 2003SAFIR Workshop - R. Sridharan1 MULTI YEAR TARIFFS (MYT), DISTRIBUTION MARGIN (DM) AND PRIVATIZATION IN KARNATAKA.
Course 3.6 Regulatory Commissions: Management & Staff Functions, Bangladesh, Mar 31- Apr 4, 2002 SOUTH ASIA REGIONAL INITIATIVE/ENERGY Regulatory Commission.
Multi-Year Tariffs in the Power Sector in India so far (August 2003)
15 October 2013 Briefing on draft s 56G report on the effectiveness of information disclosure regulation at Christchurch Airport.
Default price-quality paths for gas pipeline services Briefing on the Commission’s final decision for financial market analysts 28 February 2013.
ITCILO/ACTRAV COURSE A Capacity Building for Members of Youth Committees on the Youth Employment Crisis in Africa 26 to 30 August 2013 Macro Economic.
State Regulation in the Natural Monopoly Sphere Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan on Regulation of Natural Monopolies ALMATY – 2006.
Energy Regulatory Authority (ERA) of Mongolia Mr.Tumentsogt Tsevegmid, MSc, MPA Regulator, Energy Regulatory Authority University Street 2A, Ulaanbaatar.
Summary and analysis of information disclosed by 29 electricity distributors 12 December 2013.
Economic Benchmarking vs Financial Incentives – an alternative to incentivising performance in the gas industry? Ashley Muldrew, Gas Speak 2015.
The Australian Energy Regulator SA electricity distribution determination 2015–2020 Framework and approach 20 November 2013.
Draft 2015 electricity distribution price-path reset Briefing for financial market analysts 4 July 2014 Sue Begg Commerce Commission.
1 Electricity Distribution Price Review Metering Workshop 14 July 2005.
Draft Decision on the Reset of Prices for Electricity Distribution Businesses Presentation to Market Analysts 19 July 2011.
Budgeting and financial management
Renewable energy support schemes in the Republic of Moldova
Economic Regulation of Irish Water
NERSA presentation at the PPC meeting held on 24 May 2006
Ian Alexander Wednesday, August 13th 2003 SAFIR MYT Workshop, Delhi
Rate-of-Return Regulation
Background In compliance with section 3 of the Electricity Act 2003, the Central Government notified the Tariff Policy on 6th January, Further amendments.
WATER REGULATORY AUTHORITY
Presentation transcript:

Discussion on Multi Year Tariff By Vivek Sharma & Manisha Kabra

Structure MYT – The Concept MYT – The Concept Rationale for MYT Rationale for MYT Benefit of MYT Benefit of MYT Enabling Environment Enabling Environment Draft tariff policy Draft tariff policy Experience in South Asia Experience in South Asia Issues in Implementation Issues in Implementation

MYT – The Concept “ a new system where the tariff setting exercise is done for a number of years in one exercise, termed as MYT” MYT – The Concept “ a new system where the tariff setting exercise is done for a number of years in one exercise, termed as MYT” Concept of MYT can mean several things ranging from: Concept of MYT can mean several things ranging from: Prescribing the actual numbers Prescribing the actual numbers Adherence to certain specific benchmarks that will prevail for a number of years. Adherence to certain specific benchmarks that will prevail for a number of years. It can also govern the principles governing the input costs and output prices at two different ends. It can also govern the principles governing the input costs and output prices at two different ends.

Rationale for MYT The present system of annual determination is too flexible giving considerable freedom to arbitrary decision making. The present system of annual determination is too flexible giving considerable freedom to arbitrary decision making. Average time taken: 3-6 months Average time taken: 3-6 months It is an answer to make the tariff setting exercise more predictable. It is an answer to make the tariff setting exercise more predictable. To ensure that costs are recovered in a more mechanistic manner. To ensure that costs are recovered in a more mechanistic manner.

Benefits of MYT Reduction in regulatory effort on the part of the commissions, utilities. Reduction in regulatory effort on the part of the commissions, utilities. Reduction in regulatory uncertainty Reduction in regulatory uncertainty Provision of a transparent and stable system of incentives. Provision of a transparent and stable system of incentives. Will lead to greater private sector interest in investment in the power sector. Will lead to greater private sector interest in investment in the power sector.

Enabling Environment Pakistan Pakistan Privatisation Commission Privatisation Commission Government guidelines to NEPRA Government guidelines to NEPRA India India The Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998 The Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998 The Electricity Act 2003 (61 f) The Electricity Act 2003 (61 f) Draft tariff policy Draft tariff policy

India- Draft tariff policy: Broad principles of tariff setting To mitigate the risk related to data uncertainity, State Commissions: To mitigate the risk related to data uncertainity, State Commissions: Use AT&C losses Use AT&C losses Ensure 100% metering Ensure 100% metering SERC to design incentive/disincentive for this SERC to design incentive/disincentive for this SERC should lay down a methodology for estimation of agricultural consumption SERC should lay down a methodology for estimation of agricultural consumption Initiate action for verification of system losses including agricultural consumption, Base year operating expenses, Capital expenditure plan Initiate action for verification of system losses including agricultural consumption, Base year operating expenses, Capital expenditure plan

Cont. Mitigation of risks related to regulatory uncertainty Mitigation of risks related to regulatory uncertainty SERC to decide time frame for implementing price- cap regulation SERC to decide time frame for implementing price- cap regulation SERC to determine (Control period = 3-5 years) SERC to determine (Control period = 3-5 years) Principles of risk sharing (between the utility and the consumers Principles of risk sharing (between the utility and the consumers Definition of controllable and uncontrollable expenses for the utility Definition of controllable and uncontrollable expenses for the utility Parameters and principles for incentives/ disincentives Parameters and principles for incentives/ disincentives Opening levels of key parameters Opening levels of key parameters Customer service standards to be met by the utility Customer service standards to be met by the utility

Experience in South Asia India India Pakistan Pakistan

Most commissions experimented with multi-year targets related to T&D losses & collection efficiency Uttar Pradesh Incentivising framework adopted. Incentivising framework adopted. In UPPCL proposed reduction in T&D losses from 36.5% to 17.5% over the next decade In UPPCL proposed reduction in T&D losses from 36.5% to 17.5% over the next decade Losses decreased marginally; from 41.55% to 41.4%. Losses decreased marginally; from 41.55% to 41.4%. Multi-year path laid down previously by UPERC had to be revised Multi-year path laid down previously by UPERC had to be revised

Maharashtra- Loss sharing Maharashtra- Loss sharing Implicit adoption of MYT - targets indicated in Tariff Order of 2000 Implicit adoption of MYT - targets indicated in Tariff Order of 2000 Against mandated loss reduction to 26.89%, losses were reduced to only 39.4%. Against mandated loss reduction to 26.89%, losses were reduced to only 39.4%. MERC held consumers equally responsible for losses - cost of excess losses to be borne equally by MSEB and consumers MERC held consumers equally responsible for losses - cost of excess losses to be borne equally by MSEB and consumers

Delhi Delhi Vidyut Board proposed long-term principles for tariff determination in Delhi Vidyut Board proposed long-term principles for tariff determination in DERC -sector was not mature for the introduction of MYT DERC -sector was not mature for the introduction of MYT Government notification - MYT incorporated in privatisation process Government notification - MYT incorporated in privatisation process Bidding criteria: reduction in loss levels Bidding criteria: reduction in loss levels Negotiated losses were accepted Negotiated losses were accepted Incentivising framework of multi-year tariffs Incentivising framework of multi-year tariffs Only one discom were unable to achieve targets Only one discom were unable to achieve targets

Pakistan - Karachi Supported by Govt. of Pakistan - Reasons included privatization Supported by Govt. of Pakistan - Reasons included privatization NEPRA approved MYT in Sept NEPRA approved MYT in Sept NEPRA considered price-cap as an appropriate way of maximizing incentives NEPRA considered price-cap as an appropriate way of maximizing incentives Allowed a price capped multi year tariff with adjustments for inflation, Fuel price, power purchase. Allowed a price capped multi year tariff with adjustments for inflation, Fuel price, power purchase.

Cont. Indexation (CPI - X) allowed on annual basis. Indexation (CPI - X) allowed on annual basis. Fuel and power purchase adjustment allowed quarterly. Fuel and power purchase adjustment allowed quarterly. Sliding scale profit sharing mechanism. Sliding scale profit sharing mechanism. No loss sharing. No loss sharing. Price control period is 7 years Price control period is 7 years

Issues in implementation of MYT Availability of reliable information: Availability of reliable information: Regulatory process cannot wait for perfect information, which given its external position, it can never obtain. Regulatory process cannot wait for perfect information, which given its external position, it can never obtain. However, reliable and timely information is an imperative, and all steps should be taken to achieve this. However, reliable and timely information is an imperative, and all steps should be taken to achieve this. Sharing of downward and upward targets Sharing of downward and upward targets Controllable and non-controllable costs Controllable and non-controllable costs

Cont. Government Subsidy Government Subsidy Phased out our the period of time. Phased out our the period of time. What should be the Control period? What should be the Control period? Needs preparedness and involvement of all participants. Needs preparedness and involvement of all participants.

Thank You