TELESEISMIC BODY WAVE INVERSION Alexandra Moshou, Panayotis Papadimitriou and Konstantinos Makropoulos Department of Geophysics-Geothermics National and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Asymptotic Ray Theory
Advertisements

Chapter 28 – Part II Matrix Operations. Gaussian elimination Gaussian elimination LU factorization LU factorization Gaussian elimination with partial.
Earthquake Seismology: The stress tensor Equation of motion
Visualizing the Microscopic Structure of Bilinear Data: Two components chemical systems.
Generalised Inverses Modal Analysis and Modal Testing S. Ziaei Rad.
Tensors and Component Analysis Musawir Ali. Tensor: Generalization of an n-dimensional array Vector: order-1 tensor Matrix: order-2 tensor Order-3 tensor.
Y.M. Hu, Assistant Professor, Department of Applied Physics, National University of Kaohsiung Matrix – Basic Definitions Chapter 3 Systems of Differential.
Symmetric Matrices and Quadratic Forms
3D Geometry for Computer Graphics
Tensor Data Visualization Mengxia Zhu. Tensor data A tensor is a multivariate quantity  Scalar is a tensor of rank zero s = s(x,y,z)  Vector is a tensor.
Chapter 3 Determinants and Matrices
CSci 6971: Image Registration Lecture 2: Vectors and Matrices January 16, 2004 Prof. Chuck Stewart, RPI Dr. Luis Ibanez, Kitware Prof. Chuck Stewart, RPI.
1 Neural Nets Applications Vectors and Matrices. 2/27 Outline 1. Definition of Vectors 2. Operations on Vectors 3. Linear Dependence of Vectors 4. Definition.
3D Geometry for Computer Graphics
Visual Recognition Tutorial1 Random variables, distributions, and probability density functions Discrete Random Variables Continuous Random Variables.
Rotations. Space and Body  Space coordinates are an inertial system. Fixed in spaceFixed in space  Body coordinates are a non- inertial system. Move.
MOHAMMAD IMRAN DEPARTMENT OF APPLIED SCIENCES JAHANGIRABAD EDUCATIONAL GROUP OF INSTITUTES.
UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS Faculty of Geology and Geoenvironment Department of Geophysics and Geothermics A. Agalos (1), P. Papadimitriou (1), K. Makropoulos.
5: EARTHQUAKES WAVEFORM MODELING S&W SOMETIMES FIRST MOTIONS DON’T CONSTRAIN FOCAL MECHANISM Especially likely when - Few nearby stations, as.
化工應用數學 授課教師: 郭修伯 Lecture 9 Matrices
Arithmetic Operations on Matrices. 1. Definition of Matrix 2. Column, Row and Square Matrix 3. Addition and Subtraction of Matrices 4. Multiplying Row.
RAPID SOURCE PARAMETER DETERMINATION AND EARTHQUAKE SOURCE PROCESS IN INDONESIA REGION Iman Suardi Seismology Course Indonesia Final Presentation of Master.
Compiled By Raj G. Tiwari
Principle Component Analysis Presented by: Sabbir Ahmed Roll: FH-227.
Linear Algebra Review 1 CS479/679 Pattern Recognition Dr. George Bebis.
8.1 Vector spaces A set of vector is said to form a linear vector space V Chapter 8 Matrices and vector spaces.
Advanced Computer Graphics Spring 2014 K. H. Ko School of Mechatronics Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology.
© 2005 Yusuf Akgul Gebze Institute of Technology Department of Computer Engineering Computer Vision Geometric Camera Calibration.
General Tensor Discriminant Analysis and Gabor Features for Gait Recognition by D. Tao, X. Li, and J. Maybank, TPAMI 2007 Presented by Iulian Pruteanu.
SVD: Singular Value Decomposition
Linear algebra: matrix Eigen-value Problems
Differential wave equation and seismic events Sean Ford & Holly Brown Berkeley Seismological Laboratory.
Mathematical foundationsModern Seismology – Data processing and inversion 1 Some basic maths for seismic data processing and inverse problems (Refreshement.
Zadonina E.O. (1), Caldeira B. (1,2), Bezzeghoud M. (1,2), Borges J.F. (1,2) (1) Centro de Geofísica de Évora (2) Departamento de Física, Universidade.
Disputable non-DC components of several strong earthquakes Petra Adamová Jan Šílený.
Chapter 5 MATRIX ALGEBRA: DETEMINANT, REVERSE, EIGENVALUES.
LECTURE 6: SEISMIC MOMENT TENSORS
Solving Linear Systems Solving linear systems Ax = b is one part of numerical linear algebra, and involves manipulating the rows of a matrix. Solving linear.
ECE 546 – Jose Schutt-Aine 1 ECE 546 Lecture - 06 Multiconductors Spring 2014 Jose E. Schutt-Aine Electrical & Computer Engineering University of Illinois.
What is the determinant of What is the determinant of
Eigenvalues The eigenvalue problem is to determine the nontrivial solutions of the equation Ax= x where A is an n-by-n matrix, x is a length n column.
Introduction to Linear Algebra Mark Goldman Emily Mackevicius.
Review of Matrix Operations Vector: a sequence of elements (the order is important) e.g., x = (2, 1) denotes a vector length = sqrt(2*2+1*1) orientation.
EIGENSYSTEMS, SVD, PCA Big Data Seminar, Dedi Gadot, December 14 th, 2014.
SEISMIC SOURCES. Solution for the displacement potential Properties of the disp potential 1.An outgoing D ’ Alembert solution in the spherical coordinate.
Moment Tensor Inversion in Strongly Heterogeneous Media at Pyhasalmi Ore Mine, Finland Václav Vavryčuk (Academy of Sciences of the CR) Daniela Kühn (NORSAR)
Matrices and Matrix Operations. Matrices An m×n matrix A is a rectangular array of mn real numbers arranged in m horizontal rows and n vertical columns.
1 VARIOUS ISSUES IN THE LARGE STRAIN THEORY OF TRUSSES STAMM 2006 Symposium on Trends in Applications of Mathematics to Mechanics Vienna, Austria, 10–14.
Rapid Centroid Moment Tensor (CMT) Inversion in 3D Earth Structure Model for Earthquakes in Southern California 1 En-Jui Lee, 1 Po Chen, 2 Thomas H. Jordan,
Lecture Note 1 – Linear Algebra Shuaiqiang Wang Department of CS & IS University of Jyväskylä
Reduced echelon form Matrix equations Null space Range Determinant Invertibility Similar matrices Eigenvalues Eigenvectors Diagonabilty Power.
Alexandra Moshou, Panayotis Papadimitriou and Kostas Makropoulos MOMENT TENSOR DETERMINATION USING A NEW WAVEFORM INVERSION TECHNIQUE Department of Geophysics.
MOMENT TENSOR INVERSION OF POSSIBLY MULTIPLE EVENTS AT REGIONAL DISTANCES Petra Adamová 1, Jiří Zahradník 1, George Stavrakakis 2 1 Charles University.
PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS(PCA) EOFs and Principle Components; Selection Rules LECTURE 8 Supplementary Readings: Wilks, chapters 9.
Introduction The central problems of Linear Algebra are to study the properties of matrices and to investigate the solutions of systems of linear equations.
Continuum Mechanics (MTH487)
Review of Linear Algebra
CS479/679 Pattern Recognition Dr. George Bebis
Review of Matrix Operations
Elementary Linear Algebra Anton & Rorres, 9th Edition
Matrices and vector spaces
SVD: Physical Interpretation and Applications
CS485/685 Computer Vision Dr. George Bebis
Numerical Analysis Lecture 16.
Derivative of scalar forms
Matrix Algebra and Random Vectors
Symmetric Matrices and Quadratic Forms
Numerical Analysis Lecture 17.
Subject :- Applied Mathematics
Symmetric Matrices and Quadratic Forms
Presentation transcript:

TELESEISMIC BODY WAVE INVERSION Alexandra Moshou, Panayotis Papadimitriou and Konstantinos Makropoulos Department of Geophysics-Geothermics National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Athens, 24 – 26 May 2007

Geoenvironment Past Present FutureMethodology Body wave inversion in teleseismic distances to calculate the seismic moment tensor M ij using the generalized inverse method. The proposed methodology is applied for the largest earthquakes that occurred in Greece from 1995 – 2006 and located in different seismotectonics settings Aigio (1995), Kozani (1995) – shallow events Skyros(2001), Lefkada(2003) – shallow events Karpathos(2002), Kythira(2006) – deep events

Geoenvironment Past Present FutureMethodologies Different Methodologies  MT5 McCaffrey et all. (1988)  Kikuchi and Kanamori (1991)  A methodology is developed to calculate the seismic moment tensor  P, SV, SH waveform selection  Body wave inversion of the selected waveforms  Graphical presentation of the solution

Geoenvironment Past Present Future Calculation of body wave synthetic seismograms ρ : the density at the source c: the velocity of P, S-waves g(Δ,h) : geometric spreading r 0 : the radius of the earth R i : the radiation pattern in case of P, SH, SV-waves (i=1, 2, 3) respectively the moment rate

Geoenvironment Past Present Future Forward problem d : a vector of length m, which corresponds the observed displacements G : a non – square matrix, with dimensions mxn, whose elements are a set of five elementary Green’s functions m : a vector of length n, which corresponds the moment tensor elements

Geoenvironment Past Present Future Inverse problem  d : m x 1 matrix," lives” in data – space of n – components, represents the observed data set  G : non - square m x n matrix, green’s function  m : n x 1 vector, the model vector m “lives” in model – space of m – components

Geoenvironment Past Present Future Moment Tensor Inversion where a 1,…,a 5 are the components of the model m

Geoenvironment Past Present Future Moment Tensor Inversion ~ Normal Equations n < 5 : under – determined system n > 5 : over – determined system G non – square matrix G T ·G = square matrix pseudo inverse

Geoenvironment Past Present Future Singular value decomposition G = U S V T mn G = nn n x m m U S m m n VTVT

Geoenvironment Past Present Future Moment Tensor Inversion ~Singular Value Decomposition  U, V : orthogonal matrices (nxn) and (mxm) corresponding, which elements are the eigenvectors of the matrices G T G and GG T respectively.  S : diagonal matrix, (nxm) which element, σ i are the singular values of the G T G or GG T The singular values σ i [i=1, 2, …, min(m,n)] are real, non – zero and non – negative,

Geoenvironment Past Present Future Calculation of model parameters G T G = square matrix G = U·S·V T

Geoenvironment Past Present Future Elementary moment tensors Elementary moment tensors

Geoenvironment Past Present Future General Moment Tensor a m are the calculated components of the model parameters, m

Geoenvironment Past Present Future Applications  Aigio 1995 and Kozani 1995  Skyros 2001 and Lefkada 2003  Karpathos 2002 and Kythira 2006

Geoenvironment Past Present Future The June 15, 1995 Aigion earthquake, M w =6.2

Geoenvironment Past Present Future The June 15, 1995 Aigion earthquake, M w =6.2 ~ inversion D.C=97% CLVD=3%

Geoenvironment Past Present Future The May 13, 1995 Kozani earthquake, M w =6.5 P SV SH P SV SH SV P P P P P SH P SV

Geoenvironment Past Present Future The May 13, 1995 Kozani earthquake, M w =6.5 ~ inversion D.C=98% CLVD=2%

Geoenvironment Past Present Future The July 26, 2001 Skyros earthquake, M w =6.5 P P P P SV SH P SV SH SV P P P SH P P

Geoenvironment Past Present Future The July 26, 2001 Skyros earthquake, M w =6.5 ~ inversion D.C=98% CLVD=2% P SV P SH SV P P P P P P SH SV SH

Geoenvironment Past Present Future The August 14, 2003 Lefkada earthquake M w =6.3 The August 14, 2003 Lefkada earthquake M w =6.3 P P SV SH P SV P P P P P SH P P

Geoenvironment Past Present Future The August 14, 2003 Lefkada earthquake M w =6.3 ~ inversion D.C= 90% CLVD=10% P SV SH P SV SH P P P P SV

Geoenvironment Past Present Future The January 22, 2002 Karpathos earthquake M w =6.2 P P SV SH P SV SH P P SV SH P SV SH P P SV

Geoenvironment Past Present Future D.C=90% CLVD=10% The January 22, 2002 Karpathos earthquake Mw=6.2 ~ inversion P SV SH SV SH P P SV SH P P P P

Geoenvironment Past Present Future The January 08, 2006 Kythira earthquake M w =6.7 P P P P SH SV P P SH P SV SH SV SH P P SV

Geoenvironment Past Present Future The January 08, 2006 Kythira earthquake M w =6.7 ~ inversion D.C=93% CLVD=7%

Geoenvironment Past Present Future Moment tensor solutions Forward – InversionProblem Moment tensor solutions Forward – Inversion Problem Forward ProblemInverse Problem Aigion 1995 φ=277, δ=33, λ=-76 (Pascal etall. 1997) φ=270, δ=28, λ=-89D.C= 97% CLVD=3% Kozani 1995 φ=260, δ=45, λ=-90 (Hatzfeld etall. ) φ=264, δ=45, λ=-93D.C=99% CLVD=1% Skyros 2001 φ=160, δ=65, λ=7φ=154, δ=42, λ=6D.C=99% CLVD=1% Lefkada 2003 φ=15, δ=80, λ=170 (Papadimitriou etall. 2006) φ=7, δ=64, λ=178D.C=90% CLVD=10% Karpathos 2002 φ=95, δ=89, λ=50φ=94, δ=89, λ=60D.C=90% CLVD=10% Kythira 2006 φ=205, δ=45, λ=55φ=215, δ=49, λ=48D.C=93% CLVD=7%

Geoenvironment Past Present FutureConclusions:  It has developed a new procedure based upon the moment tensor inversion, to obtain the source parameters of an earthquake, taking to account a specific depth.  This methodology is based in two numerical methods, in the normal equations and in singular value decomposition  The method of Singular Value Decomposition is based in the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the matrix (G T G) or (GG T ). For this reason this method is more stable than the method of normal equations.  In all the applications the Singular Value Decomposition give up to 90% Double Couple and a very good fit between observed and synthetics seismograms.  Our solution was compared with others than proposed from others institutes and it was in very good agreement.  At this time, our interest is to include the depth in this procedure automatically

Geoenvironment Past Present Future THE END THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION