Measurements of DB supporting systems Fiducialisation Sylvain GRIFFET, 21/03/2011 Measurements performed in February and early March 2011 1/13 EDMS n°1134701.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Patch Testing HYPACK 2013.
Advertisements

The ISA for Physics What you need to revise.
George Kovatchev Sitius Automation SITIU S Why Use the UG Model for Dimensional Control UG Users Group Conference Fall 2000.
Frequency Scanning Interferometry (FSI) measurements
Solomon William KAMUGASA
Conclusions on torque and grease1 Alexander Dierlamm, Michael Eppard (CERN) Measurements of thermal contact between TOB module and rod May 2004.
Surveying I. Lecture 4..
Measuring Devices:. MEASURING MASS There are various types of laboratory balances. The triple beam beam balance you use may look somewhat different from.
Integrating a Short Range Laser Probe with a 6-DOF Vertical Robot Arm and a Rotary Table Theodor Borangiu Anamaria Dogar
3.1 Data and Information –The rapid development of technology exposes us to a lot of facts and figures every day. –Some of these facts are not very meaningful.
Alignment of DB and MB quadrupoles Hélène MAINAUD DURAND 17/11/2011 With a lot of input from Sylvain GRIFFET.
Tracker Week – UCSB Gantry Status – April 20, 2004 – Dean White 1 Gantry Report University of California Santa Barbara Dean White.
Arizona’s First University. Feasibility of Image-Guided SRS for Trigeminal Neuralgia with Novalis.
Yurii Levashov Undula t or fiducialization test Oct. 14, 2004 Undulator Fiducialization Test Results Fiducialization Tolerances.
Statistics Micro Mini Threats to Your Experiment!
High index glass spherical targets for laser interferometry Miroslav Sulc 1st PACMAN worshop 1.
Zachary Wolf LCLS Undulator October 30, LCLS Undulator Tuning And Fiducialization Zack Wolf, Yurii Levashov, Achim.
Pre-alignment solutions applied to girders 1/19 Sylvain GRIFFET, 06/07/2010.
Metrology for NCSX Steve Raftopoulos and the NCSX Metrology Team.
Quality Assurance in the clinical laboratory
1/9 Hélène Mainaud Durand Sylvain GRIFFET, 28/11/2011 BE/ABP-SU/ Adjustment of 4 Drive Beam Quads positions on TM0 CLIC girders EDMS Document No
Zachary Wolf Undulator Oct 12, LCLS Undulator Tuning Zack Wolf, Yurii Levashov, Achim Weidemann, Seva Kaplounenko,
Automated HIC assembly A. Di Mauro ITS-MFT mini-week
DELTA Quadrant Tuning Y. Levashov, E. Reese. 2 Tolerances for prototype quadrant tuning Magnet center deviations from a nominal center line < ± 50  m.
Measurement report of Boostec girders Control after receipt Sylvain GRIFFET, 13/12/2010 Measurements performed on the 1 st and 2 nd of December 2010 with.
Business Statistics - QBM117 Introduction to hypothesis testing.
Respected Professor Kihyeon Cho
Measurement report of Boostec girders 1/13 Sylvain GRIFFET, 15/11/2010 Measurements performed on the 28th of October 2010 with the Laser Tracker LTD500.
SETTING OUT Horizontal Angles. Ensure instrument is set to measure angles in the appropriate direction. ( refer to operators manual) Unclamp both vertical.
Fundamentals of Data Analysis Lecture 10 Management of data sets and improving the precision of measurement pt. 2.
Brewer Ozone Spectrophotometer Pointing and Levelling C.T. McElroy York University Canada.
1/12 Sylvain GRIFFET, 17/10/2011 BE/ABP-SU/ Simulations of laser tracker AT401 measurements on TM0 CLIC girders EDMS Document No
Unaddition (Subtraction)
STATUS of the final PACMAN bench integration PACMAN meeting 11/06/2015 Hélène Mainaud Durand.
BEPCII Prealignment Installation Survey and Alignment Accelerator Center of IHEP Xiaolong Wang
Section 10.1 Confidence Intervals
1962 First CMM DEA (Italy) Ahmed CHERIF CERN Metrology lab. CLIC TECHNICAL COMMITTEE – EDMS : EDMS :
CLIC survey and alignment 1 CLIC CES meeting STARTSLIDE CLIC SURVEY AND ALIGNMENT Hélène MAINAUD DURAND.
Dmitry Gudkov BE-RF-PM CLIC Module Working Group Engineering design of the adjustable supporting system for DBQ.
CLIC Module meeting, 22/08/2011 N. Chritin (EN/MME) Cradles design for CLIC module supporting system (EDMS )  General principle  Main inputs an.
Short range alignment strategy in CLEX and first results CLIC Workshop January 2015 on behalf of : Hélène Mainaud-Durand, Mateusz Sosin Mathieu.
Survey, Alignment and Metrology Fabien Rey Pawel Garsztka ESS Survey, Alignment and Metrology Group.
CLIC Beam Physics Working Group CLIC pre-alignment simulations Thomas Touzé BE/ABP-SU Update on the simulations of the CLIC pre-alignment.
Assembly Test: Elastic Averaging Jouni Huopana
Fiducialisation and initial alignment of components for CLIC Mateusz Sosin on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team CLIC Workshop 2015.
MQXF Workshop on Structure, Alignment, and Electrical QA Feb 2-4, 2016 Dan Cheng J. DiMarco, C. Hernikl, D. Humphries, S. Myers, X. Wang MQXFA Magnet Fiducialization.
Patch Testing. HYSWEEP ® Calibration of a Multibeam System Patch Testing Single and Dual Head Multibeam Systems. Patch Testing Single and Dual Head Multibeam.
Advanced Higher Biology Unit 3 Investigative Biology.
VEA’s proposal of automated assembly system WP6 meeting, 16/01/14.
1) News on the long scale length calibration 2) Results of the two surveys performed on plane 7 Set 1: morning of 12/11/2004 Set 2: morning of 19/11/2004.
Lesson 42: Estimating with Scientific Notation. The scientific notation problems we have encountered thus far have been carefully designed so the numbers.
CLIC08 Workshop, CERN October 2008 PRE-ALIGNMENT STUDY STATUS AND MODEL FOR THE BEAM DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS TS/SU/MTI Thomas TOUZE Hélène MAINAUD DURAND.
1 Research on laser tracker measurement accuracy and data processing Liang Jing IHEP,CHINA
19-Sept-2012] «BE-RF-PM» TEST MODULES in the LAB DB girders (epucret) for T1 & T4: Optimization of the V-shaped supports Nick Gazis, Dmitry Gudkov, Vadim.
H. MAINAUD DURAND on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team Status on CLIC pre-alignment studies.
Survey for SPL Dominique Missiaen BE-ABP/SU. Outline 12/11/2008 Dominique Missiaen BE-ABP-SU, Survey for SPL 2  Scope & Main Parameters  Technical Description.
TE-MSC. 07/04/2016 Jose Ferradas TE-MSC-MDT Alejandro Carlon TE-MSC-MDT Juan Carlos Perez TE-MSC-MDT On behalf to MSC-MDT section and Coil working group.
Tutorial On Fiducialization Of Accelerator Magnets And Undulators
Notes 1.2: Significant Figures
APFC-03 Reactive Power Compensation Method & Settings
MSA / Gage Capability (GR&R)
TEST MODULE WG Cradles for CLIC module supporting system
Alignment methods developed for the validation of the thermal and mechanical behavior of the Two Beam Test Modules for the CLIC project Hélène MAINAUD.
TRANSITIONS.
List of changes and improvements for the next generation CLIC module
LCLS Undulator Fiducialization
Towards a common mechanical interface
FEA of strut sample.
Undulator Tuning Status Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / LCLS for Zack Wolf, Yurii Levashov, Achim Weidemann, Seva Kaplounenko, Scott Jansson, Ralph Colon, Dave.
Working Scientifically
Presentation transcript:

Measurements of DB supporting systems Fiducialisation Sylvain GRIFFET, 21/03/2011 Measurements performed in February and early March /13 EDMS n°

Plan Measurements of DB supporting systems Sylvain GRIFFET, 21/03/2011 Measurements objectives CMM measurements, first session Calculations, fist session Checking of girders Checking of cradles Pin holes locations CMM measurements, second session Calculations, second session Checking of girders and cradles Pin holes locations Conclusions 2/13

Measurements objectives After measuring cradles and girders separately late January, to determine the shims that are necessary (EDMS n° and ), the two DB supporting systems have been assembled in the building 169. Early February, these two assemblies were brought in metrology to be measured for the following reasons: Sylvain GRIFFET, 21/03/2011 Measurements of DB supporting systems To verify that shimming ensures a correct positioning of the pin holes (articulation points) with respect to the beam axis, To add targets on the girder 3079 to allow us to develop the Micro-Triangulation method, And finally, to measure during the same time all fiducials and all sensors plates in the same coordinates system, that is to say, carry out the fiducialisation of the supporting system (All fiducials are available in the EDMS document n° ). 3/13

CMM measurements, first session Measurements were performed with Olivetti CMM within  6 µm MPE (Maximal Permissible Error). The most accurate CMM, Leitz Infinity, was out of order early February. Moreover, its capacity and its technology (measuring table that moves but not the portal above) would have complicated the measurements. Sylvain GRIFFET, 21/03/2011 Measurements of DB supporting systems Measurements with Olivetti took a lot of time because of the following reasons: The CMM is a little too short, that requires to use and calibrate a lot of different probes, The fiducials positioning is not systematic, that requires to perform the measurements once manually before automatically. 4/13

Calculations, first session Checking of girders The goal is to check that results obtained are consistent with girders measurements performed in January. For this, the cloud of 10 points (B to B for the girder 3069) measured in January is put into the coordinate system of points measured in February using a 3D similitude. Thanks to this fast check for each girder, we have controlled that all points are in the tolerances and we detected that a point of girder 3069 was not measured again. Sylvain GRIFFET, 21/03/2011 Measurements of DB supporting systems 5/13

Calculations, first session Checking of cradles Like for girders, the goal is to check that results obtained are consistent with cradles measurements of January. The two clouds of 13 points for each cradles (4 prism holders and 3 sensor plates composed by 3 balls for each) are expressed in the same coordinate system thanks to a 3D similitude. From the beginning of the calculations for cradles 2 and 4 (assembled with girder 3069), we found offsets about 20 to 40 µm, there were 3 possible explanations: Problem of Ferranti CMM (MPE of ± 3 µm) used for cradles measurements, Problem of Olivetti CMM (MPE of ± 6 µm) used for girders measurements and supporting systems measurements, Deformation of cradles between the two sessions of measurements. To confirm one of these explanations, we processed data from the second girder and we found the same problems. We can see in the next slide an example of the "deformations" seen on the cradle 3. Sylvain GRIFFET, 21/03/2011 Measurements of DB supporting systems 6/13

7/13

Calculations, first session Checking of cradles As we can see in the graph, the “deformations” are on the same direction for each type of CMM probe. On the other hand, Nicolas Chritin has made simulations of deformation and he has never been able to obtain such deformation forms. Finally Dominique Pugnat, from metrology, has made different tests on probes and he identified calibration failures. By a post-treatment of data using the errors found by Dominique we significantly improved results. Unfortunately, to have identified the problem will not allow us to remove it: The configuration of DB supporting system can’t be measured by another mean now, to improve measurements we would need larger CMM. Sylvain GRIFFET, 21/03/2011 Measurements of DB supporting systems 8/13

Calculations, first session Pin holes locations The analysis of the location of pin holes with respect to their theoretical location allowed us to identify problems concerning the assembly of the cradles on the girders. The faults, for 3 cradles on 4, are several tenths of millimeter. To remove faults on each of these 3 cradles, we had followed this method: Calculation of theoretical locations of all points in the beam coordinate system, Laser tracker measurements of prisms and pin holes, Disassembly and reassembly of cradle, Check with laser tracker measurements. When necessary, we repeated the 3 last points until to obtain offsets better than the laser tracker accuracy, about 40 µm in that case. All results are available in EDMS n° The explanation of these faults was determinate during this work: the plates glued on girder, which allow to fix cradles to girder, are misaligned, so the screwing generates stress and bad positioning. Sylvain GRIFFET, 21/03/2011 Measurements of DB supporting systems 9/13

CMM measurements, second session Measurements were performed from the 10 th to the 16 th of March with Olivetti CMM. The Leitz CMM was efficient but it was necessary to redo all the measurements program without being sure of getting good results (because of movements of the measurement table and the CMM’s capacity) and thus lose much time. Results are available in the EDMS reports n° Sylvain GRIFFET, 21/03/2011 Measurements of DB supporting systems 10/13

Calculations, second session Checking of girders and cradles The measurements method is the same, therefore we again obtained offsets between measurements performed in January and March, but not exactly with the same distribution. To summarize, on the cradles 1 and 2 the offsets average is about 20 µm whereas on the girders and on the cradles 3 and 4 the offsets average is about 10 µm. Assuming that the measures of January are better quality, we have expressed these ones in a common coordinate system that constitute the final results. Micro-Triangulation targets, glued on the girder 3079 and the cradles 1 and 3, were not measured during the session of January, therefore the results could not be crossed-checked : the accuracy on these points is about ±6 µm MPE on the girder but on the cradles we expect an accuracy from ±10 to 15 µm MPE. We will have to be careful during our future measurements. Sylvain GRIFFET, 21/03/2011 Measurements of DB supporting systems 11/13

Calculations, second session The new assemblies are successful: the pin holes are better than 20 µm with respect to their theoretical locations for 3 cradles and better than 10 µm on the cradle 1. These values ​​include measurement errors, we could not expect better results using shimming method. The pin holes locations defined the articulation point. The articulation point location between the two girders depends on the cradles 2 and 3: we can see that the shimming offset will be partly compensate vertically but not laterally. Sylvain GRIFFET, 21/03/2011 Measurements of DB supporting systems 12/13 Pin holes locations

Conclusions The usefulness of checking: The systematic check for each step of the measurement results allowed us to detect CMM probe problem, to detect a problem in the assembly of DB supporting systems and then to properly resume the assemblies of cradles on girders. What we will have to improve: To check the locations of plates which allow to fix cradles to girder, To follow the assembly of each cradle on girder by Laser Tracker measurements, To improve CMM measurements by a new protocol for Epucret girders and by the use of a larger CMM in the future. To conclude: The fiducialisation of the DB supporting system is finally over, there will be no additional dismantling to be done. The fiducialisation accuracy is generally within CMM tolerances, ± 6 µm MPE, by integrating the January results more reliable in an overall coordinate system. However, we will have to be careful about Micro- Triangulation targets fixed on cradles. All results and analysis are available on EDMS n° Sylvain GRIFFET, 21/03/2011 Measurements of DB supporting systems 13/13