Monitoring and evaluation Objectives of the Session  To Define Monitoring, impact assessment and Evaluation. (commonly know as M&E)  To know why Monitoring.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Program Evaluation: What is it?

Advertisements

Performance Measurement and Evaluation 2/8/2014 Performance Measurement and Evaluation 1 Performance Measurement and Evaluation What are they? How are.

Introduction to Impact Assessment

Postgraduate Course 7. Evidence-based management: Research designs.

Overview M&E Capacity Strengthening Workshop, Maputo 19 and 20 September 2011.

Designing an Effective Evaluation Strategy

Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment

Chapter 2 Flashcards.

Action Implementation and Evaluation Planning Whist the intervention plan describes how the population nutrition problem for a particular target group.

1 Designing a Monitoring and Evaluation System for a Rural Travel and Transport Project Michael Bamberger Gender and Development Group The World Bank RTTP.

Evaluating Physical Activity Intervention Programs Thomas Schmid, PhD Physical Activity and Health Branch CDC Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European

Gender Aware Monitoring and Evaluation. Amsterdam, The Netherlands Presentation overview This presentation is comprised of the following sections:

Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.

ISTEP: Technology Field Research in Developing Communities Instructor: M. Bernardine Dias CAs: Sarah Belousov and Ermine Teves Spring 2009.

RESEARCH A systematic quest for undiscovered truth A way of thinking

S519: Evaluation of Information Systems Week 14: April 7, 2008.

The County Health Rankings & Roadmaps Take Action Cycle.

Performance Measures AmeriCorps Project Director Training Saratoga, NY October 7 th – 9 th, 2013.

Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.

Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.

1 What are Monitoring and Evaluation? How do we think about M&E in the context of the LAM Project?

Rwanda MCC Threshold Program CIVIL SOCIETY STRENGTHENING PROJECT Cross-Cutting Advocacy Issues Data Collection Monitoring and Evaluation.

Course on Data Analysis and Interpretation P Presented by B. Unmar Sponsored by GGSU PART 2 Date: 5 July

Tools for Civil Society to Understand and Use Development Data: Improving MDG Policymaking and Monitoring Module 3: MDGs and the Policy Cycle.

Director of Evaluation and Accountability Manager, UW’s Grand Rapids, Michigan Robert McKown, CIRS Director of Evaluation and Accountability Sherri.

1 CORAT AFRICA MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP FOR IMBISA/AMECEA COMMUNICATION COORDINATORS, MAPUTO, MOZAMBIQUE.

ASSESSMENT. Assessment is the systematic and on-going process of collecting and reviewing evidence about the College's academic and administrative programs.

Monitoring & Evaluation Presentation for Technical Assistance Unit, National Treasury 19 August 2004 Fia van Rensburg.

Monitoring & Evaluation: The concepts and meaning Day 9 Session 1.

Community Health organizing concepts. community health professionals must possess specific knowledge and skills.  identify problems,  develop plan to.

CHAPTER 12 Descriptive, Program Evaluation, and Advanced Methods.

Monitoring and Evaluation Orientation 17 th May 2011 MCA Namibia.

3.2/3.3. Li: To know how to structure unit assessment answers To plan/write a draft answer for the unit assessment workbook.

Chapter 2 Doing Sociological Research Key Terms. scientific method Involves several steps in research process, including observation, hypothesis testing,

Research Design. Selecting the Appropriate Research Design A research design is basically a plan or strategy for conducting one’s research. It serves.

Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 24, 2009.

PREPARING FOR MONITORING AND EVALUATION 27 – 31 May 2013 Bangkok Bangkok Office Asia and Pacific Regional Bureau for Education United Nations Educational,

1 Results-based Monitoring, Training Workshop, Windhoek, Results-based Monitoring Purpose and tasks Steps 1 to 5 of establishing a RbM.

SJI Impact Assessment 2014 Based on Impact Assessment for Development Agencies – Learning to Value Change (Chris Roche, Oxfam, digital file 2010)

Situation Analysis. 2 Policy and planning Key messages Situation analysis is more than burden of disease (BoD) Also include SDH, population expectations.

Brief Introduction Dr R Vincent: 1 Most Significant Change: using stories to assess impact.

Yr 7.  Pupils use mathematics as an integral part of classroom activities. They represent their work with objects or pictures and discuss it. They recognise.

Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.

The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.

IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Monitoring and Evaluating Results.

Development of Gender Sensitive M&E: Tools and Strategies.

Research And Evaluation Differences Between Research and Evaluation  Research and evaluation are closely related but differ in four ways: –The purpose.

Middle Managers Workshop 2: Measuring Progress. An opportunity for middle managers… Two linked workshops exploring what it means to implement the Act.

Module 3: Ensuring Sustainability Session 1. Empowerment of the Community 1 CBDRR Framework Training - Myanmar Red Cross Society.

Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.

Module 8 Guidelines for evaluating the SDGs through an equity focused and gender responsive lens: Overview Technical Assistance on Evaluating SDGs: Leave.

Project monitoring and evaluation

Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation

Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation

Right-sized Evaluation

Fundamentals of Monitoring and Evaluation

Session 1 – Study Objectives

Evaluation of the National Programme for Gender Mainstreaming in the Swedish Municipalities and Counties Presentation at the Mayors Conference.

Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 6. Developing indicators.

Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations

Introduction to Program Evaluation

HEALTH IN POLICIES TRAINING

Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 7. Managers’ and stakeholders’ information needs.

Multi-Sectoral Nutrition Action Planning Training Module

Section 3 Monitoring, recording and evaluating performance development.

WHAT is evaluation and WHY is it important?

Session 1.4. The EFSA Analysis Plan

Monitoring and Evaluation in SIYB Program

Presentation transcript:

Monitoring and evaluation Objectives of the Session  To Define Monitoring, impact assessment and Evaluation. (commonly know as M&E)  To know why Monitoring and Evaluation is important.  To know who should be involved in Monitoring of programme impact and why.

Monitoring, Impact Assessment and Evaluation What is Monitoring?  Ongoing, systematic collection and analysis of information  Monitoring is an activity that takes place regularly throughout the programme  To be most effective it should involve the beneficiaries. Monitoring and evaluation

What is Impact Assessment?  Attempts to determine whether significant or lasting changes in the lives of the beneficiaries has occurred  The views of the beneficiaries must be sought to ascertain their perception of the programmes impact. Monitoring and evaluation

Measuring Impact What has changed and what is different as a result of the programmes intervention? The following aspects of change should be considered  Impact on people's lives  Community participation  Sustainability  Impact on Gender Equity  Impact on policy and practice Monitoring and evaluation

What is Evaluation?  It usually tries to assess impact as well as examining whether a project has been cost effective and efficient.  May be considered as a kind of research into a programme, its achievements and its limitations. Monitoring and evaluation

Why Monitor and Evaluate?  Provides a tool for assessing effectiveness and efficiency of the programme  Information used for gathering baseline data can be used for monitoring, impact assessment and evaluation.  Adjustments can be made at an early stage to allow for a greater impact of the programme. Monitoring and evaluation

Quantitative and Qualitative Methods of Collecting Information Quantitative  Data that exists as numbers – 350 girls graduated from High School  Helps to answer questions like "who, how much, how many"  Statistical analysis can be used to provide precise estimates for variables such as frequencies, averages, percentages, ranges, etc Useful in the following situations:  When accurate and precise data is required  To test whether there is a statistical relationship between variables  To produce evidence to prove that a particular problem exists  To justify a particular strategy  To identify characteristics of a population Monitoring and evaluation

Qualitative  Data that exists as words – The girl said the food was monotonous but more that she would have received at home  Answers question like "how and why"  The focus is mainly on explaining meanings, processes, reasons, explanations Qualitative techniques are useful when:  A through understanding is necessary of a situation  Information is needed on what people think about a situation, their priorities  Seeking to understand why people behave in a certain way  Resources and time are short Monitoring and evaluation

Monitoring and evaluation overview Set Objectives Define indicators and methods for measuring indicators Monitor Progress Towards objectives, feedback into programme design Impact Assessment Are we making a difference?