Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for the Illinois River at Arkansas Highway 59 Bridge, 2008 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
City of Edmonton Water Quality Monitoring Locations.
Advertisements

Low Flow Calculations In NPDES permits the permitted industry or municipality must meet certain requirements with regards to the toxicity of their effluent.
WATER DEPTH, VEGETATION, AND POLLUTANT REMOVAL IN A CONSTRUCTED WETLAND TREATING AQUACULTURE EFFLUENT Brian E. Dyson, Kim D. Jones, Ron Rosati* Department.
Quantification of Spill Data from Domestic Facilities Andy Squires Pinellas County Environmental Management Keith Hackett Janicki Environmental, Inc.
Transport of nitrogen and phosphorus from Rhode River watersheds during storm events David Correll, Thomas Jordan, and Donald Weller Water Resources Research,
Water Quality Assessment of Osage Creek & West Fork, White and Kings Rivers 2008 & ½ 2009 Marc Nelson PhD, PE Nelson Engineering.
Effects of Conservation Tillage Systems on Dissolved Phosphorus Dr. David Baker Heidelberg University Tiffin, Ohio November 15, 2012 Davenport, IA.
UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.
SCOPE OF DATA STREAM FLOW AND SOLUTE FLUXES Stream discharge gauging Stream water chemistry PRECIPITATION AND DEPOSITION NRCS Snow Survey and Snow Pillow.
Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs)
How Management Effects Nutrient and Sediment Losses Dennis FrameFred Madison Directors UW Discovery Farms Program.
Michael J. Brayton MD/DE/DC Water Science Center Hydrologic Controls on Nutrient and Pesticide Transport through a Small Agricultural Watershed, Morgan.
DESIGNING MONITORING PROGRAMS TO EVALUATE BMP EFFECTIVENESS Funded by grants from USDA- CSREES, EPA 319, NSF Nancy Mesner - Utah State University, Dept.
Settlement Agreement April - September 2008 Prepared for the Technical Oversight Committee January 29, 2009.
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT REPORT October - December 2009 Technical Oversight Committee March 2, 2010 Pam Lehr Section Leader Restoration Sciences Department.
Evaluation of Street Sweeping as a Water Quality Management Tool in Three Residential Basins in Madison, WI Bill Selbig USGS – WRD Middleton, WI Bill Selbig.
SENSORS, CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE, AND EXAMINATION OF HYDROLOGIC AND HYDROCHEMICAL RESPONSE IN THE LITTLE BEAR RIVER OBSERVATORY TEST BED Jeffery S. Horsburgh.
Impact of Sampling Frequency on Annual Load Estimation Amber Spackman Jones Utah Water Research Lab Nancy Mesner Watershed Science Jeff Horsburgh Utah.
SENSORS, CYBERINFRASTRUCTURE, AND WATER QUALITY IN THE LITTLE BEAR RIVER Jeffery S. Horsburgh David K. Stevens, Amber Spackman Jones, David G. Tarboton,
West Virginia Non-tidal Monitoring Network: 2010 Update West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection West Virginia Department of Agriculture USGS.
Real-Time Water Quality Monitoring for Investigating the Strengths and Weaknesses of Existing Monitoring Techniques Little Bear River Basin Jeffery S.
Non-Point Source Pollutant Modeling Analysis and Prediction David Munn.
Monitoring and Pollutant Load Estimation. Load = the mass or weight of pollutant that passes a cross-section of the river in a specific amount of time.
Brian Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed and L’Anguille River Watershed Presented by: Dan DeVun, Equilibrium.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed, L’Anguille River Watershed, and Bayou Bartholomew Presented.
Paonia/Collbran Low Flow Presentation Water Quality Work Group Meeting June 9, 2004.
Nutrient and Sediment Concentrations, Yields and Loads in Impaired Streams and Rivers in the Taunton River Basin, Massachusetts, Jeffrey R. Barbaro.
Water Quality Monitoring : Galla Creek Bayou Bartholomew L’Anguille River Presented By: The Ecological Conservation Organization.
Water Quality Trends across 319 Monitoring Sites Brian E. Haggard Director, Arkansas Water Resources Center Funding provided by ANRC.
Castro Valley Creek Stormwater Quality Monitoring Brake Pad Partnership Meeting June 22, 2005.
West Fork of the White River Stream Restoration Monitoring Dan DeVun Ecological Conservation Organization (501)
West Fork of the White River Stream Restoration Monitoring Dan DeVun Ecological Conservation Organization (501)
Interim Update: Preliminary Analyses of Excursions in the A.R.M. Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge August 18, 2009 Prepared by SFWMD and FDEP as part.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Regional scale point source nutrient load estimation in support of SPARROW* modeling Gerard McMahon,
Compiled by Load Profiling ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation
Nicole Reid, Jane Herbert, and Dean Baas MSU Extension Land & Water Program W. K. Kellogg Biological Station Transparency tube as a surrogate for turbidity,
Changes in Phosphorus Concentrations and Loads in the Assabet River Following Mandated Reductions in Wastewater Treatment Plant Discharges U.S. Geological.
FREQUENCY ANALYSIS.
1. Introduction The Big Darby Creek is categorized as a national scenic river with an array of biological species. Since this is one of the last pristine.
Water Quality Monitoring and Constituent Load Estimation in the Kings River near Berryville, Arkansas 2009 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center.
Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for Nutrients and Solids on the Ballard Creek, 2008 Arkansas Water Resources Center UA.
Stream Monitoring of Selected Sub-watersheds of Conesus Lake.
Automated Continuous Streamflow and Water-Quality Monitoring in the Blackstone River at the Massachusetts-Rhode Island State Line U.S. Geological Survey.
1 State of San Lorenzo River Symposium Nicole Beck, PhD 2NDNATURE April San Lorenzo Lagoon A Decade of Dry Season WQ Monitoring.
SWAT Modeling and Monitoring of Priority Watersheds- Phase III
Patapsco and Back River HSPF Watershed Model Part II – Water Quality Maryland Department of the Environment.
Water Quality Monitoring in the Upper Illinois River Watershed and Upper White River Basin Project Brian E. Haggard University of Arkansas.
Response of benthic algae communities to nutrient enrichment in agricultural streams: Implications for establishing nutrient criteria R.W. Black 1, P.W.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Bee Lake Water Quality Monitor Data Summary Period of record: to 2/19/07.
Sediment Delivery to the Watonwan River
Delaware’s Non-Tidal Monitoring Update for CY 2011 February 8,
Nutrient and Sediment Loading in Sougahatchee Creek and the Impacts on Aquatic Biota Report submitted to West Point Stevens and the Cities of Auburn and.
Robert M. Hirsch, Research Hydrologist, USGS September 6, 2012 Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended Sediment fluxes from the Susquehanna River to the Bay.
Settlement Agreement April June 2007 Prepared for the Technical Oversight Committee August 28, 2007.
Continuous Water- Quality Monitoring. Continuous Water Quality Monitoring Advantages Needed in rapidly changing systems Provides better understanding.
Brian Haggard Director Arkansas Water Resources Center Funding provided by ANRC through Beaver Water District.
Guide to Choosing Time-Series Analyses for Environmental Flow Studies Michael Stewardson SAGES, The University of Melbourne.
Effects of changes in monitoring station location on reported Lake Mead water quality Dr. David James (UNLV) Randy Hadland (CLV) Dan Fischer (CLV)
Annual Membership Meeting Water Quality Report 2010
Loading of Phosphorus and Sediment to the South End of Cayuga Lake
Continuous Surrogate Monitoring for Pollutant Load Estimation in Urban Water Systems Anthony A. Melcher, USU Civil and Environmental.
Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Water Quality Monitoring Update – Summary August 15, 2017.
Flood Monitoring Tools 2011 OFMA Annual Conference
URBANIZATION IMPACTS ON STREAM NUTRIENT
URBAN NON-POINT SOURCE NUTRIENT IMPACTS
Jim McClelland Rae Mooney University of Texas at Austin
Low Flow Calculations In NPDES permits the permitted industry or municipality must meet certain requirements with regards to the toxicity of their effluent.
Little River Ditches Watershed Monitoring
URBANIZATION IMPACTS ON STREAM NUTRIENT
Presentation transcript:

Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for the Illinois River at Arkansas Highway 59 Bridge, 2008 Brian E. Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center UA Division of Agriculture

Summary 2008 Loads and Flow-Weighted Concentrations

Water samples were collected at the AR Highway 59 Bridge during base flow and storm flow events. Stage recorded in 30 min intervals by U.S. Geological Survey to estimate discharge. Water samples were collected every other week during base flow, plus composite samples during storm events (i.e., stage exceeded 5 ft). Water samples were analyzed at the AWRC WQL for: – NO 3 -N – NH 3 -N – TN – TP – SRP – TSS – SO 4 – Cl Annual loads and flow-weighted concentrations of select constituents were calculated for Illinois River Arkansas Highway 59

Load Determination & Mean Concentration Loads (kg) – Calculated using the mid-interval approach, and summed into monthly and annual. Flow-weighted concentration (mg L -1 ) − Total load divided by discharge volume during selected time period (e.g., annual).

Discharge and constituent concentrations were variable throughout the year. Total discharge: 1,010,000,000 m 3 – Base flow: 37% – Storm flow: 63% 26 samples were collected during base flow 26 composite samples during storm events

Cl, SO 4, NO 3 -N, TN flow-weighted concentrations were greater during base flow.

And, SRP, TP, NH 3 -N, and TSS flow- weighted concentrations were greater during storm flow.

The constituent loads at Illinois River varied by orders of magnitude between months. Monthly loads were variable depending on the frequency of storm event during the month. – Greatest loads during spring (March & April) – Lowest loads during fall and winter No storms in January or November

Phosphorus loads have been variable following the general trend in annual discharge. Phosphorus loads in 2008 were 2.5 times greater than 2007 loads, but were less than those reported in 1998 through 2002.

Nitrogen loads in 2008 were the greatest since monitoring started in 1997.

Total suspended solids loads in 2008 were also the greatest since monitoring started.

Summary 2008 Loads and Flow-Weighted Concentrations

What about the data collected from January to June 2009? Total discharge was 469,000,000 m 3 – Base flow: 40% – 13 base flow samples collected – Storm flow: 60% – 22 composite storm sampled

Monitoring is on-going at this site. Water quality sampling and load estimation is being continued at the Illinois River. The monitoring program has changed, collecting more frequent samples on fixed intervals (i.e., weekly) plus storm chasing. The partial loads from 2009 combined with the continued monitoring data will be used to calculate annual loads for CY 2009.

QUESTIONS? Take Home Message: Total constituent loading is dependent on annual discharge volume which is closely tied to the frequency and duration of storm events. QUESTIONS?