Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental IV: Multi-Tiered System of Supports.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Principals Role in Systemic Change for Reading Commitment.
Advertisements

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
MTSS Trainers: Janet Stephenson Melissa Long School Psychologist: Griselle Zeno.
How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved.
Multi-tiered System of Supports District Application.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
C4K – Building an efficient and effective delivery system to impact critical outcomes for kids Our initial focus as we build this system is early literacy.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Response to Intervention: Multi- Tiered Systems for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati October, 2011.
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
CA Multi-Tiered System of Supports
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
The general structure of the facilitation notes will be:
Eugene Field Elementary School “Inspiring and empowering each other to positively impact our community and our world.” Our Journey to Responsive Intervention.
Problem Solving Model Problem Solving Model NC DPI Summer Preparation Preparation & Implementation Implementation North Carolina.
School Leaders Professional Learning for School Leaders: The Principal’s Role in School Transformation Cynthia Mruczek Rich Barbacane April 19, 2011.
Administrator’s Academy July 2015 Instruction & Accountability Division.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
TODAY Observations Hypotheses Connection to Student Performance CSIP ASPIRING Goal(s) Objectives & Actions.
“Just can’t live that negative way… Make way for the positive day.” -Bob Marley Positive Vibration.
U SING THE IPST F ORMS TO S UPPORT THE P ROBLEM S OLVING P ROCESS Shelly Dickinson Janet Stephenson.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Creating, Monitoring and Evaluating a Master Schedule That supports student learning.
Professional Learning Communities “The most promising strategy for sustained, substantial school improvement is developing the ability of school personnel.
“A New Chapter and a New Day” An Update on the School Improvement Grant Staff Meeting Friday, August 5, :30 a.m. LHS Commons.
Cohort 5 Middle/Jr. High School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring,
RTI: Response To Instruction NEA NH Presentation Madison Elementary School
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Cultural Shifts: Rethinking what we do and why we do it Together, we can make a difference.
John Fuller Elementary School Pine Tree Elementary School &
PLC & RTI Tammy Rasmussen Southern Oregon RTI Dean Richards Oregon RTI.
Nancy Steele Kelly Vanderbosch The Power of Teams in RtI as a Multi-Tiered System of Support.
RtII Response to Instruction and Intervention paTTAN.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental I: Core Curriculum & Instruction.
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
A CCOUNTABILITY & E VALUATION. Overview of this Session Defining Accountability & Evaluation MTSSS & Program Evaluation Issues Example of Evaluation in.
Victoria White, PhD Ann George, EdD Associate Professor Assistant Professor Director of KC Metro Center SSLS.
Three-Tier Model of Student Intervention Training (NMPED’s Guidance Framework) An Exploration of the SAT Process October 2, 2015 Presented by: Myra L.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental IV: Multi-Tiered System of Supports.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
TOSA Content Fundamental II. TOSA AGENDA Content for TOSAs Pink Wednesday Material Planning time.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental II: Inclusive Practice.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental II: Inclusive Practice.
Response to Intervention in a Nutshell August 26, 2009.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental III: Climate and Engagement.
Broward County Public Schools BP #3 Optimal Relationships
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental I: Core Curriculum & Instruction Session 3.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental III: Climate and Engagement.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental II: Inclusive Practice.
Instructional Consultation and Teaming: A Parent’s Perspective Closing the Gap Conference November 11, 2009 Tina Greene.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental III: Climate and Engagement 11/13/15.
Blue Friday PLC Fundamental I: Core Curriculum & Instruction.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental I: Core Curriculum & Instruction Session 2.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
School-Based Problem-Solving for Individuals (SBIT)
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Using PLCs to support MTSS Florida Association of Staff Developers September 24, 2012 Florida Association of Staff Developers September 24, 2012.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
MTSS MULTI-TIERED SYSTEMS OF SUPPORT A LOOK AT THE SYSTEMS TODAY IN CALIFORNIA GAIL LANCASTER –ASSOCIATE FACULTY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY/FRESNO CAMPUS RESOURCE.
TOSA Content Fundamental III. Consensogram 7 stickies 1-4 (1 low, 4 high)
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
Looking Forward to a Great School Year!
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Presentation transcript:

Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental IV: Multi-Tiered System of Supports

Inspiration 5oeg 5oeg

Inspiration Think of someone who has inspired you… – What did they do to inspire you? – What have you done differently because of them?

Working Agreements* Ask questions. Engage fully. Integrate new information. Open your mind to diverse views. Utilize what you learn. How do we hold each other accountable? *Taken from LearningForward.org

What steps have you taken since our last meeting? With your Commitment Partner discuss – – How did you do on your “Commitment” from last time? – Planning with MTSS Leadership Team – Pink Wednesday whole staff training – Review site-based MTSS processes – Attended training – MTSS coach visit – Behavior screening

Learning Intentions To better understand How ICEL model is used in the MTSS referral process: instruction, curriculum, and learning environment are ruled out as “causal” factors before attributions to learners requiring interventions are made.

Professional Learning Community Groups of 6-8 Share surprises your site the MTSS Pink Wednesday? Share solutions has your site implemented to address the MTSS process. Share concerns your site has regarding MTSS. Groups share 2-3 solutions discussed.

Fundamental IV: Multi-Tiered System of Support A.Position Statement: ALL students are provided Tier I core instruction in the general education classroom environment and their individual needs are addressed through collaboration between general education staff, special education staff, and ELL staff. B.Expectations: The MTSS process aligns with PLCs and school leadership team functions. The ICEL model is used in the MTSS referral process: instruction, curriculum, and learning environment are ruled out as “causal” factors before attributions to learners requiring interventions are made. Local and district level measures are used to monitor student responsiveness to core instructional practice and response to intervention as necessary. Multiple sources of data are used to monitor student progress and to determine the effectiveness of instruction and interventions. Functioning PLCs and MTSS teams meet on a regular basis to review student outcomes and determine needed supports. Documentation of student interventions and outcomes are maintained in the MTSS tab of IC. A special education referral is only considered after interventions at all tiers have been implemented with fidelity and student outcomes are insufficient. (MTSS is the evaluation strategy for determining specific learning disability.) Pres s Play

Professional Learning Community Administrator PLC –Four Essential Questions What do we expect our teachers and ourselves to learn about MTSS? MTSS process and structure How will we know we strengthening our capacity to meet expectations? How will we respond if we don’t make progress? How will we respond once practices have been established?

MTSS Expectation The ICEL model is used in the MTSS referral process: instruction, curriculum, and learning environment are ruled out as “causal” factors before attributions to learners requiring interventions are made. Remember where they come from. How do we get teachers to understand that it isn’t just about the learner, but also about instruction, curriculum and environment as well? Agreed-help!

Instruction, Curriculum, Environment, and Learner (ICEL) A common mistake is to assume that student learning problems exist primarily in the learner and to underestimate the degree to which instructional strategies, curriculum demands, and environmental influences impact the learner’s academic performance. The ICEL elements ensure that a full range of relevant explanations for student problems are examined.

Instruction, Curriculum, Environment, and Learner (ICEL) Review, Interview, Observation, and Test (RIOT) Matrix A tool that helps educators consider the full range of possible explanations for the student’s academic or behavioral problems

RIOT/ICEL Matrix The RIOT/ICEL matrix is not itself a data collection instrument. An organizing framework, or heuristic, that increases schools’ confidence both in the quality of the data that they collect and the findings that emerge from the data Can be used at the PLC or IAT level Supports strong Tier 1 conversations

Problem-Solving in an MTSS Model

How Does it Fit Together? MTSS At A Glance Addl. Diagnostic Assessment Instruction Results Monitoring Individual Diagnostic Individualized Intensive All Students at a grade level Fall Winter Spring Universal Screening None Continue With Core Instruction Grades Classroom Assessments Yearly ITBS/ITED Group Diagnostic Small Group Differentiated By Skill Step 1 Step 2Step 3Step 4 C S I 1-5% 80-90% 5-10% weekly 2 times/month

With a Partner Pair up, read through the article & discuss – Define R-I-O-T and I-C-E-L – How can you support teacher with gathering RIOT/ICEL – What is the value of using the RIOT/ICEL tool? – How do you see this enhancing the PLC process? – How may this tool support Tier 1? Whole group discussion

Practice with Partner Review the sample matrix Discuss how you may guide a teacher through this tool Use the blank matrix to walk through a student at your site

The MTSS process aligns with PLCs and school leadership team functions. The ICEL model is used in the MTSS referral process: instruction, curriculum, and learning environment are ruled out as “causal” factors before attributions to learners requiring interventions are made. Local and district level measures are used to monitor student responsiveness to core instructional practice and response to intervention as necessary. Multiple sources of data are used to monitor student progress and to determine the effectiveness of instruction and interventions. Functioning PLCs and MTSS teams meet on a regular basis to review student outcomes and determine needed supports. Documentation of student interventions and outcomes are maintained in the MTSS tab of IC. A special education referral is only considered after interventions at all tiers have been implemented with fidelity and student outcomes are insufficient. (MTSS is the evaluation strategy for determining specific learning disability.)

PLC* - Share your Professional Learning Commitment* Find a partner – Share two things you will do at your site based on today’s discussion – Identify a source of support and any obstacles – Identify when and how you will check back in with them

Closure… For next time… Documentation of student interventions and outcomes are maintained in the MTSS tab of IC. A special education referral is only considered after interventions at all tiers have been implemented with fidelity and student outcomes are insufficient. (MTSS is the evaluation strategy for determining specific learning disability.) Other asks….. Please complete the session evaluation so we can make each session valuable and engaging