Board of Ed. of Independent School Dist. no. 92 of Pottawatomie Cty. v. Earls (2002) By Jennifer Fish.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Due Process and Search and Seizure- 4 th and 14 th Amendments.
Advertisements

Drug Testing in Schools Howard Taras, M.D. Floralynn Einesman, J.D. Jesse Brennan.
HALL HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 502 Random Drug Testing of Extracurricular Participants Frequently Asked Questions.
The Fourth Amendment and Public Schools
Created by the Ohio State Bar Foundation
1 Chapter 11 Evidence is Admissible if Obtained During an Administrative Function Under the “Special Needs” of Government Evidence is Admissible if Obtained.
RANDOM STUDENT DRUG TESTING. What is Random Student Drug Testing? A Powerful Prevention Program It gives students a credible reason to resist pressure.
Ellie Ingbritsen and Rosie Parmigiani Board of Education of Independent School District #92 of Pottawatomie County et. al v Earls et. al.
Student Drug Use: Ethical & Legal Perspectives Amanda Davis & Vickie Kummer 2004.
“Why Drug Test” Drug Prevention Drug Testing Policies & Procedures Jenkins Ind. Board Informational Presentation February 26, 2007.
Fourth Amendment: Searches at School Note: Some photos and text in the PowerPoint are adapted from a lesson plan developed by Lindsey Kakert. The lesson.
Beth Herrmann March 25, 2015 Legal Policy Ethics Effectiveness.
Vernonia School District vs. Acton (1995)
Student Drug Testing: Effective? Joy Martin University Central Oklahoma.
BY: Alexis Stern, Mikey Thompson and Hao Pang.  Freedom of Press- Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier. This affects us because it tells us our boundaries on to what.
Getting Fired Up Can Get You Fired & Kicked off the Team A Study of Cases Impacting Drug Testing Policies.
Fourth Amendment Assignment. Amendment 4: Right to Search and Seizure The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,
Ferguson v. Charleston Aaron Leavitt Law, Values, and Public Policy Spring Semester 2002.
Brandon Day EDAD 689 November 3, Overview When analyzing search/seizure methods in public schools, one must be mindful of federal legislation which.
Running Head: SCENARIO Scenario: Practical Applications of School Law Jacqueline Suarez Barry University.
Reporting Requirements for School Staff Presented by Nancy Hungerford November 30, 2011 Presented by Nancy Hungerford November 30, 2011.
+ Protecting Individual Liberties Section 1 Chapter 14.
UNIT 5 AMERICAN GOVERNMENT. LESSON PAGES How do the 4 th and 5 th Amendments protect against unreasonable law enforcement procedures? Objective:
Unit Five Lesson 31 How do the Fourth and Fifth Amendments Protect Against Unreasonable Law Enforcement Procedures.
Lesson 6-X: Student Drug Testing. WALLWALL Unaddressed Risk ½ Way to the Wall Total Risk Drug-Free America.
Student Rights: What rights do students have once inside the schoolhouse door? Tinker v. Des Moines and New Jersey v. T.L.O.
The Fourth Amendment and Students’ Rights in Public Schools.
Case Study Presentation
Analyzing a Court Decision An overview of Student Searches presented by Bart Fennemore.
By: Chloe, Nicole, and Lisa. Major Violent Events which encouraged school safety precautions Columbine High School Shootings –Deadliest high school shooting.
Drug and Alcohol Statistics Is this a problem???.
THE 4 TH AMENDMENT The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall.
Some test cases. The student body of Crestwood high school, a took a vote. By a vast majority they voted to conduct a student-led prayer over the public.
Do They Have the Right??? You SHALL Decide……. Case #1 The United States is involved in a controversial war. To show their opposition to the war, two students.
A student’s rights to privacy and freedom of speech in a school setting.  Objective:  Students will describe student rights and constitutional issues.
 The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,
The 4 th amendment. The 4 th amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and requires any warrant to be judicially sanctioned and supported.
The Investigation.  Right to remain silent  Right to an attorney  No interrogation should take place before they read  Are a result of the US Supreme.
Section 2: The Fourth Amendment: Your Right to Be Secure Chapter 13: Supreme Court Cases.
Due Process and the Principal EDAD 689 The School Principal By: Melanie Dozier September 21, 2010.
What about VIOXX?. Adenomatous Polyp Prevention on Vioxx (APPROVe) Vioxx (rofecoxib) versus Placebo Basic Clinical Trial Objective: Assess whether Vioxx.
By, Kris Coles Eva Ortega Christina Torres. Veronia School District v. Acton First court case to go to Supreme Court, were the school district demand.
The Investigation Phase. An arrest takes place when a person is suspected of crime and taken into custody.
Vernonia School District V Acton Oregon-Late 1980’s school officials recognized higher rate of drug use among athletes Oregon-Late 1980’s school officials.
The Fourth Amendment COURT CASES. What does the Fourth Amendment say? The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,
Bill of Rights Test Cases. Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or.
By: Cortney Sollows, Tim Jewett, Jeff Johnson, Paul Landau.
Legal Considerations: Protecting The Employer And The Employee An Employee’s Perspective © 2016 Messing, Rudavsky & Weliky, P.C. OUR WORKPLACES & THE OPIOID.
Drug Detection in Schools Class 14. Searches in Schools Generally New Jersey v T.L.O. gave broad discretion to school officials to search students –Diminished.
Health Research Title Student Name Teacher & Class Period Date.
Jen Polin and Allison Kodroff.   The School District adopted the Student Activities Drug Testing Policy  Requires all students who participate in after.
WISD Random student drug testing
Limiting the Right of Search
4th and 5th Amendment issues in sport and physical activity
Vernonia School District v. Acton (1995)
Bill of Rights Scenarios
What Do You Think? The principal is walking down the hall at the end of lunch, hurrying students to class. As he passes the bathroom, he smells marijuana.
Jane Doe v. Little Rock School District
Do They Have The Right?.
Scenario Analysis Answers
October 16, 2018 Modern Issues in the U.S. Agenda:
Bill of Rights Test Cases
2018 Delaware State Epidemiological Profile
IRB Educational Session - IRB Regulations on Expedited Review
The Warren Court, Roe v. Wade, & School Rights Cases
Due Process and Public Schools
Search & Seizure in Schools:
School Searches and You
Chapter 23 Government Regulation and Administrative Law
Vernonia School District 47j v. Acton (1995)
Presentation transcript:

Board of Ed. of Independent School Dist. no. 92 of Pottawatomie Cty. v. Earls (2002) By Jennifer Fish

Problem Drug use in schools

Solution The Tecumseh, Oklahoma School District requires all students involved in extra curricular activities to undergo drug testing Students who test positive are not allowed to participate in ANY extra curricular activities Students who test positive are not allowed to participate in ANY extra curricular activities

Controversy Parents and students believe this policy impedes on their fourth amendments rights Fourth amendment gives: Fourth amendment gives: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons…against unreasonable searches”

What do you think?? ? Drug testing Necessary Not necessary Optional Not optional

History Veronia School District 47J v. Action (1995) High increase in drug abuse problem 1 High increase in drug abuse problem 1 Also- athletes were mainly the leaders of this drug culture Also- athletes were mainly the leaders of this drug culture Students became a threat to themselves 2 Students became a threat to themselves 2 New school policy - students in ALL extra curricular activities be subjected to random drug testing New school policy - students in ALL extra curricular activities be subjected to random drug testing

Veronia Ruling 1. The school has “reasonable cause” to believe that drugs were being used 2. Drug testing was seen to be in the best interest of the students (health and safety) 3. “The invasion of students’ privacy is not significant, given the minimally intrusive nature of the sample collection”

Weighing the Evidence 4 th ammendment

Statistics The increase in the use of marijuana has been especially pronounced. Between 1992 and 2006 past-month use of marijuana increased from: The increase in the use of marijuana has been especially pronounced. Between 1992 and 2006 past-month use of marijuana increased from: 12% to 18% among high school seniors. 12% to 18% among high school seniors. 8% to 14% among 10th graders. 8% to 14% among 10th graders. 4% to 7% among 8th graders. 4% to 7% among 8th graders.

Statistics 42.3% of high school seniors in 2006 reported having ever used marijuana/hashish 42.3% of high school seniors in 2006 reported having ever used marijuana/hashish Since 1987, the number of high school seniors who think people risk harming themselves with drug use dropped from 73.5 % to 54.8% in 2007 Since 1987, the number of high school seniors who think people risk harming themselves with drug use dropped from 73.5 % to 54.8% in 2007

Court Ruling “The need to prevent and deter the substantial harm of childhood drug use provides the necessary immediacy for a school testing policy. Given the nationwide epidemic of drug use, and the evidence of increased drug use in Tecumseh schools, it was entirely reasonable for the School District to enact this particular drug testing policy.” “The need to prevent and deter the substantial harm of childhood drug use provides the necessary immediacy for a school testing policy. Given the nationwide epidemic of drug use, and the evidence of increased drug use in Tecumseh schools, it was entirely reasonable for the School District to enact this particular drug testing policy.”

Now… What do you think?? ? Drug testing Necessary Not necessary Optional Not optional

Sources Cited PowerPoint clip art PowerPoint clip art Google images Google images