Evaluation of ES-2 by the Occupant Safety Research Partnership of USCAR presented by Annette L. Irwin representing the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WorldSID debut for UN / WP 29
Advertisements

1 KOREA GTR No.7 2 nd Phase Research Results Dec. 8, 2009 Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, Korea Automobile Testing and Research Institute.
1 Modular Loadwall Side Impacts: Implications for Advanced Sensor Deflection Measures in Dummies John R. Humm N. Yoganandan Frank A. Pintar Department.
Child safety with respect to vehicle protection and booster seats - a proposal for a CRF for children > 4yo 1 Informal document GRSP (55 th GRSP,
Recent Australian Design Rule (ADR) Developments and Implementation of UN Regulations in Australia 39th APEC Transportation Working Group Christchurch,
Federal Role & Safety Standards Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program Winter 2004.
1 Toyota Side Impact Protection for Out-of-Position Occupants Washington, DC October 25, 2001.
Transportation Safety for Wheelchair Occupants Linda van Roosmalen, PhD Douglas Hobson, PhD Department of Rehabilitation Science and Technology University.
GTR Head restraints ES Page 1 HR-7-8 GTR Head restraints Dynamic test procedure Trigger-point in dynamic test procedure.
47th GRSP Session Status report of Informal Group on CRS Pierre CASTAING Chairman Informal Document No. GRSP (47th session, May 2010, agenda.
DESIGN FOR CRASHWORTHINESS
Relevance of Chest Acceleration as an Injury Criterion for Frontal Impact A Critical Review.
NHTSA Evaluation of the Flex- GTR Legform on US Vehicles
Analysis of Shaken Baby Syndrome MRI-SCANSPRO-ENGINEERHYPERMESHFEM MODEL LS-DYNAPOST PROCESSING To perform computational simulations repeated shakings.
Utac Comparison tests on full crash test facility and hyge sled test facility in the frame of Regulation ECE R16.
2014 KNCAP Updated Status Korea Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport Submitted by the expert from Republic of Korea Informal document GRSP
GTR9-C-04 History of Development of the Flexible Pedestrian Legform Impactor (Flex-PLI) November 3rd, 2011 Japan.
Presentation to the GRSP December 2001 WorldSID Advanced Harmonised Dummy for Side Impact Martin Page C.E.E.S.A.R. (representing LAB) On behalf of the.
1 Frontal Accident Research Data in Japan Frontal Accident Research Data in Japan JASIC 29 January 2014.
1 International Harmonized Research Activities March, 2001 IHRA Steering Committee Presentation to WP-29.
Wheelchair Crashworthiness
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Survey on Safety of New Mobility Vehicles Submitted by the expert from Japan Informal document.
1/11 Proposal on Thorax Injury Criteria to protect elderly occupants February 27, 2013 Jasic.
Title: Australia’s Proposal for the Development of Pole Side Impact GTR Presenter’s Name: Allan Jonas Economy: Australia 33rd APEC Transportation Working.
WorldSID Update Edmund Hautmann BMW Group On behalf of the WorldSID Task Group 36 th GRSP Session Geneva, December 7-10, 2004 Edmund Hautmann BMW Group.
WorldSID 5 th TEG ISO WorldSID 50 th Group Summary of Meetings 16 March 2012 London, UK.
Safety Belts Save Lives Buckle Up Illinois!. Unrestrained Occupants in Frontal Crashes.
EEVC WG20 European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee 12 th December, 2006 Slide 1 EEVC WG20 and WG12 Rear Impact Test Procedure Development Programme Presented.
Federal Highway Administration Department of Transportation Effective Lateral Placement of Cable Barriers in Flat-Bottom, Sloped Medians Dr. Dhafer Marzougui.
IHRA Side Impact Working Group Status Report GRSP, December 2002
Chapter 15 Oscillations In this chapter we will cover the following topics: Displacement, velocity, and acceleration of a simple harmonic oscillator Energy.
WorldSID 50 th Update Klaus Bortenschlager PDB - Partnership for Dummy Technology and Biomechanics on behalf of the WorldSID Task Group 44 th GRSP Session.
Head Restraints Working Group Meeting Paris, France February 1-2, 2005 U.S. FMVSS No. 202 Final Rule Head Restraint IWG Document:HR-1-8.
WorldSID Update Edmund Hautmann BMW Group On behalf of the WorldSID Task Group 34 th GRSP Session Geneva, December 8-12, 2003 Edmund Hautmann BMW Group.
Japanese Proposal for the New Regulation JASIC / Japan GRSP Inf. Group on Child Restraint Systems CRS April 11th, 2012 Informal document GRSP
Proposal of the Informal Working Group on Head Restraints GTR Phase 2 JAPAN Informal document No. GRSP (43rd GRSP, May 2008, agenda item.
WORKING GROUP 18 Jean-Yves LE COZ Chairman CHILD OCCUPANT SAFETY Informal document No. GRSP
Clinical Implications from Rear Impact Investigations of a Wheelchair & Occupant Presenter: John Tiernan CEng 1 Co-Authors: Jennifer Walsh 2, Ciaran Simms.
Cases for Reconstruction Programme. CCN0010 Cars: Peugeot 309 (MY 1986) vs. side of Renault 25 (MY 1986) Reasons for repeating: P10 and P3modified were.
Cases for Reconstruction Programme. CCN0010 Cars: Peugeot 309 (MY 1986) vs. side of Renault 25 (MY 1986) Reasons for repeating: P10 and P3modified were.
POLE TEST COMPARISON of the WORLDSID IRTRACC WORLDSID Rib-EYE & ES2-re
Date of download: 6/23/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Development of an Inertia-Driven Model of Sideways Fall for Detailed Study of.
Safety Restraints for Adults T – 8.19 Topic 3 Lesson 1 Your number one defense to prevent severe injuries is to wear your safety belt. Adjust the seat,
WorldSID Update Edmund Hautmann BMW Group On behalf of the WorldSID Task Group 37 th GRSP Session Geneva, May 23 rd -27 th, 2005 Edmund Hautmann BMW Group.
Chalmers University of Technology Suggestions for new BioRID certification procedures By Johan Davidsson, Chalmers University of Technology GTR
Dynamic Impact Procedures Training Class Sled Test Demonstration July G 44 Ft/sec 10° Left Yaw (CCW) Deformed Floor Single Place Oblique Passenger.
The U.S. New Car Assessment Program (NCAP)
Transmitted by the expert from CLEPA Informal document GRSP-57-25
Vehicle Crash Testing Adam Hedges.
Northern Highlands Regional High School Applied Technology Department
WorldSID Positioning Sub-Committee Update
CHILD OCCUPANT SAFETY WORKING GROUP 18 Jean-Yves LE COZ Chairman
The Cardiovascular System: Blood Vessels Part C
Check Out Those Dead Skeeters
Status report GRSP IWG FI
Design of a Biofidelic, Instrumented 2. 5 Kg Infant Dummy N
Measurement Capabilities of Biofidelic 3.4 Kg Infant Dummy
BioRIDII Repeatability on Production Seat
14 G 35 ft/sec 60°Pitch Three Place Passenger Seat Two Occupants
FACT SHEET Recreational Vehicles (RV’s) and Child Occupants
BioRID vs. HIII Develop new “side-by-side” buck
The Cardiovascular System: Blood Vessels Part C
Harmonization of Crash Regulations in Korea
Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program Winter 2004
How does NHTSA perform the frontal crash rating and how are vehicles rated? Vehicles are crashed into a fixed barrier at 35 miles per hour (mph), which.
National Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program May 2004
National Standardized Child Passenger Safety Training Program May 2004
Real World Side Impacts Involving Rear Pediatric Occupants
GRSP Inf. Group on Child Restraint Systems CRS-31-08
OICA 31st session of GRSP May 2002
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation of ES-2 by the Occupant Safety Research Partnership of USCAR presented by Annette L. Irwin representing the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers and the Organisation Internationale des Constructeurs d ’ Automobiles

Background Occupant Safety Research Partnership of USCAR Conducted Tests with ES-2 –Full-Scale Vehicle Tests –Biofidelity Tests of ISO TR 9790 Results Published in 46th Stapp –Byrnes, et al., “ ES-2 Dummy Biomechanical Responses, ” Paper

Purpose To Evaluate –Modifications from EuroSID-1 to ES-2 –Biofidelity –Left-to-Right Symmetry –Repeatability –Reproducibility

Full-Scale Testing FMVSS 214 Configuration at 54 km/h 2 Small Sedans –EuroSID-1 Driver & Left Rear Passenger –ES-2 Driver & Left Rear Passenger 2 Large Sedans –EuroSID-1 Driver & Left Rear Passenger –ES-2 Driver & Left Rear Passenger

Results of Full-Scale Testing With Small Sedan EuroSID-1 Exhibited Rib Binding ES-2 Did Not Exhibit Rib Binding ES-2 Exhibited Rib Oscillation

Results of Full-Scale Testing With Large Sedan EuroSID-1 Exhibited Pubic “ Noise ” Spike ES-2 Did Not Exhibit Pubic “ Noise ” Spike

Biofidelity Testing ISO TR 9790 (1999) –23 Drop, Pendulum & Sled Tests –Assess Biofidelity of the Head, Neck, Shoulder, Thorax, Abdomen, and Pelvis –3 to 6 Repeat Tests Conducted –Some Tests Conducted on Both Sides –Some Tests Conducted on Two Different ES-2 Dummies

Results of Biofidelity Testing Head Test 1 – 200 mm Drop onto Rigid Surface

Pk. Resultant Head Accel. (G) Corridor ES-2

Results of Biofidelity Testing Neck Test 2 – 6.7 G Sled Test

Pk. Flexion Angle (degrees) Corridor ES-2

Results of Biofidelity Testing Shoulder Test 3 – 12.2 G Sled Test Corridor ES Pk. Lateral T1 Accel. (G)

Results of Biofidelity Testing Thorax Test 2 – 6.7 m/s Rigid Pendulum Impact Time (ms) Pendulum Force (kN) Corridor ES-2

Results of Biofidelity Testing Abdomen Test m Drop onto Rigid Armrest Time (ms) Armrest Force (kN) Corridor ES-2

Results of Biofidelity Testing Pelvis Test m/s Rigid Pendulum Corridor Pk. Pendulum Force (kN) ES-2

Results of Biofidelity Testing ES-2 Ratings by Body Region Unacceptable Marginal Fair Good Excellent Neck Shldr. Thorax Abd. Pelvis Overall Biofidelity Rating Head ES-2

ES-2 Biofidelity Compared to EuroSID-1 Unacceptable Marginal Fair Good Excellent Biofidelity Rating Head Neck Shldr. Thorax Abd. Pelvis Overall EuroSID-1 ES-2 ES-2 Exhibits Degraded Biofidelity of the Neck Shoulder Thorax

Results of Biofidelity Testing Reproducibility Concerns – 8.9 m/s Sled Time (ms) Abdomen Force (kN) Corridor TC ES-2 NHTSA ES-2

Results of Biofidelity Testing Reproducibility Concerns – 6.8 m/s Sled 2 Tests With NHTSA ES-2 Dummy 4 Tests With TC ES-2 Dummy

Results of Biofidelity Testing Reproducibility Concerns – 6.8 m/s Sled 28% Difference in Peak Pelvic Acceleration Between NHTSA and TC Dummies

Results of Biofidelity Testing Overall Biofidelity Rated Only Fair –Neck, Shoulder & Thorax Were Less Biofidelic Than EuroSID-1 Repeatability Acceptable Left-to-Right Symmetry Acceptable Reproducibility Not Acceptable

ES-2 Biofidelity Compared to WorldSID Thorax Test 2 – 6.7 m/s Rigid Pendulum Impact Time (ms) Pendulum Force (kN) Corridor ES-2 WorldSID prototype

ES-2 Biofidelity Compared to WorldSID Abdomen Test m Drop onto Rigid Armrest Time (ms) Armrest Force (kN) Corridor ES-2 WorldSID prototype

ES-2 Biofidelity Compared to WorldSID Pelvis Tests 1 & 2 – Rigid Pendulum Impacts Pendulum Velocity (m/s) Pendulum Force (kN) ES-2 Corridor WorldSID prototype

ES-2 Biofidelity Compared to WorldSID Unacceptable Marginal Fair Good Excellent WorldSID prototype ES-2 Head Neck Shldr. Thorax Abd. Pelvis Overall Biofidelity Rating

Conclusions Rib Binding Was Not Observed in Limited Tests With ES-2 Pubic “Noise” Spikes Were Not Observed in Limited Tests With ES-2 Rib Oscillations Were Observed With ES-2

Conclusions - continued Overall ES-2 Was Not Biofidelic –Rated Only Fair Repeatability, Left-to-Right Symmetry, and Durability Were Acceptable Reproducibility Was Not Acceptable Every Body Region of ES-2 is Less Biofidelic Than WorldSID Prototype

Acknowledgments Transport Canada –Providing ES-2 Dummy –Conducting Tests & Providing Data NHTSA –Providing ES-2 Dummy –Conducting Tests & Providing Data