Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Key Themes from Day 1 Breakouts National Forum on Performance-Based.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bruce Shindler, Emeritus Professor Dept. of Forest Ecosystems & Society What does the public think about the Forest Service? How can understanding public.
Advertisements

OUR STRATEGIC PLANNING JOURNEY. The Department of Medicine Strategic Plan  Our roadmap for the future  It will shape and guide what the Department of.
HR Manager – HR Business Partners Role Description
Quality, Improvement & Effectiveness Unit
Local Planning Initiatives Connecting Communities Planning Grant Curtis Baker AMATS Planning Administrator.
Regional Concept of Transportation Operations: Portland, Oregon Pilot Project Jon Makler City of Portland & Metro (MPO) Talking Technology & Transportation.
Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner.
City of Saint John Vision 2015 A Work in Progress January 31, 2006.
Issue-Based Community Impact “Community Impact” The Junior League of Kane and DuPage Counties, Inc. Oct Breakout Discussion October 14, 2014.
RTS Roundtable. RTS Team 2 Goals for Today 1.Outline key communications to partners 2.Identify how we can better inform, or support you to inform, elected.
Making partnership working effective Robin Douglas 2011.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
The Executive’s Guide to Strategic C H A N G E Leadership.
Presentation of EQ11 Advisory Group May The Approach Faculty reflections Faculty visit and discussions Discussion papers Our challenge was to.
Operations Planning Organizing for Travel Time Reliability Ohio Planning Conference July 15, 2014.
HEInnovate A self-assessment tool for higher education institutions (HEIs) wishing to explore their entrepreneurial and innovative potential.
Challenge Questions How good is our strategic leadership?
The Community Investment Triangle Targeting Our Resources Part 3: Aligning Around Strategies for Impact.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Planning for Sustainability: Framework and Process U.S. Department of Labor, Employment & Training Administration, Division of Youth Services Grantee Check-Up.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to NCHRP Project Panel presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with PB Consult Inc. Texas Transportation.
Strategic Plan. April thru November 2011 Strategic Planning Cmmte/Staff Emerging Issues Document Trustee/Staff Meeting Community Listening Campaign SPC/Staff.
Performance Management and Coaching Jayendra Rimal.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration Performance Management and Performance-Based Planning and.
Resources to Support the Use of DEC’s Recommended Practices This presentation and handout were developed by Camille Catlett.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
Transportation Coordination & Federal Transportation Administration Programs Marianne Freed, MSW/LSW Office of Transit Ohio Department of Transportation.
2 Partnerships with professionals. Partnerships and Collaboration Partnerships with other professionals are ongoing long- term relationships based on.
Ohio Transportation Planning Conference July 16, 2014.
Building Community Through Justice and Policing Challenging Attitudes Towards Racism and Sectarianism Seminar 21 st September 2011.
Building Community Partnerships to Serve Immigrant Workers Funded by the Ford Foundation Nonprofit and Community College Collaborations.
Planning for Sustainability National Child Traumatic Stress Network All Network Meeting February 6, 2007.
Engagement as Strategy: Leading by Convening in the SSIP Part 2 8 th Annual Capacity Building Institute May, 2014 Joanne Cashman, IDEA Partnership Mariola.
Designing the Future of NMDOT NM Section ITE September 3, 2015 Tamara P. Haas, P.E. Asset Management & Planning Division Director
Rural Public Health Preparedness: Setting the Agenda for Change Michael Meit, MA, MPH, Director, University of Pittsburgh Center for Rural Health Practice;
Northern Humboldt Union High School District Performance-Based Compensation William J. Slotnik Executive Director Community Training and Assistance Center.
1 Transportation Infrastructure Programs Past, Present & Future Transportation Association of Canada Fall Conference September 2011 Edmonton, Alberta.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
ROLE OF INFORMATION IN MANAGING EDUCATION Ensuring appropriate and relevant information is available when needed.
Learning Objectives by Karen McNamara Define ingredients to a successful collaborative How to establish a structure for a collaborative partnership Recognize.
The Trust Company Strategic Partners Symposium Partnership & Collaboration October 2013.
From Technical Competency to Leadership Greatness.
Governing rural-urban partnerships: lessons from the field Betty-Ann Bryce Regional Development Policy Division, Public Governance.
Big Society Ian Dodds Government Office for the North East February 2011.
The Long Road between Small Towns: Barriers to Building Community Development Partnerships in Rural BC Laura Ryser and Greg Halseth.
Transportation Planning Process Freight Transportation Planning Workshop July 11, 2001.
WHEN AND HOW TO GO TRANSBOUNDARY EFFECTIVE STRATEGIES FOR TRANSBOUNDARY NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Harry van der Linde Senior Program Officer Biodiversity.
ISO (C)SR Standard: Implications from a market access perspective Tom Rotherham International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Overview on Performance Management National Forum on Performance-Based.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Key Themes from Day 2 Breakouts National Forum on Performance-Based.
Partnership Definition and Principles The imprecise nature of the word "partnership" has created confusion in CARE and other organizations. “Partnering.
HEInnovate A self-assessment tool for higher education institutions (HEIs) wishing to explore their entrepreneurial and innovative potential.
Working in Partnership
Source: Margerum, Richard D. Author of: Beyond Consensus: Improving Collaborative Planning & Management MIT Press Overview  Completed introduction.
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BOARD TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD TRB’s Vision for Transportation Research.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Module Road Safety Program Management Identify strategies for establishing and sustaining effective multidisciplinary collaborative relationships.
Integrating Mobility into Context-Sensitive Transportation Projects 2005 Technical Conference and Exhibit Integrating Mobility into Context-Sensitive Transportation.
® ® Workshop Synthesis Reflections on the Day Completing the Handbook Making an Impact.
11 Setting Direction Broad Scanning Intellectual Flexibility Seizing the Future Political Astuteness Drive for Results Self Belief Self Awareness Self.
A Strategic Agenda for Pinellas County’s Future Growth Whit Blanton, FAICP Pinellas Planning Council & Pinellas Metropolitan Planning Organization August.
Creating Positive Culture through Leadership (Recovery Orientation) Jennifer Black.
EES Conference Maastricht 28 September 2016 (17: :30)
Human Resources Competency Framework
Support for the AASHTO Committee on Planning (COP) and its Subcommittees in Responding to the AASHTO Strategic Plan Prepared for NCHRP 8-36, TASK 138.
The SWA Collaborative Behaviors
What does the public think about the Forest Service?
Health care for the Homeless Strategic Planning 2018
A Funders Perspective Maria Uhle Co-Chair, Belmont Forum Directorates for Geosciences, US National Science Foundation.
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Presentation transcript:

Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Key Themes from Day 1 Breakouts National Forum on Performance-Based Planning and Programming September 14, 2010 Lance A. Neumann

Conference Objectives Develop a common understanding of performance-based planning and programming processes and define the next steps for implementation Identify the challenges in developing performance-based planning and programming processes and recommend strategies to deal with them Develop practical, agency specific, guidance for performance-based planning and programming Provide recommendations for a capacity building action plan that reflects the range of needs of a diverse set of agencies 2

Key Topics Disclaimer Positive Vibe Education/Communication Collaboration Planning and Programming Measures Data Targets Tradeoff Analysis Challenges Next Steps 3

No facilitator, recorder, or breakout participant is responsible for any of the observations that follow Disclaimer

Positive “Vibe” about Performance-based Planning and Programming Across breakouts and types of agencies Lots of views about what / how Caution about very real institutional/political barriers Need to move beyond “would of, could of, should of” and barriers to constructive next steps 5

Education and Communication Real opportunity to use performance-based process to improve communication with stakeholders » More informed discussions » Setting expectations » Cost / potential results » More realistic priorities …but public more informed. Elected officials a “special case” » Needs vs. politics » Equity 6

Connection to Funding Performance management as tool to help “make the case” » What you get and don’t get » Set expectations » System performance and agency performance » Not “one shot” exercise, must build confidence/trust over time » Tied to projects Changing rules/eligibility can create incentives for collaboration / new partnerships 7

Collaboration Recognize need for stronger collaboration and opportunity to encourage it » Strategic planning and defining common goals and selected measures » Break down institutional barriers » Needs to be continuous » Don’t forget rural agencies 8

Planning and Programming Lack of connection between LRPs and programs Big variation in state / MPO / transit / rural agency relationships LRP easier to get agreement on broad goals Programs: local priorities take over » Fair share / equity vs. needs / performance 9

Measures May be in good shape for preservations / state of good repair and aspects of mobility Range of opinion on multinational / mode neutral » Multimodal goals vs. Multimodal measures » People vs. vehicles » Some doing it Need more focus on » Environment » Freight » Economic development What about the rurals? 10

Data Better use of data to drive / influence decisions Recognize cost issue Better data sharing / use of national databases Visualization Data gaps 11

Targets Opinions vary about usefulness and practicality Soft vs. hard targets Implications for consequences / funding Need to be achievable / consistent with resources 12

Tradeoff Analysis Many different types of tradeoffs » Within mode or functional areas » Cross functional within an agency » Cross functions / modes / agencies Opinions varied about which are possible Some doing it now even across modes New tools / data, but… » Costs, complexity, technical capacity » No “black box” » Potential rule for U.S. DOT 13

Challenges Institutional » Financial capacity / restrictions » Multiple goals and agencies » Resistance to change » Need for strong relationships and staff buy-in » Sustained collaboration Technical capacity differences » Size of staff » Capabilities » Ability to deal effectively with Big Brother / Sister Shifting from political / equity to performance / needs 14

Next Steps Sense that there is support to move toward more performance-based planning and programming Likely to happen in any case Time to focus on practical next steps » Acknowledge variations in practice and challenges » Build on considerable past work » Define specific actions to move forward 15