Inverse modeling Semi-analytical algorithms : sensitivity analysis of the values of the backscattering spectral dependency n and the a_nap&cdom slope S.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eyk Bösche et al. BBC2 Workshop, Oktober 2004: Eyk Bösche et al. BBC2 Workshop, Oktober 2004: Simulation of skylight polarization with the DAK model and.
Advertisements

Detecting Change in the Global Ocean Biosphere using SeaWiFS Satellite Ocean Color Observations David Siegel Earth Research Institute, UC Santa Barbara.
Ocean Optics XXI, Glasgow, Scotland, October 8-12, 2012 David Antoine; André Morel Laboratoire d’Océanographie de Villefranche (LOV), CNRS and Université.
From UV to fluorescence, a semi-analytical ocean color model for MODIS and beyond Stéphane Maritorena & Dave Siegel Earth Research Institute University.
Satellite Ocean Color Overview Dave Siegel – UC Santa Barbara With help from Chuck McClain, Mike Behrenfeld, Bryan Franz, Jim Yoder, David Antoine, Gene.
Welcome to the Ocean Color Bio-optical Algorithm Mini Workshop Goals, Motivation, and Guidance Janet W. Campbell University of New Hampshire Durham, New.
Beyond Chlorophyll: Ocean color ESDRs and new products S. Maritorena, D. A. Siegel and T. Kostadinov Institute for Computational Earth System Science University.
Phytoplankton absorption from ac-9 measurements Julia Uitz Ocean Optics 2004.
A framework for selecting and blending retrievals from bio-optical algorithms in lakes and coastal waters based on remote sensing reflectance for water.
GlobColour CDR Meeting ESRIN July 2006 Merging Algorithm Sensitivity Analysis ACRI-ST/UoP.
ISOPLETHS OF CHLOROPHYLL IN RADIANCE SPACE Janet W. Campbell, Timothy S. Moore, and Mark D. Dowell Ocean Process Analysis Laboratory University of New.
The GSM merging model. Previous achievements and application to GlobCOLOUR Globcolour / Medspiration user consultation, Dec 4-6, 2006, Villefranche/mer.
Uncertainty estimates in input (Rrs) and output ocean color data: a brief review Stéphane Maritorena – ERI/UCSB.
Remote Assessment of Phytoplankton Functional Types Using Retrievals of the Particle Size Distribution from Ocean Color Data Tihomir Kostadinov, David.
Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Hyperspectral Water Quality 1 EOCAP-HSI FINAL Briefing RIT Technical Activities John Schott, RIT PI
ES3 architecture ES3’s provenance capture system uses a client- server architecture. The collector client augments a science process’s execution environment.
Rrs Modeling and BRDF Correction ZhongPing Lee 1, Bertrand Lubac 1, Deric Gray 2, Alan Weidemann 2, Ken Voss 3, Malik Chami 4 1 Northern Gulf Institute,
Inverting In-Water Reflectance Eric Rehm Darling Marine Center, Maine 30 July 2004.
Chapter 7 Atmospheric correction and ocean color algorithm Remote Sensing of Ocean Color Instructor: Dr. Cheng-Chien LiuCheng-Chien Liu Department of Earth.
1 Evaluating & generalizing ocean color inversion models that retrieve marine IOPs Ocean Optics Summer Course University of Maine July 2011.
IOP algorithm OOXX, Anchorage, September 25, 2010 Some (basic) considerations on our capability to derive b bp from AOPs (R and K d ), in situ.
Spectral Requirements for Resolving Shallow Water Information Products W. Paul Bissett and David D. R. Kohler.
Recent advances for the inversion of the particulate backscattering coefficient at different wavelengths H. Loisel, C. Jamet, and D. Dessailly.
ISAC Contribution to Ocean Color activity Mediterranean high resolution surface chlorophyll mapping Use available bio-optical data sets to estimate the.
Satellite Ocean Color Products: What should be produced? ZhongPing Lee, Bryan Franz, Norman Kuring, Sean Baily raise questions, rather to provide definite.
Soe Hlaing *, Alex Gilerson, Samir Ahmed Optical Remote Sensing Laboratory, NOAA-CREST The City College of the City University of New York 1 A Bidirectional.
Chlorophyll Results Ocean Optics 2004 Mike Sauer & Eric Rehm.
The link between particle properties (size, packaging, composition, shape, internal structure) and their IOPs. In order for us to be able to use optical.
Validation of turbidity products EuroGOOS Conference, May 20-22, 2008, Exeter Session Observations – OBS17 May 22, 2008 Validation of turbidity products.
ASSESSMENT OF OPTICAL CLOSURE USING THE PLUMES AND BLOOMS IN-SITU OPTICAL DATASET, SANTA BARBARA CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA Tihomir S. Kostadinov, David A. Siegel,
VSF as a proxy for Particle Size Distribution Pauline Stephen.
Backscattering Lab Julia Uitz Pauline Stephen Wayne Slade Eric Rehm.
Inverting In-Water Reflectance Eric Rehm Darling Marine Center, Maine 30 July 2004.
R I T Rochester Institute of Technology Simultaneous Retrieval of Atmospheric Parameters and Water Constituent Concentrations.
BIOCAREX Meeting Villefranche sur mer 24 January 2014
Definition and assessment of a regional Mediterranean Sea ocean colour algorithm for surface chlorophyll Gianluca Volpe National Oceanography Centre, Southampton.
Examples of Closure Between Measurements and HydroLight Predictions Curtis D. Mobley Sequoia Scientific, Inc. Bellevue, Washington Maine 2007.
Sensing primary production from ocean color: Puzzle pieces and their status ZhongPing Lee University of Massachusetts Boston.
Characterization of Aerosols using Airborne Lidar, MODIS, and GOCART Data during the TRACE-P (2001) Mission Rich Ferrare 1, Ed Browell 1, Syed Ismail 1,
Progresses in IMaRS Caiyun Zhang Sept. 28, SST validation over Florida Keys 2. Potential application of ocean color remote sensing on deriving.
Fluorescence Line Height (FLH) Ricardo Letelier, Mark Abbott, Jasmine Nahorniak Oregon State University.
The role of Optical Water Type classification in the context of GIOP Timothy S. Moore University of New Hampshire, Durham NH Mark D. Dowell Joint Research.
Estimating the uncertainties in the products of inversion algorithms or, how do we set the error bars for our inversion results? Emmanuel Boss, U. of Maine.
Reducing uncertainty in satellite ocean color products with measurements made from gliders and floats M.J. Perry, UMaine Herve Claustre, LOV Ken Johnson,
A semi-analytical ocean color inherent optical property model: approach and application. Tim Smyth, Gerald Moore, Takafumi Hirata and Jim Aiken Plymouth.
NRL 7333 Rb = 1-  1+  1+  2 Non- Linear b1- b2q3 influences We developed improved SeaWIFS coastal ocean color algorithms to derived inherent optical.
1 Retrieval of ocean properties using multispectral methods S. Ahmed, A. Gilerson, B. Gross, F. Moshary Students: J. Zhou, M. Vargas, A. Gill, B. Elmaanaoui,
Lecture 12: Models of IOPs and AOPs Collin Roesler 11 July 2007.
Open Ocean CDOM Production and Flux
Stratospheric Aerosol Size Distribution Retrievals Using SAGE III Mark Hervig GATS Inc. Terry Deshler University of Wyoming.
Some refinements for global IOPs products ZhongPing Lee IOPs Workshop, Anchorage, AK, Oct 25, 2010.
Results for Garver-Siegel-Maritorena semi- analytic model (GSM01) when applied to NOMAD dataset. Figures 1-6. The GSM01 model was “linearized” and the.
7/ N 74W 72W Gradient Strength (au) Boundary Frequency (%) SeaWiFS Chl a (mg m -3 ) Ocean Sat Chl a (mg m.
Hydrolight Lab: Part 1 July 18th, 2013.
L wN ( ) Uncertainty Estimation Using Hyperspectral GSM Assume a GSM trio (Chl, CDM & BBP) and associate uncertainty level Drive hyperspectral GSM forward.
Forward and Inverse Modeling of Ocean Color Tihomir Kostadinov Maeva Doron Radiative Transfer Theory SMS 598(4) Darling Marine Center, University of Maine,
ESTIMATING WEIGHT Course: Special Topics in Remote Sensing & GIS Mirza Muhammad Waqar Contact: EXT:2257 RG712.
The Dirty Truth of Coastal Ocean Color Remote Sensing Dave Siegel & St é phane Maritorena Institute for Computational Earth System Science University of.
Feng Peng and Steven Effler
Remote Sensing of the Ocean and Coastal Waters
Group Presentation, July 17, 2013
Coastal Water Algorithms
Near UV aerosol products
Developing NPP algorithms for the Arctic
Hydrolight and Ecolight
AC-9/AC-S data analysis from CDOM Lab
Wayne Slade Ocean Optics Summer 2004
IOP inversion from shallow waters
Fig. 1. Location of the study site (23-28 S, W)
Solar spectrum and absorption profiles of chlorophyll and bacteriochlorophyll pigments Solar spectrum and absorption profiles of chlorophyll and bacteriochlorophyll.
Presentation transcript:

Inverse modeling Semi-analytical algorithms : sensitivity analysis of the values of the backscattering spectral dependency n and the a_nap&cdom slope S on two stations Maéva DORON, Ocean Optics 2004

To begin with Roesler and Perry ’95 model of inverse modeling 3 basis vectors in input: 1.spectral slope of the absorption of NAP and CDOM S (DL); 2.spectral slope of backscattering n in nm -1 ; 3.spectral absorption of chlorophyll (normalized). 3 parameters in output : 1. chl in mg.m -3 ; 2.a_cdom&nap (440nm) in m -1 ; 3.bb(440nm) in m -1. Data from the second cruise: one station off the DMC dock and one station near the ocean.

Goal First idea Comparison of the data retrieved by the GSM model and the R&P95 model (hyperspectral & multispectral at 412, 442, 490, 510 and 555 nm); Sensitivity to S and n to the retrieved values Comparison of the sensitivities for the hyperspectral and the multispectral model

Original values Station A – Off of DMC Dock a_phiSn/η [chl],ag(443) + anap(443) bbp(443) GSM – Maritorena et al GSM Hyper RPCR avg Hyper RPCR avg GSM lambda CR avg

Original values Station B – SW of Pemaquid Pt. a_phiSn/ η [chl],ag(443) + anap(443) bbp(443) GSM – Maritorena et al GSM Hyper RPCR avg Hyper RPCR avg lambda CR avg

Sensitivity One spectral dependency n,instead of 0 for large particles and 1 for small particles. Varying the n – values : from 0 to 2. Change the values of S : from to 0.04 nm -1 : Realistic range of Scdom = 0.007–0.013nm -1 Realistic range of Snap = 0.016–0.022nm -1

Sensitivity for the n(bb) slope - hyperspectral

Sensitivity for the S(cdom&nap) slope - hyperspectral

Sensitivity for the n(bb) dependency - multispectral

Sensitivity for the S(cdom&nap) slope - multispectral

Sensitivity for the S(cdom&nap) slope – multispectral- different scales

Discussion This was a first qualitative approach. The results are encouraging because for realistic values of S are not erratic. Any idea about how to test the robustness of the algorithm with multispectral data?