Ad Hominem LUCAS ENGLAND & ZACH ZACCARI A.P. LANGUAGE ROSEMARIE GRICE 7 TH PERIOD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Straw Man Allison & Summer.
Advertisements

Ad Hominem Fallacy By: Lucas Cook and Sydney Hyatt.
Ad Hominem- Poisoning the Well Sydney Collier and Shelby Wood.
Ad Hominem Poisoning The Well Nathan Anderson Kaylie Young Emily Walker.
Ad Hominem The Crucible
Responding to Text Dependent Questions
Poisoning the Well Fallacy By : Katie Emmitt, Corey Faller, Chelsee Wooten.
Kenzie Garrett Amber Jewell
The Crucible False Authority.
By Madison Kerley and Rachel Haynes.  Presenting the argument in such a way that makes the argument look ridiculous, usually by misrepresenting the argument.
Fallacy Appeal to Ridicule (Appeal to Mockery/ The Horse Laugh) Anna Houchens Tiffany Tolsma.
Red Herring Matt Zuccari Ashley Steenbergen. The man tries to divert the conversation to something that is completely irrelevant but more supportive of.
The Crucible Poisoning the Well By: Jewelia Lindsey & Ann Kauffman.
Characterization Judge Hathorne: “This is contempt, sir, contempt!” (182) Deputy Governor Danforth: “And do you know that near to four hundred are in the.
The Crucible Act III.
Ad Populum Appeal to Popularity Bandwagon
The Crucible Parris Character Study. Introduction to Parris Parris is a minister from Salem, who is corrupt and ignorant. His characteristics are not.
Act IV Study Guide Questions
Poisoning the Well Fallacy
Post Hoc Perri Collier Myles King. Post Hoc Event A happened immediately prior to event B. Therefore, A caused B. Post Hoc also manifests itself as a.
Appeal to Ridicule Emma Doyle, Kelly Moss and Jake Beakes.
Argument from authority
Straw Man Logical Fallacy
By: Sammi Jo Johnson and Melissa Shirley
The Crucible Act III March 15, 2011.
Appeal To Fear and Scare Tactics Krissy Cross. Definition   X is presented. It causes fear. Therefore Y (which has some relationship to X) is true.
 Red Herring- an irrelevant topic is presented in order to divert attention from the original issue Have you Done your homework? Do you know what time.
The Crucible Bellringer #17 9/5/13 1. What does Giles accuse Mr. Putnam of in the beginning of Act III? 2. When Danforth gives John Proctor the offer to.
AD HOMINEM Mallie Wells. DEFINITION Appealing to one's prejudices, emotions, or special interests rather than to one's intellect or reason. Dictionary.com.
“It takes faith to believe in God just like it takes faith to believe in the Easter bunny -- but at least the Easter bunny is based on a creature that.
By: Haley Ford Appeal To Ignorance.
Ad Hominem Abusive and Circumstantial Fallacies Week3.
Red Herring Logical Fallacy CAMDYN JOHNSON AND KAREN CRIST.
APPEAL TO RIDICULE By: Whitney Miles.
Post Hoc First period. Definition A fallacy in which one event is said to be the cause of a later event simply because it occurred earlier. A fallacy.
Appeal to Ridicule Mattie Bruton Hannah Weedman. Definition of Fallacy AKA: Appeal to Mockery, The Horse Laugh. Appeal to Ridicule is a fallacy in which.
Da Straw Man! Dalton Stephens Nick Cairo. What is Straw Man? The Straw Man fallacy is committed when a person simply ignores a person's actual position.
Ad Hominem Brandon Sneed and Tesia Bailey AP English III L. Hughes- 7 th Period.
Person A has position X. Person B presents position Y (which is a distorted version of X). Person B attacks position Y. Therefore X is false/incorrect/flawed.
The Crucible Act III.
$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200.
The Crucible By Arthur Miller. Preview/Foundation Setting: 1692 in Salem, Massachusetts Point of View: third-person omniscient and first-person Historical.
Ad Populum/ Appeal to Popularity/ Bandwagon Krystal Sims & Makayla Glass.
Appeal to Ridicule By: Dakota Hunt. Definition Ridicule or mockery is substituted for evidence in an argument, or it presents the opponent's argument.
The Crucible Bo and Maggie Straw Man Fallacy. A straw man fallacy misrepresents a position to make it weaker than It actually is and claims that the real.
The Straw Man Whitney Phillips 7 th Period. Definition: Straw Man Fallacy- when a character misrepresents another character’s position and then proceeds.
Dec. Week Three Dec First Hour Only 3: IDENTIFY three characters. For each, list 3-5 things you currently know or think you know about them.
LOGICAL FALLACIES By: Ella Settle. DOGMATISM The tendency to lay down principles as incontrovertibly true, without consideration of evidence or the opinions.
The Crucible logical fallacy project
By: McKinley King Zoe Brownfield. Argument from Authority/ False Authority  Asks audiences to agree with the assertion of a writer based simply on his.
By: Kennedy Logsdon. Definition of Appeal to Ignorance Appeal to Ignorance is the assumption of a conclusion or fact based primarily on lack of ridicule.
Ad Hominem April Reprogle Brian Hodges Kayce Russell.
Arguments from Authority/False Authority Kelsay Manion & Sean Belding Example: In some cases, the expertise may be just for show -"I'm not a doctor, but.
Ad Hominem BY: MADDIE COSTLOW. Definition  Ad hominem means “against the man”. As the name suggests, it is a literary term that involves commenting on.
Straw Man GRAYSON HYATT. A straw man fallacy misrepresents a position to make it weaker than it actually is and claims that the real position has been.
Sample #1: Proctor: That woman will never lie, Mr. Danforth.” Proctor’s statement, “That woman will never lie…” suggest his rigid belief in the idea that.
Poisoning the Well By Tessa Britt and Tracey Resner.
The Crucible List of Characters. Francis Nurse Head of the Nurse family; Respected man in town. Tried to stop the trials by aiding John Proctor.
GOOD VS EVIL STUDENTS WILL UNDERSTAND HOW TO EXPLAIN THE NATURE OF GOOD AND EVIL IN ‘THE CRUCIBLE’
By: Tanner Gray 2nd period
Act III Important Stuff.  The setting of Act III is ___________________________________________________.  P. 83: Note Miller’s description of the Meeting.
Ad Hominem By: Ashley Crenshaw.
In this fallacy it is argued that a statement is correct because the statement is made by a person or source that is commonly regarded as authoritative.
“The Crucible” Fallacies: Ad Hominem/Poisoning the Well
The Crucible Act 2- Reputations and Hearsay
Argument From False Authority Fallacy
The Crucible Fallacies: Post Hoc
Dogmatism BY: Kennedy ludwig.
Ad Hominem directed against a person’s characteristics or reputation rather than against his arguments appealing to one's prejudices, emotions, or special.
Presentation transcript:

Ad Hominem LUCAS ENGLAND & ZACH ZACCARI A.P. LANGUAGE ROSEMARIE GRICE 7 TH PERIOD

Definition of Ad Hominem Latin for “to the man”, is a response to an argument by attacking person’s character.

Universal Example Hunter: “I think we need to lower taxes.” John: “ This coming from a man who is blonde.” Hunter: “U wot m8?” John: “You have blonde hair, therefore your argument is invalid.”

1 st Example From Crucible Danforth Act 3, Line 19, Page 221

Continuation of 1 st Example Abigail: “What look do you give me? I’ll not have such looks!” Danforth: “You will remain where you are! Mr. Parris, go into the court and bring Goodwife Procter out.” John Proctor claims his wife cannot lie, but they don’t believe him. However, they bring her out to question her and believe very word she says, and nothing Proctor says.

2 nd Example From Crucible Parris Act 3, Page 211

Continuation of 2 nd Example Danforth: “You are in all respects a Gospel Christian?” Proctor: “I am, sir.” Parris: “Such a Christian that will not come to church but once a month!” Parris is undermining Proctor’s character in order to make him seem guilty, even though his statement is completely irrelevant to the proceedings.

Citation “Ad Hominem.” Dictionary. Dictionary.com, Web. 14 March Fallacy: Ad Hominem. The Nizkor Project, Web. 14 March Miller, Arthur. The Crucible, Language of Literature. Ed. Arthur N. Applebee. Boston: McDougal-Littell, Print.