The linkages between public research organisations and business sector: the case of Mazovia region in Poland OPEN DAYS 2009 Panel debate: Innovation and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring innovation: Main definitions - Part II South East Asian Regional Workshop on Science, Technology and Innovation Statistics.
Advertisements

University of Athens, GREECE Innovation and regional development : Prof. Lena J. Tsipouri.
Entrepreneurship and competitiveness for SMEs Dialogue between Brazil and the EU EU Enterprise and Innovation Initiatives Carl James.
Making Innovation Affordable Jo Derbyshire European Commercial Manager
Regional Innovation Strategy RIS OF SOUTH MORAVIA & MASARYK UNIVERSITY Prof. Martin Bareš vice-rector of Masaryk University Petr Chládek RIS manager, JIC.
NIS in Poland current situation and recommendations for the future I. Kijenska Faculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology/PRESAFE.
Introduction to the Oslo Manual: main definitions (Part II) Introduction to the Oslo Manual: main definitions (Part II) ECO - UIS Regional.
Petar M. Gvero, Ph.D., Associate Professor University of Banja Luka Faculty of Mechanical Engineering WBC National Innovation Systems – Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Mathias Rauch, Deputy Director
23 rd November 2011 MCST Conference: Amplifying the Competitiveness of Manufacturing in Malta Industry’s views of Research for Competitiveness Ing. Ray.
Turkish Research Area and European Technology Platforms Hüseyin Güler FP6 Deputy National Coordinator
LOCAL SYSTEM OF INNOVATION CENTERED ON AUDIOVISUAL PRODUCTION Marcelo Matos Fluminense Federal University and RedeSist - IE/UFRJ.
ROLE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PARKS IN INDUSTRIALIZATION Isaac O. Nyambok University of Nairobi.
Supporting technology transfer: The role of business incubators John Gabriel Goddard Knowledge Economy Forum VII Ancona, Italy.
Commercial and Economic Section, Consulate General of Poland The Evolving Central and Eastern European Market Business Opportunities in Poland Venue: HKCEC.
ACTIVITIES OF SUPPORTING SMES DEVELOPMENT IN VIETNAM
Challenges of Reindustrialization in Kosovo The Adriatic – Balkan Area from Transition to Integration MUSTAFA Muhamet, ZOGAJ Alban and ABDIXHIKU Lumir.
Is a Financial Institution controlled by the Italian Ministry for Economic Development, participated by leading Italian Banks and Confindustria – the.
Union of Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Telecommunications (CEEC) Technical University of Sofia Third International Seminar - UPB University-
1 Prof. Dr. Necdet GEREN (Mech Eng.) Center Director Participant: TUBITAK-ADANA UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY JOINT RESEARCH CENTER TURKEY Participant Role: Contractor.
European Commission Enterprise Directorate General Innovation Policy R&D and Innovation in the Regional Operational Programs Meeting with Regions 11 July.
Main directions of innovation policy development in the Republic of Belarus State Committee for Science and Technology Prague, December 2, 2014.
Office of Science and Innovation Universities and Innovation in the UK Chris North Office of Science and Innovation UK Department of Trade and Industry.
Supporting entrpreneurs and innovators in Finland Timo Kekkonen Director, Confederation of Finnish Industries, EK.
Panagiotis KARNIOURAS NCP for SPACE / Technology Transfer Consultant PRAXI/ HELP-FORWARD Network … the Greek experience 9 October 2009.
T2S Conference 2006 Policy and Networking: an RIS in Korea Yu Jin Jung School of Public Policy George Mason University.
BŁAŻEJ MODER PRESIDENT LODZ REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY LODZ, OCTOBER 8, 2008 THE EU SUPPORT FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT.
Fraunhofer ISI Institute Systems and Innovation Research Trentino plus 10 Foresight Workshop July 2003 (Trento) Introductory notes on the Fraunhofer.
REGIONAL INNOVATION STRATEGY REGIONAL INNOVATION STRATEGY OF THE KOŠICE SELF-GOVERNING REGION doc. RNDr. Oto Hudec CSc., Technical University of Košice.
Technology Transfer Center of the University of Lodz High-Tech Accelerator - Innovation Center Foundation of the University of Lodz Bridging science and.
1 The Innovation Performance Review of Kazakhstan: Main Conclusions and Recommendations.
© Fraunhofer MOEZ Mathias Rauch, Deputy Director Fraunhofer Center for Central and Eastern Europe MOEZ Commercialization of Technologies in Germany: Fraunhofer.
National Innovation Strategy of the Republic of Moldova. Implementation, mechanisms and measures Ghenadie CERNEI Director, Agency for Innovation.
Framework for development of national ICT R&D sector Milan Zdravković Innovation Center for Information Technologies Milan Zdravković Innovation Center.
Support of small and medium-sized enterprises. 2 Importance of SMEs Business environment Business environment Structural changes Structural changes Stabilizing.
S&T and Innovation Policy in the Republic of Armenia Innovation Programs Division, SCS RA “Development of Coherent Innovation Policy in South Caucasian.
Bulgarian Industrial Association Georgi Shivarov, Vice President The 4 th Vienna Economic Forum 5 – 6 November 2007.
NETWORK STRUCTURE AND COOPERATION BETWEEN UNIVERSITIES AND INDUSTRY Prof. Ing. Tatiana Čorejová, PhD. Prof. Ing. Ján Čorej, PhD.
Measuring Inbound Diffusion from Publicly Funded Research Organizations to Innovative Firms: A Statistical Perspective Frances Anderson Science, Innovation.
2012 Raising the level of the innovation in Polish SMEs: challenges and achievements Dariusz Szewczyk Deputy to Chief Executive Officer of PARP Astana,
LEONARDO DA VINCI PROGRAMME PL/04/B/F/PP – _________________________________________________________________________ European Curricula for Economic.
JULY, 09-10, 2007 ISTANBUL KOSGEB SMALL AND MEDIUM INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION NEDRET UGUR YAVUZ KOSGEB SMALL AND MEDIUM INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION.
Technology Transfer and IP framework initiatives May 2011.
Supporting Canada’s Innovative SMEs Daegu Initiative First-Cycle Assessment Workshop June 7, 2010 Hong Kong, China Anne Pigeon Senior Policy Advisor Small.
Unilob – Artur Nowicki Istitutional Support System for Business Support Organisations in Poland Example of National Services Network for SMEs Artur Nowicki.
LEONARDO DA VINCI PROGRAMME PL/04/B/F/PP – _________________________________________________________________________ European Curricula for Economic.
„ Innovations and role of state : „ Innovations and role of state : the Polish experience” Krzysztof Gulda Chairman of Team of experts on innovations and.
National Centre for Research and Development. Executive agency supervised by the Minister of Science and Higher Education One of the two research funding.
Financing Innovation March 25, 2004 Knowledge Economy Forum III Budapest, Hungary NATIONAL INNOVATION FUND KAZAKHSTAN.
R&D STRATEGIES IN SUPPORT OF INDUSTRIAL TRANSFORMATION Arm.Dpt. ROMANIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE ARMAMENTS DEPARTMENT 01 November 2007.
24 October,2013 Technology Transfer Office “Information and Communication Technologies for Energy Efficiency” TTO “ICTEE” AComIn – Starosel, Bulgaria.
1 Trends in Science, Technology and Industry: An OECD Perspective Jerry Sheehan OECD Science & Technology Policy Division Knowledge Economy Forum III Budapest,
Community Innovation Survey ”Innovation Activity of Polish Enterprises in Service Sector ” Izabela Kijenska Ph.D. candidate.
Utilization of knowledge for economic growth in the Czech Republic Karel Klusacek Technology Centre AS CR Knowledge Economy Forum V.
1 Commercialization Segment Introduction Ralph Heinrich UNECE Team of Specialists on Intellectual Property Skopje, 1 April 2009.
Workshop on Research Methods to Study Productivity Determinants Within Firms and the Role of Policy November 1, 2012 P olicy setting and firm-level focus.
POLISH DEFENCE INDUSTRY 2014 Polish Chamber of National Defence Manufacturers.
Katowice – the capital city of the Silesia region: Highly urbanized The highest population density in Poland – 4,64 mln people 12 cities with population.
Implementation of Leader program in Estonia Kristiina Tammets.
How to support the cooperation between research organisations and enterprises? Experiences from Poland Ewa Kocinska.
EUROPEAN HUB EU Funds for SMEs and Startups Innovation and Investment.
Chemistry careers in SMEs The interface between science and business – Introduction Christopher Hone University of Leeds.
Design of foresight-based evaluation in Tekes Activities
From research to markets : why and how
REGIONAL POLICY DIALOGUE SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION
International Research Agendas
Supporting Investment in the Mediterranean Region
University-business engagement for Innovation –
COMMERCILIZATION ISSUES AND CHALLANGES
Presentation transcript:

The linkages between public research organisations and business sector: the case of Mazovia region in Poland OPEN DAYS 2009 Panel debate: Innovation and the role of the public sector Prof. Marzenna Weresa, PhD World Economy Research Institute Warsaw School of Economics Poland

INTRODUCTION Project: „Knowledge Transfer”: An analysis of the linkages between research and business in Mazovia region – a study for the needs of the „ Regional Innovation Strategy ” Performer: World Economy Research Institute, SGH, Poland Financing: from European Union funds and the state’s budget within the European Social Fund through acting of 2.6 Integrated Regional Operational Development Program Accomplished in the years GOAL: Analysis of the scope and forms of cooperation between public research organisations and business sector in the Mazovia region in Poland

Introduction: Mazovia’s position in research and innovation activities Relatively high position compared to the rest of Poland according to science development, technology and innovativeness measures (R&D investment level in relation to the GDP= 1.2% and is twice higher than the country’s average) Position of Mazovia remains low compared to leading European regions

Mazovia’s position in research and innovation activities In case of investments in R&D there is a gradual weakening of Mazovia’s importance compared to the other Polish regions (Mazovia’s share in investments accounts for 40% of the whole country investments but it is steadily decreasing since 2000 ) Unfavourable investment structure – high share of government funds (62% in 2007) and decreasing share of enterprises (7% in 2006; 6.2% in 2007)

The interlinkeages of research and business in Mazovia region - basic information The main part of linkages between research and business has a non- formal character Most important types of linkeage types between research and business  direct implementation of research results into industry  expertise  training Scale and scope of linkeages – measurement difficulties Barriers: lack of evaluation tools; lack of monitoring procedures of knowledge commercialization

Main characteristics of knowledge transfer from science to business in Mazovia Relatively low direct absorption of research activity results in the innovative processes within enterprises Scientific research is not created by the demand of enterprises The commercialization of research results through the creating of spin-off is rare Innovation in Mazovia companies are a result of other factors: Knowledge transfer from abroad Incentives to innovate coming from competition (including foreign- owned firms)

Main forms of commercialisation of research results in Mazovia in the years (answers of public research entities) Independent implementation Software sales Expertise, consulting Sales of technologies in form of documentation and intellectual poperty Training for companies’ employees Sales of expertise Other

Patents and licensing High geographical concentration of patenting and licensing activities of public higher education institutions and R+D entities in Mazovia (Warsaw) The highest amount of patents was registered in the following disciplines: Chemistry, Biotechnology, Electronics and telecommunication. Joint patents of science entities together with companies are occurring occasionally and account for 6.5% of all patents gained in Mazovia

Percentage of companies cooperating with science in Mazovia compared to the Polish average  Cooperation is more intensive on average in Poland than in Mazovia  Large companies are cooperating more frequently  Companies from Warsaw have more intensive contacts with science than firms from outside the capital city All firms Small firms Medium firms Large firms Source: GUS

Spin-off companies from universities in Mazovia (results of the survey) There are about 50 identified spin-off companies from universities in Mazovia region The majority assesses their position as strong and stable They have to face a demand barrier on the domestic market Sources of success:  Many firms have a unique or the best know-how worldwide  Firms often chose niches and e.g. produce intermediary products  Export and the cooperation with foreign customers are crucial

Metropolitan concentration (37 firms out of 50) Geographical location of spin off firms

Industry profile of analysed spin-off companies in Mazovia region NACE Section 74 – Other economic activities NACE Section 72 NACE Informatics NACE Section 33 – Production of medical, precise and optical instruments, clocks and watches NACE Section 32 – Production of radio, TV and telecommunication equipment and devices

Examples of spin-offs- results of the survey CompanySectorHome unitEmpl oyme nt Market position ConsumersSource of seed capital Patents and licences Company innovation s Barriers to operation LASER- TECH High power lasers Institute of Microelectroni cs and Optoelectronic s of the Warsaw University of Technology 3 The only producer in and the third in the world show business, medicine and science Own capital and capital leased from the university Nonetechnologi cal Bureaucracy lack of competences in marketing, risk of introduction of the innovation’ TOP-GANLasers Institute of High Pressures, Polish Academy of Sciences 17 technological leader Foreign optoelectro nics industry Government subsidies, at present a strategic investor 14 patents of the founding institute, 1 key patent in the contributi on Technolog ical Lack of capital, Low level of business culture

Examples of spin-offs- results of the survey CompanySectorHome unitEmpl oyme nt Market position ConsumersSource of seed capital Patents and licences Company innovations Barriers to operation MEDCOM Electric chargers Warsaw University of Technology 72 Technologi cal and commercial leader in Large industry: power industry, means of transport Own, but mainly a bank loan, reinvestme nt of profits 1 application for a patent technologic al, organisation al and marketing Lack of technical staff, shortage of capital APS- ENERGIA Emergenc y power supply systems, transforme rs Industry Electronics Steering Institute, Warsaw University of Technology 150 Technologi cal and commercial leader Large industry: power generation, army. Large advance payment of the first client, reinvestme nt of profits 2 patents a year; 1 licence granted technologic al, organisation al, marketing and informatisati on-related Lack of technical staff SOLARIS OPTICS S.A Optical subassem blies and assemblies Institute of Physics of the University of Warsaw 53Technologi cal leader. High position also in internationa l markets Well-known European companies (eg.Philips) Own funds, later venture capital 10 patentsTechnologic al, process- related, organisation al and marketing Financing of investment

Barriers to the development of spin-offs Problems with financing investments at the beginning of a company‘s development Regulations connected with getting certificates, complicated book keeping and bureaucracy damp down the development of small companies Export is limited due to the lack of own marketing and service chains Lack of an entrepreneurial culture Business competencies Sticking to verbal agreements Lack of large Polish industrial customers

CONCLUSIONS In the case of Poland the role of the public sector in creating innovations is relatively high. It can be seen in: - Creating innovation policy framework: national & regional level (RIS) - Financing innovation: e.g. Operational Programme „Innovative Economy” - High share of government in financing R&D Examples of industry- university collaboration in Poland: spin-off firms; however there are many barriers (e.g. complicated regulations concerning the establishment of spin-off companies, bureaucracy, etc.) University-business collaboration that contribute to innovative policy making can be developed: -Under the Foresight programmes -in designing R&D programmes when representatives of science and business work as partners in consultation processes or as members of advisory panels etc. -In assessment of research results (if representatives of science and business could work together for the government in order to assess results of R&D programmes) -

Thank you for your attention!