Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/0635r1 Submission May 2014 Dynamic Sensitivity Control Implementation Date: 2014-May Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An approach to the problem of optimizing channel parameters March 2001 Vlad Oleynik, Umbrella Technology Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /152 Submission.
Advertisements

April 2013 doc.: IEEE Nov 2013 Dense Apartment Complex Capacity Improvements with Channel selection and Dynamic Sensitivity Control Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0328r2 Submission Dense Apartment Complex Throughput Calculations Channel Selection and DSC Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0868r0 July 2014 Johan Söder, Ericsson ABSlide 1 UL & DL DSC and TPC MAC simulations Date: Authors:
Dynamic Sensitivity Control V2
Doc.: IEEE /1012r0 Submission Sept 2013 Dynamic Sensitivity Control Improvement to area throughput Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/1426r1 November 2014 Gustav Wikström et al., EricssonSlide 1 DSC and legacy coexistence Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1225r1 Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax Date: Slide 1Huawei Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0025r0 Submission Jan 2015 Dynamic Sensitivity Control Roaming Date: 2015-January Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.
Channel Sensing in UL-OFDMA
Discussion on The Receiver Behavior for DSC/CCAC with BSS Color
Doc.: IEEE /0516r0 Submission April 2015 CCA for Clauses 16, 17 and 19 Date: 2015-April Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1 NOTE: Includes.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/613r0 May 2015 Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc.Slide 1 Box 5 Calibration Result Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0319r1 Submission March 2015 Takeshi Itagaki, Sony CorporationSlide 1 Impact of TPC coupled to DSC for legacy unfairness issue Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/1148r1 Consideration of asynchronous interference in OBSS environment Date: Authors: September 2014 Slide 1Koichi.
Doc.: IEEE /0861r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury Impact of CCA adaptation on spatial reuse in dense residential scenario Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /854r0 Submission July 2014 W.Carney, Y.Morioka, M.Mori, et.al. (SONY)Slide 1 DSC and Legacy Coexistence Date: 14/07/2014 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1207r1 Submission Imad Jamil (Orange)Slide 1 OBSS reuse mechanism which preserves fairness Date: Authors: September 2014.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0085r1 Jan 2015 John Son, WILUS InstituteSlide 1 Legacy Fairness Issues of Enhanced CCA Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0050r0 January 2015 Yu Wang et al., EricssonSlide 1 Modeling components impacting throughput gain from CCAT adjustment.
Doc.: IEEE /1443r0 SubmissionEsa Tuomaala Adapting CCA and Receiver Sensitivity Date: Authors: Slide 1 November 2014.
Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1227r3 SubmissionSlide 1 OFDMA Performance Analysis Date: Authors: Tianyu Wu etc. MediaTek Sept 2014 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Discussions on the Definition of CCA Threshold
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Doc.: IEEE /1428r0 Submission Der-Jiunn Deng (NCUE) Clear Channel Assessment for OFDMA PHY Date: Slide 1 November 2014 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0045r0 Submission Jan 2014 E-Education Analysis HEW SG Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1290r0 Submission Nov 2013 Dynamic Sensitivity Control for HEW SG Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.
Doc.: ax Submission Sept 2014 Slide 1 Effect of CCA in residential scenario part 2 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0328r0 Submission Dense Apartment Complex Throughput Calculations Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1 Mar 2014.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1108r0 Technical Feasibility for LRLP September 2015 Chittabrata Ghosh, IntelSlide 1 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0804r0 Submission July 2015 TG ax Outdoor Enterprise Scenario and DSC Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.
Doc.: ax Submission July 2014 Slide 1 Proposed Calibration For MAC simulator Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1489r0 Submission Nov 2013 Airport Capacity Analysis Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1207r0 Submission Imad Jamil (Orange)Slide 1 OBSS reuse mechanism which preserves fairness Date: Authors: September 2014.
Doc.: IEEE /0637r0 Submission May 2014 James Wang et. al., MediaTekSlide 1 Spatial Reuse and Coexistence with Legacy Devices Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0523r0 Submission April 2014 Imad Jamil (Orange)Slide 1 MAC simulation results for Dynamic sensitivity control (DSC - CCA adaptation)
Doc.: IEEE / aa Submission March 2009 Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1 OBSS “OSQAP” QoS Issues Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0328r1 Submission Dense Apartment Complex Throughput Calculations Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1 Mar 2014.
Doc.: IEEE /0014r0 Submission January mc TXOP Limits Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0372r2 Slide 1 System Level Simulations on Increased Spatial Reuse Date: Authors: Jinjing Jiang(Marvell) March.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1081r3 September, 2015 Jing Ma, NICTSlide 1 Further consideration on receive behavior based on the cascading structure.
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission Eduard Garcia-Villegas Drivers of the dynamic CCA adaptation Authors: Nov Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0779r2 Submission June 2014 Dynamic Sensitivity Control Practical Usage Date: 2014-July Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1.
Performance Analysis of BSS Color and DSC
Submission doc.: IEEE /1289r2 Michelle Gong, IntelSlide 1 RTS/CTS Operation for Wider Bandwidth Date: Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE /0294r1 Submission Dynamic Sensitivity Control Channel Selection and Legacy Sharing Date: Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide.
Doc.: IEEE /0645 Submission May 2012 Open-Loop Link Margin Index for Fast Link Adaptation Date: Authors: Slide 1Yong Liu, Marvell,
Doc.: IEEE /1086r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Date: Authors: Improved Virtual Carrier Sensing Mechanism for 45GHz Sep ZTE Corp.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0098r0 January 2016 Assaf Kasher, IntelSlide 1 Channel bonding proposals Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission Feb 2016 TG ax Enterprise Scenario, Color and DSC Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.
Doc.: IEEE / aa Submission November 2009 Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1 EDCA Bandwidth Factor Date: 2009, November 17 Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1392r5 SubmissionSuhwook Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Simulation results for Box 5 calibration Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1101r1 Submission Sept Active Polling Date: Authors: Slide 1Yong Liu, Marvell, et. al.
Secondary Channel CCA of HE STA
Simulation results for spatial reuse in 11ax
Simulation-based evaluation of DSC in enterprise scenario
TG ax DSC Summary Date: Authors: July 2015 April 2013
TG ax A Unified Approach to Spatial Reuse
TG ax Indoor Enterprise Scenarios, Color, DSC and TPC
Performance Evaluation of OBSS Densification
AP Service Load: Improved Definition
The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator
20/40MHz Channel Selection
Increased Network Throughput with Channel Width Related CCA and Rules
TG ax A Unified Approach to Spatial Reuse
Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax
TG ax A Unified Approach to Spatial Reuse
System Level Simulator Evaluation with/without Capture Effect
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0635r1 Submission May 2014 Dynamic Sensitivity Control Implementation Date: 2014-May Authors: Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 1

doc.: IEEE /0635r1 Submission Background uses CSMA/CA carrier sense multiple access with collision avoidance. STA listens before transmitting Two methods of sensing the medium –Physical Carrier Sense –Virtual Carrier Sense Clear Channel Assessment (CCA) –OFDM transmission => minimum modulation and coding rate sensitivity (6Mbps) (-82dBm for 20MHz channel, -79dBm for 40MHz channel) –If no detected header, 20 dB higher, i.e. -62dBm Receive Sensitivity –Minimum receive sensitivity defined for each PHY This presentation intended to help with those interested in using DSC for simulations May 2014 Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 2

doc.: IEEE /0635r1 Submission Dynamic Sensitivity Control - DSC Scheme where STA measures the RSSI of the AP Beacon (R dBm) Sets RX Sensitivity Threshold at (R – M) dBm, where M is the “Margin” –Example: STA receives Beacon at -50dBm, with Margin = 20dB STA sets RX Sensitivity Threshold to -70dBm. Also set an Upper Limit, L, to Beacon RSSI to cater for case when STA is very close to AP. –Need to ensure that all the STAs in the wanted area do see each other. Hence if one STA very close to AP, then it could set RX Sensitivity too high. –Example: STA receives Beacon at -15dBm, L = -30dBm, M = 20dBm STA sets RX Sensitivity Threshold at = -50dBm (NOT –35dBm) If the RX sensitivity threshold is higher than the CCA Threshold then CCA Threshold = RX Sensitivity Threshold Graham Smith, DSP Group May 2014 Slide 3

doc.: IEEE /0635r1 Submission UL = Upper Limit M = Margin R = Received RSSI RX Sensitivity = RxS Reff = MIN (RxS, UL) RxS = (Reff – M) Example, FOR UL = -40dBm and M = 20dB Min RX Sensitivity = -91dBm CCA Threshold = -82dBm RX Sensitivity May 2014 Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 4 Average RSSI, dBmR effective, dBm RX Sensitivity, dBm CCA Threshold, dBm

doc.: IEEE /0635r1 Submission CCA Thresholds are as per the Standard (unchanged) –E.g. -82dBm (OFDM 20MHz BW) –E.g. -62dBm ED-CCA If the RX sensitivity threshold is higher than the CCA Threshold then CCA Threshold = RX Sensitivity Threshold If RX sensitivity threshold is lower than the CCA Threshold then CCA Threshold = Default CCA Threshold Hence, CCA threshold is never lower than default. RX Sensitivity Threshold and CCA Threshold May 2014 Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 5

doc.: IEEE /0635r1 Submission Hidden STAs – Fixed CCA vs DSC Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 6 May 2014 DSC Note NO hidden STAs

doc.: IEEE /0635r1 Submission The Margin needs to be set to account for: 1.Large enough to provide adequate SNIR –A STA at edge of CCA transmits at same time. The Margin is the effective SNIR. Possibility of more than one. 2.Large enough to account for sudden changes in reception of Beacon signal –If STA goes behind obstruction, RSSI will drop. If the drop is higher than the Margin, then the AP Beacon is lost. Suggested Margin is in the order of 20dB to 25dB. Upper Limit sets the minimum area coverage AP then sets its own Sensitivity or CCA –Based upon the Margin and Upper Limit –In the area of Margin + Upper Limit. Setting the Margin an Upper Limit May 2014 Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 7

doc.: IEEE /0635r1 Submission The Beacon RSSI will vary as the STA moves, for example. Therefore, the calculation of the CCA threshold or Receive Sensitivity is a continuous one. A suggested algorithm outline is: 1.Start a timer T 2.Record RSSI of each Beacon Check is > Upper Limit, if so RSSI = Upper Limit 3.Calculate average RSSI Use a moving average such that last reading has higher influence 4.Check if T > Update period (e.g. 1 second) No, continue Yes, Convert the Averaged RSSI to RX Threshold –RX Threshold = Ave RSSI – Margin. –Check that RX threshold not less than minimum In addition, check if a Beacon or consecutive Beacons are missed, and if so decrement the average RSSI by a set amount and reset the RX sensitivity instantly Algorithm for setting RX sensitivity May 2014 Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 8

doc.: IEEE /0635r1 Submission The default mandatory CCA levels are maintained. DSC is basically setting the RX Sensitivity according to the strength of received signal from AP. If RX Sensitivity > CCA threshold –CCA Threshold = RX sensitivity If RX Sensitivity < CCA threshold –CCA Threshold = CCA Threshold DSC is designed for relatively small network coverage areas so as to improve channel re-use and overall throughput in a total coverage area. Summary May 2014 Graham Smith, DSP GroupSlide 9