Fabrication of test coil for D1 2m model Michinaka SUGANO KEK WP3 meeting 08/10/2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LHQ Coil 02 Winding and Curing Plan Miao Yu 03/21/13.
Advertisements

LHQ Coil 1 OL Curing LHQ Coil 1 Shipping Miao Yu 02/28/2013.
EuCARD-HFM ESAC review of the high field dipole design, 20/01/2011, Maria Durante, 1/40 EuCARD-HFM ESAC Review of the high field dipole design Fabrication.
COIL & ASSEMBLY READINESS REVIEW, SEPT 2013 D. Smekens.
S. Caspi, LBNL HQS Progress Report High Field Nb 3 Sn Quadrupole Magnet Shlomo Caspi LBNL Collaboration Meeting – CM11 FNAL October 27-28, 2008.
Coil working group video-meeting P. Ferracin, J. C. Perez, S. Izquierdo Bermudez, X. Sarasola February 4th, 2014.
SQXF 25 m Cable Practice Winding at LBNL Miao Yu Dan Cheng 10/31/2013.
LHQ Coil Fabrication Experience and Plan Miao Yu 04/08/2013.
Coil Design and Fabrication Miao Yu Outline Introduction Coil Design –Coil Pole –Coil End Parts –Coil Insulation Coil Fabrication –Winding.
Mechanical properties of insulators for Accelerator Magnets WAMSDO 14/11/2011 George Ellwood 1.
Eucard WP 7.3 HFM Winding and tooling tests Insulation choice F.Rondeaux /01/2011 Dipole design review- II-8 Winding and tooling tests – insulation.
LHQ Curing Mold Miao Yu Fermilab 07/26/2011. HQ and LQ Curing HQ coil curing (LBNL) 2 LQ coil curing For HQ, the pressure of the mandrel cylinder is set.
Fred Nobrega. 9 Dec 2014 Model Design & Fabrication – FNAL Fred Nobrega 2 Outline Background Mechanical Design Model Magnet Features Coil Technology and.
Ultra-Compact Electrical Machines for Wind Energy DE-FOA : Demo Machine C. L. Goodzeit and M. J. Ball May 1, 2014 Part 1: Design and Construction.
Development of the EuCARD Nb 3 Sn Dipole Magnet FRESCA2 P. Ferracin, M. Devaux, M. Durante, P. Fazilleau, P. Fessia, P. Manil, A. Milanese, J. E. Munoz.
SC magnet developments at CEA/Saclay Maria Durante Hélène Felice CEA Saclay DSM/DAPNIA/SACM/LEAS.
CERN/CEA Collaboration agreement No. KE2275/TE WP4 – Nb 3 Sn technology development Pré-Kick-off meeting 03/07/2014.
FNAL QXF Curing Mold Miao Yu, FNAL 05/07/2013. FNAL Short Curing Press 2 2 meter long Capacity (pump psi) Max. force/cylinder kN (ton) Spacing cm(inch)
E. Cavanna, N. Bourcey, P. Ferracin, S. Izquierdo Bermudez, J. Mazet, J. C. Perez, F.O. Pincot, X. Sarasola
DOE Review of LARP – February 17-18, 2014 Coil Design and Fabrication Miao Yu February 17,
11 T Dipole Experience M. Karppinen CERN TE-MSC On behalf of CERN-FNAL project teams The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded.
Progress in D1 (since last collaboration meeting…) Michinaka SUGANO, Tatsushi NAKAMOTO KEK July 1,
Fred Nobrega, Nikolai Andreev 21 September, 2015.
Update on D1 M. Sugano, T. Nakamoto, S. Enomoto, H. Kawamata KEK The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly.
1 Short Model Coils George Ellwood, Simon Canfer Jan 08.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Baby MIND coil modules assembly the aluminium folded strip solution 1 Alexey, Philippe, Gabriella, Helder, Herman Baby Mind Magnet CERN June.
Subscale quadrupole (SQ) series Paolo Ferracin LARP DoE Review FNAL June 12-14, 2006.
D. Smekens. 2 Coil ID  CableCu DUMMY Cu DUMMY WST DUMMY RRP 54/61 DUMMY RRP 108/127 RRP 108/127 RRP 108/127 RRP 132/169.
Magnet design, final parameters Paolo Ferracin and Attilio Milanese EuCARD ESAC review for the FRESCA2 dipole CERN March, 2012.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Design modification and R&D of D1
Helene Felice HQ Test Results Review Thursday December 16 th Overview of HQ coils and Magnet.
HQM01 Test Summary Outline -Magnet Instrumentation and Shim System -SG Data -Short Sample Limits -Quench Training at 4.6 K and 2.2 K -Ramp rate and Temperature.
LARP Collaboration Meeting Racetrack Coil Fabrication
MQXFS Coil V1 Fabrication Status -Winding and Curing Miao Yu
QXF Coil Fabrication: Baseline Decisions QXF Coil Working Group Video Meeting (Revised from discussion during presentation) Dan Cheng April 16, 2013.
ABTEF Meeting, V. Namora Quality Assurance in the Superconducting Magnets and Circuits Consolidation (SMACC) project.
MQXFB design, assembly plans & tooling at CERN J.C Perez On behalf of MQXF collaboration team MQXF Workshop on Structure, Alignment and Electrical QA.
SQXF Cu Cable Winding Test at LBNL Dan Cheng Dec 17, 2013.
DOE Review of LARP – February 17-18, 2014 SQXF Coil Design and Fabrication Winding and Curing Miao Yu February 17,
KEK-CEA Superconducting Magnet Co-operation Program The FJPPL workshop LAPP, Annecy-Le-Vieux (France), June LHC-3 Superconducting Magnets.
CERN MBHSM0101 and Plan for Future Models F. Savary on behalf of the 11T Dipole Project Team.
QXF Winding/Curing Tooling and Curing Mold Miao Yu, FNAL 04/09/2013 CM20_Napa Valley, CA.
LHQ Coil Design and Features Miao Yu Fermilab May 09, 2012.
3 rd ESAC Review, 27 th February to 1 st March 2013, CEA Saclay Fresca2 Dipole Structure Assembly J.C Perez on behalf of Fresca2 collaboration team.
Superconducting Cryogen Free Splittable Quadrupole for Linear Accelerators Progress Report V. Kashikhin for the FNAL Superconducting Magnet Team (presented.
1 MQXFS Mirror Fabrication R. Bossert, G. Chlachidze, S. Stoynev HiLumi-LARP Collaboration Meeting May 11-13, 2015 FNAL.
LHQ Coil Fabrication Experience and Plan Miao Yu 04/08/2013.
Page 1 TQC Mechanical Model Igor Novitski / Rodger Bossert May 24, 2006 Results of MM#4 and MM#5.
Hardware Challenges and Limitations
QXF Coil Fabrication & Tooling Reaction / Impregnation
Coil Design and Fabrication
TQS Overview and recent progress
Model magnet test results at FNAL
HQ Mirror Assembly R. Bossert
TQS Structure Design and Modeling
MCBXFB Short Orbit Corrector Prototype: Status update
SQXF Mirror QXFSM1 Strain Gauges
High Order correctors coil manufacturing
J.C. Perez on behalf of SMC collaboration team J.C. Perez
11 T dipole coil features and dimensions
FRESCA2 Update on the dipole design and new calculations
Glyn Kirby Magnet AssemblyTechniques.
Mechanical stability and QXF coil winding
the MDP High Field Dipole Demonstrator
Analytical Cost Model (16 T dipole)
SMC Design overview of the construction and project issues
I. Bogdanov, S. Kozub, V. Pokrovsky, L. Shirshov,
P.Fabbricatore & S.Farinon
Presentation transcript:

Fabrication of test coil for D1 2m model Michinaka SUGANO KEK WP3 meeting 08/10/2014

1 Purposes of test coil fabrication 1 To verify the following items -Toolings for winding (Mandrel, Forming block, …) -Operation test for winding machine, hydraulic press, heater,… -Design of end spacers, winding and measurement of coil end -Confirmation of curing cycle (temperature profile and homogeneity, pressure) -Practice for quality assurance electrical tests of coil (ground fault, cable resistance, turn-turn insulation,…) Once test coil fabrication is completed, it will be used for -Commissioning of coil size measurement -Practice for attaching voltage leads -200mm-long mechanical model

2 Purposes of test coil fabrication 2 - Radiation resistant GFRP end spacers and wedges End spacers and wedges made of BT resin + S2 glass fibre were used for the first time Can newly developed hard GFRP end spacers be accommodated to the cable by curing ? - Curing with radiation resistant cyanate ester adhesive Curing temperature around 200 o C is needed, while it should not influence on contact resistance between the strands (lower than melting point of Stabrite coating) To consider compromised heat treatment condition and check if bonding strength is strong enough even for single layer coil End spacers were machined in house

3 Coil structure Cable: NbTi MB cable with APICAL and PIXEO insulation supplied by CERN Coil configuration: - Single layer coil - 44 turns, 4 coil blocks - Coil length: 2020 mm (between the end saddles) - 2D cross-section for HX-hole of 50 mm (old version) Wedge(GFRP) MP shim(GFRP) Pole shim (GFRP) Ramp box Center post Mandrel Pushing bar

4 Coil end -Coil end shape was slightly modified based on the result of practice winding Lead endReturn end Practice winding The cable angle was inclined too much and large gap between the cable and end spacer remained End spacer was re-designed to accommodate to the inclined cable (but further modification for the 2m-model coils should be needed)

5 Layer jump 2D cross-sections of the layer jump Coil layer at the straight sectionCollar layer at the lead end Pole turn Ramp box was designed in such a way that the layer jump turn go out uprightly Ramp box ABC A B C

6 Tensioner Feeder Turn table Winding mandrel Coil winding Winding machine Measurement of cable positions and angles Winding tension: Started from 40.9 kgf, decreased by 0.25 kgf/turn

7 Fitting of end spacer to cable Gap between the end saddle and the cable remained  We checked if the gap can be closed after curing

8 Preparation for curing SUS liner + Midplane shim SUS protective liner Pushing bars Alignment pin

9 Transfer of coil into forming block Insertion tooling Pushing the coil into the groove by screwing the bolts Forming block The coil was successfully inserted to the forming block using the alignment pin and jigs

10 How much should coil be compressed in curing ? Final size of coil is determined by yoking Pressure applied to coil Curing: 50 MPa Yoking: 100 MPa (max)  80 MPa From the results of 10 stack measurement (22 cables), coil after curing should be larger by 0.9 mm than the final size Forming block Mandrel Pushing bar Curing pressure 0.9mm-thick shim 0.9 mm-thick shims were inserted and coil was compressed until the gap was closed Gap

11 Curing press Thickness gauge Vertical load was applied incrementally until the gap was closed Longitudinal load (5.2 tonf) 90 ton hydraulic rams x3x7 over the length of 2m-coil Hydraulic ram

12 Determination of curing pressure Mandrel Forming block Gap was closed at hydraulic pressure of 23 MPa Pressure in curing Pressure pattern by pushing bars Check by Fuji paper Gap Coil pressure: 50 MPa

13 Configuration of heater and thermometers Heaters in forming block Heaters in mandrel Mandrel Form-block Heater Thermocouples (Both sides) 1m-long cartridge heater 4 in forming block 2 in winding mandrel Thermocouples 10 in forming block 5 in winding mandrel 2 at cartridge heater for mandrel Used for heater control

14 Consideration for heat treatment profile Recommended curing pattern given by the company: 150 o C x 4h o C x 4h o C x 4h Heat treatment condition for PIXEO T > 190 o C is necessary, but maximum temperature should be limited lower than 220 o C (melting point of SnAg coating) Adopted pattern: 150 o C x 4h o C x 8h Heat treatment condition for cyanate ester Heat treatment condition for curing 150 o C x 4h o C x 8h + >190 o C x 0.5h #3: Adopted pattern, thinly painted #1: Adopted pattern, thickly painted #2: Shortened pattern (no plateau), thinly painted Temperature ( o C) Elapsed time (hr) #3 #1 #2 Leakage of adhesive after HT in thickly painted sample “Adopted pattern + thinly painted” was selected Test with short sample cable and GFRP plate #1 #3

15 Heat treatment profile for curing 0.5h 190 ℃ 180 ℃ 150 ℃ 90 ℃ 8h4h4h 100 ℃ Pressure Temperature Longitudinal press - Maximum temperature was selected to be 190 o C - Vertical pressure was unloaded/reloaded during heat treatment - Longitudinal pressure was applied from the both ends of the coil Time Temperature

16 Actual temperature trend in curing Max. temperature could be controlled at o C (< 220 o C) 150 o C 180 o C 190 o C Expected temperature profile was realized F-E M F-W NNNMSSS Temperature profile to harden cyanate ester (150 o C x 4h o C x 8h) was obtained as expected Bonding of polyimide insulation

17 Coil after curing The gap between the end saddle and the cable was closed after curing  Hard BT resin + S2 glass GFRP can be accomodated to the cable Bonding between the cable and the wedges is sufficiently strong  Effectiveness of heat treatment profile is verified

18 Electrical tests after curing -No ground fault throughout winding and curing -No change of cable resistance (for 44 turn) -No damage of cable insulation checked by a bundle of fine Nb-Ti filaments -No turn-turn insulation failure at least up to 1 kV (Surge test) -Coil inductance: 2.3 mH Electrical soundness of the coil was confirmed After winding m  Under curing pressure, before curing m  After curing m  Surge test

19 Issues to be modified 1 The protective liner was plastically deformed after curing Additional support is needed for the layer jump Slit for the layer jump Protective liner Groove for the layer jump Protective liner Width of the groove should be made smaller Bottom surface of the ramp box Ramp box is slightly popping up Forming block

20 Issues to be modified 2 There is a gap at the boundary of the end spacer and the cable To make the cable more upright by elongating the length of coil end The leads for the QPH could be damaged Approach 1: Modification of coil end shape Approach 2: Filling the gap with shoe

21 Preparation for coil size measurement 50 ton loading test for checking the support structure and calibration of load-strain relationship for pushing bars have been completed Measurement using the test coil will be carried out soon Pushing bars with strain gauges -50 ton hydraulic press -Coil pressure up to 130 MPa -Continuous measurement using the 5.4 m-long bench -Two pushing bars each having 5 x 20mm-wide fingers Same system as CERN (Thanks to G. Kirby)

22 Future plan Test coil fabrication -Coil size measurement: Oct Mechanical short model: Dec m-model magnet development -Coil winding: Dec 2014 ~ Jan Delivery of collar and yoke plates: end of Jan Instrumentation: Feb Collaring: ~ end of Feb Yoking: Mar ~ April 2015 Test station -Delivery of 15kA current leads: ~end of March Inspection by local government: May Commissioning: Jun Cold test of 1st model magnet: Sep 2015

23 Summary -2m-long test coil for D1 was wound and cured. -Radiation resistant BT resin + S2 glass GFRP spacers and wedges were used for winding for the first time. Fairly good fitting was confirmed between the spacers and the cable after curing. -Heat treatment up to 190 o C for cyanate ester was tried and sufficiently strong bonding was confirmed. -Coil size measurement will be carried out soon. -Mechanical short model will be assembled using straight section cut out from the test coil. -We found some issued to be solved such as support of the ramp box and gap between the top of the cable and end spacer. Modification would be applied to the future 2m-long model coils.