06/22/04J. Lajoie – Santa Fe Muon Workshop1 Level-1 Triggers for Run-5 Outline –Vertex Triggers : BBC, ZDC (not discussed here) BBC will have ability.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.
Advertisements

Track Trigger Designs for Phase II Ulrich Heintz (Brown University) for U.H., M. Narain (Brown U) M. Johnson, R. Lipton (Fermilab) E. Hazen, S.X. Wu, (Boston.
Jin Huang Los Alamos National Lab.  Cited from March collaboration Meeting EC group Internal Communication Jin Huang 2 Preshower ID power drop significantly.
Muon Tracker Overview The PHENIX Muon Arms detect vector mesons decaying into muon pairs, allow the study of the Drell-Yan process, and provide muon detection.
Course Website: Digital Image Processing Morphological Image Processing.
The Belle SVD Trigger  Tom Ziegler  Vertex 2002  Kailua-Kona, Hawaii, 4-8 th nov The Belle SVD Trigger Tom Ziegler on behalf of the Belle SVD.
MUID Status: General Detector Health In addition to two disabled HV chains there are four other chains (out of a total of 600) that are largely or totally.
W trigger upgrade simulation Kazuya Aoki Kyoto Univ. Muon Physics and Forward Upgrades Workshop Santa Fe, June 2004.
Michal Szelezniak – LBL-IPHC meeting – May 2007 Cluster finder in the HFT readout Single-hit detection efficiency for a cluster-finder algorithm.
PHENIX Status, 2/22/11 VTX commissioning on beam Local polarimeter in service 9.6% in blue, -16.6% Residual transverse component for longitudinal beam.
Status of W analysis in PHENIX Central Arm Kensuke Okada (RBRC) For the PHENIX collaboration RHIC Spin Collaboration meeting November 21, /21/20091K.Okada.
Jornadas LIP 2008 – Pedro Ramalhete. 17 m hadron absorber vertex region 8 MWPCs 4 trigger hodoscopes toroidal magnet dipole magnet hadron absorber targets.
Andrew Glenn 4/21/02 Commissioning and Performance of the. Muon Identifier Andrew Glenn (University of Tennessee), for the PHENIX collaboration April APS.
Run11 MuTrig-FEE Summary RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa 1.
Performance of PHENIX High Momentum Muon Trigger 1.
Level 3 Muon Software Paul Balm Muon Vertical Review May 22, 2000.
CBM Software Workshop for Future Challenges in Tracking and Trigger Concepts, GSI, 9 June 2010 Volker Friese.
Spin J. Lajoie1 The PHENIX Muon Trigger Upgrade Outline: A (Brief) Spin Physics Motivation Antiquark Spin Contribution with W +/- bosons The PHENIX.
BesMUC Reconstruction Current Status You zhengyun, Mao yajun School of Physics, PKU
Takao Sakaguchi, BNL Run-11 PHENIX Run Coordinator PHENIX Run-11 Report Sakaguchi, RHIC retreat 1 RHIC retreat version.
MuTr Shutdown Work Rusty Towell for And JUNE 22, 2004 at the Muon Physics and Forward Upgrades Workshop.
Introduction to High Momentum Trigger in PHENIX Muon Arms RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa 中川格 1.
PHENIX STATUS Stefan Bathe, Time Meeting, June 1, 2010.
1 The PHENIX Muon Identifier Front End Electronics Andrew Glenn (University of Tennessee), for the PHENIX collaboration Andrew Glenn 5/1/01 April APS Meeting.
Detection of electromagnetic showers along muon tracks Salvatore Mangano (IFIC)
TGC Timing Adjustment Chikara Fukunaga (TMU) ATLAS Timing Workshop 5 July ‘07.
Time Meeting 3/10/2015 PHENIX Run-15 Status Douglas Fields PHENIX Run-15 Run Coordinator University of New Mexico.
Trigger rate studying Shiuan-Hal,Shiu. Introduction  Because the DAQ data taking rate only have 1000Hz, we must confirm the trigger rate will not higher.
Oct 6, 2008Amaresh Datta (UMass) 1 Double-Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry in Non-identified Charged Hadron Production at pp Collision at √s = 62.4 GeV at Amaresh.
MuID LL1 Study (update) 09/02/2003 Muon Trigger Upgrade Meeting.
1 Pad Chamber Simulation Results for Muon Trigger Upgrade 10/13/2003 Muon Trigger Upgrade meeting.
PHENIX Measurement of Parity-Violating Single Spin Asymmetry in W Production in p+p Collisions at 500 GeV Stephen Pate (for the PHENIX Collaboration) New.
Evgeny Kryshen (PNPI) Mikhail Ryzhinskiy (SPbSPU) Vladimir Nikulin (PNPI) Detailed geometry of MUCH detector in cbmroot Outline Motivation Realistic module.
Performance of the PHENIX Muon Identifier Introduction Calibration with cosmic rays Performance in Au+Au collisions Summary Hiroki Sato, Kyoto University.
Performance of PHENIX High Momentum Muon Trigger.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
STAR J/  Trigger in dA Manuel Calderon for the Heavy-Flavor Group Trigger Workshop at BNL October 21, 2002.
PERFORMANCE OF THE PHENIX SOUTH MUON ARM Kenneth F. Read Oak Ridge National Lab & University of Tennessee for the PHENIX Collaboration Quark Matter 2002.
1/27/2016 R.Seidl: status of simulation1 W muon analysis in PHENIX Status of the background understanding, signal, smearing and asymmetries R.Seidl (RBRC)
1 Detector Performance and Physics talks at Bern (very selective!) Pete Watkins.
2000/9/23 JPS meeting in Niigata1 Measurement of single gamma and  0 with PHENIX EMCal (I) H.Torii Kyoto Univ./RIKEN for the PHENIX Collaboration. Sep/23/2000,
JPS/DNPY. Akiba Single Electron Spectra from Au+Au collisions at RHIC Y. Akiba (KEK) for PHENIX Collaboration.
10/27/2005J. Lajoie - PANIC '051 The PHENIX Forward Upgrade Topics: A (Brief) Spin Physics Motivation Antiquark Spin Contribution with W +/- bosons The.
Performance of PHENIX High Momentum Muon Trigger.
1 NCC CDR prep and Physics strategy Richard Seto UCR DC Upgrades meeting Feb 8, 2006.
Forward Trigger Upgrade and AuAu Pattern Recognition V. Cianciolo, D. Silvermyr Forward Upgrade Meeting August 18-19, 2004.
David Silvermyr Lund University for the PHENIX Collaboration Early global event results using the PHENIX Pad Chambers at RHIC.
Run11 MuTrig Performance RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa 1.
Muon Arm Physics Program Past, Present + Future Patrick L. McGaughey Los Alamos National Laboratory Santa Fe June 17, 2003.
Jamaica 11 Jan.8, 2009 Muon Trigger Upgrade at PHENIX RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa.
Reduction of background in observation of W – decay using FVTX tracker Abraham Meles New Mexico State University DNP2012 – Newport Beach, CA. Oct 25, 2012.
A Time-To-Digital Converter (TDC) Harley Cumming Lisa Kotowski 1.
MuTrg/Mutr Optimization Yoshi-mitsu Imazu. ● Mutr Lv1 timing scan Adjustment of Lv1 timing Online/Offline shape cut values ● Mutrg threshold scan → Better.
Study of polarized sea quark distributions in polarized pp collisions at sqrt(s)=500GeV with PHENIX Oct. 10, 2008 Tsutomu Mibe (KEK) for the PHENIX collaboration.
PHENIX Plan for Run13 Kieran Boyle RSC 01/11/20131.
Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.
Shashlyk DAQ and FEE Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA DAQ and FEE Workshop, Rauischholzhausen Castle.
Electron Trigger in PHENIX Kenta Shigaki (KEK) at PHENIX Heavy Flavor and Light Vector Meson Physics Working Group Meeting on March 9, 2000.
Muon Trigger Performance Run12 PP510GeV Sanghwa Park (SNU/RIKEN)
High Multiplicity FVTX Trigger Toru Nagashima, Yomei Fukushima (Rikkyo University) Shoichi Hasegwa (J-Parc) Itaru Nakagawa RIKEN and FVTX Group 1.
Off-Detector Processing for Phase II Track Trigger Ulrich Heintz (Brown University) for U.H., M. Narain (Brown U) M. Johnson, R. Lipton (Fermilab) E. Hazen,
Interactions of hadrons in the Si-W ECAL
Jin Huang Los Alamos National Lab
Dee1 View from back of back plate
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
Forward-Backward Asymmetry Study in
J/Y Simulations for Trigger
Samples and MC Selection
p0 ALL analysis in PHENIX
Presentation transcript:

06/22/04J. Lajoie – Santa Fe Muon Workshop1 Level-1 Triggers for Run-5 Outline –Vertex Triggers : BBC, ZDC (not discussed here) BBC will have ability for multiple N tubes triggers –Central Arm Triggers: ERT LL1 (not discussed here) Working to move from ERT blue logic to ERT LL1 (~x2 better rejection) –Muon Arm Triggers: MUID LL1 Algorithm (reminder) Update from this time last year –MuID LL1 “Efficiency” –ROC-to-LL1 communication issues solved! Expected trigger rejection (Au+Au and p+p) –Number of required gaps for 1-deep road –“Square hole” background rejection –Remaining work to prepare for Run-5 Efficiency checks on algorithm tweaks Trigger rejection in Si+Si (Cu+Cu?)

06/22/04J. Lajoie – Santa Fe Muon Workshop2 MuID LL1 Algorithm Logical tubes formed by OR of physical tubes across panels in each gap. The most probable trajectory for a vertex muon striking a gap-1 logical tube is to continue on a path of equal dx/dz (vertical tubes) or dy/dz (horizontal tubes). Tubes w/ the same dx/dz (or dy/dz) get the same index.

06/22/04J. Lajoie – Santa Fe Muon Workshop3 MuID LL1 Deep Symset Logic 0B 1A 1B 1C 2A 2B 2C 3A 3B 3C 4A 4B 4C OR  >2 OR ANDAND dee p Either gap 0 or gap 1 Either gap 3 or gap 4 Three or more hit gaps

06/22/04J. Lajoie – Santa Fe Muon Workshop4 Shallow Symset Logic (Run-4) 0B 1A 1B 1C 2A 2B 2C 3A 3B 3C 4A 4B 4C OR ANDAND sha l.  >=2 Either gap 0 or gap 1 Two or more hit gaps Expected rejection? Needs simulation input! Lots of combined logic with 1D symset.

06/22/04J. Lajoie – Santa Fe Muon Workshop5 MuID LL1 Deep Symset Logic (4/5) 0B 1A 1B 1C 2A 2B 2C 3A 3B 3C 4A 4B 4C OR  >3 OR ANDAND dee p Either gap 0 or gap 1 Either gap 3 or gap 4 Four or more hit gaps suggested as a mod. to improve rejection

06/22/04J. Lajoie – Santa Fe Muon Workshop6 MuID LL1 Efficiency (June 2003) Horizontal Vertical ~80% eff. LL1 Data Simulator

06/22/04J. Lajoie – Santa Fe Muon Workshop7 ROC-to-LL1 Communication 20 horizontal fibers 20 vertical fibers MuID ROCs (T 0 adjust) Alg. FPGA’s Ctl. FPGA (GL1 delay) (all fibers on same clk) To GL1 The problem was in the ROC/MUX chip timing!

06/22/04J. Lajoie – Santa Fe Muon Workshop8 MuID LL1 Efficiency (May 2004) ~100% efficiency Trigger efficiency robust against problem fibers!

06/22/04J. Lajoie – Santa Fe Muon Workshop9 MuID LL1 Rejection Study (AuAu) Run MuID LL1 Hardware Simulator on BBCLL1 Events –Simulator uses complete trigger hardware description –One segment from Run First Check – 3/5 and 4/5 gaps required for deep symset: 3/5 gap requirement for deep: South 1 Deep rejection = South 1 Deep 1 Shallow rejection = South 2 Deep rejection = North 1 Deep rejection = North 1 Deep 1 Shallow rejection = North 2 Deep rejection = /5 gap requirement for deep: South 1 Deep rejection = South 1 Deep 1 Shallow rejection = South 2 Deep rejection = North 1 Deep rejection = North 1 Deep 1 Shallow rejection = North 2 Deep rejection =

06/22/04J. Lajoie – Santa Fe Muon Workshop10 Why so low? MuID LL1 triggers dominated by hits close to square hole –Expected from background studies –Look at all horiz.,vert. combinations from symsets (all events): (square hole partly filled in by false combinations)

06/22/04J. Lajoie – Santa Fe Muon Workshop11 “Square Hole Rejection” Improve rejection by eliminating a region around the square hole –Horizontal and vertical tracked independently in MuID LL1! –Define strips in symset ranges within square hole region horizontal 40-75, vertical –Reject event if the ONLY fired combinations within square hole Some loss of acceptance at low p T 4/5 gap requirement for deep w/strip rej: South 1 Deep rejection = South 1 Deep 1 Shallow rejection = South 2 Deep rejection = North 1 Deep rejection = North 1 Deep 1 Shallow rejection = North 2 Deep rejection =

06/22/04J. Lajoie – Santa Fe Muon Workshop12 MuID LL1 Rejection Study (pp) Run MuID LL1 Hardware Simulator on BBCLL1 Events –Not enough clock triggers for unbiased study –All segments from Run – BBC LL1 events 3/5 gaps required for deep symset: Without square hole rejection: South 1 Deep rejection = South 1 Deep 1 Shallow rejection = South 2 Deep rejection = North 1 Deep rejection = North 1 Deep 1 Shallow rejection = North 2 Deep rejection = With square hole rejection: South 1 Deep rejection = South 1 Deep 1 Shallow rejection = South 2 Deep rejection = North 1 Deep rejection = North 1 Deep 1 Shallow rejection = North 2 Deep rejection =

06/22/04J. Lajoie – Santa Fe Muon Workshop13 Run-5 Preparation Study Trigger Rejection for Light Ions –Si+Si (or Cu+Cu)? –Straightforward study HIJING with pisaToPRDF (Is this working for MuID?) Run through MuID LL1 simulator –Additional algorithm development? –Backgrounds? Hardware Setup –Square hole rejection logic implemented crosscheck with cosmics –Run blue logic and MuID LL1 switch to MuID LL1 when satisfied MuID LL1 Ready for Physics in Run-5

06/22/04J. Lajoie – Santa Fe Muon Workshop14 BACKUP SLIDES

06/22/04J. Lajoie – Santa Fe Muon Workshop15 “Extreme” Square Hole Rejection Improve rejection by eliminating a region around the square hole –Horizontal and vertical tracked independently in MuID LL1! –Define strips in symset ranges within square hole region horizontal 40-75, vertical –Reject event if ANY fired combinations within square hole Some loss of acceptance at low p T Some loss of efficiency (not quantified) 4/5 gap requirement for deep w/strip rej: South 1 Deep rejection = South 1 Deep 1 Shallow rejection = South 2 Deep rejection = North 1 Deep rejection = North 1 Deep 1 Shallow rejection = North 2 Deep rejection =

06/22/04J. Lajoie – Santa Fe Muon Workshop16 Shower Rejection Another idea from the original algorithm –Reject tracks that shower in the MuID absorber (pions) –Sum over all symset elements in gaps 2-5 More elements per gap than used in logic Symset doesn’t fire if any of these have >5 hits –Modest improvement in rejection 4/5 gap requirement for deep, shower cut: South 1 Deep rejection = South 1 Deep 1 Shallow rejection = South 2 Deep rejection = North 1 Deep rejection = North 1 Deep 1 Shallow rejection = North 2 Deep rejection = /5 gap requirement for deep: South 1 Deep rejection = South 1 Deep 1 Shallow rejection = South 2 Deep rejection = North 1 Deep rejection = North 1 Deep 1 Shallow rejection = North 2 Deep rejection =