INTERGOVERNMENTAL PROMISING PRACTICES ■ GETTING THE MOST FROM INTERGOVERNMENTAL ■ And how not to cringe in the process!

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Division of Child Support Services
Advertisements

Bankruptcy A Resource Guide for Child Support Professionals ERICSA May 2011.
National Tribal Child Support Association Conference 2014 National Tribal Child Support Association Sheraton Hotel Chandler, Arizona June 9-12, 2014 Intergovernmental.
Family Law Facilitator Services Jason Groce Assistant Family Law Facilitator Contra Costa County.
Enhanced Parental Involvement Collaboration (EPIC) San Francisco Department of Child Support Services Karen M. Roye, Director.
State Services Portal Moderated by:Tracy Boricchio Alameda LCSA Supervising Caseworker II Presented by:Dee Price Sanders OCSE FPLS Technical Support Liaison.
Understanding Social Security Administration Information in the State Services Portal Moderated by:DeAnne Sandoval Statewide Training Branch Section Manager.
Developing an Effective Call Center within the Financial Aid Office Texas Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators Fall 2010 Conference.
Involving the IV-D Attorney Sometimes a referral will go to the IV-D Attorney when there is an issue about the NCP’s ability to work The child support.
Monterey County, California Child Support "Delinquency Prevention Program" Pilot Project (May – December 2007) Presentation to the Child Support Director’s.
Child Support Services Date. Purpose Child Support Services exists to establish and enforce court orders for paternity, child support and medical support.
Enforcement Strategies for Long Term Delinquent Cases.
IN CHILD SUPPORT PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT AND MANAGEMENT.
Los Angeles County Child Support Services Department Mobile Application Proposed solution and approach October 15 th, 2012 County of Los Angeles Child.
Overview of the Florida State Disbursement Unit. The Role of the State Disbursement Unit (SDU) Operate a single statewide centralized payment and distribution.
Statewide Directors Meeting January 18, 2012 California Department of Child Support Services.
Module 2.1 Finance and Administration Cabinet Organizational Changes and Agency Impact March
WISCONSIN/ILLINOIS AND INDIANA SHARING AND CARING FOR OUR CHILDREN’S FUTURE ~WISCONSIN/ILLINOIS/INDIANA BORDER PROJECT~
Children thrive in safe, caring, supportive families and communities Title IV-D Program Overview IPAC Office Administrators Course May 8-9, 2013 Karla.
MacArthur Foundation Juvenile Indigent Defense Action Network (JIDAN) National Symposium on Indigent Defense Washington, D.C. (February 19, 2010) Sue Burrell,
OCSE’s Efforts to Enhance Interstate Communication ERICSA 2011 Atlantic City, New Jersey May 22,
Roberta Coons Dee Price Sanders Picture Perfect Caseload/Case Management “Let’s Get Fired Up”
Enhanced Parental Involvement Collaboration (EPIC) San Francisco Department of Child Support Services Karen M. Roye, Director.
Colorado’s Child Support Services Program
DC Child Support and the Fatherhood Movement. The New Face Of Child Support ENFORCER SUPPORTER.
Leveraging CMT to Improve Performance
Criminal Enforcement Unit San Luis Obispo County Dept. of Child Support Services Office of the District Attorney.
Arrears Management Two States, Two Ways
1 E arly I ntervention P rojects Los Angeles County Steven J. Golightly, Director Lisa M. Garrett, Chief Deputy Lisa M. Garrett, Chief Deputy.
Introduction to the Tribal Child Support Enforcement Program.
Providing excellent Customer Service to mothers and fathers HELENE TUNSTALL, CHIEF CUSTOMER SERVICE OPERATIONS NJ Department of Human Services Division.
STRATIFICATION The aim of stratification is to segment non-custodial parents based on their ability and willingness to support their children, and to use.
SUCCESS WITH INTERSTATE ERICSA 50 th Annual Training Conference & Exposition ▪ May 19 – 23 ▪ Hilton Orlando Lake Buena Vista, Florida Speakers: Rob Velcoff,
Social Security and Child Support: Making Sure Our Families Have Those Bare Necessities Lara Webb-Fors Cristol Porter ERICSA 50 th Annual Training Conference.
UIFSA: The Fundamentals and More
ERICSA 51 st Annual Training Conference & Exposition ▪ May 18 – 22 ▪ Sheraton Greensboro ▪ Greensboro, North Carolina Communication between the States:
1 Intergovernmental Child Support: Final Rule. 2 Overview Purpose and Scope Major Areas of the Final Rule Questions and Answers.
DCSS SDU Transition Project DCSS STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT (SDU) TRANSITION PROJECT CHERYL MELLO, Project Manager, CCSAS Migration Projects ANA VEGA, Manager,
1. Moderator Jennifer Effie San Diego County DCSS Speakers Chris Bradley State DCSS Ginger Harms El Dorado County DCSS Youa Xiong Sacramento County DCSS.
2007 Annual Child Support Training Conference and Expo CSE DATA MANAGEMENT September 18, 2007 Presenters Rick Bermudez (DCSS) Janet Nottley (CSDA) Kim.
Inter-County Collaboration Locate Pilot Project Randy Dancer - San Bernardino Sarah Honeycutt – Madera
STATE REPORTS CS 34/CS 35, CS 356, CS 921, and CS 1257.
Child Support Directors Association of California in partnership with California Department of Child Support Services Annual Child Support Training Conference.
Bankruptcy A Resource Guide for Child Support Professionals 2.
Best Practices – Tools to Increase Performance Presenters: COAP Wizard - Cheryl Mock, Sacramento County Arrears Calculator – Dennis Snapp, Los Angeles.
Moderator Jennifer Effie Child Support Manager – San Diego County DCSS Speaker Jim Garrison Systems Software Specialist – State DCSS Speaker Barbara Logan.
Case Management Collection Techniques ■Presenters: ■Kimberly Byram, Sacramento County ■Cheryl Mock, Sacramento County ■Amy Crawford, LexisNexis.
How Do you Impact the Success of the Office? Janet Nottley Director Napa County (707) David Kilgore Deputy Director.
Best Practices for Reducing Suspended Payments Presenters: Kathy Sokolik – Director, Santa Cruz/San Benito Regional Child Support Laura Secondo - Senior.
1 The Power of Pact Parole Re-Entry Program Presenters: Bill Bullock, Santa Cruz/San Benito Department of Child Support Services
NAPA COUNTY.  Assessment and treatment of cases based on the type of case and/or the non-custodial parent’s ability to pay.  In Napa County, the cases.
Presenters ■Dalaine Heagle, CSS Supervisor ✷ Tuolumne County ■Rose Schwab, Staff Services Manager ✷ Ventura County ■Linda Dippel, Director ✷ Contra Costa.
Version 3: IDB and CSR - Post Los Angeles. Agenda CSE Transition Timeline CSE and IDB Processing CSE and CSR Processing.
201 – Transitional Issues and Alternative Processes September 18, 2007.
Federal Parent Locator Service Your Partner for Improving Performance Presenters: Cindy Dean, OCSE Dee Price Sanders, OCSE
1 Child Support 101 Child Support Directors’ Association Annual Conference Anaheim, CA  September, 2007.
July 19, 2006 Delinquency Prevention Through Early Intervention Prepared for the California Child Support Directors Association Annual Training Conference.
California Department of Child Support Services: An Overview California Department of Child Support Services: An Overview.
Speakers ■Janet Nottley, Director Napa County DCSS ■Salli Matteson, Staff Development Manager Yolo County DCSS.
Service of Process Presenters Kathy Fischer, El Dorado County Cheryl Pintar, El Dorado County Jim Crum, Los Angeles County Sandy Kilgore, Action Serv.
“ Child Support Services and Parents Working Together for Children” Tehama County Child Support Services.
Tips and Techniques Carrie Norris Tex Ritter Maria Carlomagno-Brice
1 CSDA Procedures that Work Tamara Thomas Tracy Griffin Tex Ritter barbara.ca.us
NOBODY’S IN CONTROL PARTICIPANT AND CASE MANAGEMENT IN CSE -INTERCOUNTY TRANSFERS-
October 28,  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Failure to properly investigate earnings in a timely manner.
Child Support Directors Association of California in partnership with California Department of Child Support Services Employer Data Initiatives (W-55)
Service Requests How to Get Ahead and Stay Ahead Presenters: Sylvia Reyna, Napa County Department of Child Support Services,
What’s Trending in Tribal Child Support Policy National Tribal Child Support Association Annual Training Conference June 26-30, 2016.
Extraordinary Intergovernmental Topics
The Financial Aid Verification Process
Presentation transcript:

INTERGOVERNMENTAL PROMISING PRACTICES ■ GETTING THE MOST FROM INTERGOVERNMENTAL ■ And how not to cringe in the process!

■Presenters Tina Thomas, Staff Services Mgr, Ventura Co. Carol Beckett, Supervisor, San Francisco Co. Melissa Fox, Staff Attorney, Los Angeles Co.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES ■To gain knowledge and to bring back to your own LCSA tips and tricks that other counties have used to improve their processes and increase performance in the world of Intergovernmental cases!

VENTURA’S INTERGOVERNMENTAL PROMISING PRACTICES ■Cases distributed by alpha breakdown (not by state). ■Files – All files, Initiating and Responding, put on a central shelf. ■Mail – All Intergovernmental mail is delivered to a central mail bin. ■Tasks – All CSENet tasks go directly to the CSP.

VENTURA’S INTERGOVERNMENTAL PROMISING PRACTICES CONT’D ■Staff – Well-trained, experienced, faster caseworkers assigned to the Intergovernmental Team. ■Pick up the phone (use ) as often as possible for quick answers. ■Usage of OCSE website for State information. ■More focus on closures

NICR ■Ventura County completed the NICR Report in 2010 for the first time. We were able to complete it due to our improved processes. Since our casework was current we were able to spend more time on other projects such as the NICR and collection projects.

COLLECTIONS PROJECTS ■In addition to completing the NICR Report we were able to do monthly projects to increase collections: ■- Focus on ongoing or arrears in any given month. ■- Projects worked on Wednesdays for 2-4 hours. ■- Catchy titles to get staff involved – such as “increased arrears bring holiday cheers.” ■- Prizes awarded to the top performers such as – the team with the most collections or the CSP with the most collections.

PERFORMANCE MEASURES ■How is Ventura increasing Performance Measures? ■Collections Projects ■Case Management Tool ■Dedicated Collection Team ■Dedicated Enforcement Team ( OEX, Contempts) ■Focus on COAP ■Focus on Community Outreach ■Early Intervention Team

VENTURA COUNTY’S CONTACTS ■Tina Thomas ■Staff Services Manager ■ ■INTERSTATE CONTACTS: ■Tim Yuss ■Supervising Child Support Services Specialist ■ ■Brenda Tomaszewski ■Child Support Services Specialist IV ■

San Francisco County’s Intergovernmental Promising Practices ■Created an Intergovernmental Team ■Staffed with experienced supervisor level case managers ■Each case manager has their own case load ■Responsible for telephone calls, tasks and mail

San Francisco County’s Intergovernmental Promising Practices ■Use CMT to capture cases where the NCP on a one state case has an out of California address ■Cases identified by Special Projects Team ■Task to Intergovernmental Team for petition to Other Jurisdiction

San Francisco County’s Intergovernmental Promising Practices ■Intergovernmental “Boot Camps” ■NICR Training/NICR Report ■Bank Levies on Initiating Intergovernmental cases

CSENet ■Interstate Perspective ✷ 2 Step Process – Initial CSENet Request Transaction and Transmittal #1 ✷ Active and Open ✷ Essential for Outbound and Inbound CSENet Communication ✷ Suspends All Automated Immediate Enforcement Activities in CSE ✷ Suspends Some Non-Discretionary and Data Match Enforcement Activities in CSE

CSENet ■Interstate Transaction Search Page ✷ Inbound and Outbound Transactions ✷ CSENet Errors – Internal and External ✷ Reject Transactions – (inbound only) ✷ Intergovernmental Case Worker Information – may or may not be added by CSENet

Desk Aids and Other Resources ■CSENet Desk Aid ■Intergovernmental Desk Aid ■Intergovernmental Section of Statewide Policy Manual ■DCSS Intergovernmental Policy ■OCSE IRG (Intergovernmental Referral Guide) located at ■Interstate Source Book (provided by Orange County)

National Child Support Communication Forum (NCSCF) NCSCF is a national membership of interstate child support professionals representing 34 states and 2 countries. The forum provides a news board for members to share questions and answers as well as a database of interstate child support professionals that includes direct contact information. Contact Darlene Sandberg at for more information or if you are interested in joining the forum.

San Francisco County Contacts  Carol Beckett, Supervisor (415) Intergovernmental Contacts:  Mark Torres, Supervisor (415)  Judith Merrill, Supervisor/NICR Contact (415)  Luretha Jones, Supervisor (415)

County of Los Angeles – Interstate Division ■The County of Los Angeles (“COLA”) has a full- service Interstate Division, which handles all cases in which one parent resides out of state. ■In late 2009, COLA’s Interstate Division transitioned from specialized enforcement to a “modified case ownership” approach. ■Presently, COLA’s Interstate Division is managing approximately 44,000 open cases. 91% have orders. We receive about 250 new cases each month from the Central Registry.

County of Los Angeles – Interstate Division ■Of the 250 new cases received each month, approximately half are establishment and half are registrations of foreign orders (“RFO’s). ■Currently, cases are managed by five case ownership teams and are assigned by IV-D number. Each team has a specific Child Support Officer (“CSO”) assigned to process Uniform Support Petitions (“USP’s”) for Establishment and a specific CSO to process USP’s for Enforcement.

County of Los Angeles – Interstate Division ■The other CSO’s on each team manage their individual caseloads from cradle to grave. They field calls, mail and scheduled appointments. ■COLA continues to utilize specialized enforcement teams for unscheduled interviews, ICT/COV/transfer to local divisions, COAP, audit and case closing.

County of Los Angeles – Promising Practices ■Identify all new establishment cases on a monthly basis and create a “General Testimony Mailout.” ■Letter to Custodial Parents to obtain General Testimony, which is required for establishment. ■ Cases involved are placed on our shared drive in order to track them. If no response, these cases are closed.

County of Los Angeles – Promising Practices ■For all establishment cases received from the Central Registry, we are doing a “merge match” with the Postal Verification letter. This allows us to more quickly obtain the postal verification required for the USP and General Testimony. ■Establishment cases – COLA obtains uncontested judgments vs. default judgments. ■Consolidation project – to assist with USP’s for enforcement to other states.

County of Los Angeles – Promising Practices ■Early Intervention/Stern Letter: All non paying new cases with orders are targeted on a quarterly basis (through CMT) – update addresses, Income Withholding Order’s (“IWO’s”), financial information to process modifications, legal and case information, repayment plans, release driver’s licenses and facilitate payment arrangements. ■Saturday Outreach – using merge match and CMT to target nonpaying TMSO cases.

County of Los Angeles – Promising Practices ■Importance of interstate communications: - CSENET - Transmittals - Tasks - Excel list of out-of-state contacts

County of Los Angeles – Interstate Contacts ■Melissa A. Fox, Staff Attorney ■ ■Patricia Erb – Division Chief ■ – ■Nancy Ruffolo – Assistant Division Chief ■ – ■Irene Korn – Assistant Division Chief ■ –

Questions?