School Committee Presentation November 1, 2011.  Piloted on a limited basis in 2010-11  Expansion to 13 class sections in 2011-12  9 th and 10 th grade.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation Pilot September 1, 2011 – September 30, 2012 NJ State Board of Education, July 13, 2011.
Advertisements

Building Capacity for Effective Co- Teaching EdPower Teacher Institute Summer 2013.
MEMORIAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
COE Office of Assessment and Accreditation Department of Elementary and Middle Grades Education COE Office of Teacher Education College of Education East.
Action Research Opportunity Or Research Based Action.
Understanding the EPC Rating rubrics
Co-Teaching Getting Started
Teachers for a New Era Teacher & Pupil Assessment Phase II: Numeracy and Literacy in Grades 2-8 Scott W. Brown, Ph.D. Teachers for a New Era Project University.
Co-Teaching Classroom
Special Education Review Manchester Essex Regional School District School Committee Meeting November 17, 2009.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
The Maryland Co-teaching Framework
Presented by: Jennifer Timpone-Goldstein ED Fall 2008 Collaborative Team Teaching: Does it Effect the Way a Child Learns?
NSF GK-12 STEP Fellow Training at the University of Cincinnati Dr. Anant R. Kukreti – Lead PI Dan Boles – Secondary STEP Teacher Andrea C. Burrows – Grant.
NEW TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS CONNECTING TEACHER PERFORMANCE to ACADEMIC PROGRESS.
Kentucky Integrated Strategy September 29, College & Career Readiness Agenda—Literacy/Mathematics Design Collaborative Tools Offer tools for the.
Urbana Middle School School Improvement Plan
Math Science Partnership Excellence In Mathematics Lanakila Elementary School Honolulu, HI.
Co-Teaching as Best Practice in Student Teaching
THE DRAGON CONNECTION March Who are we?  Jefferson City Schools  Small, rural school district 60 miles north of Atlanta, 18 miles north of the.
WELCOME!!!. NTO Science / Social Studies Michele Dorsey (ITL, Gen Ed Inclusion)- Longfellow Rebecca Allwang- (Gen Ed Inclusion) Bryant Woods Sonya Robinson.
Co-Teaching is defined as two teachers (cooperating teacher and teacher candidate) working together with groups of students - sharing the planning, organization,
Summer Transitions BRIDGES TO HIGH SCHOOL, CONNECTIONS FOR LIFE How Three Community Partnerships are Planning to Enhance and Expand their Summer Transition.
Assisting, Collaborating, and Training ESL Secondary Content Teachers ACT-ESL Virginia Commonwealth University School of Education Project Director: Dr.
Where on the World Are You? Supporting & Developing School Based Math Teacher Leaders NCSM Conference, Washington DC April 21, 2009 Astrid Fossum, Mathematics.
AWMLP BOARD MEETING JANUARY 26, 2014 MIKE HUBERT.
Welcome Parents of Gifted Students. LCMA’s teachers of the gifted would like to take this opportunity to introduce ourselves and to tell you about our.
1 Gifted Cluster Model Update October 14, 2014 Mrs. Linda Palles-Thompson, K12 Administrator.
PRIMES Partnerships and Research Investigations with Mathematicians, Engineers, and Scientists Professional Development Model MSP Regional Meeting February.
Berkshire Local School District Strategic Plan Update Fourth Update, 10/14/09.
TRHS Action Plan Goal 1 O Goal #1: In the School Year TRHS will further develop our Response to Instruction (RTI) model to ensure.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the FY2006 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Creating Collaborative Communities Presented and adapted by: Fleming MS Team Emily Kuwahara, LRE Specialists Jean Lee, Program Specialists Support Unit.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND Update on Secondary Learning Center Transition March 23, 2010.
Simcoe County District School Board Numeracy Coaches Jennifer Brown Numeracy Consultant K-12.
Effective Teaching Each person will take a piece of string when it is their turn 2. Once you have your piece of string you will describe the.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Moon Area School District.  tml tml 
Denise Bell Literacy Coach Waco HS, Waco ISD. Writing Technique: Silent Discussion.
CHAPTER 3 Strategy Cards for: Communication with Colleagues, Students, & Families.
Inclusion and the Differentiated Classroom By Jennifer Cucinotta.
Teacher-to-Teacher Conference UNC Charlotte October 13, 2015.
PIIC/PLN UPDATES AIU3 Coaches’ Workshop September 11, 2014.
BOOKER T. WASHINGTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Planning Standards-Based Teaching and Learning Presented by Dwight R. Counsel Director of School Programs September 20, 2010.
Content Strategies for Middle School Math Bo Kim I.S.5 – 7 th & 8 th Grade CTT Math.
Mock Board Meeting E. W. Chambliss Elementary School Grades K – 3 Diane Brown, Principal January 12, 2012 Home of The CES Tiger Cubs.
Challenges with Secondary Special Education January 13, 2009.
Garrett Elementary Accountability Report Kids are our Business! October 14,
Alliance for Teaching Mathematics to Special Education Learners Strengthening Content Knowledge and Collaboration of General and Special Education Teachers.
Presentation to the Faculty of North Surry High School September 11, 2014 Mark Fuhrmann North Surry High School, Mount Airy, NC Participant in the
Strategies for Collaboration CHAPTER 5. Consultation and Collaboration: Models and Skills What are the six problem-solving stages of the collaborative.
Peer Coaching for Effective Professional Learning.
INCLUSION The Road to Success for Students with Disabilities.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS SINGLE SUBJECT CREDENTIAL PROGRAM INITIAL CLINICAL PRACTICE MEETING FOR COOPERATING TEACHERS AND TEACHER CANDIDATES.
Working with other adults to support bilingual learners.
Nevada Mathematics and Science (MSP) Program Grants Technical Assistance Meeting November 2014.
Co-Teaching Making it work Downloading Files You can download all of today’s materials in the FILES 2 Pod on the bottom left of your screen.
TAP Math: Teachers and Administrators Partnering for Mathematics Learning Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Department of Education funded through.
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
A Productive Partnership
The Ethical Community Charter School
Number Talks: Developing Computational Fluency
Challenges with Secondary Special Education
School Redesign and SRCL Implementation
WCPSS 3rd Grade Explorers
The Formative Assessment Process Module #12 (Elem. & Sec.)
Milwaukee Public Schools University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Teaching Collaboration Collaboratively
Presentation transcript:

School Committee Presentation November 1, 2011

 Piloted on a limited basis in  Expansion to 13 class sections in  9 th and 10 th grade classes  English (Edgerton, Koughan, Lane)  Math (Deluca, Brown)  Social Studies (Tran, Jewett)  Science (Burgess, Nolan)

 Special and general education teachers partner in educating students  Both teachers plan, teach, and assess students  Both teachers support learning of all students by differentiating instruction

 Builds teacher capacity  General education teachers learn new instructional strategies and supports  Special education teachers expand content knowledge  Enhances instruction for general education and special education students

 Increased student achievement  Decreased special education needs outside the classroom  Lower student to teacher ratios  Decreased referrals to special education

 Dr. Kathleen Porcaro, EPSI  Co-Teachers attended half-day trainings in September and October with Dr. Porcaro  Grant funding for additional co- teaching consult and planning in summer 2012

 Observations by Jim Lee, Allison Collins, and Scott Morrison throughout the year  Use of a co-teaching rubric to assess collaboration and partnership

Look for…  Evidence of co-planning  Shared roles and responsibilities  Modifications for struggling students  Reinforcement strategies for learning  Student engagement and risk-taking  All students are appropriately challenged

 Comparison of student grades from to  Comparison of special education and SAT referrals from to