Figure 1. PARTICIPATING STEM CELL DONOR REGISTRIES Number of registries Year ©BMDW

Figure 2. PARTICIPATING CORD BLOOD BANKS/REGISTRIES Number of registries Year ©BMDW

Figure 3. TOTAL NUMBER OF HLA-A, -B AND HLA-A, -B, -DR TYPED STEM CELL DONORS 28 Number in bars is % HLA-A,-B,-DR typed stem cell donors Number of stem cell donors (x million) Year ©BMDW 74 77

Figure 4. THE NUMBER OF STEM CELL DONORS ADDED TO THE DATABASE PER YEAR Number of stem cell donors (x thousand) added per year Year ©BMDW

Figure 5. TOTAL NUMBER OF CORD BLOOD UNITS Year ©BMDW

Figure 6.THE NUMBER OF CORD BLOOD UNITS ADDED TO THE DATABASE PER YEAR Number of cord blood units (x thousand) added per year Year ©BMDW

Figure 7. TOTAL NUMBER OF STEM CELL DONORS PER CONTINENT Number of stem cell donors (x million) ©BMDW

Figure 8a.DISTRIBUTION OF STEM CELL DONORS IN THE WORLD < 25,000 donors25, ,000 donors> 100,000 donors Argentina, India, Mexico, United Arab Emirates, Uruguay Australia (including New Zealand), Canada, Israel, Japan, Taiwan, USA China (Hong Kong), South Africa, Thailand See Fig.8b ©BMDW

<25,000 donors 25,000 – 100,000 donors >100,000 donors Armenia, Bulgaria, Croatia, Finland, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Lithuania, Russia, Republic San Marino, Slovakia, Slovenia, Switzerland Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Norway, Poland, Spain, Sweden, The Netherlands, Turkey Cyprus, France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, United Kingdom Figure 8b.DISTRIBUTION OF STEM CELL DONORS IN EUROPE ©BMDW

Figure 9. TOTAL NUMBER OF CORD BLOOD UNITS PER CONTINENT Number of cord blood units (x thousand) Year ©BMDW

Figure 10a. DISTRIBUTION OF CORD BLOOD UNITS IN THE WORLD < 5,000 donors5,000-10,000 donors> 10,000 donors Argentina, Korea, Mexico China, Israel, Japan Australia, Taiwan, USA ©BMDW See Fig. 10b

Figure 10b. DISTRIBUTION OF CORD BLOOD UNITS IN EUROPE < 5,000 units 5,000 – 10,000 units > 10,000 units Austria, Czech Republic, Finland, Greece, The Netherlands, Poland, Slovakia, Sweden Switzerland, Turkey France,Belgium, Germany, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom ©BMDW

Figure 11.THE NUMBER OF STEM CELL DONORS AND CORD BLOOD UNITS TYPED FOR HLA-A, -B, -DR SPLIT ANTIGENS AND THE NUMBER OF DIFFERENT AND UNIQUE PHENOTYPES Number of stem cell donors and cord blood units and phenotypes (x million) Year ©BMDW

Number of different phenotypes per thousand new stem cell donors and cord blood units Figure 12. NUMBER OF DIFFERENT HLA-A, -B, -DR SPLIT PHENOTYPES PER THOUSAND NEW STEM CELL DONORS AND CORD BLOOD UNITS Year ©BMDW

Figure 13. INCREASE IN THE NUMBER OF DIFFERENT PHENOTYPES ADDED TO THE BMDW DATABASE ©BMDW

Figure 14: THE RELATIVE PERCENTAGE OF UNIQUE HLA-A, -B, -DR SPLIT PHENOTYPES OF STEM CELL DONORS PER COUNTRY CONTRIBUTED TO THE ENTIRE DATABASE IN BMDW Remark: Bulgaria, India, United Arab Emirates and Uruguay had too few HLA-A, -B, -DR split typed donors to be depicted in Figure 14. ©BMDW

Figure 15:THE RELATIVE PERCENTAGE OF UNIQUE HLA-A, -B, -DR SPLIT PHENOTYPES OF CORD BLOOD UNITS PER COUNTRY CONTRIBUTED TO THE ENTIRE DATABASE IN BMDW Remark: Turkey had too few HLA-A, -B, -DR typed cord blood units to be depicted in Figure 15. Data from Greece requires further clarification ©BMDW

Figure 16: THE RELATIVE PERCENTAGE OF UNIQUE HLA-A, -B, -DR SPLIT PHENOTYPES OF STEM CELL DONORS CONTRIBUTED TO THE STEM CELL DONOR DATABASE IN BMDW Remark: Bulgaria, India, United Arab Emirates and Uruguay had too few HLA-A, -B, -DR split typed donors to be depicted in Figure 16. ©BMDW

Figure 17:THE RELATIVE PERCENTAGE OF UNIQUE HLA-A, -B, -DR SPLIT PHENOTYPES OF CORD BLOOD UNITS CONTRIBUTED TO THE CORD BLOOD UNIT DATABASE IN BMDW Remark: Turkey had too few HLA-A, -B, -DR typed cord blood units to be depicted in Figure 17. Data from Greece requires further clarification ©BMDW

Figure 18.THE USERS OF ONLINE SERVICES (IN TOTAL: 685) ©BMDW

Figure 19.THE MONTHLY USAGE OF NEW BMDW ONLINE MATCH PROGRAMS IN 2008 Number of match runs Month ©BMDW

Figure 20.THE USAGE OF BMDW ONLINE MATCH PROGRAMS PER YEAR Year ©BMDW