NPOESS P 3 I Space Demonstration of 3D wind observations using Doppler Wind Lidar (DWL) DWL Mission Definition Team April 18, 2005 21 April 05.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Airborne Doppler Wind Lidars for Climate and Weather Forecasting G. D. Emmitt Simpson Weather Associates Charlottesville, VA.
Advertisements

ESTO Advanced Component Technology 11/17/03 Laser Sounder for Remotely Measuring Atmospheric CO 2 Concentrations GSFC CO 2 Science and Sounder.
CALIPSO and LITE data for space-based DWL design and Data utility studies: Research plans G. D. Emmitt Simpson Weather Associates D. Winker and Y. Hu (LaRC)
Calibration Scenarios for PICASSO-CENA J. A. REAGAN, X. WANG, H. FANG University of Arizona, ECE Dept., Bldg. 104, Tucson, AZ MARY T. OSBORN SAIC,
1 Doppler Wind Lidar Technology Roadmap Ken Miller, Mitretek Systems Coauthors –see Reference 2 January 27, 2004.
Performance characteristics and design trades for an ISS Hybrid Doppler Wind Lidar G. D. Emmitt and S. Wood Simpson Weather Associates Charlottesville,
ECMWF WMO Workshop19-21 May 2008: ECMWF OSEs Slide 1 The ADM-Aeolus mission Geneva, May 2008 Representing the ADM-Aeolus Mission Advisory Group,
US Calibration/Validation Activities for the ADM/Aeolus Mission Mike Hardesty and Lars-Peter Riishojgaard.
Atmospheric structure from lidar and radar Jens Bösenberg 1.Motivation 2.Layer structure 3.Water vapour profiling 4.Turbulence structure 5.Cloud profiling.
CALIPSO and LITE Data for Space-based DWL Design and Data Utility Studies: Research Plans: Part II Dave Emmitt, Simpson Weather Associates Dave Winker,
Lidar Remote Sensing for Environmental Monitoring IX
Application of a High-Pulse-Rate, Low-Pulse-Energy Doppler Lidar for Airborne Pollution Transport Measurement Mike Hardesty 1,4, Sara Tucker 4*,Guy Pearson.
G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R Status of the HIWRAP and URAD Conical Scan Radars for Wind Measurements Gerald Heymsfield NASA/Goddard.
G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R Goddard Lidar Observatory for Winds (GLOW) Wind Profiling from the Howard University Beltsville Research.
Michiko Masutani NOAA/NWS/NCEP/EMC RSIS/Wyle Information Systems Introduction to OSSE and Summary of NCEP OSSEs
Utility of Doppler Wind Lidars in cloudy conditions For Marty Ralph Provided by Dave Emmitt per request by Wayman Baker 1.
Maj Richard “Krash” Krasner Directorate of Requirements Headquarters Air Force Space Command Air Force Space Command's Environmental Monitoring Requirements.
1 Satellite data assimilation for air quality forecast 10/10/2006.
THORPEX OSSEs to support predictability experiments, mission planning and future observing system design G. D. Emmitt (Simpson Weather Associates) and.
Polar Communications and Weather Mission Canadian Context and Benefits.
1 Global Tropospheric Winds Sounder (GTWS) Reference Designs Ken Miller, Mitretek Systems January 24, Jan-02.
Science Mission Directorate Meeting of the Working Group on Space-Based Lidar Winds: View from NASA Headquarters Ramesh Kakar Weather Focus Area Leader.
B. Gentry/GSFCGTWS 2/26/01 Doppler Wind Lidar Measurement Principles Bruce Gentry NASA / Goddard Space Flight Center based on a presentation made to the.
Preparing for a Wind Lidar Venture Class Mission Discussion at Lidar Working Group Meeting Bar Harbor, ME August 24 – 26, 2010 Dr. Wayman Baker 1.
GIFTS - The Precursor Geostationary Satellite Component of a Future Earth Observing System GIFTS - The Precursor Geostationary Satellite Component of a.
January 24, 2002 Key West, FL Lidar Winds Working Group Meeting GTWS SDT-Yoe & Atlas Science Definition Team Activities and the GTWS Draft Data Requirements.
Point vs. VAD scans for complex terrain G. D. Emmitt and C. O’Handley WG SBLW Destin, FL January 27-30, 2009.
1 GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Aviation Application Team – Volcanic Ash Mike Pavolonis (STAR)
Update on Hybrid Detection DWL Study* G. D. Emmitt WG on Space-based Lidar Winds Oxnard, CA 7-9 February, 2001 *funded by the IPO.
Integrating Airborne DWL and PBL Models in Real Time G.D. Emmitt, C. O’Handley, S. A. Wood and S. Greco Simpson Weather Associates WGSBLW Miami 2007.
Update on NASA’s Sensor Web Experiments Using Simulated Doppler Wind Lidar Data S. Wood, D. Emmitt, S. Greco Simpson Weather Associates, Inc. Working Group.
1 XOVWM User Impact Study Coastal Simulations Contacts:
Page 1 The Passive A-band Wind Sounder (PAWS) for Measurement of Tropospheric Winds Brian R. Johnson (CO- I), Shane Roark (PI), Pei Huang, Grzegorz Miecznik,
Status of CFLOS study using CALIPSO data G. D. Emmitt, D. Winker and S. Greco WG SBLW Destin, FL January 27-30, 2009.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Infrared Temperature and.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is working to use Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) to improve its ability to monitor the global.
Kavaya - 1 Components of the Space-Based Lidar Winds Roadmap Michael Kavaya, Farzin Amzajerdian, Grady Koch, Jirong Yu, Upendra Singh NASA/LaRC Working.
NPOESS DWL Mass and Power Estimation Ken Miller, Dave Emmitt, Bruce Gentry, Raj Khanna Key West WG Meeting January 20, 2006.
More on Wind Shear Statistics: Intercomparison of Measurements from Airborne DWL and Ground-based Sensors S. Greco and G.D. Emmitt Simpson Weather Associates.
N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Space-based Wind Lidar Working Group Bar Harbor, Maine August 23-26,
Wind Lidar OSSEs in the Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation Lars Peter Riishojgaard 1,2, Zaizhong Ma 1,2, Michiko Masutani 3, Jack Woollen 3,
OSSEs and NOAA’s Quantitative Observing Systems Assessment Program (QOSAP) Bob Atlas, Craig MacLean, Lidia Cucurull (NOAA, USA) Sharan Majumdar, Tom Hamill.
LWG, Destin (Fl) 27/1/2009 Observation representativeness error ECMWF model spectra Application to ADM sampling mode and Joint-OSSE.
GeoLidarObservatory A Geosynchronous LIDAR Observatory For Atmospheric Winds And Moisture Measurements G. D. Emmitt Simpson Weather Associates G. D. Spiers.
(to optimize its vertical sampling)
1 Summary of Global Tropospheric Wind Sounder (GTWS) Technology Roadmap Ken Miller, Mitretek Systems June 23, 2003.
OSSE Plans Related to a Hybrid Mission and ADM Follow-on Missions G.D. Emmitt Simpson Weather Associates WG on Space-base Lidar Winds Welches, OR
Developing a Cal/Val Plan* for a Space-based Doppler Wind Lidar G. D. Emmitt WG on Space-based Lidar Winds Oxnard, CA 7-9 February, 2001 * funded by the.
Developing the configuration trade space for space-based DWLs: vertical and horizontal coverage G. D. Emmitt, S. A. Wood and S. Greco Simpson Weather Associates.
Evaluation of T511(1°) clouds Simpson Weather Associates 7 June 2007 NCEP OSSE meeting.
Adaptive Targeting Schemes and Their Technology Implications G. D. Emmitt SWA January 2006.
Doppler Lidar Winds & Tropical Cyclones Frank D. Marks AOML/Hurricane Research Division 7 February 2007.
GWOLF and VALIDAR Comparisons M. Kavaya & G. Koch NASA/LaRC D. Emmitt & S. Wood SWA Lidar Working Group Meeting Sedona, AZ January 2004.
Shear statistics in the lower troposphere and impacts on DWL data interpretation G. D. Emmitt and S. Greco Simpson Weather Associates WG on Space-Based.
Planned Simulations for New Nature Run G. D. Emmitt, S. Greco, S. A. Wood and C. O’Handley Simpson Weather Associates OSEE meeting November 16, 2006.
Kavaya-1 Coherent Doppler Lidar Roadmap to Both the NRC Decadal Survey “Science Demonstration” and “Operational” Missions Michael J. Kavaya Jirong Yu Upendra.
Status of Preparation of Manuscript for DWL BAMS Article Discussion at Lidar Working Group Meeting Miami February 8 - 9, 2011 Dr. Wayman Baker 1.
CFLOS opportunities update with CALIPSO and impact on simulating GWOS and ADM in OSSEs G. D. Emmitt and S. Greco Simpson Weather Associates D. Winker NASA/LaRC.
DWL Operations within a Sensor Web Modeling and Data Assimilation System:Recent Results M. Seabloom, S. Talabac, G. McConaughy, J. Ardizzone, G. Brin,
Developing an OSSE Testbed at NASA/SIVO
Clouds, shear and the simulation of hybrid wind lidar
IPO Funded Airborne DWL for Cal/Val Planning
Status of Hybrid DWL Study
Methodology for 3D Wind Retrieval from HIWRAP Conical Scan Data:
Application of Aeolus Winds
ECV definitions Mapping of ECV product with OSCAR variables
GLAS Cloud Statistics and Their Implications for a Hybrid Mission
New Sampling Perspectives for TODWL
NPOESS P3I & Follow-on Threshold Operational Mission
IPO Cal/Val for a Space-Based Wind Observing Systems
Presentation transcript:

NPOESS P 3 I Space Demonstration of 3D wind observations using Doppler Wind Lidar (DWL) DWL Mission Definition Team April 18, April 05

General Mission Description The goal is to obtain global 3D wind observations within the troposphere ( and lower stratosphere) using a Doppler Wind Lidar flown as a P 3 I on NPOESS. The initial mission would have two primary objectives: Demonstrate performance of the first 3D horizontal vector wind sounder in space leading to a fully operational deployment Demonstrate data utility to civilian and military atmospheric operations and research communities and prepare users for optimal use of the “high impact” wind data To optimize the return on the mission investment, the instrument would be operated in an adaptive targeting mode. Synergisms with other NPOESS instruments will be pursued.

Motivation The NWP communities and the NPOESS program have identified 3D global tropospheric (and stratospheric) winds as having the highest priority as a new observing capability. Global tropospheric winds are NPOESS’s #1 unaccomodated EDR. Computer modeling studies at NCEP, NASA and ESA show that 3D tropospheric wind profiles are critical to advancing operational forecasting skills. Cost benefit studies show that global 3D wind observations would have significant cost/safety impacts on aviation (> $100M$/yr), severe weather preparation (evacuation cost avoidance > 100M$/yr) and military operations (>15M$/yr)

The Achievable Instrument Based upon NASA/NOAA funded studies of several DWL concepts, the mission definition team has selected a dual technology approach for its initial consideration. This approach optimizes the data return given the available platform resources. The NPOESS P 3 I wind sounder would include a: Coherent detection sub-system to provide wind data at cloud tops and within optically thin clouds; in the boundary layer below clear regions and broken cloud decks, aerosols permitting. Primary vertical coverage: boundary layer and cloudy regions up to 20 km Direct detection sub-system to provide wind profiles above the boundary layer in cloud free (or thin cloud) regions, including the important tropopause region, using the return from molecules in the atmosphere. Primary vertical coverage: clear regions from 3 km to 20 km The instrument would scan its laser beams in a stepwise fashion, providing both components of the horizontal wind at 1 km intervals above the boundary layer and km within the boundary layer. The current design concept would require an average of ~ watts : the coherent sub-system would be on continuously (~80 watts) and the direct subsystem would operate on a 10% duty cycle (~250 watts average; 850 peak).

Aerosol Subsystem NPOESS 3D wind profiler system (dual DWL technologies) Molecular Subsystem Dual wavelength Scanner/mirror Common DWL systems

The Plan – Adaptive Targeting Based upon IPO funded studies and the experience of NOAA/NCEP, adaptive targeting will be used in the initial NPOESS mission to maximize the impact of the resources available. Targets can be identified by several methods including Pre-launch selection of current data voids Near real time model-based selection of data sensitive regions “On-board” detection of targets of opportunity Given the exploratory nature of the P 3 I mission, the targeting will be a major component of the data utility evaluation.

DWL Sampling Concept Measure vertical stack of Target Sample Volumes (TSVs) Average shots within TSV Fore and aft perspectives resolve horizontal wind vectors 2 ground tracks

Adaptive targeting with emphasis on CONUS interests ( Blue is coherent coverage Red is both coherent and direct) Example of targeting a hurricane as it approaches the Gulf coast. (blue segments: forward looks; Red segments: aft looks; Blue plus red Provide full horizontal wind vector) Adaptive Targeting Adaptive Targeting Experiments

Steps to a NPOESS Mission Prepare to respond to NPOESS for flight opportunities Develop a detailed mission plan/roadmap Advance TRLs for critical subsystems Pursue joint industrial and government participation Establish partnerships Develop instrument Exploratory development phase (e.g. NASA Instrument Incubator Program (IIP)) Instrument build, test, and demonstration Airborne DWL testbed to refine instrument design and operations plan and to provide users with precursor data sets Deliver a space-qualified instrument 18 months before planned launch Integrate onto NPOESS platform Operate for a minimum design lifetime of 3 years

Global Wind Data Requirements NPOESS Integrated Operational Requirements Document (IORD) included P 3 I wind profile objectives: IORD I (1996) IORD II (2001) Global Tropospheric Wind Sounder (GTWS) acquisition study Data requirement workshop attended by NASA, NOAA and academia (2001) WMO requirements are very similar to those vetted within the GTWS workshop Strategy: use the GTWS threshold requirements for NPOESS P 3 I mission in adaptively targeted areas.

NPOESS P 3 I 3D Wind Mission Data Requirements Wind Data Product RequirementsMission Threshold 1 IORD II Objective 2 Depth of Regard (DOR) (km)0-20 Vertical Target Sample Volume (TSV) Resolution (km) Top of DOR to Tropopause Tropopause to boundary layer top Within boundary layer Not Required (reporting interval) Height Assignment Accuracy (km)0.1N/A Horizontal TSV Dimension (km) (maximum for averaging) 100N/A Horizontal Location Accuracy (km)0.510 Horizontal Resolution (km) (distance between TSVs) Minimum X-track Regard (km) (Number in () is number of TSVs) +/- 400 (4)N/A 1. Based upon GTWS threshold requirements 2. IORD-II did not identify wind threshold requirements GTWS ≤ IORDGTWS ~= IORD

Requirements (cont’d) Data RequirementGTWS Threshold IORD II Objective Number Line of Sight (LOS) perspectives in TSV (angular separation >30 & <150) 22 Precision (1  ) LOS Horiz (LOSH) (m/s) Above Boundary Layer Within Boundary Layer (number in () is  S within TSV) 3 (1.2) 2 (1.2) Horizontal Component Bias (m/s)0.11 Maximum Horizontal Speed (m/s) Above boundary layer Within Boundary layer Temporal Resolution (hours) (revisit period) 121 Data Product Latency (hours) GTWS ≤ IORD GTWS ~= IORD

DWLs can meet the requirements Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs) at NOAA/NCEP and NASA/GSFC have consistently documented improvements in weather forecasts not attainable by current (or improved versions) space-based observing systems Space-based DWLs provide contiguous profiles of wind shear not achieved by scatterometers, CMV and surface networks. DWLs can be designed to provide wind observations throughout the troposphere and lower stratosphere, even in the presence of clouds

Why dual technologies? The three basic DWL options: Direct detection of molecular motion Direct detection of aerosol motion Coherent detection of aerosol motion Basic direct-only and coherent-only instrument concepts to meet GTWS threshold requirements Evaluated by NASA’s ISAL and IMDC in 2001 Resulting instrument size, mass, and power were very large

Why dual technologies (cont’) First proposed in 1995 as WOS/H (Wind Observing Satellite/Hybrid) Capitalizes on the strengths of both technologies Coherent detection probes lower troposphere with high accuracy below clouds and in regions of enhanced aerosols Direct detection provides broad coverage of mid/upper troposphere (+ stratosphere) with modest accuracy Reduces costs Smaller instrument Shared launch; platform; pointing control, data collection, operations Possibly sharing scanner/telescope. Provides redundancy, options for multi-wavelength research and opportunity for synergisms with other platform sensors.

The Dual Technology Advantage DWL Concept Direct Only 1 Coherent Only 1 Hybrid Direct Hybrid Coherent Hybrid AT 3 Power6-8 KW4 -6 KW.6-.8 KW (10X) KW (20X) KW (20X) Telescope size (area) 1.23 m 2.42 m 2.75 m 2 (1.6X).2 m 2 (2.1X).75 m 2 (1.6X) 1.These numbers are for a 400 km orbiting DWL meeting GTWS threshold requirements (at 833km power draw would be ~ 5X greater for the lasers) 2. Numbers in () indicate hybrid advantage 3.Coherent (100% duty); Direct (10% duty)

The Hybrid Instrument Uses two lidar subsystems One direct detection, the other coherent Complementary measurement properties Direct detection subsystem Detects doppler shift from atmospheric molecules Operates everywhere, 0 to 20 km altitude Provides useful wind observations in cloud free regions Coherent subsystem Meets requirements in regions of high aerosol backscatter (dust layers, clouds, PBL aerosols)

Why Adaptive Targeting? As is the case with many observation data sets, only a fraction may be useful for a given objective. Such may be the case for wind observations needed to improve weather forecasts. NASA and NOAA studies suggest targeted (~ %) observations of full tropospheric winds could yield impacts close to continuous observations Given the NPOESS orbit altitude (824 km) and available resources (~ 400 W), the MDT considers adaptive targeting appropriate to both demonstrate highly useful data over limited areas and yield significant global impact.

Primary Targets for Hybrid/AT * Significant Shear regions Requires contiguous observations in the vertical. Thus both direct and coherent detection technologies are needed. Divergent regions Requires some cross track coverage. Identified by NCEP adaptive targeting scheme(s) Partly cloudy regions Requires measurement accuracy weakly dependent upon shot integration (i.e., coherent detection). Tropics Tropical cyclones (in particular, hurricanes & typhoons). Requires penetration of high clouds and partly cloudy scenes. *AT: Adaptive Targeting

DWL Technology Readiness Much of critical technology is mature and ready for space qualification (some subsystems already at Technology Readiness Level 7) Investments within NASA, NOAA and DoD are in place to move some remaining subsystems to Technology Readiness Level > 5

Technology Readiness (cont’) Coherent Demonstrated 1J at 2 microns (LaRC) Airborne Wind Sounder (IPO and ONR) Ground-based DWLs (DoD, NASA, NOAA) Use subsystems developed and tested under SPARCLE initiative Direct Detection Subsystem space-heritage in GLAS (altimetry and backscatter) Ground-based system demonstration (NOAA, NASA)

Summary Global wind observations are the number one unaccommodated EDR for NPOESS Combining coherent and direct detection technologies in a hybrid DWL instrument is the best path forward Adaptive targeting of observations provides the highest level of data utility, given the NPOESS platform resources available to P 3 I The Mission Definition Team is looking for partners to provide the instrument build and system integration (NPOESS is to provide the launch, platform support and data communications)