LHCb Current Understanding of Italian Tier-n Centres Domenico Galli, Umberto Marconi Roma, January 23, 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Computing for LHCb-Italy Domenico Galli and Umberto Marconi Dipartimento di Fisica and INFN Bologna Cagliari, September 13, 2000.
Advertisements

31/03/00 CMS(UK)Glenn Patrick What is the CMS(UK) Data Model? Assume that CMS software is available at every UK institute connected by some infrastructure.
Status GridKa & ALICE T2 in Germany Kilian Schwarz GSI Darmstadt.
1 First Considerations on LNF Tier2 Activity E. Vilucchi January 2006.
Resources for the ATLAS Offline Computing Basis for the Estimates ATLAS Distributed Computing Model Cost Estimates Present Status Sharing of Resources.
Amber Boehnlein, FNAL D0 Computing Model and Plans Amber Boehnlein D0 Financial Committee November 18, 2002.
T1 at LBL/NERSC/OAK RIDGE General principles. RAW data flow T0 disk buffer DAQ & HLT CERN Tape AliEn FC Raw data Condition & Calibration & data DB disk.
Distributed IT Infrastructure for U.S. ATLAS Rob Gardner Indiana University DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS and CMS Computing Projects Brookhaven National.
Title US-CMS User Facilities Vivian O’Dell US CMS Physics Meeting May 18, 2001.
DATA PRESERVATION IN ALICE FEDERICO CARMINATI. MOTIVATION ALICE is a 150 M CHF investment by a large scientific community The ALICE data is unique and.
CERN/IT/DB Multi-PB Distributed Databases Jamie Shiers IT Division, DB Group, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland February 2001.
Planning LHCb computing infrastructure 22 May 2000 Slide 1 Planning LHCb computing infrastructure at CERN and at regional centres F. Harris.
MONARC : results and open issues Laura Perini Milano.
Status of LHCb-INFN Computing CSN1, Catania, September 18, 2002 Domenico Galli, Bologna.
LHCb computing in Russia Ivan Korolko (ITEP Moscow) Russia-CERN JWGC, October 2005.
Data Import Data Export Mass Storage & Disk Servers Database Servers Tapes Network from CERN Network from Tier 2 and simulation centers Physics Software.
Fermilab User Facility US-CMS User Facility and Regional Center at Fermilab Matthias Kasemann FNAL.
DataGrid Applications Federico Carminati WP6 WorkShop December 11, 2000.
LHC Computing Review - Resources ATLAS Resource Issues John Huth Harvard University.
Finnish DataGrid meeting, CSC, Otaniemi, V. Karimäki (HIP) DataGrid meeting, CSC V. Karimäki (HIP) V. Karimäki (HIP) Otaniemi, 28 August, 2000.
Modeling Regional Centers with MONARC Simulation Tools Modeling LHC Regional Centers with the MONARC Simulation Tools Irwin Gaines, FNAL for the MONARC.
INFN Computing for LHCb Domenico Galli, Umberto Marconi, and Vincenzo Vagnoni Genève, February 15, 2001.
Computing for LHCb-Italy Domenico Galli, Umberto Marconi and Vincenzo Vagnoni Genève, January 17, 2001.
14 Aug 08DOE Review John Huth ATLAS Computing at Harvard John Huth.
А.Минаенко Совещание по физике и компьютингу, 03 февраля 2010 г. НИИЯФ МГУ, Москва Текущее состояние и ближайшие перспективы компьютинга для АТЛАСа в России.
7April 2000F Harris LHCb Software Workshop 1 LHCb planning on EU GRID activities (for discussion) F Harris.
Tier-2  Data Analysis  MC simulation  Import data from Tier-1 and export MC data CMS GRID COMPUTING AT THE SPANISH TIER-1 AND TIER-2 SITES P. Garcia-Abia.
ATLAS Data Challenges US ATLAS Physics & Computing ANL October 30th 2001 Gilbert Poulard CERN EP-ATC.
The LHCb Italian Tier-2 Domenico Galli, Bologna INFN CSN1 Roma,
…building the next IT revolution From Web to Grid…
The LHCb CERN R. Graciani (U. de Barcelona, Spain) for the LHCb Collaboration International ICFA Workshop on Digital Divide Mexico City, October.
Monte Carlo Data Production and Analysis at Bologna LHCb Bologna.
Claudio Grandi INFN Bologna CMS Computing Model Evolution Claudio Grandi INFN Bologna On behalf of the CMS Collaboration.
LHCb Computing Model and updated requirements John Harvey.
NA62 computing resources update 1 Paolo Valente – INFN Roma Liverpool, Aug. 2013NA62 collaboration meeting.
The ATLAS Computing Model and USATLAS Tier-2/Tier-3 Meeting Shawn McKee University of Michigan Joint Techs, FNAL July 16 th, 2007.
CMS Computing Model summary UKI Monthly Operations Meeting Olivier van der Aa.
LHCb datasets and processing stages. 200 kB100 kB 70 kB 0.1 kB 10kB 150 kB 0.1 kB 200 Hz LHCb datasets and processing stages.
10-Jan-00 CERN Building a Regional Centre A few ideas & a personal view CHEP 2000 – Padova 10 January 2000 Les Robertson CERN/IT.
Victoria, Sept WLCG Collaboration Workshop1 ATLAS Dress Rehersals Kors Bos NIKHEF, Amsterdam.
January 20, 2000K. Sliwa/ Tufts University DOE/NSF ATLAS Review 1 SIMULATION OF DAILY ACTIVITITIES AT REGIONAL CENTERS MONARC Collaboration Alexander Nazarenko.
CLRC Grid Team Glenn Patrick LHCb GRID Plans Glenn Patrick LHCb has formed a GRID technical working group to co-ordinate practical Grid.
LHCbComputing Computing for the LHCb Upgrade. 2 LHCb Upgrade: goal and timescale m LHCb upgrade will be operational after LS2 (~2020) m Increase significantly.
Distributed Physics Analysis Past, Present, and Future Kaushik De University of Texas at Arlington (ATLAS & D0 Collaborations) ICHEP’06, Moscow July 29,
GDB, 07/06/06 CMS Centre Roles à CMS data hierarchy: n RAW (1.5/2MB) -> RECO (0.2/0.4MB) -> AOD (50kB)-> TAG à Tier-0 role: n First-pass.
ALICE Computing Model A pictorial guide. ALICE Computing Model External T1 CERN T0 During pp run i (7 months): P2: data taking T0: first reconstruction.
Main parameters of Russian Tier2 for ATLAS (RuTier-2 model) Russia-CERN JWGC meeting A.Minaenko IHEP (Protvino)
Belle II Computing Fabrizio Bianchi INFN and University of Torino Meeting Belle2 Italia 17/12/2014.
WLCG November Plan for shutdown and 2009 data-taking Kors Bos.
05/14/04Larry Dennis, FSU1 Scale of Hall D Computing CEBAF provides us with a tremendous scientific opportunity for understanding one of the fundamental.
ATLAS Computing: Experience from first data processing and analysis Workshop TYL’10.
1-2 March 2006 P. Capiluppi INFN Tier1 for the LHC Experiments: ALICE, ATLAS, CMS, LHCb.
ATLAS – statements of interest (1) A degree of hierarchy between the different computing facilities, with distinct roles at each level –Event filter Online.
Database Replication and Monitoring
Pasquale Migliozzi INFN Napoli
Workshop Computing Models status and perspectives
LHCb computing in Russia
LHCb Computing Model and Data Handling Angelo Carbone 5° workshop italiano sulla fisica p-p ad LHC 31st January 2008.
The INFN TIER1 Regional Centre
Proposal for the LHCb Italian Tier-2
ALICE Computing Model in Run3
An introduction to the ATLAS Computing Model Alessandro De Salvo
ALICE Computing Upgrade Predrag Buncic
US ATLAS Physics & Computing
R. Graciani for LHCb Mumbay, Feb 2006
Status of LHCb-INFN Computing
The ATLAS Computing Model
LHCb thinking on Regional Centres and Related activities (GRIDs)
Development of LHCb Computing Model F Harris
The LHCb Computing Data Challenge DC06
Presentation transcript:

LHCb Current Understanding of Italian Tier-n Centres Domenico Galli, Umberto Marconi Roma, January 23, 2001

LHCb Current Understanding of Italian Tier-n Centres Domenico Galli and Umberto Marconi LHCb Difference With Respect to Other LHC Experiments The first stage in the analysis (ESD  AOD, final state reconstruction and event classification) in LHCb experiment is performed in common for all the analyses that subsequently follow. This means that more than one algorithm could have to be run on any single event, if that event satisfies more than one tag criterion. The first stage in the analysis is therefore performed in production (Production Analysis) soon after data taking at CERN (real data) and in MC production centres (MC). AOD (20 TB/a real data) are systematically distributed to all Tier-1 centres. ESD (100 TB/a real data) are kept in production centres.

LHCb Current Understanding of Italian Tier-n Centres Domenico Galli and Umberto Marconi Production — Production Analysis Production analysis L2/3 Farm Reconstruction Raw ESD AOD Production analysis Reconstruction Raw ESD AOD Monte Carlo Distribution Tier-0 Tier-1 Distribution To other Tier-1s

LHCb Current Understanding of Italian Tier-n Centres Domenico Galli and Umberto Marconi User Analysis — Interactive Analysis User Analysis (selection) AOD selection User Analysis (processing) AOD selection DPD Interactive Analysis Tier-1 Tier-3 WAN

LHCb Current Understanding of Italian Tier-n Centres Domenico Galli and Umberto Marconi LHCb Tier-n Tasks Tier-1. MC production (  RAWmc,  ESDmc) + production analysis (  AOD) + reprocessing (  ESDmc). User analysis (selection task) in collaboration with Tier-3s.  Storage of RAWmc and ESDmc produced in the centre itself.  Storage of all the AOD (real AOD produced at CERN, MC AOD produced in all Tier-1 centres). Tier-3s. User analysis (processing task,  DPD) in collaboration with Tier-1. Interactive analysis of DPD.  Storage of AOD selections.  Storage of DPDs. Tier-2s. Can collect several Tier-1 and Tier-3 functionalities.

LHCb Current Understanding of Italian Tier-n Centres Domenico Galli and Umberto Marconi LHCb Total Capacity Needs Processing Step Output Data Frequency Response/ Pass Time [d] Total CPU Power [SI95] Total Data Storage [TB] Total Data IO [MB/s] L2/3 FarmRaw1/a ReconstructionESD1/a ReprocessingESD2/a Production Analysis AOD12/a Simulation/ Reconstruction Raw + ESD 3x10 6 evt/d User AnalysisDPD2/d —

LHCb Current Understanding of Italian Tier-n Centres Domenico Galli and Umberto Marconi LHCb Tier-1 Capacity Needs Processing Step Output Data CPU Power [SI95] Disk Storage [TB] Active Tape Storage [TB] Archive Tape Storage [TB] Real DataAOD+TAG—40800 Simulation/ Reconstruction Raw+ESD Production MC Analysis AOD+TAG Calibration——100 Disk Cache for Staging Data ——1500 User AnalysisDPD Total—

LHCb Current Understanding of Italian Tier-n Centres Domenico Galli and Umberto Marconi The Proposed INFN Unique Tier-1 RC The proposed unique INFN Tier-1 Regional Centre for the 4 LHC experiments doesn’t change LHCb-Italy computing planning: since the beginning LHCb-Italy planned indeed to build up a “concentrated” Tier-1, and already in 2001, it will put computing resources in only one site (the Tier-1 prototype at CNAF). INFN unique Tier-1: must place at LHCb’s disposal the computing resources needed (in terms of CPU power, disk/tape storage, connectivity, etc.). with the requirements demanded by LHCb (operating system, experiment software, etc.). In our opinion, personnel at Tier-1 should include: Qualified system administrators; Computer scientist motivated by the interest about computing methods; Physicists directly involved in analysis, motivated by the scientific results.

LHCb Current Understanding of Italian Tier-n Centres Domenico Galli and Umberto Marconi LHCb-Italy Required Personnel Tier-1 [FTE] Tier-3 [FTE] Support for R&D and general software tools 4— Support for experiment- specific LHCb software 20.5 System administration20.5

LHCb Current Understanding of Italian Tier-n Centres Domenico Galli and Umberto Marconi 2007 LHCb Tier-n Organization in Italy Centre#LocationResources Tier-11CNAF 140 kSI95, 110 TB disk, 185 TB active tape, 55 TB archive tape Tier-20—— Tier-39 Bologna, Cagliari, Ferrara, Firenze, Frascati, Genova, Milano, Roma1, Roma2 Average (10 physicists): 5 kSI95, 10 TB disk. They can vary, depending upon group size and analysis activity.