3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking performance in LHCb Tracking Performance Jeroen van.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LHCb Alignment 12 th April 2007 S. Viret Coseners Forum « LHC Startup » 1. Introduction 2. The alignment challenge 3. Conclusions.
Advertisements

More on making fake TT clusters More creating Fake TT clusters We can compute the number of combinations instead of the purity (following all the possible.
Simulation Studies of a (DEPFET) Vertex Detector for SuperBelle Ariane Frey, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München Contents: Software framework Simulation.
LHCb PatVeloTT Performance Adam Webber. Why Upgrade?  Currently we de-focus the beams o LHCb Luminosity ~ 2x10 32 cm -2 s -1 o ~ 1 interaction per bunch.
7 Nov 2002Niels Tuning - Vertex A vertex trigger for LHCb The trigger for LHCb ….. and the use of the Si vertex detector at the first and second.
A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for the ATLAS Detector Mark Sutton University College London 7 th October 2005.
27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.
Increasing Field Integral between Velo and TT S. Blusk Sept 02, 2009 SU Group Meeting.
Introduction Silicon Tracker project: design production Tracking strategy and performance Design and performance of the LHCb Silicon Tracker Kim Vervink.
ATLAS SCT module performance: beam test results José E. García.
MC Study on B°  J/  ° With J/      °     Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 03/04/01.
1 EMCal design MICE collaboration meeting Fermilab Rikard Sandström.
The LHCb Inner Tracker LHCb: is a single-arm forward spectrometer dedicated to B-physics acceptance: (250)mrad: The Outer Tracker: covers the large.
BEACH Conference 2006 Leah Welty Indiana University BEACH /7/06.
1 Track reconstruction and physics analysis in LHCb Outline Introduction to the LHCb experiment Track reconstruction → finding and fitting Physics analysis.
Jeroen van Hunen The LHCb Tracking System. May 22, 2006 Frontier Detectors for Frontier Physics, Elba, Jeroen van Huenen 2 The LHCb Experiment LHCb.
1 Performance of the LHCb VELO Outline LHCb Detector and its performance in Run I LHCb Detector and its performance in Run I LHCb VELO LHCb VELO VELO performance.
Tracking at LHCb Introduction: Tracking Performance at LHCb Kalman Filter Technique Speed Optimization Status & Plans.
D 0 Measurement in Cu+Cu Collisions at √s=200GeV at STAR using the Silicon Inner Tracker (SVT+SSD) Sarah LaPointe Wayne State University For the STAR Collaboration.
Large Magnetic Calorimeters Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) in a Nufact Nufact04 (Osaka, 1/8/2004)
Chris Parkes First results from the LHCb Vertex Locator Act 1: LHCb Intro. Act 2: Velo Design Act 3: Initial Performance for LHCb VELO groupVienna Conference.
Ooo Performance simulation studies of a realistic model of the CBM Silicon Tracking System Silicon Tracking for CBM Reconstructed URQMD event: central.
Installation and operation of the LHCb Silicon Tracker detector Daniel Esperante (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela) on behalf of the Silicon Tracker.
Performance of Track and Vertex Reconstruction and B-Tagging Studies with CMS in pp Collisions at sqrt(s)=7 TeV Boris Mangano University of California,
Tracking at Level 2 for the ATLAS High Level Trigger Mark Sutton University College London 26 th September 2006.
Hadronic Interaction Studies for LHCb Nigel Watson/Birmingham [Thanks to Silvia M., Jeroen v T.]
1 Th.Naumann, DESY Zeuthen, HERMES Tracking meeting, Tracking with the Silicon Detectors Th.Naumann H1 DESY Zeuthen A short collection of experiences.
LHCb VErtex LOcator & Displaced Vertex Trigger
Tracking, PID and primary vertex reconstruction in the ITS Elisabetta Crescio-INFN Torino.
Optimization of the Silicon Tracking System (STS) layout and beam pipe configuration for the CBM experiment. Andrey Chernogorov, Sergey Belogurov, ITEP,
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting Rutherford Appleton Lab Tuesday 25 th April 2006 M. Ellis.
MSSM H 0  3 prong using vertexing at CMS Helsinki b/tau workshop Lauri A. Wendland / HIP.
18 december 2002, NIKHEF Jamboree Tracking and Physics Studies, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking and Physics Studies in LHCb Jeroen van Tilburg NIKHEF Jaarvergadering.
Oct 6, 2008Amaresh Datta (UMass) 1 Double-Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry in Non-identified Charged Hadron Production at pp Collision at √s = 62.4 GeV at Amaresh.
26 June 2006Imaging2006, Stockholm, Niels Tuning 1/18 Tracking with the LHCb Spectrometer Detector Performance and Track Reconstruction Niels Tuning (Outer.
LHCb: Xmas 2010 Tara Shears, On behalf of the LHCb group.
- Performance Studies & Production of the LHCb Silicon Tracker Stefan Koestner (University Zurich) on behalf of the Silicon Tracker Collaboration IT -
T-Station Alignment Infrastructure at LHCb Adlène Hicheur (Ecole Polytechnique F é d é rale de Lausanne) T-Station Alignment group: J.Blouw, F.Maciuc,
Lukens - 1 Fermilab Seminar – July, 2011 Observation of the  b 0 Patrick T. Lukens Fermilab for the CDF Collaboration July 2011.
Jonathan BouchetBerkeley School on Collective Dynamics 1 Performance of the Silicon Strip Detector of the STAR Experiment Jonathan Bouchet Subatech STAR.
CHIPP meeting Appenberg, 24 Aug 2009 Preparation for LHC beam, Jeroen van Tilburg 1/15 Jeroen van Tilburg (Universität Zürich) LHCb: Preparation for LHC.
LHCb performance for B s  J/   and B d  J/  K s decays Jeroen van Hunen.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 1 Tracking Performance in CLIC_ILD and CLIC_SiD e + e –  H +
Particle Identification with the LHCb Experiment
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
Clara MatteuzziFPCP, Paris 2-6 june 2003 The LHCb experiment: status and physics program Clara Matteuzzi On behalf of the LHCb collaboration Università.
ST Occupancies (revisited) M. Needham EPFL. Introduction Occupancies matter Date rates/sizes In particular was data size on links from Tell1 to farm estimated.
P.F.Ermolov SVD-2 status and experimental program VHMP 16 April 2005 SVD-2 status and experimental program 1.SVD history 2.SVD-2 setup 3.Experiment characteristics.
Testbeam analysis Lesya Shchutska. 2 beam telescope ECAL trigger  Prototype: short bars (3×7.35×114 mm 3 ), W absorber, 21 layer, 18 X 0  Readout: Signal.
SiD Tracking in the LOI and Future Plans Richard Partridge SLAC ALCPG 2009.
Paolo Massarotti Kaon meeting March 2007  ±  X    X  Time measurement use neutral vertex only in order to obtain a completely independent.
Alignment Challenge at LHCb Steven Blusk Syracuse University LHC Alignment Workshop, Aug 3-5, 2006.
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
The BTeV Pixel Detector and Trigger System Simon Kwan Fermilab P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510, USA BEACH2002, June 29, 2002 Vancouver, Canada.
Performance of the LHCb Vertex Locator Thomas Latham (on behalf of the LHCb VELO group) 11/06/20111TIPP Chicago.
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.
Using IP Chi-Square Probability
Vertex, Track Reconstruction & Luminosity Monitoring at LHCb
The LHC collider in Geneva
Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS
Niels Tuning (Outer Tracker Group LHCb)
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
Background rejection in P326 (NA48/3)
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
The LHCb VErtex LOcator
First results from the LHCb Vertex Locator
Presentation transcript:

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking performance in LHCb Tracking Performance Jeroen van Tilburg NIKHEF On behalf of the LHCb collaboration IV INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON LHC PHYSICS AND DETECTORS FermiLab, Chicago May Overview: LHCb setup Velo/ST/OT performance Track finding Track fitting

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 2 LHCb setup ~1.4  1.2 m 2 ~6  5 m 2 VELO 21 stations R and φ sensors

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 3 Vertex Locator Vertex Locator: 21 stations. R/φ sensors (single sided, 45º sectors). Pitch ranges from 37 μm to 103 μm. 220 μm thin silicon. Sensitive area starts at only 8 mm from beam axis.

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 4 Silicon Tracker TT T1 T2 T3 IT OT Trigger Tracker: 4 layers arranged in 2 stations. 30 cm split. 400/500 μm thin silicon. Stereo views: 0°,+5°,-5°,0°. 198 μm readout pitch. 170k readout channels. Used in L1 trigger. The Silicon Tracker: Two parts: 1. IT (Inner Tracker) 2. TT (Trigger Tracker)

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 5 Inner Tracker 3 stations (T1-T3) with 4 layers each (0°,+5°,-5°,0°). 320 μm thin silicon. 198 μm readout pitch. 130 k readout channels. After clustering: ~65% ~30%

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 6 Outer Tracker OT double layer cross section 5mm straws Outer Tracker 3 stations (T1-T3) with 4 double layers (0°,+5°,-5°,0°). 5 mm straws. Fast drift gas (Ar(75)/CF 4 (15)/CO 2 (10)) → Signal collection < 50 ns. 25 ns beam crossing → spillover from previous and next spills. Straws are 4.7 m with readout on top and below (long modules). 50k readout channels. Short prototype module pitch 5.25 mm Track e-e- e-e- e-e- e-e- e-e-

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 7 Outer Tracker Resolution: Tails due to low momentum secondaries: Average occupancy in OT ~ 4 % (hottest region ~ 7 %) p > 2 GeV Cross shape determined by restricting the OT occupancy: Core σ = 200 μm

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 8 Geant3 LHCb event display Track finding Track finding challenges in LHCb High density of hits and tracks. Track pattern recognition must be fast (in trigger and offline). High track efficiency important (especially for many-prong decays).

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 9 Track finding Track finding challenges in LHCb High density of hits and tracks. Track pattern recognition must be fast (in trigger and offline). High track efficiency important (especially for many-prong decays). Zoom of OT station (hits in red)

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 10 Track finding algorithms Velo tracks Velo tracks: Find straight line segments in Velo. Start search for triplets in R-z projection. Then add φ hits and extend track to other sensors. Important for finding primary vertex. Efficiency ~ 97%, ghost rate < 5%.

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 11 Track finding algorithms Forward tracks Velo tracks Forward tracks: Starts with Velo track and find continuations in TT and T1-T3. Uses optical model. Accurate measurement of momentum. Long track: important for most physics studies. B decay products. Efficiency ~ 90%. Afterwards the used hits are discarded for use in remaining algorithms.

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 12 Track finding algorithms Velo tracks Forward tracks Seed tracks Seed tracks: Stand-alone track finding in stations T1-T3. Tracks almost straight lines (parameterized as parabola). First search for x-hits then add stereo hits. Improves RICH2 performance.

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 13 Track finding algorithms Velo tracks Forward tracks Seed tracks Matched tracks Matched tracks: Try to match Seed tracks with Velo tracks. First, estimate momentum from deflection of Seed track. Then extrapolate Seed track to Velo. Match with Velo track. Finds remaining long tracks: additional to Forward tracks. Adds ~ 2% to efficiency for long tracks.

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 14 Track finding algorithms Velo tracks Forward tracks Seed tracks Matched tracks VTT tracks Velo  TT (VTT): Finds tracks without hits after the magnet (momentum too low). Start with unused Velo tracks. Find a continuation of at least 3 hits in TT. Magnetic deflection before TT: moderate momentum estimate Δ p/p~20%. Improve RICH1 performance, slow pions, kaon tagging. Efficiency ~75%.

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 15 Track finding algorithms Velo tracks Forward tracks Seed tracks Matched tracks VTT tracks T  TT tracks T  TT (or Upstream): Find tracks without hits in Velo. Start with unused Seed tracks and try to add hits in TT. Estimate momentum from deflection Seed track. Final momentum estimate Δp/p~0.4% Enhance K S finding. Pion efficiency ~74%.

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 16 Track finding algorithms Finally apply clone killing algorithm. Select the best candidate among tracks that share many hits. Velo tracks Forward tracks Seed tracks Matched tracks VTT tracks T  TT tracks Many track types, many algorithms

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 17 Event with average occupancy: Event display Red: measurements (hits) Average number of tracks per event: 27 Long (Forward + Matched), 23 Velo, 10 VTT, 10 T  TT 4 Seed tracks + Total74 Average efficiency = 92 % Efficiency for B daughters ~ 95% Blue: reconstructed tracks

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 18 Tracking performance Long tracks 95% 8% Long tracks 8% Average efficiency = 92 % Efficiency for p>5GeV > 95% Total ghost rate = 16% Ghost rate p T >0.5 GeV ~ 8%. Large event to event fluctuations. Efficiency vs pGhost rate vs p cut Ghost rate vs p Tcut

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 19 Robustness tests Tracking is also robust against: Lower hit efficiencies, Decreased hit resolutions, More noise hits. Tracking is robust against number of interactions Note: Luminosity adjusted to have the maximum number of single interactions. Pile-up veto trigger (L0) rejects multiple interaction events. N interactions

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 20 Track fit The Kalman Fit properties: Adds measurements recursively. Mathematically equivalent to least χ 2 method. Needs as input initial track estimate. Multiple scattering and energy loss are naturally included. The tracks are fitted using the Kalman Filter. The Kalman Fit: 1.The prediction step. 2.The filter step. Adds measurements one-by-one. 3.The smoother step. direction of the filter track prediction filtered track

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 21 Track fit resolution LHCb provides an excellent momentum estimate at the vertex. Δp/p Momentum resolution core σ = 0.35% 2nd σ = 1.0% (fraction 0.1) Note: Fitted with single Gaussian in each bin. percent

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 22 Mass and vertex resolutions 4-prong prompt decay  all long tracks. Total tracking efficiency 84.6±0.5 % (= 95.6 % per track) Good resolutions: Good tracking performance essential input for physics analysis: Decay channel: B s  D s - (  KKπ) π +

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 23 K s reconstruction Example: B  J/ψ K s Combine oppositely charged T  TT tracks. p T > 250 MeV. Common vertex. Tracking efficiency for K s : 54% (74% per track). Where does the K s decay? ~25 % in Velo  Long tracks ~50 % between Velo and TT  T  TT tracks ~25 % after TT  Lost Reconstruction of K s (  π + π - ) challenging : Long decay lengths (~ 1 m); many decay outside Velo. Tracks don’t point to interaction point. Leave less hits in detector. π + π - mass of selected B  J/ψ K s σ=10.9±0.6 MeV/c 2

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 24 Conclusions Tracking system provides good spatial and momentum resolutions.: Vertex IP resolution (17+32/p T ) μm, Cluster resolutions 45 μm (ST), 200 μm (OT), Momentum resolution 0.35%. Many algorithms developed for finding tracks in optimised setup. Tracking efficiency ~ 95% for B-daughters, For pions from K s ~ 74%. (~54% both tracks), Ghost rate ~ 8% (for p T >0.5GeV). Tracking is robust against worse conditions. Provides excellent input for physics analysis: e.g. B s  D s - π + :Mass resolution 13 MeV/c 2 Proper time resolution 42 fs.

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 25

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 26 BACKUP SLIDES

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 27 Event display Event with average occupancy: Red: measurements (hits) Blue: reconstructed tracks Average number of tracks per event: 27 Long (Forward + Matched), 23 Velo, 10 VTT, 10 T  TT 4 Seed tracks + Total74 Average efficiency = 90.6 % Efficiency for B daughters ~ 95%

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 28 Tracking performance Mean momentum 13 GeV On average 37 measurements (Velo, IT, OT) Long tracks:

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 29 Efficiency definition Efficiencies are normalised to a sample of “reconstructable” particles: in VELO at least 3 r and 3 φ hits, in T stations at least 1 x and 1 stereo hit in each station T1-T3. Long tracks must be reconstructable in VELO and T. VTT tracks must be reconstructable VELO and at least 3 TT hits. TTT tracks must be reconstructable in T and have at least 1 hit in TT. Successfully reconstructed track: at least 70% of hits from one MC particle. Long tracks must be successfully reconstructed in VELO and T, VTT tracks must be successfully reconstructed in VELO and have at least correct 1 hit in TT, TTT tracks must be successfully reconstructed in T and have at least 1 correct hit in TT.

3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 30 LHCb classic setupLHCb light setup VELO