NYSED Network Team and Teacher and Principal Evaluator Training Kate Gerson -Senior Fellow Ken Slentz -Associate Commissioner June 2, 2011 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Support Professionals Evaluation Model Webinar Spring 2013.
Advertisements

April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
Missouri Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support (MO SW-PBS) Implementation Mary Richter MO SW-PBS State Coordinator.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Targeted Efforts to Improve Learning for ALL Students.
Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth (LEPG) Model Module 3: Reflection, Rating, and Planning 1.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
RHODE ISLAND MODEL Fall 2013 Evaluation Update. 2 Fall Evaluation Educator Update Agenda 1.RI Model Improvements 2.Support Professionals Overview 3. Questions.
August Professional Development 1 Janise Lane, Interim Executive Director of Teaching and Learning Linda Chen, Chief Academic Officer August 25 – 28, 2015.
Using the T-9 Net This resource describes how schools use the T-9 Net to monitor the literacy and numeracy skills of students in Transition, Year 1 and.
REGIONAL PEER REVIEW PANELS (PRP) August Peer Review Panel: Background  As a requirement of the ESEA waiver, ODE must establish a process to ensure.
Day 3. Agenda [always] Aligning RTTT Growth and Value-Added Update 21 st Century Readiness and APPR Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
June 19 th – PLC Day June 19 th – PLC Day Year In Review – Year In Preview District Road Map District Road Map TPEP Early Release Collaboration Early Release.
Broome-Tioga BOCES Network Team… the ENTIRE team! (Pat Walsh, Barb Phillips, Jennifer Dove)
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Student Growth Goals Pendleton School District Teacher Evaluation System Domain Five Targeting Growth Using Student Growth Goals as a Measure of Educator.
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
SSL/NYLA Educational Leadership Retreat New York State Teacher Evaluation …and the School Librarian John P. Brock Associate in School Library Services.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Creating a Student Learning Objective (SLO). Training Objectives Understand how Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) fit into the APPR System Understand.
PROVIDENCE PUBLIC SCHOOLS Office of Performance Management Strategic Planning, Continuous Learning & Improvement & Accountability.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING (FFT) SUMMER INSTITUTE CONVERSATIONS TO ENHANCE PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE DR. MICHAEL BROOKS JUNE 18, 2012.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Created by NWRESD Data Quality Project CCSS Stewardship Committee 2013 Created by NWRESD Data Quality Project EQuIP Network Common Core Stewardship Committee.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
Quarterly Update Blue Ribbon Commission’s Recommendations of the 2009 Criterion Referenced Competency Test (CRCT) Erasure Investigation Dr. Beverly L.
Adopting the Iowa Core CSL Working Group Nov. 10, 2009.
Evidence-Based Observations Training for Observers of Teachers Module 5 Dr. Marijo Pearson Dr. Mike Doughty Mr. John Schiess Spring 2012.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
CCSS Road Map: The goal of implementing the Common Core State Standards is to ensure that instruction in our schools is changing dramatically.
RTTT Scope of Work. Key Dates John King video conference with CSA, October 15, 2010, 9:00am, Distance Learning Center Intent to Submit due October.
CIcu Conference June 18, 2014 Joan Thompson Mid- Hudson Region.
Overview of Indiana’s Alternate Assessment October 2014 Karen Stein, IDOE.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
Idaho Principal Evaluation Process Tyson Carter Educator Effectiveness Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education
Assessment Design. Four Professional Learning Modules 1.Unpacking the AC achievement standards 2.Validity and reliability of assessments 3. Confirming.
TEACHER EVALUATION After S.B. 290 The Hungerford Law Firm June, 2012.
Day 9. Agenda Research Update Evidence Collection SLO Summative Help Summative Evaluation Growth-Producing Feedback The Start of the Second.
Creating a Student Learning Objective (SLO). Training Objectives Understand how Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) fit into the APPR System Understand.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Data Driven Instruction & School-Based Inquiry What we know to this point…
Forum on Evaluating Educator Effectiveness: Critical Considerations for Including Students with Disabilities Lynn Holdheide Vanderbilt University, National.
Mission Erie 1 BOCES commits to those we serve students, staff and communities by understanding, anticipating and responding to their needs. Administrative.
Overview of Network Team Plan.  Deliverable Metrics are being finalized  Assessment of Network Team Deliverables ◦ Principals ◦ Teachers ◦ District.
National Summit for Principal Supervisors Building an Effective Evaluation System May 11-13, 2016 Jackie O. Wilson, Interim Director, Professional Development.
DECEMBER 7, 2015 Educator Effectiveness: Charter School Webinar.
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Network Team Institute July 8-12, 2013
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
Common Core State Standards
Standard Four Program Impact
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Implementing Race to the Top
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Presentation transcript:

NYSED Network Team and Teacher and Principal Evaluator Training Kate Gerson -Senior Fellow Ken Slentz -Associate Commissioner June 2,

Agenda  Overview of Training  Draft participation methodology  Outcomes  Recommended Participants for principal evaluation training  The Turn-Key Model  Dates  Q and A 2

Network Team Training Participants

Overview of Training 4  By focusing on Common Core State Standards, data-driven instruction (school-based inquiry), and evidence-based observation and evaluation, we are seeking to build the capacity of administrators and teachers to drive deep conversations around  what good teachers and principals do,  what actions (inputs) drive results, and  what is the most useful evidence of those behaviors.

Outcomes  As a result of SED Summer Institute, participants will be able to  Implement initial phase of local training on Common Core State Standards and Data-Driven Instruction (School Based Inquiry)  meet NYSED calibration requirements and assurances on teacher and leader evaluation in order to provide high- quality training regionally, district wide, and school wide. 5

Outcomes – Common Core State Standards  Be able to create awareness of and fluency with the CCSS in districts and schools  Be able to collaboratively diagnose school capacity for implementing the CCSS and create action plans to ensure initial execution.  Be able to introduce exemplary modules aligned to the CCSS and unpack the qualities of a module. Use teacher videos and student work to illustrate.  Set expectation to develop and implement one unit of instruction (for each teacher) aligned to the CCSS per semester 6

Outcomes – Data Driven Instruction  Understand the value and relevance of a Data Driven Instruction model for School Based Inquiry  Be able to articulate and diagnose against the key drivers in the Data Driven Instruction model  Have an “entry” plan for professional development and support so that schools and districts are willing and able to adopt this model 7

Outcomes – Teacher Leader Evaluation 1. Gather evidence of learning that represents the priorities of the assessment criteria; students constructing meaning and producing evidence of learning 2. Articulate the importance and relevance of a common language in the development of a culture of learning 3. Accurately apply standards of practice in the assessment of teaching and leadership 4. Apply best practices in evidence-based observation processes 5. Hone observation skills to focus on o Evidence collection o Alignment of evidence with standards o Scoring levels of practice based on evidence 5. Establish inter-rater reliability of evaluator interpretations and judgments of leadership practice 6. Calibrate evaluator skills in the practice of evidence-based evaluation 7. Build an understanding of the student growth percentile model and the value-added growth model. 8. Familiarize participants with the application and use of assessment tools 9. Focus evaluation skills in evaluating teachers and principals of English language learners and students with disabilities 10. Provide opportunities for collaboration with colleagues 8

Recommended Participants  Characteristics of the Professional Development Expert  Administrative degree holder  Knowledgeable about adult learning strategies and best practices  Enthusiastic and well-received disposition  Demonstrated experience with performance evaluation  Leadership in professional development on a large scale  Characteristics of the Expert Practitioner from the Field  Willing to champion the cause  SDL/SDA certificate holder and practicing administrator (In lieu of the an active superintendent, a retired superintendent can champion the cause.)  Demonstrated experience in teacher evaluation  Highly effective and/or well respected in the field regionally  Contextual knowledge of the region  Recommended by peers  Passionate 9

The Turn-Key Model for T/ L Evaluation  The sequence of training events is intended to be a model for how regions and districts might certify their evaluators, as well as a model to ensure sustainability.  Once the full, research-driven scope of the calibration process is experienced, participants are prepared to go home and turnkey a high-quality training and calibration process. 10

Training Dates SY SUMMER CONFERENCE AUGUST12345 Common Core State Standards Common Core State Standards & Data-Driven Instruction Evidence- based observation of teachers (APPR) *Teacher evaluators must attend. Evidence- based observation of teachers (APPR) *Teacher evaluators must attend. FUTURE APPR TRAINING DATES Teacher Evaluator Sept 7, 8, 9 Oct 4, 5 Nov 1, 2, 3 Feb 27, 28, 29 May 18 Principal Evaluator Sept 13, 14 Oct 4, 5 Nov 4, 29, 30 Feb 27, 28, 29 May 18 NYSED will provide 10 days of training for teacher evaluators, 7 days for principal evaluators, in addition to 3 days on the Common Core and data-driven instruction.

Next Steps  TLE Guidance  TLE Webinar  NT Webinar (hopefully)  Network Team guidance, information and planning documents  Finalize participants for August 1-5  Summer Institute Registration and Baseline Survey  Release of website  Assignment of prework  Summer Institute 12

Our Students. Their Moment.