Oklahoma State University Precision Agriculture / Soil Fertility / Soil Nutrient Management Why should Nitrogen Use Efficiencies be improved? What technologies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Do In and Post-Season Plant-Based Measurements Predict Corn Performance and/ or Residual Soil Nitrate? Patrick J. Forrestal, R. Kratochvil, J.J Meisinger.
Advertisements

Crop Canopy Sensors for High Throughput Phenomic Systems
INTRODUCTION Figure 1: Seedling germination success by planting technique plus rainfall amount and date at the Poolesville location during fall BC.
Sensor Orientation to maize canopy row and estimating biomass and Nitrogen Status Paul Hodgen, Fernando Solari, Jim Schepers, John Shanahan, Dennis Francis.
Sensor-based Nitrogen Application – Converting Research to Practicality Brent Rendel Rendel Farms Miami, Oklahoma.
O K L A H O M A S T A T E U N I V E R S I T Y Nitrogen Management for Wheat and Corn, What you Shouldn’t Do.
Use of remote sensing on turfgrass Soil 4213 course presentation Xi Xiong April 18, 2003.
 ADDRESSING THE NEEDS OF CONTINUOUSLY GROWING POPULATION World population is estimated to reach 7 billion by 2013 and 9.1 billion by 2050 World population.
Comparison of Active Optical Sensors
Precision Agriculture in Europe Olga S. Walsh BIOEN/SOIL 4213 Spring 2007.
GreenSeekerTM Variable Rate Applicator Equipment and Applications
Differences b etween Red and Green NDVI, What do they predict and what they don’t predict Shambel Maru.
Economics of Precision Agriculture, What Technologies are Being Adopted and Why Danny Dallas Soil 4213.
Operating the Oklahoma State Univ. Ramp Mobile Analysis V2.0.
New Technology and Strategies for Nitrogen Management.
O K L A H O M A S T A T E U N I V E R S I T Y Precision Agriculture Oklahoma State University NTech Industries Redball.
Operating the Oklahoma State Univ. Ramp_Mobile_Analysis Program V.1.
Ask the Expert Improve Yields and Make Money by Saving Inputs with GreenSeeker Products Daniel Rodriguez Russ Linhart.
GreenSeeker® Handheld Crop Sensor
Determining the Most Effective Growth Stage in Corn Production for Spectral Prediction of Grain Yield and Nitrogen Response Department of Plant and Soil.
Presented by: Keri D.Brixey
Use of By-Plot CV’s for Refining Mid-Season Fertilizer N Rates Daryl Brian Arnall Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State University.
Use of Alternative Concepts for Determining Preplant and Mid-Season N rates.
Reverse N lookup, sensor based N rates using Weather improved INSEY Nicole Remondet Rationale Weather is an aspect of agricultural sciences that cannot.
The Use of Red and Green Reflectance in the Calculation of NDVI for Wheat, Bermudagrass, and Corn Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213 Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213.
UTILIZATION OF CROP SENSORS TO DETECT COTTON GROWTH AND N NUTRITION
2013 NUE Conference Des Moines, Iowa August 5-7 Jacob T. Bushong.
GreenSeeker Sensor Brian Arnall Precision Nutrient Management Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State University.
Development of a SBNRC Calculator for Cotton D. Brian Arnall Oklahoma State University W. Raun, J. Solie, M. Stone, R. Taylor, O. Walsh, D. Edmonds, C.
Economically Raising Nitrogen Use Efficiency By: Paul Hodgen.
Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Wade Thomason,
Automated Calibration Stamp Technology for Improved In-Season Nitrogen Fertilization K. Freeman, R. Teal, C. Mack, K. Martin, B. Arnall, K. Desta, J. Solie,
John SolieIvan Ortiz-Monasterio Bill RaunCIMMYT Marv Stone Oklahoma State University John SolieIvan Ortiz-Monasterio Bill RaunCIMMYT Marv Stone Oklahoma.
Generalized Algorithm for Variable Rate Nitrogen Application on Cereal Grains John B. Solie, Regents Professor Biosystems and Agri. Engineering Dept. William.
Precision Agriculture an Overview. Precision Agriculture? Human need Environment –Hypoxia –$750,000,000 (excess N flowing down the Mississippi river/yr)
Fact vs. Myth, What is Holding Precision Agriculture Back Daniel Edmonds Cody Daft Zimbabwe, January 2008.
Variable Rate Technology in Wheat
Three Alternative Nitrogen Management Strategies for Cereal Grain Production Brian Arnall Brian Arnall Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State.
Nutrient Management: Ways to Save Money, From Simple to High Tech Brian Arnall Precision Nutrient Management Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma.
Generalized Algorithm for Variable Rate Nitrogen Application on Cereal Grains John B. Solie, Regents Professor Biosystems and Agri. Engineering Dept. William.
NFOA for Wheat and Corn. Yield Potential Definitions INSEYIn Season Estimated Yield = NDVI (Feekes 4 to 6)/days from planting to sensing (days.
REAL-TIME CALIBRATION OF ACTIVE CROP SENSOR SYSTEM FOR MAKING IN-SEASON N APPLICATIONS K.H. Holland and J.S. Schepers Holland Scientific and USDA-ARS,
O K L A H O M A S T A T E U N I V E R S I T Y E VOLUTION OF N ITROGEN R EFERENCE S TRIPS.
Economics of Variable Applied Nitrogen Fertilizer By Brad W Collier.
Expression of Spatial Variability in Corn (Zea mays L.) as Influenced by Growth Stage Using Optical Sensor Measurements By-Plant Prediction of Corn (Zea.
Theory of Predicting Crop Response to Non-Limiting Nitrogen.
Drew Tucker and Dave Mengel KSU Agronomy An update on Kansas sensor based N recommendations.
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Laboratory for Agriculture and Environmental Studies Sensor Based Variable Rate N Management in Mid-Atlantic.
Bob Woods Area Extension Agronomy Specialist
Variable Rate Nitrogen Application in Corn Production
Using vegetation indices (NDVI) to study vegetation
Variable Rate Nitrogen
Nutrient Management: Ways to Save Money, From Simple to High Tech
Evolution of OSU Optical Sensor Based Variable Rate Applicator
Evaluation of the Yield Potential Based NFOA for Cotton
Precision Agriculture an Overview
Precision Agriculture
Sensing Resolution in Corn
Precision Sensing Extension Workshop January 8, 2008
EVOLUTION OF NITROGEN REFERENCE STRIPS
G. V. Johnson and W. R. Raun Dept. Plant & Soil Sciences
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Sensors and Fertility Management
History of Predicting Yield Potential
REVIEW.
Determining Nitrogen Application Rates with SBNRC and RAMP Calculator
Annual ASA Meeting, Indianapolis
By Blake Balzan1, with Ramesh Sivanpillai PhD2
Late-Season Prediction of Wheat Grain Yield and Protein
Reflectance and Sensor Basics
Presentation transcript:

Oklahoma State University Precision Agriculture / Soil Fertility / Soil Nutrient Management Why should Nitrogen Use Efficiencies be improved? What technologies have been developed to increase Nitrogen Use Efficiency? Some of the advanced technologies developed by OSU for improved fertilizer management are 1. By-Plant N Fertilization 2. GreenSeeker ® and 4 Band Sensor 3. N-Rich Strip and N-Ramp Calibration Strip International Extension Activities Who has employed recent graduate students from Soil Fertility? Over the past 15 years, Soil Fertility graduate students have been involved in international programs and workshops to extend technologies developed at OSU. To date, graduate students have traveled to Argentina, Australia, Canada, China, India, Mexico, Turkey, Uzbekistan, and Zimbabwe. World wide nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) for cereal grains is only 33%. Oklahoma State University’s Precision Agriculture Team employs a wide array of techniques and equipment in an effort to improve NUE. Some of these techniques include the use of the GreenSeeker ® and 4 band sensors, both developed at OSU. When either of these are used in conjunction with a N-Rich Strip or a N-Ramp Calibration Strip, it allows producers to make accurate midseason fertilizer applications based on crop needs. The benefits of implementing these methods results in more accurate N rates, providing producers the same yield with less fertilizer; thereby, reducing over application of fertilizer. Less N is lost to runoff, leaching, volatilization, etc., resulting in a net savings for producers. It’s been calculated that a 20% increase in NUE world wide would result in a savings of US$10,000,000,000 for producers. In addition, these techniques benefit the environment. By reducing runoff from agricultural lands, we can reduce the estimated US$1,000,000,000 worth of fertilizer flowing down the Mississippi River each year. The Precision Agriculture Team at OSU continues to refine and develop new technologies for improving NUE. Technologies to Increase Nitrogen Use Efficiency Mexico 2002 Canada 2004 China 2004 India 2005 Uzbekistan 2008 Zimbabwe 2008 Sensor Based N-Rate Calculator N-Rich Strip The amount of N the environment delivers changes from year to year. So, why do you apply the same N fertilizer rate every year? N-Rich Strips indicate how much N the environment delivers. Using the web-based, Sensor Based Nitrogen Rate Calculator, proper recommendations of additional mid-season N fertilizer to be applied to achieve maximum yields can be obtained. How is this technology established? Using the GreenSeeker ® hand-held sensor, actual wheat or corn grain yield potential can be estimated using the NDVI readings (value output from the sensors) from the Nitrogen Rich Strip compared to the Farmer Practice and the number of days where growing degree days are greater than zero (GDD>0) or days from planting to sensing. Essentially, the NDVI value from the hand- held sensor outputs “total biomass.” For readings collected between January and March (regardless of when the wheat was planted), we can estimate “biomass produced per day.” This value is used to predict the wheat grain yield obtainable. With these numbers, the yield and the need for additional N can be predicted accurately. This approach is established for other crops too. What can I expect from using this technology? This method determines the ideal top-dress N rate. From research conducted by OSU, this method is worth over US$10.00 per acre. When fertilizers are applied in excess of that needed for maximum yields, the potential for surface and subsurface nitrate contamination of water supplies increases. The amount of N that the environment delivers is considered with this approach; therefore, the recommendation obtained accurately estimates the additional N required, if any, by the crop for the current growing season to produce maximum yields. This approach can be used in other crops as well, i.e. sorghum, cotton, bermudagrass, etc. GreenSeeker ® Sensor 4 - Band Sensor The GreenSeeker ® sensor is an active, optical sensor that measures crop status. From these measurements, a fertilizer recommendation can be made based on the crop's N requirements. The sensor works by using light emitting diodes (LED) to generate red and near infrared (NIR) light. The light generated is reflected off the crop and measured by a photodiode located at the front of the sensor head. Yield potential for a crop is identified using a vegetative index known as NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetative Index) and an environmental factor. GreenSeeker ® calculates NDVI using both red and NIR light. Red light is absorbed by plant chlorophyll as an energy source during photosynthesis. Therefore, healthy plants absorb more red light and reflect larger amounts of NIR than unhealthy plants. NDVI is an excellent indicator of biomass (amount of living plant tissue), and is used in conjunction with growing degree days greater than zero (GDD>0) or days from planting to accurately project yield potential. Nitrogen is then recommended based on yield potential and the responsiveness of the crop to additional nitrogen. Using the GreenSeeker ® has yielded significant savings. The 4-band sensor utilizes four wavelength bands (670nm, 780nm, 870nm, and 970nm) to determine crop status. Another useful feature of the 4-band sensor is its ability to determine plant tissue temperature. The 4-band sensor is currently being utilized as an aid to plant breeders in addition to its utilization for nutrient management. 1. By-Plant N Fertilization 3. N-Rich Strip and N-Ramp Calibration Strip N-Ramp Calibration Strip The N-Ramp Calibration Strip (RCS) allows the producer to visually determine the appropriate mid-season N fertilizer rate. Although use of the hand-held GreenSeeker ® sensor is not required for evaluation, using the sensor offers the opportunity to sense the entire "RAMP" and thus accurately determine where the peak in NDVI exists over the range of N rates applied. Without the sensor, farmers can simply walk from one end of the RAMP to the other and stop where they no longer see any differences in vegetative growth to determine the appropriate mid-season N application rate. Whether determined visually, or with a hand-held sensor, the point where differences no longer exist is the TOPDRESS N Rate for mid-season application. What was found? In some years, zero N check plots can produce near maximum yields. Where check plots (0-N) produced near maximum yields, a RCS would have visibly illustrated limited differences between the zero N segment and plots in the RCS receiving N. As a result, in-season observation would have recognized limited or no demand for additional N fertilizer. 2. GreenSeeker ® and 4-Band Sensor Since 1992, 64 students have completed or are currently pursing a Master of Science (M.S.) or Doctorate of Philosophy (Ph.D.) degree through the Soil Fertility program at OSU. A few of the companies recent graduates are employed with and the graduates employed there is listed below. Current Students: Olga Walsh, Daniel Edmonds, Cody Daft, Birehane Desta,Yumiko Kanke, Emily Ruto, Jake Vossenkemper, Jerry May, Guilherme Torres Former StudentEmployed ByFormer StudentEmployed By Dr. Brian ArnallOkla. StateJason LawlesWest. Equip. Dr. Brenda TubañaLSUClint DotsonPioneer Dr. Byungkyun ChungMcNeese StateStarr HoltzMonsanto Dr. Kefyalew GirmaOkla. StateClint MackMonsanto Dr. Kyle FreemanMonsantoKyle LawlesMonsanto Dr. Robert MullenOhio StateBrandon EnglandFSA Dr. Paul HodgenMonsantoShambel MogesAccurate Labs Dr. Jagadeesh MosaliNoble FoundationPam TurnerDEQ Dr. Kent MartinKansas StateKeri BrixeyNRCS Dr. Wade ThomasonVirginia TechCody DaftMonsanto Dr. Steve PhillipsIPNIDoug CosseyServiTech Dr. Fred KanampiuCIMMYTJeremy DennisNRCS Dr. Edgar AscencioCAREJeff BallEstes Chem. Dr. F. Gavi-ReyesUniv. ChapingoCurt WoolfolkSST O K L A H O M A S T A T E U N I V E R S I T Y With an increase in precision farming practices and improved remote sensing technology, the ability to evaluate physiological differences at the by-plant level, and on-the-go is now a reality. This is increasingly important following the findings from on-farm, by-plant yield data collected in Argentina, Mexico, Iowa, Nebraska, Ohio, Virginia, and Oklahoma. Over all sites in all countries and states, plant-to-plant variation in corn grain yield averaged 44.1 bu/ac. In other words you can expect one corn plant to differ from the other “on-average” by more than 44 bu/ac, yet farmers apply the same rate to each plant. Furthermore, the yield range (maximum corn grain yield minus the minimum corn grain yield per row) was found to increase with increasing yield level. Regardless of yield level, plant-to-plant variability in corn grain yield can be expected. Averaging yield over distances 1.5 ft removed the extreme by-plant variability, thus, the scale for treating other factors affecting yield should be less than 1.5ft. Oklahoma State University has developed an applicator that can effectively sense and treat every 1.5 feet in corn fields on-the-go at 5 mph. The future of precision agriculture will ultimately end up at the by-plant level since this is where the major yield differences exist.