Deutscher Wetterdienst FE 15 04.03.2010 VERSUS 2 Priority Project Meeting Langen Use of Feedback Files for Verification at DWD Ulrich Pflüger Deutscher.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss WG5-Report from Switzerland: Verification of COSMO in.
Advertisements

Statistical Postprocessing of Weather Parameters for a High-Resolution Limited-Area Model Ulrich Damrath Volker Renner Susanne Theis Andreas Hense.
The use of the NWCSAF High Resolution Wind product in the mesoscale AROME model at the Hungarian Meteorological Service Máté Mile, Mária Putsay and Márta.
Verification of DWD Ulrich Damrath & Ulrich Pflüger.
THE SCAR MET-READER PROJECT Steve Colwell and John Turner British Antarctic Survey.
COSMO General Meeting Zurich, 2005 Institute of Meteorology and Water Management Warsaw, Poland- 1 - Verification of the LM at IMGW Katarzyna Starosta,
On the impact of the SSO scheme in the COSMO model into the development of a deep cyclone in the Tirrenian sea Case study: April Antonella Morgillo.
Dr Mark Cresswell Model Assimilation 69EG6517 – Impacts & Models of Climate Change.
Advances in the use of observations in the ALADIN/HU 3D-Var system Roger RANDRIAMAMPIANINA, Regina SZOTÁK and Gabriella Csima Hungarian Meteorological.
Deutscher Wetterdienst Measurement Technology Humidity Measurements by Aircraft of the E-AMDAR Fleet TECO 2008 Axel Hoff Deutscher Wetterdienst Observing.
Eidgenössisches Departement des Innern EDI Bundesamt für Meteorologie und Klimatologie MeteoSchweiz Statistical Characteristics of High- Resolution COSMO.
ISDA 2014, Feb 24 – 28, Munich 1 Impact of ensemble perturbations provided by convective-scale ensemble data assimilation in the COSMO-DE model Florian.
WIGOS National Implementations DWD - Good Pratices Jochen Dibbern, Olaf Schulze Deutscher Wetterdienst.
COSMO General Meeting, Offenbach, 7 – 11 Sept Dependance of bias on initial time of forecasts 1 WG1 Overview
Data Quality Control and Quality Monitoring Jitze van der Meulen,  WMO AMDAR PANEL.
11° COSMO General Meeting – Offenbach Sept 2009 VERSUS2 Priority Project Report.
1 Mexico Regional AMDAR Workshop November 2011 Data Quality Monitoring and Control (QM / QC) Axel Hoff Convenor of WMO AMDAR Panel‘s Science and Technical.
AMB Verification and Quality Control monitoring Efforts involving RAOB, Profiler, Mesonets, Aircraft Bill Moninger, Xue Wei, Susan Sahm, Brian Jamison.
Latest results in verification over Poland Katarzyna Starosta, Joanna Linkowska Institute of Meteorology and Water Management, Warsaw 9th COSMO General.
The latest results of verification over Poland Katarzyna Starosta Joanna Linkowska COSMO General Meeting, Cracow September 2008 Institute of Meteorology.
Requirements from KENDA on the verification NetCDF feedback files: -produced by analysis system (LETKF) and ‘stat’ utility ((to.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Verification results of COSMO at MeteoSwiss in the year.
Operational ALADIN forecast in Croatian Meteorological and Hydrological Service 26th EWGLAM & 11th SRNWP meetings 4th - 7th October 2004,Oslo, Norway Zoran.
Nudging Radial Velocity, OPERA, LHN for COSMO-EU COSMO GM, Sibiu, 2 September Recent developments at DWD
Verification Verification with SYNOP, TEMP, and GPS data P. Kaufmann, M. Arpagaus, MeteoSwiss P. Emiliani., E. Veccia., A. Galliani., UGM U. Pflüger, DWD.
Deutscher Wetterdienst Vertical localization issues in LETKF Breogan Gomez, Andreas Rhodin, Hendrik Reich.
Deutscher Wetterdienst Fuzzy and standard verification for COSMO-EU and COSMO-DE Ulrich Damrath (with contributions by Ulrich Pflüger) COSMO GM Rome 2011.
Introduction of temperature observation of radio-sonde in place of geopotential height to the global three dimensional variational data assimilation system.
RADIOSONDE TEMPERATURE BIAS ESTIMATION USING A VARIATIONAL APPROACH Marco Milan Vienna 19/04/2012.
Status of AMDAR Implementation in Japan, Forecast Department, Japan Meteorological Agency Prepared for APSDEU-6 Seoul, Korea, 1 June 2005.
Eidgenössisches Departement des Innern EDI Bundesamt für Meteorologie und Klimatologie MeteoSchweiz Statistics of COSMO Forecast Departures in View of.
Deutscher Wetterdienst Lindenberg Meteorological Observatory Richard Assmann Observatory Michael Sommer GRUAN Lead Centre, DWD 2 nd GRUAN Implementation.
The Impact of the Reduced Radiosonde Observation in Russia on GRAPES Global Model Weihong Tian, Ruichun Wang, Shiwei Tao, Xiaomin Wan Numerical Prediction.
10 th Argo data management 2009 Toulouse What is new at GDACs ?
General Meeting Moscow, 6-10 September 2010 High-Resolution verification for Temperature ( in northern Italy) Maria Stefania Tesini COSMO General Meeting.
NCAR April 1 st 2003 Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Data Assimilation in AMPS Dale Barker S. Rizvi, and M. Duda MMM Division, NCAR
0 0 July, 2009 WRF-Var Tutorial Syed RH Rizvi WRFDA Analysis/Forecast Verification Syed RH Rizvi National Center For Atmospheric Research NCAR/ESSL/MMM,
Overview of WG5 activities and Conditional Verification Project Adriano Raspanti - WG5 Bucharest, September 2006.
MODIS Winds Assimilation Impact Study with the CMC Operational Forecast System Réal Sarrazin Data Assimilation and Quality Control Canadian Meteorological.
10th COSMO General Meeting, Cracow, Poland Verification of COSMOGR Over Greece 10 th COSMO General Meeting Cracow, Poland.
1 3D-Var assimilation of CHAMP measurements at the Met Office Sean Healy, Adrian Jupp and Christian Marquardt.
Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs) with LM Verification against Temps Ulrich Pflüger, Deutscher Wetterdienst.
Assimilating Cloudy Infrared Brightness Temperatures in High-Resolution Numerical Models Using Ensemble Data Assimilation Jason A. Otkin and Rebecca Cintineo.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Experiments at MeteoSwiss : TERRA / aerosols Flake Jean-Marie.
ALADIN 3DVAR at the Hungarian Meteorological Service 1 _____________________________________________________________________________________ 27th EWGLAM.
OSEs with HIRLAM and HARMONIE for EUCOS Nils Gustafsson, SMHI Sigurdur Thorsteinsson, IMO John de Vries, KNMI Roger Randriamampianina, met.no.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss VERSUS: Requirements for TEMPs and windprofilers Francis.
Station lists and bias corrections Jemma Davie, Colin Parrett, Richard Renshaw, Peter Jermey © Crown Copyright 2012 Source: Met Office© Crown copyright.
A revised formulation of the COSMO surface-to-atmosphere transfer scheme Matthias Raschendorfer COSMO Offenbach 2009 Matthias Raschendorfer.
Deutscher Wetterdienst VERSUS at DWD Ulrich Damrath & Ulrich Pflüger COSMO GM Rome, September 2011.
Joint MAP D-PHASE Scientific Meeting - COST 731 mid-term seminar, May 2008, Bologna. ErgebnissErgebniss : Long-Term Evaluation of COSMO-DE and COSMO-EU.
Eidgenössisches Departement des Innern EDI Bundesamt für Meteorologie und Klimatologie MeteoSchweiz Statistics of COSMO Forecast Departures in View of.
Slide 1 Investigations on alternative interpretations of AMVs Kirsti Salonen and Niels Bormann 12 th International Winds Workshop, 19 th June 2014.
Satellite data monitoring
Use of radar data in the HIRLAM modelling consortium
COSMO-RU operational verification in Russia using VERSUS2
Studies with COSMO-DE on basic aspects in the convective scale:
High Resolution Mode-S observations
Current verification results for COSMO-EU and COSMO-DE at DWD
BACY = Basic Cycling A COSMO Data Assimilation Testbed for Research and Development Roland Potthast, Hendrik Reich, Christoph Schraff, Klaus.
“Consolidation of the Surface-to-Atmosphere Transfer-scheme: ConSAT
aLMo from GME and IFS boundary conditions: A comparison
WG5-Report from Switzerland: Verification of aLMo in the year 2005
Use of satellite winds at Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD)
Recent work using Satellite winds at the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD)
COSMO General Meeting 2009 WG5 Parallel Session 7 September 2009
Item Taking into account radiosonde position in verification
Ulrich Pflüger & Ulrich Damrath
Advances in Rfdbk based Verification at DWD
Verification using VERSUS at RHM
Presentation transcript:

Deutscher Wetterdienst FE VERSUS 2 Priority Project Meeting Langen Use of Feedback Files for Verification at DWD Ulrich Pflüger Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach  Current Use of Feedback Files  Some Examples of Verification Products  Use of Feedback Files in VERSUS (Requirements)

Deutscher Wetterdienst FE VERSUS 2 Priority Project Meeting Langen Current Use of Feedback Files  in COSMO EU/DE Routine Verification and Experiment Verification  for each verification time (00, 06, 12, 18 UTC) one feedback file for all data (ASCII Format)  feedback file contains  Observation data  Report meta data (coordinates, height, obs. time, flags set by data assimilation (active, passive, rejected, qc info, etc.)  Observation deviations (COSMO DE): obs-an, obs-fc06, obs-fc12, obs- fc18  Observation deviations (COSMO EU): obs-an, obs-fc06, ………..., obs- fc48  building of feedback files  inital version created by data assimilation (obs, obs-an)  Model verification run calculates deviations of forecasts for the current verification time(obs-fc06, ……….., obs-fc48)  Update of feedback file with forecasts devations

Deutscher Wetterdienst FE VERSUS 2 Priority Project Meeting Langen Current Use of Feedback Files (continued)  feedback files are used for Upper Air Verification since more than 10 years now  COSMO EU/DE routinely verified/monitored against  radiosonde data (wind speed and direction, temp, rel.hum., geopotential)  aircraft data (wind speed and direction, temp, rel.hum.(3 aircrafts))  windprofiler (wind speed and direction, temp. (some)Δ)  vad winds (wind speed and direction)  Arbitrary verification area (definition as a rectangle(λ,φ) or via station list)  Selection of observation data according data usage and qc information  Sorting in arbitrary vertical bins  in Routine Verification Δp = 25 hPa below 800 hPa and 50 hPa above  Calculation of forecast deviation statistics for selected forecast lead times for vertical bins or for standard pressure levels, plotting as vertical profile  daily or monthly mean profiles of Mean Error (BIAS), RMSE  Up to three runs can be compared in one plot  Time Series of daily or monthly mean profiles

Deutscher Wetterdienst FE VERSUS 2 Priority Project Meeting Langen Examples for Upper Air Verification Products: Monthly Mean Profiles for BIAS and RMSE (ML Aircraft)

Deutscher Wetterdienst FE VERSUS 2 Priority Project Meeting Langen Examples for Upper Air Verification Products: Monthly Mean Profiles for BIAS and RMSE (RS, Comparison)

Deutscher Wetterdienst FE VERSUS 2 Priority Project Meeting Langen Examples for Upper Air Verification Products: Monthly Mean Profiles for BIAS and RMSE (RS, Comparison)

Deutscher Wetterdienst FE VERSUS 2 Priority Project Meeting Langen Examples for Upper Air Verification Products Time Series of Daily Means of Temperature BIAS 48 h 00 h

Deutscher Wetterdienst FE VERSUS 2 Priority Project Meeting Langen Examples for Upper Air Verification Products Time Series of Monthly Means of Temperature BIAS 48 h 00 h

Deutscher Wetterdienst FE VERSUS 2 Priority Project Meeting Langen Use of Feedback Files in VERSUS Format and Content of Feedback Files:  Format of COSMO Feedback Files will be changed from ASCII to NETCDF  The format and content is documented in the „Feedback File Definition“ by A. Rhodin and C. Schraff  with the new NETCDF files there will be probably one file for conventional observation data (Synop, RS, aircraft, windprof, etc.)  and seperate files for mass data like radar, satellite etc.  data content will remain the same (obs, obs-fcxx, data usage and qc info)

Deutscher Wetterdienst FE VERSUS 2 Priority Project Meeting Langen Use of Feedback Files in VERSUS (continued) Requirements to a VERSUS front-end respectively VERSUS itself:  Usage of all kind of observations (Synop, RS, aircraft, windprof, vad, etc.)  Loading of feedback files from routine and experimental runs together (probably from a directory structure)  Internal data storage in VERSUS after the (VERSUS) step of assigning model data to obs data  Probably the internal VERSUS data base has to be extended in order to keep additional data like data usage information, qc information, etc.  Possibility to use qc information and data usage information for data stratification and conditional verification  e.g. selection of observations with certain level of quality  Arbitrary verification area (at least via a stationlist)  Possibility to calculate scores for any verification periods (day, sev. days, month, year)

Deutscher Wetterdienst FE VERSUS 2 Priority Project Meeting Langen Use of Feedback Files in VERSUS (continued) Requirements to a VERSUS front-end respectively VERSUS itself:  Time series of scores (daily, monthly), also for vertical profiles of scores  Operation of VERSUS via GUI and in Batch Mode  GUI  Selection of runs  Selection of period  Selection of verification area/stations ( posibility to use same set of observations in case of comparison between experiments)  Selection between bias corrected and original reported observation values  Selection of data stratification (conditions) and scores  etc.  batch mode (necessary for operational runs and experimental runs)  Selection of runs, period, etc. via a control file

Deutscher Wetterdienst FE VERSUS 2 Priority Project Meeting Langen Thank you for your attention

Deutscher Wetterdienst FE VERSUS 2 Priority Project Meeting Langen Examples for Upper Air Verification Products: Monthly Mean Profiles for BIAS and RMSE (Comparison)

Deutscher Wetterdienst FE VERSUS 2 Priority Project Meeting Langen Examples for Upper Air Verification Products: Monthly Mean Profiles for BIAS and RMSE (Comparison)

Deutscher Wetterdienst FE VERSUS 2 Priority Project Meeting Langen Examples for Upper Air Verification Products: Monthly Mean Profiles for BIAS and RMSE (Comparison)

Deutscher Wetterdienst FE VERSUS 2 Priority Project Meeting Langen Examples for Upper Air Verification Products: Monthly Mean Profiles for BIAS and RMSE (Comparison)

Deutscher Wetterdienst FE VERSUS 2 Priority Project Meeting Langen Examples for Upper Air Verification Products: Monthly Mean Profiles for BIAS and RMSE (Comparison)