Explorer Post 1010 TARC Team 8296 Chris Fann Ronnie Foreman Phil Manougian Amanda Steckel.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
University of Florida Hybrid Rocket Team’s Mile High Club
Advertisements

UF Hybrid Rocket Teams Mile High Club Brought to you by Chris Leonard, Ty Morton, Sam Darr, and Josh Childs.
UF Hybrid Rocket Teams Mile High Club Brought to you by Chris Leonard, Ty Morton, Alex Aueron, Sam Darr, and Josh Childs.
Preliminary Design Review. Rocket & Payload Schematic.
Northwestern University Space Technology and Rocketry Society (NUSTARS) NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review March 16, 2015.
P RELIMINARY D ESIGN R EVIEW University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Rockety Team.
“ The Other Woman ” National Association of Rocktry Level Three Certification Project By Steve Laird NAR #86948.
Critical Design Review NASA University Student Launch Initiative University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Student Launch Project Preliminary Design Review January 10, 2014.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI CDR Presentation.
NASA SLI 2010 Mulberry Grove High School Critical Design Review Measurement of UVB Radiation Absorption by Cloth Material at Different Altitudes and Measurement.
Critical Design Review “The Distribution of Ionizing Radiation with Altitude” Left to Right: Izzy S.- Audio Visual Tom L.- Payload James Z.-Construction.
NASA CDR Presentation Spring Grove Area High School.
St. Vincent – St. Mary FRR Presentation NASA Student Launch Initiative.
Alabama A&M University Rocket Program CDR Presentation 2011.
NASA SLI 2010 Mulberry Grove High School Flight Readiness Review Measurement of UVB Radiation Absorption by Cloth Material at Different Altitudes and Measurement.
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Flight Readiness Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 47 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude 5203’- RockSim.
Critical Design Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 45 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude RockSim.
November 7,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6.00 inches  Mass: oz. / 17.34lbs.  Span: inches  Center of Gravity: inches.
Critical Design Review of “Mach Shock Reduction” Phase II January 2008 Statesville, NC.
Launch Vehicle  Launch Vehicle Summary  The length of the rocked is inches, and the mass is ounces.  We have a dual Deployment Recovery.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI FRR Presentation.
CDR Clear Lake's Team Rocket 2929 Bay Area Blvd. Houston, TX
Preliminary Design Review “Analysis of Atmospheric Cosmic Radiation Distribution as a Function of Altitude” Steven Schroeder-Program Manager Damon Emerson-Rocket.
Team 7139 Madison West High School, WI
 Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications  Static stability margin  Plan for vehicle safety verification and testing  Baseline motor selection.
Safety ► The safety officer for the entire team is Maia Madrid. ► During launch we will follow NAR safety rules and regulations. ► We will follow standard.
3/19/09. Animal Motor Works (AMW) K475WW High Power Rocket Motor. 54 mm casing, 40.3 cm long, 2.9 seconds burn time, 1394 N-sec total impulse, and
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
TARCkan Nasir Almasri Audrey Kelly Kari Schulz. Overview Problem Statement Timeline Background Scope Brainstorming & Research Criteria Constraints Explore.
Flight Readiness Review Student Launch Initiative SCS Rocket Team Statesville Christian School April 2, 2008.
The Efficiency of Flexible Solar Panels and Changes in the Earth’s Magnetic Field at Altitude.
University of Florida Rocket Team Critical Design Review Presentation.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
Critical Design Review- UCF Jeremy Young Anthony Liauppa Erica Terry, Emily Sachs Kristen Brightwell Gillian Smith 1.
Explorer Post 1010 TARC Team Rockville, Maryland Team America Rocketry Challenge Final Fly-Off Presentation May 12, 2012.
Samantha Steckel Mughil Muthupari Aparna Natarajan Julia Roh 1.
WINDWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII
PARACHUTE PROJECT BY: Jacob Rose. UNDERSTAND  First I looked at our specified rubric to understand what I was required to do.  Next, I looked at the.
Neelam Patel David Wade Brian Reyes TITLE IN PROGRESS.
Atomic Aggies CDR. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Preliminary Design Review “The Distribution of Ionizing Radiation with Altitude” Left to Right: Tom L.- Payload James Z.-Construction Izzy S.- Audio Visual.
Explorer Post 1010 Team 8186 Research P resentation Ben Fann, Mattie Bryant, Disa Yu, Kathleen Yu Samantha Steckel, Becca Foster, Jon Boruch.
HARDING UNIVERSITY FLYING BISONS A Study of Atmospheric Properties as a Function of Altitude Flight Readiness Review.
University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Team Rocket.
High Powered Rocket Team Fall Project Manager Wesley M. Harpster Team Members James Lawrence Ryan Horton Karna Shah James “Trey” Simmons Irfan Shaukat.
Explorer Post 1010 TARC Team 8296 Chris Fann Ronnie Foreman Phil Manougian Amanda Steckel.
January 14,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6 inches  Mass: oz. / lbs.  Span: 22 inches  Center of Gravity: inches 
Neelam Patel Brian Reyes David Wade ????? Mystery Member ????? STATUS UPDATE TEAM ALPHA.
UPDATE #2.  The predicted altitude was ~9500 feet.  Actual altitude was ~11960 feet.  After investigation the error was found in the simulated weight.
Bernadette Cannon Daniel Roh Daniel Du. Design Team America Rocketry Challenge’s goal is to get a model rocket to fly to a height of exactly 825 feet.
Flight Readiness Review UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA CONNER DENTON, JOHN FAULK, NGHIA HUYNH, KENT LINO, PHILLIP RUSCHMYER, & ANDREW TINDELL MENTOR : RICHARD.
Preliminary Design Review Presentation
Critical Design Review Presentation
Nasir Almasri Audrey Kelly Kari Schulz
2018 First Nation Launch - Flight Readiness Review
Preliminary Design Review
Establishing a Model for the Variability of Wind Speed
November 7, 2014.
Design Review 4 Chris Bredberg, Ryan Dwyer, Kjell Gordon
November 7, 2014.
Final Readiness Review
2019 First Nation Launch – PDR Virtual Review
2019 First Nation Launch – Oral Presentation
Dual-Deploy Launch Checklist
University of Iowa USLI
2019 First Nation Launch – Oral Presentation
Presentation transcript:

Explorer Post 1010 TARC Team 8296 Chris Fann Ronnie Foreman Phil Manougian Amanda Steckel

Design and Development We used RockSim to digitally build and simulate our rocket and its performance before we actually built it. From our years of experience, we adapted a basic design. We tested streamers over the summer and developed experience packing and deploying them. We researched streamer deployment techniques. We found a way to run the streamer connection line outside the rocket up to the nose cone. We used our launch rails and rail buttons from last year. 2

Final Design Our final design was a 38 inch rocket. BT80 Body Tube 3 7x70 inch Streamers F32-6T Motor Nose Cone: PNC-80K Altimeter: PerfectFlite Alt15k Our cargo unit was 22 inches long in order to have a large cross section when descending. Three streamers were attached to the cargo unit at the aft end, on the nose cone, and in the middle. 3

Flight Testing We conducted 17 test launches on six launch days to refine our streamer deployment and rocket weight to altitude ratio. December 30 - two launches (F32-4T) January 16 - two launches (F32-4T) February 20 - two launches (F32-4T) February 27 - two launches (F32-4T) March 20 - four launches (CATO with F32-6T) March 27 - five launches (F32-6T and backup booster) 4

Success/Failure Initially, we had success reaching 825ft but not descending slow enough. We increased the cargo unit size and added streamers to slow the descent. We used an Aerotech F32-4T for most of our launches. We tried a F32-6T and had a major CATO, which was determined to be a manufacturing problem. For the final qualification launches we used the F32-6T to delay ejection a few seconds. 5

Problems/Solutions We used a cyclic process to refine our rocket and streamer solution. We recorded our launches and mapped them using Excel graphs. We video taped our launches so we could review them. After every launch we conducted an analysis session and planned modifications for the next launch. 6

Lessons Learned Test early and often. Launch whenever possible. A lot of streamer material is required to get a slow descent rate. Because we maxed out the streamer size, we used the rocket itself to increase drag and slow the descent. Get data from every launch to make meaningful adjustments. 7

Teamwork Our team is all high school seniors. This is our fourth year participating in TARC. We have all been to a National Fly-off before. Initially, we worked with our other teams to get them going and share our experience. We decided to form our own team so our senior year would be memorable, and it has been. 8