Examining Student Work Middle School Math Teachers District SIP Day January 27, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Advertisements

School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
Welcome to College and Career Ready Standards Quarterly Meeting # 1.
“PD in a PowerPoint” Standards Based Grading & Reporting (SBGR)
Examining Student Work. Ensuring Teacher Quality Leader's Resource Guide: Examining Student Work 2 Examining Student Work Explore looking at student work.
 Leadership For Student Learning Sharon Friesen, Candace Saar, Jim Brandon.
WORKING TOGETHER ACROSS THE CURRICULUM CCSS ELA and Literacy In Content Areas.
CTE PLC Meeting September 27,   Review some basic PLC information  Goal Setting  CTE PLC Teams  Changes  Focus of goals  New Forms and Procedures.
How can we collect relevant evidence of student understanding?
Assessment OF Learning (Summative) vs
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Formative Assessment Lessons General Information.
ASSESSMENT& EVALUATION Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.
Growing Success-Making Connections
Check-in on Curriculum Progress Next Steps.  Brings all of the pieces together.  Transparency  Creates curriculum conversation  A tool for the journey.
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional Development Knowledge, Management, & Dissemination Conference.
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
Portfolios: A Useful Resource For All Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Beth Schefelker The Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP), an initiative of the Milwaukee.
Section 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Sustaining Change.
Math Liaison Meeting September 2014 Presenter: Simi Minhas, Math Achievement Coach Network 204.
1 / 27 California Educational Research Association 88 th Annual Conference Formative Assessment: Implications for Student Learning San Francisco, CA November.
Goals and Self- Assessment Admin Observation Student Course Feedback Peer Observation Community Feedback.
SEISMIC Whole School and PLC Planning Day Tuesday, August 13th, 2013.
Effective Feedback March 24th, 2015.
Berry Spring Primary School Year 5/6 AITSL Standard 5: Assess, provide feedback and report on student learning Stacey Price s June 2014.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
ELA: Focus on Collaborative Conversations & Writing FCUSD Instructional Focus Meeting Sara Parenzin September 20, 2012 Welcome! Please sign in and start.
Company LOGO Embedding Mathematics into Advanced Careers 1 New Jersey Entrepreneurship Summer Teacher Training Institute July 31, 2013 Facilitator: Kenna.
Overview to Common Formative Assessments (CFAs) Adapted from The Leadership and Learning Center Presented by Jane Cook & Madeline Negron For Windham Public.
“How Do We Know They Are Learning?” ACT Meeting October 9, 2007 Ladera Ranch Middle School ACT Meeting October 9, 2007 Ladera Ranch Middle School Enhancing.
1 What are the roles of learning targets and success criteria in my classroom? – I can specify plans for engaging my students with learning targets.
Classroom Assessment for Student Learning: Doing It Right – Using It Well.
Activity 4 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
Elementary CCSSM Menu of Services Joseph Espinosa August 21, 2014 We innovate and transform learning to inspire excellence.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Introduction to Curriculum Topic Study – Bridging the Gap Between Standards and Practice.
Standards-Based Assessment Overview K-8 Fairfield Public Schools Fall /30/2015.
Mathematics Teachers Grade 8 October 10, 2013 Joy Donlin and Tony Lobascher.
New Junior Cycle. Aims To understand Assessment for learning (AFL) strategies. To understand two types of feedback. To be aware of the importance of descriptive.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Formative Assessment vs. Summative Assessment Assessment OF Learning (Summative) vs. Assessment FOR Learning (Formative)
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
ASD20’s Learning Services Department Curriculum & Instruction Team April 2013.
P.R.I.D.E. School Professional Day :45 am- 3:30 pm.
In this presentation you can: Clarify the purpose and value - Clarify the purpose and value of effective feedback to learners Identify strategies - Identify.
Understand the purpose and benefits of guiding instructional design through the review of student work. Practice a protocol for.
1 WebCast # 1 October 17, Inquiry – A Starting Point Educators with an inquiry habit of mind do not presume an outcome; instead they allow for.
A Signature Tool of The Institute for Learning
TEACHER EVALUATION IMPLEMENTATION DAY: STUDENT GROWTH AND GOAL SETTING September 25, 2015 Shorewood High School 9/25/15 1.
Activity 5a Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Deepening Implementation.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Connecting the Characteristics Margaret Heritage UCLA/ CRESST Attributes of Other Characteristics of Effective Instruction and Assessment for Learning.
Moderation and Validation of Teacher Judgements in School.
Toyota PEP Grant in Boone County Schools. Student Mastery Strengthen collaboration Instructional Strategies Vertical progression of Algebra standards.
On The Right Road Moving Forward From a Lowest Achieving School to a High Progress Rewards School Fitzgerald High School Ben Hill County.
Peer Coaching for Effective Professional Learning.
Assessment for Learning “Assessment for Learning”: A brief synopsis of a PLC working towards higher student achievement through assessment, data-based.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Copyright © 2014 American Institutes for Research and Cleveland Metropolitan School District. All rights reserved. March 2014 Interpreting Vendor Assessment.
Support for (rather than Evaluation of) Administrators Delaware Academy for School Leadership.
F.M. Kearns Primary School 5 Year School Improvement Plan
Effective Feedback.
Smarter Balanced Assessment Results
M.A.T.C.H. Professional Series: Module 10
Southern Regional Education Board Annual Leadership Forum
Effective Feedback.
Examining Student Work
Presentation transcript:

Examining Student Work Middle School Math Teachers District SIP Day January 27, 2016

2 Examining Student Work Explore looking at student work as a strategy for teacher learning. Engage in examining student work. Discuss implications for teacher learning. Learn about possibilities for future work.

3 Why look at student work? Reflect on evidence of student learning. Reflect on intent of task. Reflect with colleagues. Reflect on evidence of effective teaching. Increase teachers’ knowledge. To have focused conversation on teaching and learning.

4 Purposes for Looking at Student Work Determine the nature and extent of student understanding. Determine the implications for instructional practice. Clarify learning expectations.

5 Context for Examining Student Work NWEA (Fall 2015) Percent of students at or above grade level benchmark (50 th percentile) District 5 th Grade: 26% 6 th Grade: 24% 7 th Grade: 29% 8 th Grade: 30% PARCC (Spring 2015) Percent of students meeting or exceeding standards - District 5 th Grade: 11% 6 th Grade: 12% 7 th Grade: 16% 8 th Grade: 20% Major gap between white and African American performance

6 Bringing Equity to the District Teachers at each grade level administered the identical task to their students and brought samples of student work to the meeting. Purpose: To determine the nature and extent of student understanding. Are students using multiple representations to solve problems and making connections among the representations? Are students showing mastery of grade level standards from 1 st semester? Are patterns of understanding consistent throughout the District? What are the implications for future instruction?

7 Ground Rules for Looking at Student Work Be in the spirit of dialogue. Understand the expectations of the task related to the CCSSM. Focus on the evidence, not what you think the student knows or can do. Put your stake in the ground AND be ready to move it. (Implications for future instruction) Be aware of personal biases.

Today’s Work Complete Task as a grade level group and complete discussion questions as a group. Prior to reviewing student work, review the discussion questions and read about purposeful feedback. Trade student work and partner up for review and discussion. Come back together and discuss as a grade level. Look at specific samples to provide feedback. Summarize major takeaways from today’s work. Provide next steps for examining student work. 8

9 Looking at Student Work: Complete the task as a group. Determine the knowledge and skills required to complete the task successfully (show mastery) What was this task designed to assess? When were these concepts taught-developed? Review the CCSSM related to this tasks. What are the most important “Big Ideas” related to the task?

10 Looking at Student Work : Observation and Collaboration Trade your entire set of work samples with another teacher. Pair up with another teacher-Someone who does not have your work samples. Look at student work samples with a partner and discuss: What skills, knowledge, and understandings do the students demonstrate? What is the evidence?

11 Discussion Tips Focus on the purpose of the task-The Common Core State Standard expectations. Stay focused on the evidence provided by the student. Separate observations from inferences. Think about formative (non-evaluative) feedback. Make sure to discuss classroom implications.

12 Step 3 Review the Discussion Questions What are the patterns or trends across the samples? What are the misunderstandings and understandings? What is the EVIDENCE? What implications for instruction do these misunderstandings suggest? What formative feedback could be given to students? (No Grade)

Consider Your Feedback Findings from research (Hattie 2009) show that: Students given only grades made no gain from the first assessment to the second. Students given only purposeful comments related to the specific task scored on average 30% higher on the next assessment of the same concepts. Giving grades alongside comments cancelled the beneficial effects of the comments. Research conclusion: If you are going to grade a piece of work, you are wasting your time writing careful diagnostic comments. Providing more formative feedback and fewer grades increases student achievement. 13

Purposeful Feedback Comment-only marking provides students with a focus for progression instead of a reward or punishment for their ego (as a grade does). Comments should make it clear how the student can improve. When giving written feedback, highlight successes in the student’s work along with the areas where some improvement is necessary. 14

15 With Your Partner What are the patterns or trends across the samples? What are the misunderstandings and understandings? What is the EVIDENCE? What implications for instruction do these misunderstandings suggest? What formative feedback could be given to students? (No Grade)

16 With Your Partner 2 samples that show that the student has mastered the standards expectations/meets or exceeds standards. 2 samples that show that the student does not “get it” 2 confusing samples 2 interesting or unusual samples

17 Group Share What are the patterns or trends across the samples? What are the misunderstandings and understandings? What is the EVIDENCE? What implications for instruction do these misunderstandings suggest? What formative feedback could be given to the students? (No Grade)

18 Group Share 2 samples that show that the student has mastered the standards expectations/meets or exceeds standards. 2 samples that show that the student does not “get it” 2 confusing samples 2 interesting or unusual samples What implications for instruction do each of these categories suggest?

As a Grade Level Group Providing Purposeful Feedback Look at one work sample that needs improvement and provide purposeful feedback to the student to move their understanding forward. Look at one work sample that shows mastery of the concept(s) and provide purposeful feedback to this student in order to deepen their understanding. 19

Give students meaningful tasks. Provide comment-only feedback more often that evaluative feedback. Look at the work through the lens of moving toward mastery of the CCSSM rather than merely providing a grade in Skyward. Work together as a building level math team to evaluate student work on a regular basis. 20 Going Forward

21 Looking at Student Work: Format Identify the purpose, focus, or goal for looking at student work. Select student work that relates directly to the goals and outcomes. Engage in discussion of participants’ interpretations and understanding of the student work samples. Reflect on the implications and applications of what is learned to teaching.

22 When to Examine Student Work At weekly PLCs During grade-level meetings During ongoing study groups In cross-grade group meetings As part of a building-wide professional development effort

23 Samples of Student Work Several samples from different students Samples from one student over time Randomly selected Representative of low-medium-high quality work Representative of specific student misconception The work represents a confusion or question for the teacher

All Teachers What are the big “takeaways” from this examination of student work? 24

All Teachers What are your next steps regarding examination of student work? 25