Bc → J/   Lifetime measurement Use 6.7 fb -1 and try two independent approaches Selection 1: no dependence of selection on decay time Fit fixes bkgd.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
JOLANTA BRODZICKA Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow April 09, 2003 Doubly charmed B decay B ± D0 D0 K ± ( for ~78 fb -1 )
Advertisements

STAR Status of J/  Trigger Simulations for d+Au Running Trigger Board Meeting Dec5, 2002 MC & TU.
Charged kaon lifetime F. Ambrosino, P. Massarotti. Paolo Massarotti Kloe meeting 10 march 2005.
Measurements of sin2  from B-Factories Masahiro Morii Harvard University The BABAR Collaboration BEACH 2002, Vancouver, June 25-29, 2002.
Status Analysis pp -> D s D s0 (2317) Overview Reconstruction Some QA plots Figure of merit First approach/strategy.
Linear vs. exponential growth Linear vs. exponential growth: t = 0 A = 1x(1+1) 0 = 1 A = 1x0 + 1 = 1.
H Yepes, C Bigongiari, J Zuñiga, JdD Zornoza IFIC (CSIC - Universidad de Valencia) NEWS ON ABSORPTION LENGTH MEASUREMENT WITH THE OB SYSTEM ANTARES COLLABORATION.
Search for B     with SemiExclusive reconstruction C.Cartaro, G. De Nardo, F. Fabozzi, L. Lista Università & INFN - Sezione di Napoli.
16 April 2005 APS 2005 Search for exclusive two body decays of B→D s * h at Belle Luminda Kulasiri University of Cincinnati Outline Motivation Results.
12/14/021 Measurements of the Branching Fractions and Helicity Amplitudes in B  D*  Decays Authors: Guangpei Chen, Roy A. Briere Intended for: PRD (RC)
Impact of ILC Tracker Design on e  e   H 0 Z 0       X Analysis Hai-Jun Yang & Keith Riles University of Michigan, Ann Arbor SiD Benchmarking.
B Lifetime Results from CDF and D0 Daria Zieminska Indiana University (D0 Collaboration) Beauty 2003 See also recent CDF talks: Sinead Farrington, EPS,
STATUS OF THE ABSORPTION LENGTH MEASUREMENT ANTARES collaboration meeting Clermont-Ferrand (France), May 17th-20th 1 H Yepes, JdD Zornoza, J Zuñiga, C.
Study of e + e  collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar Michel Davier (LAL-Orsay) for the BaBar collaboration TM.
Radiative Leptonic B Decays Edward Chen, Gregory Dubois-Felsmann, David Hitlin Caltech BaBar DOE Presentation Aug 10, 2005.
G. Cowan RHUL Physics Bayesian Higgs combination page 1 Bayesian Higgs combination using shapes ATLAS Statistics Meeting CERN, 19 December, 2007 Glen Cowan.
Page 1 B 0   Ks + quasi 2 body modes Koji Hara (Nagoya University) CKM2006 WG4    from charmless B decays.
Analysis work by: Rachid Ayad Sheldon Stone Jianchun Wang CBX note available: /homes/cleo/sls/ds4pi.ps Status of B  D  (4  )   analysis Jianchun.
Resonances in decay for 400fb -1 DC Meeting April 10th, 2006 J.Brodzicka, H.Palka INP Kraków J.Brodzicka, H.Palka INP Kraków B +  D 0 D 0 K + B +  D.
Analysis Meeting vol Shun University.
 Candidate events are selected by reconstructing a D, called a tag, in several hadronic modes  Then we reconstruct the semileptonic decay in the system.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Status of the Glasgow B→hh analysis CP Working group γ from loops 14 th October 2010 Paul Sail, Lars Eklund and Alison Bates.
N  for 2012 Zhiyong Wang May, 12,2015 Charmonium group meeting 1.
1 HEP 2008, Olympia, Greece Ariadni Antonaki Dimitris Fassouliotis Christine Kourkoumelis Konstantinos Nikolopoulos University of Athens Studies for the.
HERA-LHC, CERN Oct Preliminary study of Z+b in ATLAS /1 A preliminary study of Z+b production in ATLAS The D0 measurement of  (Z+b)/  (Z+jet)
Kalanand Mishra April 27, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
Observation in BaBar of a narrow resonance in the D + s  0 system at 2317 MeV Roger Barlow Manchester University For the B A B AR Collaboration.
Evidence for the Flavor Changing Neutral Current Decays ICHEP 2002, Amsterdam, July 27, 2002 Jeffrey D. Richman UC Santa Barbara for the B A B AR Collaboration.
Taikan Suehara et al., TILC09 in Tsukuba, 2009/04/18 page 1 Tau and SUSY study in ILD Taikan Suehara ICEPP, The Univ. of Tokyo Jenny List, Daniela Kaefer.
Checks with the Fourier Method A. Cerri. Outline Description of the tool Validation devices –“lifetime fit” –Pulls Toy Montecarlo –Ingredients –Comparison.
Optimization of  exclusion cut for the  + and  (1520) analysis Takashi Nakano Based on Draft version of Technical Note 42.
M. Muniruzzaman University of California Riverside For PHENIX Collaboration Reconstruction of  Mesons in K + K - Channel for Au-Au Collisions at  s NN.
On quasi-two-body components of (for 250fb -1 ) (for 250fb -1 ) J.Brodzicka, H.Palka INP Krakow DC Meeting May 16, 2005 B +  D 0 D 0 K + B +  D 0 D 0.
Lukens - 1 Fermilab Seminar – July, 2011 Observation of the  b 0 Patrick T. Lukens Fermilab for the CDF Collaboration July 2011.
Scalar and pseudoscalar mesons at BESII Xiaoyan SHEN (Representing BES Collaboration) Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS, China Charm06, June 5-7, 2006,
Study of pair-produced doubly charged Higgs bosons with a four muon final state at the CMS detector (CMS NOTE 2006/081, Authors : T.Rommerskirchen and.
Measurements of sin2  1 in processes at Belle CKM workshop at Nagoya 2006/12/13 Yu Nakahama (University of Tokyo) for the Belle Collaboration Analysis.
D 0 reconstruction: 15 AGeV – 25 AGeV – 35 AGeV M.Deveaux, C.Dritsa, F.Rami IPHC Strasbourg / GSI Darmstadt Outline Motivation Simulation Tools Results.
04/06/07I.Larin pi0 systematic error 1  0 error budget Completed items (review) Updated and new items (not reported yet) Items to be completed.
QCD Background Estimation From Data Rob Duxfield, Dan Tovey University of Sheffield.
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
A High Statistics Study of the Decay M. Fujikawa for the Belle Collaboration Outline 1.Introduction 2.Experiment Belle detector 3.Analysis Event selection.
Penny Kasper Fermilab Heavy Quarkonium Workshop 21 June Upsilon production DØ Penny Kasper Fermilab (DØ collaboration) 29 June 2006 Heavy Quarkonium.
Kalanand Mishra June 29, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event at 7 TeV 1QCD low pT meeting, 18/03/2011.
1 The use of control channels in the analysis of the B s  μ + μ - decay Tuesday Meeting, 2 June 2009.
Paolo Massarotti Kaon meeting March 2007  ±  X    X  Time measurement use neutral vertex only in order to obtain a completely independent.
LPNHE Richard Kass December Measurement of the Branching Fraction of B - → D 0 K* - J. Chauveau, M. John, R. Kass, G. Thérin Details of this.
Paolo Massarotti Charged Kaon Meeting 4 may 2006 Charged kaon lifetime P. Massarotti.
Charm Mixing and D Dalitz analysis at BESIII SUN Shengsen Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing (for BESIII Collaboration) 37 th International Conference.
1 D *+ production Alexandr Kozlinskiy Thomas Bauer Vanya Belyaev
Paper Committee: Moneti(chair?), Danko, Ehrlich, Galik 1 OCT 21, 2006.
LNF 12/12/06 1 F.Ambrosino-T. Capussela-F.Perfetto Update on        Dalitz plot slope Where we started from A big surprise Systematic checks.
K. Holubyev HEP2007, Manchester, UK, July 2007 CP asymmetries at D0 Kostyantyn Holubyev (Lancaster University) representing D0 collaboration HEP2007,
Upsilon production and μ-tagged jets in DØ Horst D. Wahl Florida State University (DØ collaboration) 29 April 2005 DIS April to 1 May 2005 Madison.
23 Jan 2012 Background shape estimates using sidebands Paul Dauncey G. Davies, D. Futyan, J. Hays, M. Jarvis, M. Kenzie, C. Seez, J. Virdee, N. Wardle.
On behalf of the BABAR Collaboration
Ex1: Event Generation (Binomial Distribution)
Kinematic variables pT and Rapidity of J/psi and Psi(2S) in invariant mass window of 100 MeV around respective peaks (3.097 and 3.68 GeV)
Theoretical Motivation Analysis Procedure Systematics Results
Timing Uncertainty Analysis Update
p0 life time analysis: general method, updates and preliminary result
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
B  at B-factories Guglielmo De Nardo Universita’ and INFN Napoli
Calibration Method.
Search for
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Presentation transcript:

Bc → J/   Lifetime measurement Use 6.7 fb -1 and try two independent approaches Selection 1: no dependence of selection on decay time Fit fixes bkgd determined from sideband region Selection 2: better S/N, but decay time dependence Fit procedure uses sideband background parameters as a Gaussian constraint before fitting signal region Requires MC input on the decay time dependence Use the selection 2 result as the central value (selection 1 serves as a cross-check) 6.7 fb -1

Systematic uncertainties Vary models of the efficiency vs decay time and the models of background mass and decay time distributions Vary bkgd mass model => 5  m effect Vary bkgd decay time model => 4  m effect Vary eff vs decay time  3  m effect

Results Selection 1 cross-check result: Fit and project in decay time and mass Signal mass: Gaussian resolution Signal decay time: exponential convoluted with resolution Bkgd mass: Linear sideband Bkgd decay time: 3 exponentials fitted above 80  m Use background parameters from the sideband as a Gaussian constraint in the fit over the signal mass region.