Evaluation of State Oral Health Plans Paul W. Mattessich, Ph.D.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Health Promotion.
Advertisements

Campus Improvement Plans
Research has shown that healthy students are better learners. How can you develop a healthy school community using a Comprehensive School Health Approach?
Best Practices for State & Local Oral Health Programs ASTDD Best Practices Project March 2010 Introduction to Best Practices Optimal oral health across.
Don Compton, Ph. D. Senior Evaluator DNPAO
Writing an Effective Proposal for Innovations in Teaching Grant
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
A plain English Description of the components of evaluation Craig Love, Ph.D. Westat.
IT Strategic Planning Project – Hamilton Campus FY2005.
Dissemination and Use of Results from OVC Program Evaluations Florence Nyangara, PhD MEASURE Evaluation/Futures Group Dissemination Meeting, September.
A Healthy Place to Live, Learn, Work and Play:
United Nations Workshop on Principles and Recommendations for a Vital Statistics System, Revision 3, for African English-speaking countries Addis Ababa,
Orientation to the Health and Career Education K to 7 Integrated Resource Package 2006.
Evaluating Physical Activity Intervention Programs Thomas Schmid, PhD Physical Activity and Health Branch CDC Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
CDC Evaluation Process Harlen Hays, MPH Office of Health Promotion, KDHE.
Adapting to Climate Change: Canada’s Experience and Approach Elizabeth Atkinson Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Directorate Natural Resources Canada.
+ Program Planning for Health Promotion/Disease Prevention Activities Suzanne Marks, Director Albuquerque Area Dental Support Center January 22, 2013.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
Program Evaluation Debra Spielmaker, PhD Utah State University School of Applied Sciences, Technology & Education - Graduate Program Advisor USDA-NIFA,
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
How to Develop a Project Evaluation Plan Pat Gonzalez Office of Special Education Programs
RoadTek Business Systems Ownership Briefing Session July 2003.
IWRM PLAN PREPARED AND APPROVED. CONTENT Writing an IWRM plan The content of a plan Ensuring political and public participation Timeframe Who writes the.
Best Practices Guidelines in Implementing and Evaluating CHW Programs in Health Care Settings Jamie Campbell, MPH Sinai Urban Health Institute CHWs in.
1 European Conference on Training Strategies Kieran Cox -NSAI Education & Promotion-
PRESENTATION TO THE MHSA PLANNING STAKEHOLDER STEERING COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 24, 2014 MHSA THREE-YEAR PROGRAM AND EXPENDITURE PLAN –
1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.
DON MARIANOS, DDS, MPH ORAL HEALTH 2014 INITIATIVE WEBINAR MAY 11, 2012 Prevention & Dental Public Health (DPH) Infrastructure: A State Oral Health Program.
The Department of Educational Administration Assessment Report School of Education and Human Services Carol Godsave, Chair, Assessment Coordinator.
Measuring Governance with Pro- Poor and Gender Sensitive Indicators: Process flow chart as a tool for promoting gender-responsive governance & identifying.
Training of Process Facilitators Training of Process Facilitators.
Skunk Works Evaluation Tools: How do we know if we are having an impact?
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Lecture #9 Project Quality Management Quality Processes- Quality Assurance and Quality Control Ghazala Amin.
UNIT 9: An Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management Plan.
Evaluation Assists with allocating resources what is working how things can work better.
2004 National Oral Health Conference Strategic Planning for Oral Health Programs B.J. Tatro, MSSW, PhD B.J. Tatro Consulting Scottsdale, Arizona.
Shifting resources: disinvestment and re-investment Craig Mitton, PhD Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research.
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION working together to improve education with technology Using Evidence for Educational Technology Success.
Promoting a Culture of Evidence and Use of Data through Program Evaluation Session Theme 2 Presentation to: OSEP Project Directors’ Conference July 21,
International Comparisons - CANADA "Are there emergency management principles promoted in Canada and what influence do they have on the practice and teaching.
Regional Seminar 2005 EVALUATING POLICY Are your policies working? How do you know? School Development Planning Initiative.
 2008 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Evaluating Mass Media Anti-Smoking Campaigns Marc Boulay, PhD Center for Communication Programs.
The Global Fund - Proposal Process & Round 8 February 19, 2008.
Integrating Knowledge Translation and Exchange into a grant Maureen Dobbins, RN, PhD SON, January 14, 2013.
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Project quality management. Introduction Project quality management includes the process required to ensure that the project satisfies the needs for which.
Community Resources Assessment Training 4-1. Community Resources Assessment Training 4-2.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Program Assessment. Before you get started Need to determine if the program can be evaluated or should be evaluated. Is the answer already available?
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Planning Evaluation Setting the Course Source: Thompson & McClintock (1998) Demonstrating your program’s worth. Atlanta: CDC/National Center for Injury.
Evaluation: from Objectives to Outcomes Janet Myers, PhD MPH AIDS Education and Training Centers National Evaluation Center
DEVELOPING THE WORK PLAN
Online Learning Module: Planning evaluation. Webinar overview  This webinar will be recorded so that it can be available on the Centre’s website as an.
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
Developing a national governance framework for health promotion in Scottish hospitals Lorna Smith Senior Health Improvement Programme Officer NHS Health.
The Opportunity to Support & Enhance Through Research, Evaluation, & Professional Development Megan Owens April 6, 2016.
CHW Montana Training Program Curriculum Feedback Retreat
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
Evaluation Plan Akm Alamgir, PhD June 30, 2017.
9/16/2018 The ACT Government’s commitment to Performance and Accountability – the role of Evaluation Presentation to the Canberra Evaluation Forum Thursday,
Strategic Prevention Framework - Evaluation
12/9/2018 3:38 PM Quality Improvement Plans (QIPs): Aligning the Content to the QIP Guidelines.
Blueprint Outlines practical, consumer-focused, state and local strategies for improving eating and physical activity that will lead to healthier lives.
Promoting Child & Family Outcomes through Partnerships between
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation of State Oral Health Plans Paul W. Mattessich, Ph.D.

State Oral Health Plans A comprehensive, integrated approach to meeting the oral health needs of a state’s population. Specific, measurable, time-phased objectives

Importance of Planning “If you don’t know where you are going, any road will take you there.” “Failing to plan is planning to fail.”

Oral Health Plan Components Oral health infrastructure Healthy People 2010 objectives Water fluoridation School based/linked sealant programs Strategies to identify best practices Evaluation strategies And others

Why evaluate state plans? Promote effective development and implementation Can determine what worked and did not work – then make adjustments (in current phase of work, or with next plan) Enables states to learn from one another

Categories of Evaluation Questions 1.Process: Do plan development activities occur in a way that will nurture engagement of relevant stakeholders for implementation of the plan? 2.Content: Does the plan contain the necessary elements?

3. Dissemination: Do distribution activities bring the plan to all relevant stakeholders, decision-makers? 4. Awareness: Do relevant audiences recognize and reference the plan? 5. Implementation: Do those supposed to take action actually take action?

Logic Model Inputs: Data on Oral Health Conditions, etc. Activities: Production and Dissemination of Plan – writing, approvals, presentations, etc. Outputs: Decisions made; policies change; resource allocations change

Logic Model Initial Outcomes: New and/or increased services Evaluation of state plan goes this far Intermediate Outcomes: Initial changes in oral health care delivery; reduction in untreated conditions; etc. Ultimate Outcomes: Changes in the health of the population

Questions about Process Were the appropriate stakeholders involved in the development of the state plan? Were the stakeholders satisfied with their level of involvement? Do the involved stakeholders feel “ownership” of the plan?

Measurement Participation records Surveys (participants and non- participants)

Questions about Content Does the plan include sufficient data describing the oral health of the state’s population? To what extent does the plan address the Healthy People 2010 Oral Health Objectives? Does the plan include the necessary components and sufficiently cover the necessary aspects of oral public health?

Does the plan reflect the current state of the art and science in oral public health? Is it science based? Are goals and objectives stated in SMART (or similar) format? Does the plan incorporate national goals as outlined in the CDC/DOH Oral Health Index?

Measurement Comparison, by objective individuals, of plan to template or guidelines, e.g. (see report): CDC Oral Health State Plan Index State Plan Index

Questions about Dissemination Has an intentional strategy for dissemination of the plan been developed? Has a strategy been implemented?

Measurement Recording dissemination activities

Questions about Awareness Do those who should know about the plan actually know about it? Do those who should know about the plan (or parts of it) actually understand what it says? Do awareness and understanding remain over time?

Measurement Surveys Meetings with legislators, key leaders

Questions about Implementation Is the plan being used to guide activities and shape thinking? Is it used to guide decisions? Do decision-makers and agencies reference the plan in their documents? Have significant stakeholders endorsed the plan?

Have policies changed to conform to the plan? Has the allocation of resources changed to conform to the plan? Have agencies/organizations identified by the plan for specific roles or actions carried out their assignments?

Measurement Annual inventory of references (in documents and/or news articles) Surveys Annual checklist for completion of activities specified in plan

EXAMPLE OF TIMELINE – Plan Development & Evaluation July – OctoberNovember – March April – July +July + Fact-finding, state conference Writing, discussion of drafts Formal release, distribution, presentations Implementation Participation records Survey Participation records Survey State Plan Index Recording of dissemination activities Annual inventory of references Annual checklist Surveys