Management of Service Performance Measurement Workgroup #103 August 2, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
® MTAC User Group 007 Meeting January 28, Agenda  Inventory Roll-up Reports  MTEOR Launch in Southern Pacific Area  Mailer Implementation Plan.
Advertisements

® Service Performance Measurement using Intelligent Mail & Seamless Acceptance.
MTAC Workgroup 100 Seamless Acceptance for MLOCR Environment Co-chairs Industry – Jay Gillotte USPS – Pritha Mehra.
1 Wednesday, Sept. 17, 2008 It’s Time for Intelligent Mail ® : Overview and Value of Intelligent Mail ®
MTE Forecasting and Tracking Workgroup #108 Ability to effectively forecast and fulfill Mail Transport Equipment needs for customers and plants.
MTAC General Session Meeting Electronic Verification System (eVS)/ Product Tracking System (PTS) User Group #2 February 16, 2011.
Service Performance Measurement using Intelligent Mail & Seamless Acceptance.
Seamless Acceptance Pritha Mehra, USPS Manager, Marketing Technology & Channel Management.
1 It’s Time for Intelligent Mail ® : Bringing It All Together Wednesday, Sept. 17, 2008.
Mailer’s Technical Advisory Committee (MTAC) Task Team 2 General Session Presentation November 16, 2010.
Visibility Strategy September, Visibility Today CONFIRM provides piece level mail processing data that can be used for tracking for letters and.
Mail Entry and Payment Technology MTAC Pritha Mehra VP Mail Entry & Payment Technology February 17, 2011.
MTAC General Session Meeting Electronic Verification System (eVS®)/ Product Tracking System (PTS) User Group #2 Industry co-chair – John Medeiros Postal.
1 MTAC WORKGROUP 111 Status Update Nov 1, Work Group 111 Charter Issue Statement: Identify gaps, define solutions, highlight benefits, and improve.
® Intelligent Mail Update Measurement & Barcodes Periodicals Subgroup June 25.
MTAC Update November 6, 2002 Larry Goodman USPS Co-Chair Dan Minnick Industry Co-Chair.
MTAC Workgroup 114 Periodicals Subgroup Update May 15, 2007.
Network Rationalization Mail Moves, Labeling Lists and Mail Direction File Industry Webinar July 1, 2013 To listen to a recording of this presentation.
Washington DC May 18 th, 2005 MTAC Workgroup #87 Status Improving the Drop Shipment Process.
MTE Forecasting and Tracking Workgroup #108 Goal: To have enough of the right type of MTE equipment in the right place at the right time to meet every.
® Service Measurement & Reporting Format MTAC November 7, 2007.
November 01, 2005 MTAC 93 Design & Concept Testing Workgroup Status.
® MTAC Workgroup 114 Establish Service Standards and Measurement USPS Service Measurement Capability July 31, 2007.
MTAC Workgroup 93 Streamlining Verification Debbie Cooper Bob Galaher May 18, 2005 Washington DC.
Mailer’s Technical Advisory Committee (MTAC) Task Team 2 General Session Presentation November 16, 2010.
MTAC 114 Package Services Sub-Group Service Standards for Market Dominant Products Package Services and Standard Mail Parcels Sub-group Update June 13,
Acceptance and Induction: The Mailing Industry’s Digital Revolution IDEAlliance Print Distribution April 22, 2007 Debbie Cooper.
1 Presentation Topics Agenda  January Release  BMA Channel Strategy –eDropship –Expanded Start-the-Clock  MTAC Workgroups.
MTAC Meeting February 23, 2005 Integrated Mail Management.
MTE Forecasting and Tracking Workgroup #108 Goal: To have enough of the right type of MTE equipment in the right place at the right time to meet every.
EInduction Overview 1 eDropship Induction Process September 8, 2010 MTAC Workgroup 138.
MTAC Workgroup # 83 First-Class Business Mail Measurement February 4, 2004.
USPS Product Information MTAC Jim Cochrane Vice President, Product Information February 17, 2011.
Mail Acceptance and Induction Seamless Mailing with Intelligent Mail Barcodes Debbie A. Cooper Quebecor World Logistics.
® Customer Supplier Agreements Presented by Pritha Mehra Vice President, Business Mail Entry Friday, October 17, 2008.
MTAC Workgroup 100 Seamless Acceptance for MLOCR Environment Co-chairs Industry – Jay Gillotte USPS – Pritha Mehra.
1 Wed Aug. 6, 2008 Intelligent Mail®. 2  Implementation  Investing in Intelligent Mail  Full Service Review » Intelligent Mail® Barcodes and Labels.
MTE Forecasting and Tracking Workgroup #108 Goal: To have enough of the right type of MTE equipment in the right place at the right time to meet every.
MTAC Workgroup # 87 Update Improving the Drop Shipment Process Washington, D.C. May 18, 2006.
Workgroup #94 Service Performance Reporting Process Standardization MTAC Meeting Presentation August 17, 2005.
Confirm MTAC Summary November MTAC Work Teams – Purpose Training & Certification Team Address USPS & Customer training Certification Program under.
MTAC WG 114 MTAC Workgroup 114 Service Performance Measurement Review and Discussion Full Workgroup Meeting July 31, 2007.
1 Service Standards & Measurement Status Report MTAC: February 18, 2009.
Optimizing Parcel Preparation & Entry for Seamless Acceptance MTAC Work Group # 109 Industry Leaders: Chris Finley & Wendy Smith USPS Leader: Jim Cochrane.
MTAC Workgroup #87 - Update Improving the Drop Shipment Process August 3, 2006.
MTAC MAIL IRREGULARITY FEEDBACK WORKGROUP MTAC Presentation February 6, 2003.
MTAC Workgroup 100 Seamless Acceptance for MLOCR Environment Co-chairs Industry – Jay Gillotte USPS – Pritha Mehra.
MTAC Work Group #82 Parcel Delivery Performance Measurement Effectiveness.
Workgroup # 120 Communicating Entry Requirements/ In-Home Delivery Dates Solutions/ Seasonality Impacts INDUSTRY CO-CHAIR DALE MILLER POSTAL CO-CHAIR CHRIS.
Advance Notification Streamlined Acceptance and Visibility for First-Class Mail MTAC Workgroup 102.
® Service Standards and Performance Measurement MTAC Workgroup 114 Status Report.
MTAC Workgroup 102 Update Advance Notification, Streamlined Acceptance & Visibility for First-Class Mail January 2008.
MTAC #107 Update November 1, 2006 Washington DC. MTAC #107 2 © 2006 Accenture. All rights reserved. Progress Goal  To provide key visibility points for.
Workgroup # 120 Communicating Entry Requirements/ In-Home Delivery Dates Solutions/ Seasonality Impacts INDUSTRY CO-CHAIR DALE MILLER POSTAL CO-CHAIR CHRIS.
MTAC Workgroup 114 Establish Service Standards and Measurement Standard Mail Measurement July 30, 2007 Std Subgroup Meeting.
1 USPS/MTAC Work Group #75 MOVE Update Initiative February 5, 2003 Joel Thomas and Angelo Wider MOVE Update Initiative.
Streamlining Verification MTAC Workgroup Mission Statement: –Collectively determine how the USPS and the Industry can leverage existing, or guide.
® Leveraging the NCSC RIBBS ® Site – Understanding What’s Available to You ribbs.usps.gov.
PostalOne! ® Workgroup #84 1 MTAC February PostalOne! ® Workgroup #84 2 Scheduled for April 3rd  Supporting Mail.dat 05-1  Testing server available.
National Postal Policy Council. Celebrating our 25 th Year.
MTAC Workgroup 100 Seamless Acceptance for MLOCR Environment Co-chairs Industry – Jay Gillotte USPS – Pritha Mehra.
Status for MTAC #123 Workgroup Service Information Needs, Reporting and Communication Channels.
Business Mail Measurement MTAC Workgroup Issue 60 May 7-8, 2003.
MTAC MAIL IRREGULARITY FEEDBACK WORKGROUP MTAC Presentation May 8, 2003.
Improving the Drop Shipment Process Update MTAC Workgroup #87 Washington DC – August 18.
1 Service Measurement Status Report MTAC: November 19, 2008.
MMA presentation for MTAC August 2, MTAC Association Presentation Wednesday, August 2, 2006.
1 MTAC 117 – Periodicals Subgroup  USPS Co-Chairs: Bob Galaher, Ruth Stock  Industry Co-Chair: John Stark  Objective: Identify any constraints and define.
1 First Class MTAC Workgroup 102 November 1, 2006.
1 First Class MTAC Workgroup 102 February 20, 2007.
Presentation transcript:

Management of Service Performance Measurement Workgroup #103 August 2, 2006

Issue Statement The mailing industry creates many different types of service data and service performance reports. The lack of credibility and absence of standardization often make it difficult for the Postal Service to be responsive to these reports. The lack of actionable data upon which service performance measure could be enacted is frustrating for both the mailers and the Postal Service. The mailing industry creates many different types of service data and service performance reports. The lack of credibility and absence of standardization often make it difficult for the Postal Service to be responsive to these reports. The lack of actionable data upon which service performance measure could be enacted is frustrating for both the mailers and the Postal Service.

Desired Results Develop protocol to use “industry- gathered” delivery data to identify problems and perform diagnostics. Implied in this work group’s charter is that the data will be similarly formatted, presented in a timely fashion and will allow for the Postal Service to take corrective action. Develop protocol to use “industry- gathered” delivery data to identify problems and perform diagnostics. Implied in this work group’s charter is that the data will be similarly formatted, presented in a timely fashion and will allow for the Postal Service to take corrective action.

The Challenge Putting data together is not the issue because there are huge amounts of data already available; it is designing and building the systems to bring that data together and make them actionable that are more challenging. Putting data together is not the issue because there are huge amounts of data already available; it is designing and building the systems to bring that data together and make them actionable that are more challenging.

Time Frame Announced at the last MTAC meeting Announced at the last MTAC meeting First USPS/industry mtg June 1 First USPS/industry mtg June 1 SEVERAL smaller meetings, telecons and s SEVERAL smaller meetings, telecons and s USPS-only meetings held on June 27 and July 11USPS-only meetings held on June 27 and July 11 Second USPS/industry mtg July 27 Second USPS/industry mtg July 27 Expected Success by May 2007 Expected Success by May 2007

Service Performance Information Resolution Accurate Accurate Timely Timely Actionable ActionableAwareness Accurate Accurate Timely Timely

Service Advisory Short-term: Short-term: Based on Data Already Available Based on Data Already Available Patterned on DMMAdvisory Patterned on DMMAdvisory CONFIRM CONFIRM Scan to scanScan to scan Compared with ExpectationsCompared with Expectations USPS Reports USPS Reports Condition ReportsCondition Reports 24-hour clock24-hour clock Core Network Facilities ReportCore Network Facilities Report Industry Reports Industry Reports Red TagRed Tag CONFIRM Customer DataCONFIRM Customer Data Del TrakDel Trak “Seeds”“Seeds” othersothers

“Early Warning” System/Service Advisory Web-based (consider cost factor) Web-based (consider cost factor) Combines existing data systems Combines existing data systems Effort by mailers who may not have “actionable” data but have data indicating problems in service Effort by mailers who may not have “actionable” data but have data indicating problems in service Back-up data supplied by those who do have the correct data Back-up data supplied by those who do have the correct data

“Early Warning” System/Service Advisory From internal USPS From internal USPS Location(s)Location(s) Type of MailType of Mail Service ImpactService Impact Suggested Alternatives Suggested Alternatives Possible Rerouting Possible Rerouting Container Changes Container Changes Classes AffectedClasses Affected Expected DurationExpected Duration

“Early Warning” System/Service Advisory From industry From industry TBDTBD

Service Advisory RIBBS RIBBS “alerts” to subscribers “alerts” to subscribers Variation of ePubwatch to include all classes/shapes Variation of ePubwatch to include all classes/shapes BSN BSN “Customer First” database“Customer First” database eServiceseServices

Long Term Surface Visibility Surface Visibility CONFIRM CONFIRM Seamless Acceptance Seamless Acceptance In-process Verification Approach In-process Verification Approach Analyze mail at inductionAnalyze mail at induction Scans taken throughout processingScans taken throughout processing Compare with eDocumentationCompare with eDocumentation