Collaborative Action Research Option: Staff Development.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Entry to Student Outcomes (ESO). Objective: Teachers will analyze student data to drive instruction and increase student achievement.

Advertisements

Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluation Guidelines. The single most influential component of an effective school is the individual teachers within that school.

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information

NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation

Santa Rosa County District Schools Professional Orientation Program (POP) Professional Improvement Plan (PIP)

PROFESSIONAL GROWTH PLAN UPDATE PROPOSALS COMMITTEE UPDATE MAY 2008

Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.

By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.

August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.

Intern Principal Preparation Program Information Session Piper High School February 10, :30 p.m.-6:30 p.m. Program Coordinator: Cindy Pluim “It is.

Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.

Peninsula School District

Amphitheater Career Ladder Orientation

Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.

August Professional Development 1 Janise Lane, Interim Executive Director of Teaching and Learning Linda Chen, Chief Academic Officer August 25 – 28, 2015.

1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.

National Board Resource Center at Illinois State University Debbie Kasperski Director NBRC National Board Professional Development.

OFFICE OF CAREER GUIDANCE, EXPLORATION, AND PREPARATION Module 5: Program Activities Module 5: Program Activities.

PDC Procedures – Individual Growth Action Plan The Individual Growth Action Plan (IGAP) is a plan each individual completes describing professional.

PAS…. The Second Observation Cycle Learning Targets: Administrators will be able to: Understand and Articulate the remaining two Observation Cycles for.

Highly Effective School Library Program Action Plans:

TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.

For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES/OPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For.

ADVISORY COUNCIL May 7, 2008 Executive Inn, Oakland.

Educator Effectiveness Update September Training Outcomes Review the WPSD Evaluation System – Overall Focus – New & Modified Components – System.

Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.

South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.

NC Teacher Evaluation Process

CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION, AND ASSESSMENT UPDATE FEBRUARY 2014 VERONA PUBLIC SCHOOLS.

BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.

Orientation and Summer Institutes Implementer’s Forum October 2005 Susan Barrett PBIS Maryland.

School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.

Developing Monitoring and Pre-Scoring Plans for Alternate/Alternative Assessments Virginia Department of Education Division of Student Assessment and School.

Technology Action Plan By: Kaitlyn Sassone. What is Systemic Change? "Systemic change is a cyclical process in which the impact of change on all parts.

Welcome to PD Forum FY 11. Professional Development Support Structure SchoolsDistrict Support Department PD Team (Administrator, PD Contact, & PD Team.

Collaborative Action Research (CAR). Objective : Teacher will lead and participate in a collaborative action group exploring a topic based on student.

AEA9: Iowa Core Webinar April 7, AWichman, Mississippi Bend AEA9.

Module 1 Peer Coaching on Paper Peer Coach Training.

For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES.

Collaborative Action Research Option (2013) Staff Development.

Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.

Student Outcomes (SO) Objective: Teachers will analyze student data to drive instruction and increase student achievement.

Standards of Achievement for Professional Advancement District 2 Career Ladder Training April 29, 2016 Ronda Alexander & Michael Clawson.

Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.

Professional Growth & Effectiveness System. DECISION REQUIRED BY MARCH 2013 Current Evaluation and PD Models The current evaluation plan was last revised.

The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012

Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.

Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.

EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS

MINT MENTORING AND INDUCTION FOR NEW TEACHERS Miami Dade County Public Schools Office of Professional Development and Evaluation.

AUGUST DESIRED OUTCOMES  An understanding of the two PGP options available for teachers  Knowledge of the Professional Growth Plan [PGP] Rubric.

PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION

Avon Grove School District October 2009

Teacher Evaluation Timeline

Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process

Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback

Edgewood T-TESS Updates for

Teacher Evaluation Process

Teacher Evaluation Process Training

What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?

Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process

Alabama Teacher Mentoring Program

Aspiring School Leaders Information Session

Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012

Teacher Evaluation Process

New Jersey City University College of Education

Resident Educator Program

Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)

Teacher Evaluation Process Training

SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham

Presentation transcript:

Collaborative Action Research Option: Staff Development

Professional Growth Participation in CAR Orientation (electronically) by August 17, 2012 and read all materials on the web site for this module. Completion of an Individual Professional Growth Plan (see Professional Growth Plan Guide) Participation in (1) structured peer review with other staff developers Participation in (2) structured staff developer meetings with protocol Facilitation of a follow-up plan for all participants of Staff Development trainings Completion of (4) Presenter Reflections for the year Maintenance and completion of a portfolio, professionally presented, organized and aligned to Staff Development Option Expectations and Standards for a Quality Portfolio Adherence to all due dates

Instructional Skills Instruction is modified and adjusted based upon analysis of student data Amphitheater Teacher Performance Evaluation System (ATPES) evaluations (informal and formal) conducted by site administrator

Student Outcomes Development of a Student Achievement Plan based on Arizona State/Common Core Standards and School Site Focus Class Data Sheet for entire population with a minimum of three (3) assessments (pre, mid, post) Student Data Analysis and Teacher Reflection Forms Evidence of 21st Century Skill(s) in student work

Prior to First Semester Staff Development Application Window: August 20, Potential Staff Development Option candidates review needs for professional development offerings and submit a resume and application for one of the modules Administration reviews resumes and makes decisions based on need and best fit no later than August 27, 2012 Candidates who are not accepted participate at the regular CAR level of Career Ladder

First Semester: Staff Development Option Participate in the Staff Developers meeting on September 12, 2012 (Structured meeting with protocol) Student Achievement Plan - Due September 14, 2012 received by 5:00 p.m. Give to site Instructional Support Leader or Deliver to the Pay for Performance Office by the deadline First Submittal - December 3, 2011 Complete and Submit Peer Review to Performance Pay office

Second Semester: Staff Development Option Update your portfolio in preparation for peer review Participate in the Staff Developers Meeting on February 6, 2013 (optional) Submit Mid Student Data Analysis and Teacher Reflection Form to Performance Pay Office by March 1, Peer Review Session (optional) on March 1, 2013 Final Submittal - Due May 24, 2013 received by 5:00 p.m.

Reminders Meeting Staff Development Option Program Expectations qualifies a teacher to participate in CAR the following year Not meeting Staff Development Option Program Expectations will result in a return to the traditional salary schedule or require the teacher to meet with the Career Ladder Coordinator prior to September 3, 2013 to create a Professional Growth Plan if choosing to remain in the Career Ladder Program

Support for this Module Web Site Materials programs/career-ladder/ staff- development-option-module.aspx