ISWG / SIF / GEOSS OOSSIW - November, 2008 GEOSS “Interoperability” Steven F. Browdy (ISWG, SIF, SCC)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GEOSS ADC Architecture Workshop Break-out summaries: Initial Operating Capability (IOC) Doug Nebert U.S. Geological Survey February 5,
Advertisements

GEOSS Architecture Implementation Pilot Water Information Services with GEOSS Interoperability Arrangements George Percivall Open Geospatial Consortium.
High level summary and recommendations from AIP-3 George Percivall Open Geospatial Consortium Task lead AR-09-01B ADC-16, May 2011.
AR – Issues for Attention Tactical and Strategic Guidance documents – what is the agreed approval/ publication process? –Strategic Guidance will.
GEO-5 in Ottawa 1 29 November 2004 Draft GEOSS 10-Year Implementation Plan and Status Report on Reference Document Ivan B. DeLoatch, Toshio Koike, Robert.
SIF Status to ADC Co-Chairs
Core Task Status, AR Doug Nebert September 21, 2008.
Standards and Interoperability Forum: Status, Issues & Plans GEO Architecture and Data Committee Kyoto, Japan 9 February 2009 Siri-Jodha Singh Khalsa.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2011 Infrastructure May 5, 2011.
Managing Interoperability for GEOSS - A Report from the SIF S.J. Khalsa, D. Actur, S. Nativi, S. Browdy, P. Eglitis.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure (GCI)
Slide # 1 Report to ADC AR Status Doug Nebert, POC U.S. Geological Survey.
Digital Earth Communities GEOSS Interoperability for Weather Ocean and Water GEOSS Common Infrastructure Evolution Roberto Cossu ESA
Interoperability Principles in the Global Earth Observations System of Systems (GEOSS) Presented 13 March 2006 at eGY in Boulder, CO by: Eliot Christian,
© GEO Secretariat The Group on Earth Observations – Status and Post 2015 Osamu Ochiai GEO Secretariat 41 st CGMS Tsukuba, Japan 8-12 July 2013.
Best Practices Wiki Ruth Duerr NSIDC, IEEE Jay Pearlman, IEEE Siri Jodha Singh Khalsa, IEEE Report to GEO Committees February 2008.
From “Usability Testing 2009” to the “Sprint to Plenary 2011” GEO Portal and Clearinghouse: reaching out to users with user-friendly interfaces. Gary J.
Architecture and Data Management Strategy (Action Plan) Ivan 1 DeLoatch, USGS, ADC Co-chair Alessandro Annoni, EC, ADC Co-chair Jay Pearlman, IEEE, ADC.
GEOSS Architecture Describes how components fit together for providing data and information that will be better …than the individual components or systems.
ESIP Air Quality Workgroup and the GEO Air Quality Community of Practice collaboratively building an air quality community network for finding, accessing,
How GEO works  Coordinating activities of Members and Participating Organisations  Supporting the development of capabilities for Observations, Processing.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure: A practical tour Doug Nebert U.S. Geological Survey September 2008.
ADC Meeting ICEO Standards Working Group Steven F. Browdy, Co-Chair ADC Workshop Washington, D.C. September, 2007.
The Group on Earth Observations (GEO): An Introduction.
Best Practices Wiki Ruth Duerr NSIDC, IEEE Jay Pearlman, IEEE Siri Jodha Singh Khalsa, IEEE Report to ADC Committee May 21, 2008.
Best Practices Wiki Ruth Duerr NSIDC, IEEE Report to GEO Committees September, 2008.
Global Earth Observing System-of- Systems (GEOSS) Architectural Framework Doug Nebert FGDC, U.S. Geological Survey February 2008.
GEO Architecture and Data Committee Architecture Workshop Hosted by the European Commission At the Joint Research Centre February 2008 DRAFT.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CDI Webinar Sept. 5, 2012 Kevin T. Gallagher and Linda C. Gundersen September 5, 2012 CDI Science.
GEO Architecture and Data Committee Task AR Architecture Implementation Pilot George Percivall Open Geospatial Consortium GEO Task AR Point.
DA Sensor Web Enablement for In-Situ Observing Network Facilitation.
AIP-2 Kickoff Workshop End-to-end use case: Discovery, access, and use with variations Doug Nebert GEOSS AIP-2 Kickoff September 2008.
SIF Status to ADC Co-Chairs Siri Jodha S. Khalsa Steve Browdy.
Linking Tasks, Data, and Architecture Doug Nebert AR-09-01A May 2010.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure Internal Structure and Standards Steven F. Browdy (IEEE)
WGISS-39, Tsukuba, Japan, May 11-15, 2015 GEO Community Portals Ken McDonald/NOAA CWIC Session, WGISS–39 May 13, 2015.
FEA DRM Management Strategy Presented by : Mary McCaffery, US EPA.
W HAT IS I NTEROPERABILITY ? ( AND HOW DO WE MEASURE IT ?) INSPIRE Conference 2011 Edinburgh, UK.
Synthesis of Strategic Issues (Climate, Disasters, Water) and a draft European strategic framework.
GEOSS Interoperability Workshop November 12-13, Introduction to the SIF Steven F. Browdy, IEEE
® GEOSS AIP 5 Water SBA Update HDWG June 2012 Matt Austin NOAA Stefan Fuest KISTERS Jochen Schmidt NIWA.
The ADC, the CBC and the UIC Where Should These Committees Be Interacting? Gary J. Foley, USEPA Co-Chair User Interface Committee July 20, 2006.
GEO Standards and Interoperability Forum SIF First Organizational Meeting 27 July 2007 Barcelona, Spain.
Report of the Architecture and Data Committee (ADC) R.Shibasaki (ADC, Japan)
Architecture Task AR Status Presented to the July Meeting of the GEO and Architecture and Data Committee Dr. Thomas C. Adang AR Point.
SIF Telecon March 9, Agenda Discussion of SIR taxonomy changes –Review of letter to SIF for SIR contributions 2012 Plans –UNEP Live update –GEOSur.
The Process for Achieving Interoperability in GEOSS AGU Fall Meeting IN43C-08.
Core Task Status, AR Doug Nebert September 22, 2008.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure Initial Operating Capability Directions and Discussion Presented to GEO ADC Geneva May
Data Services Task Team WGISS-22 meeting Annapolis, the US, September 12th 2006 Shinobu Kawahito, JAXA/RESTEC.
Implementing GEOSS architecture with-and-for Users George Percivall Open Geospatial Consortium Task lead AR-09-01B.
GEO Partnerships, Objectives and Activities Roundtable: Strengthening UN Engagement with a Special Focus on the Post-2015 Development Agenda Barbara J.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure Access to Priority Earth Observations Data “ Sprint to Plenary” Group on Earth Observations Eighth Plenary Session - GEO-VIII.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure: A Practical Tour Doug Nebert U.S. Geological Survey AIP-3 Kickoff March 2010.
ISWG / SIF / GEOSS OOS - August, 2008 GEOSS Interoperability Steven F. Browdy (ISWG, SIF, SCC)
GCI Overview Steve Browdy with input from Doug Nebert May 2012.
GEOSS Common Infrastructure (GCI) The GEOSS Common Infrastructure allows Earth Observations users to search, access and use the data, information, tools.
CEOS Working Group on Information System and Services (WGISS) Data Access Infrastructure and Interoperability Standards Andrew Mitchell - NASA Goddard.
OGC’s role in GEO: Results from the Architectural Implementation Pilot (AIP) George Percivall Open Geospatial Consortium GEO Task IN-05 Coordinator
ESA-FAO GEOPortal STATUS & PLANS
GEOSS Component and Service Registry (CSR)
GEOSS Interoperability Workshop
The Architecture of GEOSS Dr
Workplan for Updating the As-built Architecture of the 2007 GEOSS Architecture Implementation Pilot Session 7B, 6 June 2007 GEOSS Architecture Implementation.
The Standards and Interoperability Forum
Core Task Status, AR Doug Nebert September 22, 2008.
Status Report on SIF to GEO ADC
GEOSS Future Products Workshop March 26-28, 2013 NOAA
GEOSS AIP-5 Data Sharing Working Group
Air Quality Data Systems and the GEOSS Architecture
Presentation transcript:

ISWG / SIF / GEOSS OOSSIW - November, 2008 GEOSS “Interoperability” Steven F. Browdy (ISWG, SIF, SCC)

OOSSIW - November, 2008ISWG / SIF / GEOSS GEOSS Background Administered by GEO (Group on Earth Observations) Administered by GEO (Group on Earth Observations) – –membership open to UN + EC (currently 72 countries plus EC) –participating organizations approved by GEO members (currently 52) intergovernmental, international, regional intergovernmental, international, regional engaged in Earth observations and related matters engaged in Earth observations and related matters Guided by 10-Year Implementation Plan ( ) Guided by 10-Year Implementation Plan ( ) The Vision: The Vision: “… to realize a future wherein decisions and actions for the benefit of humankind are informed by coordinated, comprehensive and sustained Earth observations and information.”

OOSSIW - November, 2008ISWG / SIF / GEOSS GEOSS Purpose and Scope Meet the need for timely and quality global information for addressing societal benefit areas. Meet the need for timely and quality global information for addressing societal benefit areas. To utilize contributing systems that span the spectrum from primary data observation to data products. To utilize contributing systems that span the spectrum from primary data observation to data products. To share data, metadata, and products. To share data, metadata, and products. Increase sharing of methods for modeling and analysis. Increase sharing of methods for modeling and analysis. To encourage the adoption of existing and new standards that support interoperability and data usability. To encourage the adoption of existing and new standards that support interoperability and data usability.

OOSSIW - November, 2008ISWG / SIF / GEOSS GEOSS Committees Established by GEO to guide the 10-Year Implementation Plan. Established by GEO to guide the 10-Year Implementation Plan. Architecture and Data Committee Architecture and Data Committee User Interface Committee User Interface Committee Capacity Building Committee Capacity Building Committee Science and Technology Committee Science and Technology Committee

OOSSIW - November, 2008ISWG / SIF / GEOSS GEOSS Core Architecture Reached Initial Operating Capability in 2007 Reached Initial Operating Capability in 2007 Core components include Core components include –GEO Web Portal (3 candidates as of IOC) –GEOSS Clearinghouse –GEOSS Components Registry (56 as of IOC) –GEOSS Services Registry (68 as of IOC) –GEOSS Standards Registry (about 90 as of IOC)

OOSSIW - November, 2008ISWG / SIF / GEOSS GEOSS Architecture (Engineering Viewpoint)

OOSSIW - November, 2008ISWG / SIF / GEOSS GEOSS Architecture (Core Component Interaction) MMI Other User Groups

OOSSIW - November, 2008ISWG / SIF / GEOSS GEOSS Architecture (Core Component Interaction)

OOSSIW - November, 2008ISWG / SIF / GEOSS GEOSS Architecture (GEOSS Clearinghouse)

OOSSIW - November, 2008ISWG / SIF / GEOSS GEOSS Architecture (GEOSS Registries)

OOSSIW - November, 2008ISWG / SIF / GEOSS Critical GEOSS Use Case ???

OOSSIW - November, 2008ISWG / SIF / GEOSS Standards Taxonomy Effort Required for quick search and discovery of standards and special arrangements. Required for quick search and discovery of standards and special arrangements. Helps facilitate seamless registration of standards when entering services. Helps facilitate seamless registration of standards when entering services. Is the first step towards ontology development. Is the first step towards ontology development.

OOSSIW - November, 2008ISWG / SIF / GEOSS Existing Standards Taxonomy Linear, few categories, entries skewed. Linear, few categories, entries skewed. Too broad to associate well with standards. Too broad to associate well with standards. Let’s take a look! Let’s take a look!

OOSSIW - November, 2008ISWG / SIF / GEOSS Existing Standards Taxonomy Metadata (33) Metadata (33) Data Format (15) Data Format (15) Catalog/Registry Service (24) Catalog/Registry Service (24) Data Access (14) Data Access (14) Streaming Protocols (6) Streaming Protocols (6) Semantics Semantics Portrayal and Display Service (4) Portrayal and Display Service (4) Data Acquisition (3) Data Acquisition (3) Engineering Process (1) Engineering Process (1) Data Transformation Services (2) Data Transformation Services (2) QA/QC (3) QA/QC (3) Schema (1) Schema (1) Modeling, Simulation, or Analytic Processing Service Modeling, Simulation, or Analytic Processing Service Archival (0) Archival (0) Communications and Telecommunications (0) Communications and Telecommunications (0) Development Environments and Software Languages (0) Development Environments and Software Languages (0) Technical Documentation (0) Technical Documentation (0)

OOSSIW - November, 2008ISWG / SIF / GEOSS Existing Standards Taxonomy Category Description Examples

OOSSIW - November, 2008ISWG / SIF / GEOSS Standards Taxonomy Goals Generate a finer-grained controlled vocabulary with user community input. Generate a finer-grained controlled vocabulary with user community input. Associate primary taxonomy category with standards, as well as secondary categories. Associate primary taxonomy category with standards, as well as secondary categories. Use MMI resources and other possible collaborations. Use MMI resources and other possible collaborations. Associate the finished product with the GEOSS Standards Registry to enable efficient search for standards to associate with registered services. Associate the finished product with the GEOSS Standards Registry to enable efficient search for standards to associate with registered services. and … and … Apply ebRIM, or acceptable profile, association taxonomy to relate Standards Register entries. Apply ebRIM, or acceptable profile, association taxonomy to relate Standards Register entries.

OOSSIW - November, 2008ISWG / SIF / GEOSS Provisional Standards Taxonomy

OOSSIW - November, 2008ISWG / SIF / GEOSS Provisional Standards Taxonomy

OOSSIW - November, 2008ISWG / SIF / GEOSS Provisional Standards Taxonomy

OOSSIW - November, 2008ISWG / SIF / GEOSS Taxonomy Category Properties name definition properties associations comment parent

OOSSIW - November, 2008ISWG / SIF / GEOSS Taxonomy Examples Name: Quality Definition: Standards specific to the procedures and algorithms needed to decrease uncertainty and improve validity of acquired data, and associated processes and systems. Parent: Production Cycle Rules and Standards Name: Quality Assurance Definition: Standards specific to the design of procedures and algorithms necessary to provide confidence that requirements are met prior to data acquisition. Comment: The phrase 'data acquisition’, and variants, will include data received from physical sensors, models, humans, data feeds, etc. May need an associated category for confidence metrics. Parent: Quality

OOSSIW - November, 2008ISWG / SIF / GEOSS Taxonomy Examples Name: In-Situ Parent: Infrastructures Name: In-Situ Parent: Earth Observation Techniques Good naming convention needed ???

OOSSIW - November, 2008ISWG / SIF / GEOSS Lessons Learned Involve a separate review group. Involve a separate review group. Limit debate time. Limit debate time. Keep track of potential properties and associations for ontological efforts. Keep track of potential properties and associations for ontological efforts. Adopt common phrases for organization and continuity. Adopt common phrases for organization and continuity. Adopt a “glossary” of secondary definitions to support the main vocabulary. Adopt a “glossary” of secondary definitions to support the main vocabulary.

OOSSIW - November, 2008ISWG / SIF / GEOSS Another Standard ? The ISWG is about to issue a CFP to engage in an effort to look into developing a standard, or guide, or best practice, for creating earth observation taxonomies and ontologies, and creating standards taxonomies and ontologies. The ISWG is about to issue a CFP to engage in an effort to look into developing a standard, or guide, or best practice, for creating earth observation taxonomies and ontologies, and creating standards taxonomies and ontologies. This will be a collaborative effort with existing resources, assets, and experts. This will be a collaborative effort with existing resources, assets, and experts.

OOSSIW - November, 2008ISWG / SIF / GEOSS Best Practices Registry It is currently a wiki. It is currently a wiki. It is found at: It is found at: – There is an ontology area that has just been formed. There is an ontology area that has just been formed.

OOSSIW - November, 2008ISWG / SIF / GEOSS Best Practices Registry

OOSSIW - November, 2008ISWG / SIF / GEOSS Possible Areas of Synergy (MMI and GEOSS) Taxonomy/Ontology collaboration. Taxonomy/Ontology collaboration. –with ISWG and SIF –with new GEO ontology task (can give broader recognition to MMI) Registration of taxonomies and ontologies at MMI. Registration of taxonomies and ontologies at MMI. Registration of metadata tools as components and services in the GEOSS registries. Registration of metadata tools as components and services in the GEOSS registries. Contribution to the GEOSS Best Practices Registry (MMI Guides, Case Studies, etc.). Contribution to the GEOSS Best Practices Registry (MMI Guides, Case Studies, etc.). Discussions regarding applications and resources needed based upon GEOSS use cases. Discussions regarding applications and resources needed based upon GEOSS use cases.

OOSSIW - November, 2008ISWG / SIF / GEOSS GEOSS AIP Architecture Implementation Pilot Architecture Implementation Pilot –a call for participation to engage the scientific community in deploying requested components, services, portals, etc. that serve as case studies for the GEOSS initiative. –a mechanism to test the operating capability of the core GEOSS architecture. –Details about the AIP Phase 2 can be found at: –CFP can be found at: Submissions requested by Sep. 1, 2008, but will be accepted all through AIP Phase 2. Submissions requested by Sep. 1, 2008, but will be accepted all through AIP Phase 2.

OOSSIW - November, 2008ISWG / SIF / GEOSS The End