ICE National Sheriff’s Association Conference 2016 ICE Detention Authority defined by the US Supreme Court Monday February 8, 2016 Presented by Assistant.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
REPORTING VIOLATIONS OF PROBATION
Advertisements

Callie Glanton Steele Supervising Deputy Federal Public Defender Central District of California.
Section 4 support: Taking all reasonable steps to leave the UK
Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Terminal Objective Upon completion of this module, the participant will be knowledgeable about the sections of the Code.
Civil Administrative Enforcement of Environmental Laws.
PUBLIC HEALTH REMEDIES. How do you get people to comply with public health laws? Usually seek voluntary compliance first— educate, persuade. If that doesn’t.
Ed Cape Professor of Criminal Law and Practice.  ‘Street’ bail should be abolished  The power to impose conditions on ‘pre- charge’ bail should be abolished.
The Brussels II Regulation The jurisdiction of courts.
Many local authorities misinterpret the ICE hold requests as binding.
ICAOS Mini Training Transfer Eligibility and Reporting Instructions Eligibility Presented by: Training Committee [Revision 3/1/2014] Be Ready for a Test.
1 ICAOS 2011 Rule Amendment Presentation for Deputy Compact Administrators & Compact Office Staff Presented by:
PA/FOIA INTERFACE OSD/JS Privacy Office (703)
Unit 8: Practice and Procedure Immigration Detention and Bond.
ICAOS Jail Administrator Presentation Presented by: [Revision 3/1/2014]
ICAOS Jail Administrator Presentation Presented by: [Revision 5/18/2012]
2005 Children’s Code Amendments: Delinquency Act.
© 2003 Rule 1.9. Duties to Former Clients (a) A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person.
Contempt of Court.
Alternatives to detention and their practical implementation Introducing the CAP model 1.
Army Family Advocacy Program 1 of R APR 06 Restricted Reporting Policy for Incidents of Domestic Abuse.
Security Services Constitutional Issues in Private Security.
Newsgathering: Access to Meetings & Records. Access and the First Amendment How has the U.S. Supreme Court responded to claims that the First Amendment.
 ICE= Immigration and Customs Enforcement  Largest investigative arm of the Department of Homeland Security.  Their job: identifying, detaining, and.
Privacy, Confidentiality and Duty to Warn in School Guidance Services March 2006 Disclaimer - While the information in these slides are designed to reflect.
Comparison of Health Laws Audrey Kaiser Manka, J.D. Minnesota Assistant Attorney General "The findings and conclusions in this presentation have not been.
Cal-OSHA and Labor Code Understanding the Law And Its Consequences
Bail Motions and ICE Detainers Cecillia Wang ACLU Immigrants’ Rights Project NLG Conference Seattle, Washington October 14, 2009.
ALL INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE!!! MMAH… A “Qualification Process” That Varied Based On… “Who Was Paying The Fees…”
1 POLICY AND DECISION MAKING PROCESS. By the Secretariat.
DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL.
FAR Part 1 The Federal Acquisition Regulation System.
What does the Safe Haven Law provide? The law protects a parent who leaves their baby at a “Safe Haven” location. The parent will not face criminal prosecution.
SUMMARY OF INFORMAL COMMENTS Temporary Waiver of Terms Regulations May 2006.
Introduction to Constitutional Law Unit 4. CJ140-02A – Introduction to Constitutional Law Unit 4: The Fourth Amendment CJ140-02A– Class 4 Part 1.
2010 Florida Building Code: I nterpretation P rocess O verview.
Ensuring the Accused’s Appearance in Court
1 THE KENTUCKY OPEN MEETINGS ACT KRS – [T]he basic policy of KRS to is that the formation of public policy is public business.
Privacy and the Civil Commitment Process Allyson K. Tysinger Assistant Attorney General June 4-5, 2008.
MODULE II: THE INSTRUMENTS OF JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE.- TOPIC 4 THE 1959 CONVENTION ON MUTUAL.
Chapter 22: Organization and Coordination of Counterterrorism Investigations.
1 ICAOS 2008 Rule Amendment Presentation for Deputy Compact Administrators & Compact Office Staff Presented by:
PROCEDURES IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM, 8 th ed. Roberson, Wallace, and Stuckey PRENTICE HALL ©2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ
UMBC POLICY ON ESH MANAGEMENT & ENFORCEMENT UMBC Policy #VI
PROCEDURES IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM, 8 th ed. Roberson, Wallace, and Stuckey PRENTICE HALL ©2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ
Amendment Six: News Article And Explanation Paul Collopy.
Institute for Criminal Justice Studies Texas Family Code.
Adult Protective Services Basic Skills Training Presented by: Rajeev Premakumar Assistant Attorney General Public Assistance Section N.C. Department of.
11 CHANGES IN ARREST POWERS IN HB NOTE: Officers should have a copy of DOCJT handout entitled: “House Bill 463 Training Letter” “House Bill 463.
ICAOS Training 101-Transfer & Reporting Instructions Eligibility [Revision 6/16/2015] Be Ready for a Test at the End.
1 ICAOS Mini Training Rule Mandatory Retaking Violent Offenders and Violent Crimes & Rules & Absconders Presented by: Training.
2009 Legislative Changes Concerning Protective Orders and Firearms Effective October 1, 2009 FVC--1.
Criminal Law Lecture 5 Sources  Criminal Code (CAP 154) – Includes all major offences and criminal responsibility  Criminal Procedure Law (CAP 155)
Declaring Beneficial Use in Water Use Groups R
PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURE KAROLINA KREMENS, LL.M. (Ottawa), Ph.D. International Criminal Procedure.
Sharing Information (FERPA) FY07 REMS Initial Grantee Meeting December 5, 2007, San Diego, CA U.S. Department of Education, Office of Safe and Drug-Free.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
The Legal Rights of Immigrant Victims of Family Violence: What You Need to Know Today to Help Victims and Their Children Atlanta, Georgia June 10, 2011.
HIPAA Training Workshop #2 Trainer: Kaye L. Rankin Rankin Healthcare Consultants, Inc.
National Sheriff’s Association Conference
American Civil Liberties Union
Dispute Resolution Between ICT Service Providers in Saudi Arabia
Bylaw Enforcement: How to build a better community
Probation Conditions for the WELLS CIRCUIT COURT
Chapter 4 Initial Appearance
Violence Against Women Act 2013 Domestic and Family Violence Code
Existing Law: Sanctuary Cities Banned In South Carolina
Contempt of Court.
Border Procedures for Minors
Border Procedures for the Removal or Detention of Minors
Presentation transcript:

ICE National Sheriff’s Association Conference 2016 ICE Detention Authority defined by the US Supreme Court Monday February 8, 2016 Presented by Assistant Director, Marlen Piñeiro

ICE What is a Final Order of Removal?  Authority to issue removal orders lies with an Immigration Judge, the Board of Immigration Appeals, a federal court judge, or any authorized Service official  The removal order becomes “final” when the alien has waived further due process or immigration proceedings are exhausted

ICE ICE Detention and Post Order Custody Reviews?  Required by law  Reviews ensure continued detention is justified and in compliance with governing statutes, regulations, and policies.  ICE detention authority is limited

ICE Zadvydas v. Davis Legal Cite: 533 U.S. 678 (2001)  Resident aliens who had been ordered removed and who were held in custody by Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) beyond 90- day removal period, due to government's inability to remove them. The Supreme Court held that:  The Immigration & Nationality Act post removal period detention provision contains an implicit reasonableness limitation; Unlimited detention time is not reasonable.  Presumptive limit to reasonable post removal period detention is six months (180 days).  Continued detention beyond 180 days must have a “Significant Likelihood of Removal in the Reasonably Foreseeable Future” (SLRRFF).

ICE Clark v. Martinez Legal Cite: 543 U.S. 371 (2005)  Application of presumptively reasonable limits of detention from Zadvydas for all aliens.  ICE may detain aliens beyond the 90 day removal period for so long as it is reasonably necessary to achieve removal. Significant Likelihood of Removal in the Reasonably Foreseeable Future must exist Example: Cubans must be on repatriation list

ICE The Removal Period  There is only one removal period.  The removal period is the initial 90 days after an alien is a final order and is in ICE custody  ICE officers are responsible for initiating removal efforts on day 1 of the removal period.  These efforts include exhausting all avenues to obtain a travel document and/or effecting the alien’s removal  Field personnel are encouraged to engage the Headquarters subject matter experts

ICE The Removal Period  Aliens must be notified 30 days in advance of the 90 day Post Order Custody Review (POCR). They may present evidence of the lack of SLRRFF  Initial 90 day POCRs apply to Judicial Stays of Removal and documented Failure To Comply (FTC) cases All cases are due a 90 day POCR

ICE Headquarters Custody Management  Most cases detained 180 days or more post final order must be referred to ICE HQ  Only exception is Failure To Comply and Judicial Stay cases  Nationwide Program Oversight  Reviews usually at 180 days

ICE Headquarters Custody Management  If there is not SLRRFF, alien must be released unless he/she meets “Special Circumstances” (i.e. if alien poses a special danger to the public, has a highly contagious disease, terrorist grounds, or if the Service determines that an alien presents a threat to public safety).

ICE Headquarters Custody Management  ICE understands that many aliens released due to lack of removability often violate State or Federal laws, and are re-arrested by other law enforcement agencies  HQ provides guidance that affords field offices a mechanism to quickly evaluate repeat offenders, adjust their conditions of release, and effect the alien’s re-release pursuant to those conditions without mandating prolonged detention in the absence of SLRRFF.

ICE Aliens previously released by HQ  Aliens released by HQ previously due to lack of SLRRFF who are later encountered by ICE may only be returned to custody by the field for a brief period [to allow the field sufficient time to remove or to establish new conditions of release]

ICE Exceptions to release  Cases where field offices believe there is a change in SLRRFF should be referred to HQ for approval to return the alien to custody for removal purposes.

ICE Failure to Comply (FTC) What is a FTC? INA § 241(a)(1)(C) :  The removal period shall be extended beyond a period of 90 days and the alien may remain in detention during such extended period if the alien fails or refuses to make timely application in good faith for travel or other documents necessary to the alien’s departure or conspires or acts to prevent the alien’s removal subject to an order of removal.

ICE FTC factors to be considered  Aliens who have demonstrated a FTC with their removal must have the overt action documented in a timely manner.  Aliens who fail to comply may remain in detention, and the removal period is extended beyond 90 days.  Alien must willfully/intentionally block efforts to obtain a TD or to be removed.  Must be something the alien has control over

ICE FTC documentation  Notice of Failure to Comply  A letter informing the alien that failed to assist in efforts to obtain travel documents or removal has caused ERO to keep him in custody and extend the removal period; also advises of possible criminal prosecution.