1 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed Jan 7, 2009 The Interstellar Interaction Observed N. A. Schwadron on behalf of the IBEX.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Relating the Sub-Parker Spiral Structure of the Heliospheric Magnetic Field to the Dynamic Sources of Solar Wind N. A. Schwadron Southwest Research Institute.

Advertisements

R. P. Lin Physics Dept & Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley The Solar System: A Laboratory for the Study of the Physics of Particle.

An overview of the cycle variations in the solar corona Louise Harra UCL Department of Space and Climate Physics Mullard Space Science.

4/18 6:08 UT 4/17 6:09 UT Average polar cap flux North cap South cap… South cap South enter (need to modify search so we are here) South exit SAA Kress,

Pickup Ions and Reservoir for Energetic Particles George Gloeckler & Eberhard Möbius.

A Whole-Heliosphere View of the Solar Wind Hale Lecture American Astronomical Society 5/24/2010 Marcia Neugebauer University of Arizona.

Galactic and Anomalous Cosmic Rays in the Heliosheath József Kόta University of Arizona Tucson, AZ , USA Thanks to : J.R. Jokipii, J. Giacalone.

Las Cruces CRS April 21-22, 2011 F.B. McDonald 1, A.C. Cummings 2, E.C. Stone 2, B.C. Heikkila 3, N. Lal 3, W.R. Webber 4 1 Institute for Physical Science.

ESS 7 Lecture 14 October 31, 2008 Magnetic Storms

Inner Source Pickup Ions Pran Mukherjee. Outline Introduction Current theories and work Addition of new velocity components Summary Questions.

Observations of Pickup Ions and their Tails in the Heliosphere and Heliosheath George Gloeckler University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI Implications of Interstellar.

Particle Acceleration at a Blunt Termination Shock Nathan Schwadron (BU) Marty Lee ( UNH) Dave McComas (SwRI) Particle Acceleration at a Blunt Termination.

Weaker Solar Wind Over the Protracted Solar Minimum Dave McComas Southwest Research Institute San Antonio, TX With input from and thanks to Heather Elliott,

CME Workshop Elmau, Feb , WORKING GROUP C: ENERGETIC PARTICLE OBSERVATIONS Co-Chairs: Klecker, Kunow SUMMARY FROM WORKSHOP 1 Observations Questions.

Observational Constraints on the Interplanetary Hydrogen (IPH) Flow and the Hydrogen Wall John T. Clarke Boston University Boston University NESSC meeting.

Solar wind interaction with the comet Halley and Venus

Solar system science using X-Rays Magnetosheath dynamics Shock – shock interactions Auroral X-ray emissions Solar X-rays Comets Other planets Not discussed.

Plasma in the Heliosheath John Richardson M.I.T. Collaborators: J. Belcher, J. Kasper, E. Stone, C. Wang.

Magnetospheric Morphology Prepared by Prajwal Kulkarni and Naoshin Haque Stanford University, Stanford, CA IHY Workshop on Advancing VLF through the Global.

Interstellar and Interplanetary Material HST Astrobiology Workshop: May 5-9, 2002 P.C. Frisch University of Chicago.

F1B: Determine the Dominant Processes of Particle Acceleration Phase , Open the Frontier UV Spectroscopic determin- ation of pre/post-shock density,

November 2006 MERCURY OBSERVATIONS - JUNE 2006 DATA REVIEW MEETING Review of Physical Processes and Modeling Approaches "A summary of uncertain/debated.

The 511 keV Annihilation Emission From The Galactic Center Department of Physics National Tsing Hua University G.T. Chen 2007/1/2.

International Colloquium and Workshop "Ganymede Lander: scientific goals and experiments"

The Sun and the Heliosphere: some basic concepts…

Solar Modulation: A Theoretical Perspective Modeling of cosmic ray charge-sign dependence in the heliosphere Marius Potgieter Unit for Space Physics North-West.

30 Years in Space: The Voyagers and the Distant Heliosphere Péter Király KFKI Research Institute for Particle and nuclear Physics, Budapest, Hungary Kosice,

Cosmic Rays in the Heliosphere J. R. Jokipii University of Arizona I acknowledge helpful discussions with J. Kόta and J. GIacalone. Presented at the TeV.

14 May JIM M. RAINES University of Michigan DANIEL J. GERSHMAN, THOMAS H. ZURBUCHEN, JAMES A. SLAVIN, HAJE KORTH, and BRIAN J. ANDERSON Magnetospheric.

9 May MESSENGER First Flyby Magnetospheric Results J. A. Slavin and the MESSENGER Team BepiColombo SERENA Team Meeting Santa Fe, New Mexico 11 May.

Solar Wind and Coronal Mass Ejections

Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Spring, 2012 Copyright © The Heliosphere: The Solar Wind March 01, 2012.

Ed Stone Symposium February 11, 2006 Voyager Observations of Galactic and Anomalous Cosmic Rays in the Heliosheath F.B. M c Donald 1, W.R. Webber 2, E.C.

Space Science MO&DA Programs - September Page 1 SS It is known that the aurora is created by intense electron beams which impact the upper atmosphere.

1 N. A. Schwadron - Hawaii -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed Jan 7, 2009 The Interstellar Interaction Observed N. A. Schwadron, J. Richardson, P.

Why Solar Electron Beams Stop Producing Type III Radio Emission Hamish Reid, Eduard Kontar SUPA School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow,

N. A. Schwadron U. New Hampshire Solar Wind and Coronal Electron Temperature in the Protracted Solar Minimum, the Cycle 24 Mini Maximum, and Over Centuries.

ASEN5335- Aerospace Environments -- The Solar Wind 1 THE INTERPLANETARY MEDIUM AND IMF Consequently, the "spiral" pattern formed by particles spewing.

Pre-accelerated seed populations of energetic particles in the heliosphere N. A. Schwadron* and M. Desai Southwest Research Institute *Also, Boston University.

Dim ENA Emissions from 1-30 keV D.J. McComas, P. Valek, J.L. Burch, and C.J. Pollock Southwest Research Institute San Antonio, TX H.O. Funsten, R.M. Skoug,

Cosmic Rays2 The Origin of Cosmic Rays and Geomagnetic Effects.

39 th COSPAR Scientific Assembly Mysore, INDIA July 14-22, 2012 F.B. McDonald 1, W.R. Webber 2, E.C. Stone 3, A.C. Cummings 3, B.C. Heikkila 4, N. Lal.

1 Hybrid Simulations of the Callisto - Magnetosphere Interaction Stas Barabash and Mats Holmström Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Kiruna, Sweden.

Outline ■The Heliosphere, Astrospheres and the Interstellar Interaction ● Implications of Recent Voyager Results ■Energetic Neutral Atoms [ENAs], ENA Imaging.

Centenary Symposium 2012 University of Denver June 26-28, 2012 F.B. McDonald 1, W.R. Webber 2, E.C. Stone 3, A.C. Cummings 3, B.C. Heikkila 4, N. Lal 4.

Determining the direction of the local interstellar magnetic field (LISMF) is important for understanding the heliosphere’s global structure, the properties.

Mission Description Well-designed spacecraft and instruments using high energy launches and gravity assists to escape quickly Could be accomplished by.

Quo vadis? Jeffrey Hughes Boston University. Quo vadis? Where are you going?

The Suprathermal Tail Properties are not well understood; known contributors Heated solar wind Interstellar and inner source pickup ions Prior solar and.

16-20 Oct 2005SSPVSE Conference1 Galactic Cosmic Ray Composition, Spectra, and Time Variations Mark E. Wiedenbeck Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California.

WG3 Session#3 Thursday PM: This session focused on the global effects of the Sun as seen in the outer heliosphere. The largest solar energetic particle.

Modeling 3-D Solar Wind Structure Lecture 13. Why is a Heliospheric Model Needed? Space weather forecasts require us to know the solar wind that is interacting.

1 The IBEX-HI SensorVoyagers in the Heliosheath Conference, January 12, 2009 January 12, 2009 Voyagers in the Heliosheath Kauai, Hawaii. The IBEX Hi Sensor:

PI: Dave McComas Co-Is: Peter BochslerMaciej BzowskiHans FahrHorst Fichtner Priscilla FrischHerb FunstenSteve FuselierMike Gruntman Vlad IzmodenovPaul.

08/4/2009NAS - SHINE-Suprathermal Radial Evolution (1-11 AU) of Pickup Ions and Suprathermal Ions in the Heliosphere N. A. Schwadron Boston University,

Measurements of the Orientation of the Heliospheric Magnetic Field Neil Murphy Jet Propulsion Laboratory.

Low-energy Ion Distributions at the Termination Shock Rob Decker Johns Hopkins Univ., Applied Physics Lab., Laurel, MD SHINE, June-2008, Zermatt.

Voyager Observations of Galactic Cosmic Ray Transport in the Heliosheath and their Reacceleration at the Termination Shock F.B. McDonald 1, W.R. Webber.

Voyager SSG November 3-4, 2011 F.B. McDonald 1, A.C. Cummings 2, E.C. Stone 2, B.C. Heikkila 3, N. Lal 3, W.R. Webber 4 1 Institute for Physical Science.

Breakout Session F: Anomalous and Galactic Cosmic Rays Rick Leske and Maher Dayeh 5 presentations…and lots of discussion.

Observations of reflected ions downstream of shocks in the heliosphere John Richardson M.I.T. (Voyager plasma experiment) 10 – 5950 eV/q.

1 Voyager Observations of Anomalous Cosmic Rays A. C. Cummings and E. C. Stone, Caltech F. B. McDonald, University of Maryland B. Heikkila and N. Lal,

35th International Cosmic Ray Conference

Importance of Pickup Ions & Suprathermal Ions in the Inner Heliosphere

Voyager Observations in the Heliosheath: An Overview

Voyager Observations of Anomalous Cosmic Rays in the Outer Heliosphere

Ulysses COSPIN High Energy Telescope observations of cosmic ray and solar energetic particles intensities since its distant Jupiter flyby in 2004 R.B.

Data analysis of photometric observations by HDAC onboard Cassini: 3D mapping and in-flight calibrations Yuri Skorov, Horst Uwe Keller, Karl-Heinz.

Physics 320: Interplanetary Space and the Heliosphere (Lecture 24)

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center …on behalf of the entire IMAP Team

Presentation transcript:

1 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed Jan 7, 2009 The Interstellar Interaction Observed N. A. Schwadron on behalf of the IBEX Team The Interstellar Interaction Observed N. A. Schwadron on behalf of the IBEX Team

2 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed Interstellar Interaction Components Outflowing solar wind contributes vast majority of Ram Pressure ━ Time-dependence through Merged Interaction Regions and Solar Cycle and longer term variations ━ Heliospheric Magnetic Field (Heliospheric Falts?) The Local Interstellar Cloud ━ Inflowing neutral atoms give rise to a hydrogen wall ━ Pickup Ions Carried Out By the Solar Wind (leading to ACRs) ━ Interstellar Magnetic Field Energetic Particles ━ Galactic Cosmic Rays ━ Anomalous Cosmic Rays ━ Suprathermal Tails Dust, Grains ━ From interstellar medium ━ Kuiper Belt grains ━ Outer Source for Pickup Ions (heavy composition) Courtesy Muller et a, 2006l

3 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed Where is the Nose? Predominantly a mix of H, He, O (neutral and singly ionized particles, GCRs and dust High FIP neutrals penetrate deeply into the heliosphere (observed as neutrals and Pickup ions) Gravitational focusing (radiation press. Negligible) He neutral atoms measureed directly (Ulysses) and from Pickup Ions provide our best mesaurement of interstellar flow direction (Witte et al., 1992, 2004; Moebius 2004, Gloeckler et al, 1996) ━ Velocity = 26.3  0.4 km/s ━ T = 6300  340 K ━ Ec. Long.(J2000) = 75.4   0.5  ━ Ec. Lat. = 5.1   0.2  ━ n =  0.002

4 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed Evidence of N/S Asymmetry from H Interstellar H observed ━ Ly-  ━ Pickup ions ━ Inferences from Mass Loading H experiences significant interaction (charge-exchange) in the heliosheath ━ inflow speed ~20 km/s, 6 km/s less than He, and higher 1600 K temp (Lallement et al., 1993) ━ SOHO/SWAN indicates flow deflection by ~4  (Lallement et al., 2005) ━ Filtration in the heliosheath lowers the density relative to the interstellar medium LISM H - N int ~0.2  0.03 cm -3 Filtered H - N filt ~0.1 cm -3 Latitude Longitude Lallement et al., 2005

5 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed Asymmetry due to the Interstellar Magnetic Field(?) Field strength thought to be ~1  G; upper limit 2-4  G Deflection of H observed by SOH/SWAN suggests effect of asymmetric interstellar magnetic

6 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed Voyager 1 Unveils the Heliosheath The Source of Anomalous Cosmic Rays Missing from near the nose of the termination shock

7 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed Effects of a Blunt Termination Shock Acceleration of ACRs requires ~ 1 year (Mewaldt et al., 1996) This timescale is similar to that of the motions of field lines from the nose back to the flanks and tail of the termination shock But recent simulations (e.g., Pogorelov et al., 2006,8) show a more symmetric TS due to neutral interactions

8 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed Speed decrease starts 82 days, 0.7 AU before TS (but TS is likely moving outward). Crossing clear in plasma data Flow deflected as expected Crossing was at 84 AU, 10 AU closer than at V1 V2 crosses the TS In Aug at 84 AU V

9 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed Purpose of shock is to make flow subsonic BUT, flow remains supersonic wrt thermal plasma in heliosheath. Energy must reside in pickup ions. Pickup ion energy must be 6-10 keV TS Pickup Ions Carry Substantial Energy

10 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed Decreasing Solar Wind Ram Pressure Time Solar wind Ram Pressure decreasing with time At least part of the reason for the differences in TS location observed by V1/V2 Solar wind Ram Pressure, Energy, Density Correlated with Magnetic Flux (Schwadron and McComas, 2003, 2006, 2008)

11 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed How Big a Change in Ram Pressure between V1/V2 Crossings V1 Crosses Dec, 2004 at 94 V2 Crosses Aug, 2007 at 84 AU Dynamic Pressure Changes in Fast Wind ~30% Dynamic Pressure Changes in Slow Wind much smaller McComas et al., 2008 Note ~1 year lag

12 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed N/S Asymmetry Reflected by V1-V2 Differences Models of TS (e.g., Pogorelov et al, 2006, Opher et al., 2006, 2007) generally show V2 closer than V1 by ~ 10 AU at a given time The distance observed by V1-V2 difference reflects, in part, a real N/S asymmetry Richardson et al., 2006

13 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed Summary of Observational Evidence Where’s the nose? ━ He neutral observations (Ulysses) give us our main sense of direction Nose/Tail Asymmetry ━ Predicted from Models ━ Possible Evidence for Blunt Termination Shock from Absence of ACRs near Nose ━ Overall bluntness debated -- new models including neutral interactions show more spherical shock North/South Asymmetry ━ Ly-  observations suggest N/S asymmetry, possibly due to asymmetry in interstellar B ━ V1-V2 difference in TS location also suggests this asymmetry ━ Heliosheatht thicker in the North Voyager 2 seems to show dominance of the pickup ion energy ━ More consistent with the Gruntman et al (2001) weak shock limit

14 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed Forward Modeling Acounts for: ━ Loss by ionization ━ Deflection by rad pressure ━ Energy change through heliospheric transmission ━ Sensor response functions Geometric Factors Angular Response Energy Response

15 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed Global Forward Mapping Above 0.1 keV, the global symmetries of the heliosphere are preserved in ENA maps Reduction in magnitude due to ENA ionization- loss

16 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed Predicted ENA distributions near HSp nose for strong (black) and weak (green) TS [Gruntman et al., 2001]. ENAs >1 keV are accelerated inner heliosheath protons based on projecting observed distributions beyond TS. Energy Spectra in Strong and Weak limits ENA energy spectra provide direct measures of ions beyond TS: ━ Solar wind ━ Pickup Protons ━ Energetic protons Spectra as a function of direction show 3D configuration of the shock and energy partition of the ions at the shock Spectra also provide information about how EP pressure modifies the TS and what types of injection processes may be at work there

17 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed Energy Distribution Mapping Energy dependent.. ━ ENA ionization loss ━ ENA deflection ━ These effects are all stronger at low energies

18 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed More dramatic Effects at Low Energies

19 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed IBEX-Hi at 1.11 keV

20 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed Summary We are about to discover a new global view of the heliosphere from ENAs! We expect to see asymmetries ━ Nose/Tail asymmetry (which one should be brighter, we don’t yet know) ━ North/South asymmetry (perhaps). Brighter emissions from the North? The energy distribution ━ Voyager 2 results suggest prominence of pickup ions ━ Will we see a knee in the pickup ions ━ Relative contribution of kappa function & pickup-like distribution? Model interface at the IBEX Science Operations Center ━ A first version up and running Forward modeling interfaces to models (to be expanded as much as possible/desired) Reverse modeling account for heliospheric transmission effects

21 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed

22 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed NASA-Supplied Pegasus Launch Vehicle VAFB RTS Pegasus-OCA Mate FS-LV Integration Ferry To RTS Staging Operations Launch Ferry To Hawaii

23 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed IBEX Flight System Standard Pegasus XL 3rd Stage SRMS/C with HPSAdapter Cone 38” MLB 31” MLB 15” MLB MLB = Motorized LightBand separation system

24 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed Launch ! - 19 October 2008

25 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed Orbit Raising Used extra propulsion to significantly raise apogee Able to waive off PM2 and AM3 and AM5 because orbit met requirements Orbit raising completed 12 November 2008

26 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed Final Orbit Orientation

27 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed Two Year Nominal Mission

28 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed Apogee/Perigee over Two Years

29 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed Orbit Moves over Lat and Long

30 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed Exposure/Pixel over Two Year Mission

31 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed Fluence over 5 Years

32 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed Exposure/Pixel over Five Years

33 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed Potential Noise and Background Sources Noise: the result of particles that generate uncorrelated (non-coincident) counts in the sensor detectors ━ UV ━ X-rays ━ Photo and secondary electrons ━ Penetrating radiation Background: the result of an ion or atom that masquerades as a signal ENA in the IBEX sensors ━ ENAs ━ Ions Noise SourceBackground Source Diffuse UV, UV from starsENAs from planetary magnetospheres X-rays from photoelectron acceleration toward, and impact with, biased collimator grids Ions from magnetosheath and foreshock Photoelectrons and secondary electrons generated at conversion surface Charge exchange of plasma ions with outgassing spacecraft species Penetrating radiation: radionuclide decay in detectors Secondary ions generated in entrance subsystem Penetrating radiation: cosmic raysENAs from CMEs, CIRs, and pickup ion charge exchange in the heliosphere Penetrating radiation: Solar Energetic Particle events Penetrating radiation: Magnetospheric energetic particles

34 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed Solar Wind Background in IBEX-Hi

35 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed Triple Coincidences ab-ABC b-ABC a-ABC a-AB Background Monitor

36 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed What Will the Sky Map Show ???

37 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed IBEX-Lo In-Flight Performance IBEX-Lo TOF Works Great! Excellent Tool to Tackle Background H & O Easily Identified e Filtered out!

38 N. A. Schwadron - NESSC -2009Interstellar Interaction Observed IBEX-Lo Will See Interstellar Neutrals Arbitrary Orbit 9 Sample No Selection or Background Subtraction! Normalized to ISM Flow Viewing Both ISM O & He will be well Visible! First Spring Period Starts Now!